Creepy Disclosures Weblog

Web notables, scary news and hypochondria.

Edited by Grindlestick


Creepy Disclosures Weblog- issue#45

  • Behind the Scenes of the Iraq War: The Age-Old Israeli Plan to Divide Iraq
    04/17/2003
    HarunYahya.com
    The plan for the Iraq war, which has erupted in the face of opposition from the entire world, was drawn up at least 3 decades ago, by Israeli strategists
    In its attempt to realize its strategy of destabilizing or dividing the Middle Eastern Arab states, Israel has Egypt, Syria, Iran and Saudi Arabia on its list of subsequent targets.
    As these lines are being written, the United States of America has begun striking at Iraq. Despite the fact that most countries of the world, and even the majority of the USA's allies, opposed it, the US administration was determined for the strike to go ahead. When we look behind the scenes of this insistence, it seems that Israel and its powerful lobby in the US, have the greatest share in the make-up.
    In fact, Israel's policy aimed at the fragmentation of Iraq has lengthy historical roots-
    The Age-Old Israeli Plan to Divide Iraq
    An ambitious report entitled "A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s," which appeared in the World Zionist Organization's periodical Kivunim in February 1982 disclosed a strategy aimed at making the whole of the Middle East a kind of "living space" for Israel. The report, drawn up by Oded Yinon, an Israeli journalist and formerly attached to the Foreign Ministry of Israel, set out the scenario of the "division of Iraq" in these terms:
    Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel's targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria- Iraq is, once again, no different in essence from its neighbors, although its majority is Shi'ite and the ruling minority Sunni. Sixty-five percent of the population has no say in politics, in which an elite of 20 percent holds the power. In addition there is a large Kurdish minority in the north, and if it weren't for the strength of the ruling regime, the army and the oil revenues, Iraq's future state would be no different than that of Lebanon in the past- In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi'ite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north. 1)
    This was not the only announcement of the Israeli plan to atomize Middle East, including Iraq. As Israel Shahak, the notable Israeli scholar known for his dedication to a peaceful solution in the Middle East, explained that Yinon was just echoing the views of Israeli hawks:
    The idea that all the Arab states should be broken down, by Israel, into small units, occurs again and again in Israeli strategic thinking. For example, Ze'ev Schiff, the military correspondent of Ha'aretz (and probably the most knowledgeable in Israel, on this topic) writes about the "best" that can happen for Israeli interests in Iraq: "The dissolution of Iraq into a Shi'ite state, a Sunni state and the separation of the Kurdish part" (Ha'aretz 6/2/1982). Actually, this aspect of the plan is very old. 2)
    Thus, the plan was a serious one and this has been confirmed by the age-old Israeli support to non-Arab or non-Muslim minorities in the Muslim Arab states. The rebellious Kurds of northern Iraq was one of these strategic allies of Israel. During their revolt against the Baghdad regime, 1961-75, they have been financially and militarily supported by Israel. Israelis would love to see them carve up the northern part of Iraq, no matter how bloody and devastating such a civil war would be. However, the revolt failed in 1975, after loosing the support of its major patron, the Shah.
    Fifteen years later, a new opportunity arose for Israel, an opportunity from the ambitions of the Iraqi dictator, Saddam Hussein.
     Israel's Role in the Gulf War
    Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, after his bloody war against Iran in the 80's, invaded Kuwait in a sudden attack on August 1, 1990, giving rise to an international crisis. Israel headed the list of those forces that encouraged that crisis. Israel was the fiercest supporter of the attitude adopted by the United States in the wake of the invasion of Kuwait. The Israelis even regarded the United States as moderate, and wanted a harsher policy. To such an extent in fact that the President of Israel Chaim Herzog recommended that the American use nuclear weapons. On the other hand, the Israeli lobby in the United States was working to bring about a wide-ranging attack on Iraq.
    This whole situation encouraged the idea in the United States that the attack against Iraq under consideration was actually planned in Israel's interests. Pat Buchanan summarized this idea in the words "There are only two groups that are beating the drums for war in the Middle East - the Israeli Defense Ministry and its amen corner in the United States."
    Israelis had also initiated a serious propaganda campaign on the issue. Since this campaign was largely waged in secret, Mossad also entered the equation. Rogue Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky provides important information on this subject. According to Ostrovsky, Israel had wanted to wage war with the United States against Saddam long before the Gulf crisis. So much so in fact, that Israel began to implement the plan immediately after the Iran-Iraq war. Ostrovsky reports that Mossad's Psychological Warfare department (LAP - LohAma Psychologist) set about an effective pro-war campaign using misinformation techniques. 3)
    A Mossad Agent Describes the Gulf War
    Ostrovsky describes how Mossad used agents or sympathizers in various parts of the world in this campaign. Among the tools employed in the campaign were the horrible massacres done by missiles launched against civilian targets in Iran during the Iran-Iraq war. As Ostrovsky makes clear, Mossad's later use of these missiles as a propaganda tool was quite peculiar, since those missiles had actually been directed towards their targets by Mossad, with the help of information from US satellites. Having supported Saddam throughout his war with Iran, Israel was now disclosing his crimes. Ostrovsky writes:
    The Mossad leaders know that if they could make Saddam appear bad enough and a threat to the Gulf oil supply, of which he'd been the protector up to that point, then the United States and its allies would not let him get away with anything, but would take measures that would all but eliminate his army and his weapons potential, especially if they were led to believe that this might just be their last chance before he went nuclear. 4)
    The Israelis were so determined on this matter, and with regard to the United States, that on August 4, 1990, Israeli Foreign Minister David Levy issued a diplomatically worded threat to William Brown, the American ambassador to Israel, stating that Israel "expects the U.S. will fulfill all of the goals it set for itself at the beginning of the gulf crisis," in other words that it attack Iraq. According to Levy, if the United States failed to do so, Israel would act unilaterally. 5)
    It would be of enormous benefit to Israel to have the United States engage in the war and for Israel to remain entirely uninvolved: and that is indeed what happened.
    Israel Forces the USA to War
    However, the Israelis were actively involved in the United States' war plans. Some US staff officers involved in planning Operation Desert Storm received fine tactical advice from the Israelis that "the best way of wounding Saddam was to strike at his family."
    The Mossad-inspired propaganda campaign reported by Ostrovsky set up the necessary public backing for the Gulf War. It was again Mossad local assistants who lit the touchpaper for the war. The Hill and Knowlton lobbying firm, run by Tom Lantos of the Israeli lobby, prepared a dramatic scenario to convince members of Congress on the subject of war against Saddam. Turan Yavuz, a noted Turkish journalist, describes the incident:
    October 9, 1990. The Hill and Knowlton lobbying firm organizes a sitting in Congress on the subject of "Iraq's Barbarities." A number of "eye witnesses" brought to the session by the lobbying firm maintain that Iraqi troops killed new-born babies in the hospital wards. One "eye witness" describes the savagery in enormous detail, saying that Iraqi soldiers killed 300 new-born babies in one hospital alone. This information deeply disturbs the members of Congress. This works to President Bush's advantage. However, it later emerges that the eye witness brought by Hill and Knowlton to Congress is in fact the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to Washington. Nevertheless, the daughter's account is sufficient for members of Congress to give Saddam the nickname "Hitler". 6)
    This leads to just one conclusion: that Israel played an important role in the United States' to wage its first war on Iraq. The second one is not much different.
    The Pretext of "War Against Terrorism"
    Contrary to popular belief, the plan to attack Iraq and overthrow Saddam Hussein's regime by force was prepared and placed on Washington's agenda long before the genesis of the "war against terrorism," which emerged in the wake of September 11. The first indication of this plan emerged in 1997. A group of pro-Israeli hawkish strategists in Washington D.C. began to put forward the scenario of the invasion of Iraq by manipulating the "neo-con" think-tank, called PNAC (Project for The New American Century). The most notable names in the PNAC were those of Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney, who as defense secretary and vice-president would be the most influential figures in the George W. Bush administration.
    An article titled "Invading Iraq Not a New Idea for Bush Clique: 4 Years Before 9/11 Plan Was Set" written by William Brunch and published in the Philadelphia Daily News, sets out the following facts:
    But in reality, Rumsfeld, Vice President Dick Cheney, and a small band of conservative ideologues had begun making the case for an American invasion of Iraq as early as 1997 - nearly four years before the Sept. 11 attacks and three years before President Bush took office.
    An obscure, ominous-sounding right-wing policy group called Project for the New American Century, or PNAC - affiliated with Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rumsfeld's top deputy Paul Wolfowitz and Bush's brother Jeb - even urged then-President Clinton to invade Iraq back in January 1998. 7)
    Is Oil the Real Objective?
    Why were the PNAC members so determined to attack Iraq? The same article continues:
    While oil is a backdrop to PNAC's policy pronouncements on Iraq, it doesn't seem to be the driving force. [Ian] Lustick, [a University of Pennsylvania political science professor and Middle East expert,] while a critic of the Bush policy, says oil is viewed by the war's proponents primarily as a way to pay for the costly military operation.
    "I'm from Texas, and every oil man that I know is against military action in Iraq," said PNAC's Schmitt. "The oil market doesn't need disruption."
    Lustick believes that a more powerful hidden motivator may be Israel. He said Bush administration hawks believe that a show of force in Iraq would somehow convince Palestinians to accept a peace plan on terms favorable to Israel- 8)
    This, therefore, is the principal motivation behind the plan to attack Iraq: to serve Israel's Middle East strategy.
    This fact has also been identified by other Middle East experts. Cengiz ?andar, a Turkish Middle East expert, for instance, describes the real power behind the plan to attack Iraq thus:
    ... Who is directing the attack on Iraq? Vice-President Dick Cheney, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld, National Security Adviser Condoleeza Rice. These are the "senior level" backers of the attack. Yet the rest of the iceberg is even richer and more interesting. There are a number of "lobbies."
    Heading these lobbies are the Jewish Institute for Security Affairs team, pro-Likud and Israeli-right and known for their close relations with US arms manufacturers. These have close relations with the "arms lobby," Lockheed, Northrop, General Dynamics and Israeli military industries ... JINSA's fundamental principle is this: America's and Israel's security are inseparable. In other words, they are the same thing.
    JINSA's objective is not solely the overthrow of the Saddam regime in Iraq: it also supports the overthrow of the Saudi Arabian, Syrian, Egyptian and Iranian regimes with a logic of "total war," and the subsequent importation of "democracy." ... In other words, a number of American Jews on the same wavelength as the most extreme factions in Israel at the moment comprise the hawks in Washington. 9)
     The Israeli Strategy for The Muslim Middle East
    In short, there are those in Washington who are encouraging a war aimed first at Iraq and then at Saudi Arabia, Syria, Iran and Egypt. The most distinguishing feature of these is that they are lined up alongside, and even equivalent to, the "Israeli lobby."
    No matter how much they speak of "American interests," these people are actually supporting Israeli interests. A strategy of waging war against the whole of the Middle East and turning all the peoples of the region against it cannot be to the United States' advantage. The adoption of such a strategy can only be possible if the United States is bound to Israel, by means of the Israeli lobby, which is profoundly influential in this country's foreign policy.
    It is for these reasons that behind the strategy which began to be set in motion after September 11 and is aimed at re-arranging the entire Islamic world, lies Israel's strategy for dominating the Middle East. Ever since its foundation, Israel has aimed at restructuring the Middle East, making it manageable and secure to itself. The search for security is of course a legitimate one, but the way that Israel chose to achieve this end is wrong: From the beginning, Israel decided to establish security behind an "iron wall" that would separate itself from the Arabs, and most important of all, protect the lands that Israel occupied through methods of invasion, colonization and depopulation. This strategy of reaping the wind had its consequence as a century of constant clash between Israelis and Arabs. Had Israel chosen a peaceful path to secure its existence, by building good relations with its Arab neighbors and refraining from aggression, Jews and Muslims could peacefully co-exist in the Middle East, as they have done before for centuries.
    However, the radical Zionist ideology still denies any chance to peace and relentlessly tries to transform the whole Middle East to create a "living space" for Israel. It has been using its influence in the United States for that purpose in recent years, and to a large extent directs Washington's Middle East policy. The post-September 11 climate gave Israel the opportunity it had been seeking. Pro-Israeli ideologues who for years had been propounding the falsehood that Islam itself - not some militant radicals who use Islam as a shelter - posed a threat to the West and the United States, and who encouraged the mistaken concept of a "clash of civilizations," have been trying to incite the United States against the Islamic world in the wake of September 11. As early as 1995, Israel Shahak of the Jerusalem Hebrew University wrote former Israeli Prime Minister Rabin's obsession with "the idea of an Israeli-led anti-Islamic crusade". Nahum Barnea, a commentator from the Israeli newspaper Yediot Ahronot, stated that same year that Israel was making progress "[to] become the Western vanguard in the war against the Islamic enemy." 10)
    All that has happened in the years which have followed is that Israeli hawks have made their intentions even clearer. The political climate in the wake of September 11 prepared the ground for this intention to be made a reality.
    The Only Way to World Peace: An Islamic Union
    The situation may be summarized as follows: Israel's aim is to reshape the Middle East in line with its own strategic interests. In order to do this, it needs a "world power." That power is the United States; and Israeli hawks, thanks to their influence there, are trying to wage a militant American strategy against the Islamic world. Although Israel is a small state with a population of only 4.5 million, the plans drawn up by Israeli strategists and their counterparts in the West are directing the world affairs.
    What needs to be done in the face of this?
    1) "Counter lobby activities" need to be adopted in the face of the Israeli lobby's influence in the United States in order to develop dialogue between the United States and the Islamic world and to invite it to seek peaceful solutions to Iraq and similar problems. A wide section of the United States wishes to see their country adopt a fairer Middle East policy. Many statesmen, strategists, journalists and intellectuals have expressed this, and a "peace of civilizations" movement must be carried forward in cooperation with them. The approach inviting the US administration to peaceful solutions must be carried forward at governmental and civil society organization level.
    2) A reconciliation between Israel and the Muslim Middle East must be sought. There are many "peaceniks", i.e. pro-peace Israelis, too. Many Israeli statesmen, religious leader, opinion leaders and many Jews from all around the world are urging the Israeli state to refrain from its brutal occupation and accept a just peace to live along with their Arab neighbors. Cooperation with them, especially on the inter-faith level, should be initiated and encouraged. One thing should never be forgotten: The rise of radicalism, enmity and violence is bad for all parties.
    3) Alongside all this, a deeper rooted solution lies in a project which can resolve all the problems between the Islamic world and the West and deal with the fragmentation, suffering and poverty in the Islamic world and totally alter it: An Islamic Union. Recent developments have shown that the whole world, not just Islamic regions, stands in need of an "Islamic Union." This Union should heal the radical elements in the Islamic World, and establish good relations between Muslim countries and the West, especially the United States.
    This Union, can find a solution to the mother of all problems: The Arab-Israeli conflict. With Israel retreating to its pre-67 borders and Arabs recognizing its right to exist, there can be real peace in the Middle East. And Jews and Muslims - both Children of Abraham and believers in one true God - may peacefully co-exist in the Holy Land, as they have done during the past centuries. Then, Israel would need no strategy to destabilize or divide the Arab States. And it will not have to face the results of occupation in forms of terrorism and constant fear of annihilation. Then, both the Israeli and Iraqi (and Palestinian) children may grow up in peace and security. That is a Middle East that any sane person should work to see.
     
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1- (ed.) Israel Shahak, The Zionist Plan for the Middle East; from Oded Yinon's "A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties" Published by the Association of Arab-American University Graduates, Inc. Belmont, Massachusetts, 1982 Special Document No. 1 (ISBN 0-937694-56-8); 2- (ed.) Israel Shahak, The Zionist Plan for the Middle East;
    3- Victor Ostrovsky, The Other Side of Deception, pp. 252-254.
    4- Victor Ostrovsky, The Other Side of Deception, p. 254
    5- Andrew and Leslie Cockburn, Dangerous Liaison, p. 356.
    6- Turan Yavuz, ABD'nin K?rt Kart? (The US' Kurdish Card), p. 307
    7- William Bunch, Philadelphia Daily News, Jan. 27, 2003
    8- William Bunch, "Invading Iraq not a new idea for Bush clique" Philadelphia Daily News, Jan. 27, 2003
    9- Cengiz ?andar, "Iraq and the 'Friends of Turkey' American Hawks", Yeni ?afak, September 3, 2002.
    10- Israel Shahak, "Downturn in Rabin's Popularity Has Several Causes", Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, March 1995.
    Harun Yahua
    The author, who writes under the pen-name Harun Yahya, has published many books on political, faith-related and scientific issues. Harun Yahya is well known as an author who has written very important works disclosing the imposture of evolutionists, the invalidity of their claims and the dark liaisons between Darwinism and bloody ideologies. Some of the books of the author have been translated into many languages. Harun Yahya's books appeal to all people, Muslims and non-Muslims alike, regardless of their age, race and nationality, as they center around one goal: to open the readers' mind by presenting the sign's of God's eternal existence to them.
     
  • Terrorist's Name On Manifest Raises Questions About Saudi Flights After 9/11
    List and testimony indicates FBI may have allowed alleged hijacker's kin to leave U.S. with son of Saudi defense minister without questioning them.
    by Tom Flocco
    WASHINGTON - April 4, 2004
    TomFlocco.com
    A copy of a previously unpublished manifest, obtained late Thursday night and dated September 15, 2001, provides evidence of a private Boeing-727 Saudi flight from Lexington, Kentucky to London. But the names on the manifest raise serious questions about FBI policies and procedures related to witness identification, criminal investigations and obstruction of justice.
    Ahmad A. M. Alhazmi, 20, (Saudi passport no. B805019) is listed on the manifest with Prince Sultan bin Fahad bin Salman bin Abdulaziz, 19, (Saudi passport no. 406 A), son of Saudi defense minister Crown Prince Abdullah bin Abdulaziz.
    The name Alhazmi and its ties to laundered Riggs Bank cashiers checks may become a subject of interest when National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice testifies later this week--especially since young Ahmad Alhazmi has the same last name as Nawaf Alhazmi, one of the terrorists identified as an alleged hijacker of American Airlines flight 77.
    The White House had originally asserted that flights evacuating Saudis from the United States after 9/11 never existed, but author Craig Unger--who has written a book about clandestine Bush-Saudi relationships--obtained flight manifest lists which were drawn up by the Saudi embassy.
    Besides the Alhazmi list, three other manifests confirm a total of four separate Saudi flights leaving the United States on September 15, 16, 22 and 24, 2001, after the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks. Unger, author of "House of Bush / House of Saud: The Secret Relationship Between the World's Two Most Powerful Dynasties," has now posted all four manifests online. (http://www.houseofbush.com/files.php)
    Alhazmi's associates received continued payments of $3,500. per month from Princess Haifa Al-Faisal, wife of Saudi Crown Prince Bandar bin Sultan who is Ambassador to the United States, according to sources familiar with the financial evidence. (Newsweek, 11-22-2002)
    Both Saudis visited President Bush's Texas ranch in late August, 2002--before this news broke--but Americans will never hear Mr. Bush publicly discuss the contents of their conversations, or Bandar and Haifa's signed checks made out to terrorist associates through his uncle's Riggs Bank. 9/11 Commission Chairman Thomas Kean negotiated away the important opportunity for personal, public presidential testimony under oath in exchange for Condoleezza Rice's public testimony.
    Interestingly, Kean stumbled slightly this morning when Meet the Press host Tim Russert asked him why Bush and Vice-President Cheney were testifying together, and why former President Clinton and Vice-President Gore were not being offered the same opportunity.
    Bush and Cheney will not be under oath, allowing joint corroboration of each other's testimony on-the-spot regarding their actions during the key two hour time-line of the actual attacks--thus avoiding possible future perjury charges and/or impeachment proceedings.
    Favorable testimony deals notwithstanding, internet controversy continues to rage because the Commission conducts 90 % of its investigation in secret, failing to hear public testimony from boarding gate personnel, cleanup and catering crews with less security scrutiny, air traffic controllers, military pilots in the air on 9/11 and their ordinance crews, Securities & Exchange commissioners who ordered the still-secret "control list" of pre-attack insider trades, and Lockheed-Martin officials who hold the air-traffic system contract--for an explanation as to whether the integrity and control of the doomed jets could have been compromised in any manner.
    Instead, Americans have been forced to accept the politically expedient desire to conclude well before November's election--stampeding the most important investigation since Watergate--to avoid electoral ramifications at the expense of truth, accountability and justice.
    Relative of alleged hijacker permitted to leave country without questioning?
    During last week's hearing testimony, 9-11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer asked Richard Clarke, former Bush Administration National Coordinator for Counterterrorism for the National Security Council (NSC), "Who gave the final approval for the bin Laden family to leave the country without being interviewed?"
    Clarke answered that it could have been the "Inter-Agency Crisis Management Group, but most likely it was the White House Chief of Staff's office or the State Department." [according to this writer's notes / Commission transcripts for March 23 - 24, 2004 should be available soon at http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/index.htm ]
    When Roemer asked "why the Saudis were allowed to leave the country, who was on the planes, how many, and why the decision was made," Clarke said the government "feared for their lives...some of them were bin Laden family members, and the Saudi embassy requested their evacuation."
    During testimony Clarke told Roemer "I refused to approve the [Saudi] request. I passed it on to [FBI Asst. Director] Dale Watson and the flight was approved....I don't think they were ever interviewed in this country." Only transcripts and/or video would negate Clarke's assertion.
    Clarke only mentioned one flight. And it is not known whether the counter-terrorism chief was kept in the dark about the other flights, as Roemer did not mention the now-public manifests. The commission has not revealed publicly whether it knows about Ahmad Alhazmi and Prince Sultan bin Fahad, fueling speculation that an investigation of the young Alhazmi may have been suppressed by the FBI or commission executive director Philip Zelikow who controls the inner-workings of the panel's probe.
    Publication of the manifests raises important questions whether Kean's panel ever asked the FBI to produce interview notes or video tape, indicating that absent Watson's public testimony, the White House will never have to reveal potential evidence as to the possibility that the young Alhazmi may be alleged hijacker Nawaf Alhazmi's brother or cousin. If this is so, more questions arise as to why Alhazmi was traveling with the son of the Saudi Minister of Defense and what Alhazmi knew about the attacks.
    Dale Watson, who Clarke intimated as the sponsor of the FBI-approved flights and the decision not to interview bin Laden family members and other Saudi royals or citizens, was the former FBI Executive Asst. Director for Counter-Terrorism and Counter-Intelligence.
    Watson led controversial investigations of the first World Trade Center attack, Oklahoma City bombing, East Africa Embassy bombings, Khobar Towers bombings, USS Cole bombing, the September 11 attacks and the anthrax attacks, before retiring to assume a position with Booz Allen Hamilton.
    The 'non-existent' flight through closed U.S. air space
    There are indications that young Ahmad Alhazmi, along with Saudi prince Sultan bin Fahad, and one other young man on the Lexington to London evacuation flight, were among a select few to fly on September 13, 2001, two days after the attacks, when all planes over U.S. air space were grounded--save a few emergency medical and body-part transplant flights, one of which was forced to use a helicopter to comply with the flight ban.
    Since the Lexington-London manifest lists a total of only four men of the same reasonably close age range, there is a 3 out of 4 possibility that a man with the same name as one of the alleged hijackers flew with a Saudi royal from Tampa to Lexington, Kentucky over closed U.S. air space two days after the attacks.
    The special Saudi flight has been termed the "phantom flight from Florida," since Atlanta Federal Aviation Administration spokesman Chris White said "It's not in our logs...it didn't occur." But the Tampa Tribune's multiple sources indicate that very high strings were pulled, raising more questions about the identities of the young Alhazmi and Prince.
    Private investigator and former Tampa police department homicide and internal affairs officer Dan Grossi said he was told that clearance for the flight came from the White House. This may confirm Richard Clarke's recent testimony that "most likely it was the White House Chief of Staff's office" who gave the order.
    Grossi said the prince's family [Crown Prince Abdullah bin Abdulaziz] pulled a favor from former President Bush--the only indication that it was Bush 41 who first contacted Bush 43 to get the three men out of Florida. All this, according to the Tampa Tribune.
    Tampa University (TU) spokesman George Donaldson refused to offer details but Grossi's fellow bodyguard for the young men, Manuel Perez--a former 29-year FBI counter-terrorism official and bomb technician, said the men arrived in Tampa three weeks earlier to receive tutoring in English. This, according to the Tribune's Kathy Steele--the one who broke this neglected piece of important evidence, adding that one of the three men Grossi was contacted to protect was the son of a Saudi army commander.
    Jim Harf, director of TU's international programs, confirmed that one of the three men was the son of Saudi defense minister Prince Sultan [Abdullah bin Abdulaziz], and Lexington police Lt. Mark Barnard confirmed a Saudi relative had asked for help in getting protection for the men in Tampa. Tampa police records list Sultan bin Fahad [bin Abdulaziz] as the one requesting the security detail.
    Grossi and Perez said they saw "several private 747s parked on the tarmac with foreign flags on the tails and Arabic lettering on the sides," helping to confirm the authenticity of the Saudi embassy manifests. This, at a time when all U.S. air space was locked down by the United States military under federal orders.
    The learjet carrying the three young men to Lexington, Kentucky took off from a private Raytheon Corporation hanger. Raytheon is tangled throughout the events surrounding the attacks, not the least of which is the strange death of a Saudi test pilot and two Raytheon test pilots at the Pensacola Naval Air Station.
    Interestingly, reporter Dan Hopsicker says the learjet was owned by multimillionaire businessman Wallace J. Hilliard of Naples, Florida, who Hopsicker says owned Huffman Aviation at the Venice Airport since its purchase in 1999--just before State Department officials began to use America's visa program as a tool to allow squadrons of young Arabs into the U.S. to take flying lessons at Huffman. ( Terror Flight School Owner's Plane Seized for Heroin Trafficking and Spooks and Saudi's in Florida - http://www.madcowprod.com/ )
    "Wally Hilliard owns the only charter Lear service in Southwest Florida," said a Hopsicker source. "If a Lear was flying that day, it would have been his," raising even more questions.
    Curiously, in July, 2000, one of Hilliard's jets was seized by federal agents with more than 30 pounds of heroin onboard at the Orlando Executive Airport. This, at a time when Florida governor Jeb Bush honored Hilliard's operation--Florida Air, Sunrise Airlines and Discover Air--with personal visits and posed for photos with what Hopsicker called the "Discover Air family."
    Questions can be raised about Hilliard's operation, which supported a special presidential favor for a Saudi defense minister's son, a Saudi army commander's son, and also their friend--who may have been the relative of an alleged hijacker. Anyone who followed the Afghanistan war knows that the chief product for export by Osama bin Laden's terrorist organization was heroin--another source of funds to support terrorism in America.
    Hopsicker said local police collected all the hijacker flight training files from Hilliard's Huffman Aviation School the day after the attacks--detailing information that would have confirmed or denied the flight capabilities of the hijackers and sources of their funding support.
    Just five days before the attacks on September 7, Governor Bush signed executive order No. 01-261, declaring the authority "to order members of the Florida National Guard into active service...to support law enforcement and emergency management in the the event of civil disturbances or natural disasters..."
    Curiously, according to one local law enforcement official, “The FBI took all our files, everything.” Then he added, “they loaded two Ryder trucks right outside that (police station) window, then drove them right onto a [Florida National Guard] C130 military cargo plane at Sarasota airport which flew out with [Governor] Jeb Bush aboard.”
    No one knows where the President's brother went with the FBI officials and the hijacker flight training evidence, fueling speculation that both Congress and the 9-11 Commission are hiding something by refusing to call the Florida governor to testify publicly about why he activated the National Guard and what happened to the terrorist's records--documents that should be considered crucial evidence.
    Journalist Catherine Arnie posed some interesting questions that the 9-11 Commission should be asking Condoleezza Rice this Thursday: How could our governement have authorized a flight out of the country before they even knew who the perpetrators of the attacks were? Why did the families of the young men "perceive a threat" when it wasn't yet clear on the 13th of September exactly WHO had attacked America or where they were from? (http://www.democrats.com/view.cfm?id=14289)
    Arnie said according to a transcript on the State Department website of a statement given by a "senior government official," on September 13 at 5:22 pm, it had not yet been announced that Osama bin Laden was behind the attacks when protection was requested for the three young men by Bush 41 and Bush 43.
    Hijacked bank
    Questions also remain regarding the web of money transfers from Princess Haifa, Prince Bandar and the daughter of late King Faisal, some of which reached Nawaf Alhazmi and fellow terrorist Khalid Almihdar.
    Princess Haifa's bank account--the source of the funds which ultimately supported the alleged hijackers--was with Riggs Bank where Jonathan J. Bush, the brother of former President George H. W. Bush and uncle of President George W. Bush, is CEO, President and Director of Riggs' investment management subsidiary.
    Cashiers checks were sent to Majeda Ibrahin Dweikat, who signed them over to her friend Manal Ahmed Bagader, wife of Omar al-Bayoumi who met and befriended Alhazmi and Almihdar when they arrived in the U.S.
    After Al Bayoumi fled the U.S. to England in July, 2001--two months before the attacks, Princess Haifa's Riggs Bank checks were then sent to Osama Basnan, who with his wife Majeda Dweikat, were both later to be found in the U.S. illegally as a result of poor or suspicious State Department visa supervision.
    Former FBI linguist Sibel Edmonds said she found evidence of espionage in both the State Department and the FBI in pre-9/11 translations of intelligence intercepts--which also warned about planes used as weapons well before the attacks.
    A federal law enforcement source said Basnan was a known "al-Qaeda sympathizer" who "celebrated the heroes of September 11" at a party after the attacks and openly talked about "what a wonderful, glorious day it had been," according to Newsweek.
    Al Bayoumi and Basnan both befriended Alhazmi and fellow Saudi hijacker Khalid Almihdar after they arrived in San Diego, according to the sources; and the Riggs checks from Prince Bandar's wife helped the terroists pay rent and living expences in the months just prior to the attacks, according to reports. Newsweek said Al Bayoumi helped them obtain social security cards and helped them arrange for flying lessons in Florida--indicating dramatic evidence of the state of congressional internal security oversight.
    Basnan was convicted of visa fraud and deported to Saudi Arabia on November 17, 2002. His wife Majida Ibrahim--who had also laundered checks from Riggs Bank--was deported the same day to her native Jordan for visa violations. (Washington Post, 9-24, 2002) Reasons were not given why the White House allowed the high profile suspects to leave the country on charges much less important than being implicated as an accessory to mass murder.
    All this, at a time when the White House was receiving "frantic" threat warnings about "planes used as weapons" that would "set your hair on fire," according to Commissioner Jamie Gorelick and other panel members.
    Gorelick is a partner in Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering--the law firm defending Prince Mohammed al Faisal against 9-11 families in their $1 trillion suit accusing wealthy Saudis of transferring millions to Islamic charities to finance al Qaeda terrorism in America. 9/11 Commission chief counsel Daniel Marcus is a former member of the firm, adding an additional representative of Wilmer-Cutler's interests regarding the outcome of the panel's investigation.
    Friends in high places
    Six months before his deportation, Osama Basnan traveled to Houston to meet a prominent Saudi prince involved in intelligence matters at the same time that Crown Prince Abdullah came to visit President George W. Bush at his Crawford, Texas ranch in April, 2002, according to reports. Questions remain whether Basnan personally associated with Prince Abdullah or the defense minister's host, George W. Bush.
    The 9-11 Commission has publicly declined to address Saudi links to terrorist finance. Victim family concerns about major panel conflicts of interest and credibility issues notwithstanding, a recent uptick in media reporting and public interest indicates Americans may be wondering whether the White House is hiding something about its Saudi relationships.
    Houston's Baker & Botts, the family law firm of Bush 41 Secretary of State James Baker that is defending Saudi Arabia's defense minister, Crown Prince Abdullah, against the 9-11 families regarding the financing of terrorism in America, produced "stacks of affidavits and copies of canceled checks," admitting that for 16 years Abdullah has been funding Islamic charity organizations raided after the attacks by federal agents and anti-terrorism investigators.
    9/11 Commission Chairman, current member of the board of directors and shareholder of Amerada-Hess oil company, Thomas Kean--with fellow directors and officers, maintained a Caspian Sea basin joint venture business relationship with terrorism-linked Delta Oil company for 15 months after the September 11 attacks. This, before Hess terminated the deal 21 days before President Bush appointed Kean to his position as chairman of the terrorism investigation.
    Delta Oil is backed financially by Saudi billionaire Khalid bin Mahfouz, who is Osama bin Laden's brother-in-law and a former financial benefactor of one of President George W. Bush's early oil company ventures. Washington law firm Ropes & Grey is receiving the hefty fees for defending Khalid bin Mahfouz--accused of funneling millions into Islamic charities to support terrorism--against the 9-11 families' suit.
    On the advice of White House lawyers, President Bush has refused to declassify a 28-page section of a congressional report investigating the September 11 terrorist attacks, citing "national security concerns" and that it would "reveal sensitive intelligence sources and methods."
    According to the Los Angeles Times (8-2-2003), sources familiar with Bush's classified section of the document, said it describes "very direct, very specific links" between Saudi officials, two of them San Diego-based [alleged] hijackers and other potential co-conspirators "that cannot be passed off as rogue, isolated or coincidental." Another official said "It's really damning. What it says is that not only Saudi entities or nationals are implicated in 9-11, but the [Saudi] government."
    Several U.S. officials confirmed that President Bush's classified sections of the report provide detailed additional allegations about Omar Al Bayoumi and Osama Basnan, two Saudi men, and their suspicious activities in the United States, according to the Los Angeles Times.
    Importantly, the Commission has not disclosed whether it is hearing private testimony regarding the money laundering machinations linking Washington's Riggs Bank to the hijackers--evidence government sources also say is contained in the 28-pages classified by White House lawyers.
    Given the implications of the evidence in its totality, any judicial, legislative or investigative forum in the United States could be hard-pressed to disclose thus far hidden U.S. connections to Saudi-linked terrorism--especially credible evidence of financial facilitation of terrorism within U.S. borders. Hence the current state of congressional oversight.
    That is, unless America's legal or legislative branches wish to strain to the possible breaking point the very constitutional threads binding the country together--even as the executive branch strives mightily to place the protection of national secrecy ahead of securing national security. Hence the current state of the 9-11 Commission's credibility in the face of sweetheart presidential testimony deals.

  • Pet spider kills its owner
    4/4/4
    http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2004092008,00.html
    A MAN who lived in his own “zoo” of lizards and insects was fatally bitten by a pet black widow spider — then eaten by the other creepy-crawlies.
    Police broke in to Mark Voegel’s apartment to find spider Bettina along with 200 others, several snakes, a gecko lizard called Helmut and several thousand termites had gorged on his body.
    Neighbours alerted police after becoming alarmed by the stink.
    And horrified officers were met by a nightmare scene.
    A police spokesman said: “It was like a horror movie. His corpse was over the sofa.
    “Giant webs draped him, spiders were all over him. They were coming out of his nose and his mouth.
    “There was everything there one could imagine in the world of reptiles.
    “Larger pieces of flesh torn off by the lizards were scooped up and taken back to the webs of tarantulas and other bird-eating spiders.”
    Loner Voegel, 30, never invited people back to his “jungle” home, a small apartment in the German city of Dortmund.
    Police described it as a cross between a botanical garden and the butterfly breeding ground in the serial killer movie The Silence Of The Lambs.
    One tarantula had built a nest the size of a swallow’s in a corner of the ceiling.
    Voegel also had a boa constrictor and several poisonous frogs from South America.
    Spider expert and animal cruelty officer Gabi Bayer said he kept creatures “that should never be allowed in a private home”.
    She said: “He had spiders so aggressive they are the equivalent of a pit-bull in the animal world.”
    The reptiles were allowed to roam free in the flat.
    The heating elements on two tanks containing spiders and their termite snacks had exploded and dislodged the metal tops allowing them to escape.
    Voegel is thought to have been dead for between seven and 14 days.
    A post-mortem will be carried out in the next few days. But authorities believe Bettina alone was responsible for Voegel’s death.

  • Bird Beak Deformities Concern Scientists ABout Possible Implications To Humans
    AP
    Scientists don't know what's causing deformed beaks in Alaskan birds.
    JUNEAU, Alaska (April 6) - A bird beak deformity first recorded among black-capped chickadees near Anchorage has been increasingly seen in crows in Southeast Alaska, broadening an already mysterious phenomenon.
    Black-capped chickadees, Northwestern crows and 27 other species of birds in Alaska have been reported with beaks up to three times their normal length. The deformity often strikes mature birds and reduces their ability to feed and preen effectively. In many birds, the deformity leads to death.
    "We don't know what's causing the problem," said Colleen Handel, a wildlife biologist with the U.S. Geological Survey's Alaska Science Center in Anchorage. She's been studying the beak deformities for five years.
    Though the phenomenon was first noticed in black-capped chickadees in the early 1990s, a deformed raven, a deformed Steller's jay and several deformed crows have been reported in Southeast Alaska since 1997. Southeast sightings have increased this year, biologists told the Juneau Empire.
    The center has received 1,600 reports of deformed black-capped chickadees beaks in Alaska and 200 reports of other kinds of birds in Alaska, compared with only 12 reports of beak deformities of black-capped chickadees in the rest of North America. Handel had no total for other deformed birds elsewhere in North America but said nowhere is there a concentration as in Alaska.
    Those deformities could have been caused by genetic mutations. Damaged DNA could be implicated in the abnormal growth, Handel said, but no one knows what might be causing damage to the DNA.
    "With such a broad geographic range, you look for something that could be occurring over a broad area, and that immediately calls to mind something like contaminants or a disease organism that could be affecting a large area," Handel said.
    Tests on affected birds have shown no specific parasite or disease, and only low levels of contaminants.
    Besides caring for the health of Alaska's wildlife, there are concerns about possible implications to humans, Handel said.
    "In the back of my mind I always wonder what else might be affected, depending on what's causing it," Handel said. "... If there's something happening to those species, it's certainly something that raises an alarm for all of us."

  • Found - The 911'Stand Down Order'?
    From Jerry Russell
    [email protected]
    Rense.com
    3-30-4
    Jim Hoffman has discovered a document which I believe may be very important to the 911 skeptic movement. This document superseded earlier DOD procedures for dealing with hijacked aircraft, and it requires that Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld is personally responsible for issuing intercept orders. Commanders in the field are stripped of all authority to act. This amazing order came from S.A. Fry (Vice Admiral, US Navy and Director, Joint Staff) so it appears to me that responsibility for the US armed forces "Failure to Respond" rests directly with Fry for issuing this instruction, as well as with Donald Rumsfeld for failing to execute his responsibility to issue orders in a timely fashion.
    Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction CJCSI 3610.01A (dated 1 June 2001) was issued for the purpose of providing "guidance to the Deputy Director for Operations (DDO), National Military Command Center (NMCC), and operational commanders in the event of an aircraft piracy (hijacking) or request for destruction of derelict airborne objects." This new instruction superseded CJCSI 3610.01 of 31 July 1997.
    This CJCSI states that "In the event of a hijacking, the NMCC will be notified by the most expeditious means by the FAA. The NMCC will, with the exception of immediate responses as authorized by reference d, forward requests for DOD assistance to the Secretary of Defense for approval."
    Reference D refers to Department of Defense Directive 3025.15 (Feb. 18, 1997) which allows for commanders in the field to provide assistance to save lives in an emergency situation -- BUT any requests involving "potentially lethal support" (including "combat and tactical vehicles, vessels or aircraft; or ammunition") must still be approved by the Secretary of Defense. So again, the ability to respond to a hijacking in any meaningful fashion, is stripped from the commanders in the field.
    While none of this relieves the Bush Administration from ultimate responsibility from 911, nevertheless there is the possibility that this discovery could somewhat diffuse the power of our movement's message about the "Stand Down", since it is now clear that it was implemented through a routine administrative memo.
    If this comes up as an issue at the Washington 911 cover-up commission, it would be interesting if Fry could testify as to the reasoning behind making it bureaucratically impossible for the DOD to respond to hijackings in a timely fashion.
    The relevant documents are on the Web at:
    http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/analysis/norad/docs/intercept_proc.pdf
    http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/d302515_021897/d302515p.pdf

  • The Cosmic Timebomb
    The Independent - UK
    3-30-4
    The asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs was thrown to Earth in a moment of 'planetary madness'. And scientists can now predict when the heavens will go haywire again.
    There's something badly wrong with the pendulum clock in the corner of the room. Normally, it ticks rhythmically, its bob swinging back and forth with hypnotic regularity. Over time, however, the size of the swing gradually gets larger, the ticks louder and louder. And, very occasionally - in fact, so occasionally that nobody has yet ever observed it - the clock goes stark-staring mad, ticking completely erratically as the pendulum bob swings first to one side, then twice or three times as far to the other side.
    Surely, there is no clock that behaves like this? According to a team of geophysicists and mathematicians, there is: the clock in the sky. "For tens of millions of years, the planets circle the Sun with the predictability of clockwork," says Michael Ghil of the Ecole Normale SupÈrieure in Paris and the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA). "Then, without the slightest warning, everything goes utterly haywire."
    The heavens are generally considered to be a paragon of predictability so this is a radical stuff. But it is only the beginning. Ghil and his colleagues, Ferenc Varadi and Bruce Runnegar at UCLA, believe the last time the solar system went insane was roughly 65 million years ago. "It seems too much of a coincidence," says Ghil. "We think it may have been connected with the extinction of the dinosaurs."
    The kind of planetary madness Ghil and his colleagues are talking about goes by the name of "chaos". Chaos is defined as erratic motion with no sign of any regularity. Loosely speaking, chaotic systems are infinitely sensitive to initial conditions, like a hurricane in the Caribbean that was triggered by the flutter of a butterfly's wings in distant Hawaii.
    In the solar system, the most important drivers of chaos are Jupiter and Saturn because they are the most massive of the planets. In their investigation of planetary chaos, it is therefore these two planets that Ghil and his colleagues have focused their attention on. The Jupiter-Saturn system is actually not inherently chaotic. However, it is known to skate close to the edge of chaos. The possibility therefore exists that, occasionally, something might cause it to teeter over the edge into planetary insanity.
    Ghil and his colleagues considered the possibility that the "something" might be fluctuations in the pressure exerted on Saturn by sunlight and the wind of subatomic particles blowing from the Sun. Over tens of millions of years, their combined buffeting could have a significant effect on Saturn's orbit. The researchers guessed that solar variability might change the planet's "semi-major axis" - a measure of the length of its elliptical path round the Sun - by as much as 0.1 per cent. "We think this is perfectly plausible," says Ghil.
    To see what changing Saturn's semi-major axis did to the Jupiter-Saturn system, Ghil and his colleagues used a "digital orrery". This is a purpose-built computer rigged to simulate the motion of the planets under their mutual gravity. The researchers also incorporated a novel feature of the behaviour of Jupiter and Saturn.
    Jupiter orbits the Sun "about" five times for every two times Saturn goes round. If the ratio of the orbital periods was precisely 5:2, the combined effect of the gravity of two massive planets on other bodies in the solar system would be greatest every 10 years - that is, when the two planets are on the same side of the Sun and pulling together. But, because this 5:2 "resonance" is not exact, the planets are in perfect alignment on the same side of the Sun only every 1,000 to 2,000 years. "What this means is that the effect of Jupiter and Saturn on the other bodies in the solar system rises to a crescendo every 1,000-odd years," says Ghil.
    Until now, researchers who have used computers to simulate the long-term future of the solar system have assumed that this effect is of no consequence, guessing that over long periods of time its effect "averages out". "We had a hunch, however, that this wasn't true," says Ghil. Using their digital orrery and taking this effect into account, Ghil and his colleagues discovered that as the semi-major axis of Saturn's orbit changes, the Jupiter-Saturn system drifts back and forth between motion which is regular and motion which is totally chaotic. "The system trips over into chaos every few tens of millions of years," says Ghil.
    The team's most remarkable discovery, however, is that in a wide range of simulations in which the semi-major axis of Saturn is allowed to vary, a burst of chaos arises around 65 million years before the present. "The timing coincides strikingly with the Cretaceous-Tertiary [geological] boundary which marks the extinction event that wiped out the dinosaurs," says Ghil.
    As yet, says Ghil, it is impossible to tell how long the burst of chaos persisted. Nevertheless, it is possible to investigate the effect it would have had on other bodies in the solar system - specifically, asteroids. The asteroids are thought to be the left-over rubble of a planet which was prevented from congealing out of the "proto-planetary nebula" by the disruptive effect of Jupiter. Vast numbers of asteroids - ranging in size from pebbles to rocky bodies 1,000 kilometres across - circle the Sun between the orbits of Jupiter and Mars.
    Ghil and his colleagues simulated the effect on the asteroids of a burst of chaos in the Jupiter-Saturn system. They found a wealth of effects. "The most important are abrupt changes in the semi-major axis of asteroid orbits," he says. "These would lead eventually to complete ejection of bodies from the asteroid belt." Some of these could easily end on a collision course with Earth.
    The sequence of events revealed by the simulations is complex. Some asteroids suffer small jumps in the size of their semi-major axis, others large jumps. Some move to smaller orbits, some to longer orbits. "A population of asteroids can drift back and forth through a succession of different orbits," says Ghil.
    Crucially, bodies whose elliptical orbits become ever more elongated eventually come under the influence of the gravity of other planets and are tugged free of the asteroid belt. "They get catapulted out of the asteroid belt, some into orbits which cross the Earth's orbit," says Ghil. This is precisely what Ghil and his colleagues think might have happened 65 million years ago. "A burst of chaos in the Jupiter-Saturn system caused a flurry of Earth-crossing asteroids," says Ghil. "Among them was one which struck the Earth off the coast of Central America, providing the killer blow which finished off the dinosaurs."
    If Ghil and his colleagues are right, the demise of the dinosaurs cannot be attributed to an entirely random event. As the dinosaurs grazed unawares, the great clock of the solar system went temporarily out of kilter. The dinosaurs may have been victims of an event hardwired into the dynamics of the solar system. "And they may not have been the only victims," says Ghil.
    The team's simulations reveal that another burst of planetary chaos occurred about 250 million years ago. This seems to correspond precisely with another major mass extinction at the Permian-Triassic boundary. "As yet, however, we aren't totally confident about this," says Ghil.
    The new paradigm which seems to be emerging is of a solar system which evolves quietly for tens of millions of years but which goes through occasional periods of madness. And what has happened in the past will happen again. The simulations show another burst of chaos is due in the future. "I wouldn't lose sleep over it," says Ghil. "The due date is AD30 million, so there's plenty of time to evacuate the Earth!"
    - Marcus Chown is author of 'The Universe Next Door'
    © 2004 Independent Digital (UK) Ltd http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_medical/story.jsp?story=506699

  • See also:
    NASA Resoundingly Confirms MAJOR
    Prediction of Hoagland Mars Tidal Model:
    Rover Sits on the Shore of
    "an ancient, salty sea ..."
    http://www.enterprisemission.com/tide.htm


  • Scientists Predict Major SoCal Quake Within Five Months
    POSTED: 3:07 pm PST April 1, 2004
    UPDATED: 3:27 am PST April 2, 2004
    LOS ANGELES -- A state earthquake council has given a qualified endorsement to a prediction by a group of scientists who believe that a temblor of magnitude-6.4 or greater will occur in the Southern California desert sometime in the next five months.
    The California Earthquake Prediction Evaluation Council, a group of eight scientists selected by the state Office of Emergency Services, said it considers the new prediction by the scientists to be "a legitimate approach in earthquake prediction research."
    Despite its support the panel noted in a report that "the physical basis for the prediction has not been substantiated."
    The team of scientists at the University of California, Los Angeles, predict that a quake will occur within a 12,000-square-mile area east of Los Angeles by Sept. 5. The zone includes a large swath of the Mojave Desert, the Coachella Valley, the Imperial Valley and eastern San Diego County.
    The area was the location of the magnitude-7.3 Landers earthquake in 1992 and the 7.1 Hector Mine quake in 1999.
    The zone is so seismically active that the council noted in its report that the chances of an earthquake of at least magnitude-6.4 occurring randomly in the area sometime before the Sept. 5 deadline is about 10 percent.
    The council concluded that the results do not warrant any special public policy actions in California. Such actions could include warnings to the public or alerts issued to utilities to help them prevent disruptions in service.
    The scientists piqued interest after they forecast the magnitude-6.5 San Simeon quake in December and the magnitude-8.1 quake last year off Japan's Hokkaido island. In both cases, the group set wide parameters in place and time.
    The team bases its predictions on long chains of small earthquakes recorded in the area.
    "In the vicinity of each such chain, we look backward and see its history over the preceding years -- whether our candidate (for an earthquake) was preceded by certain seismicity patterns," said lead team scientist Vladimir Keilis-Borok. "If yes, we accept the candidate as a short-term precursor and start a nine-month alarm."
    Copyright 2004 by KTVU.com. The Associated Press contributed to this report. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed

  • The Russians (& Yakuza) have been engineering our North American weather for a couple decades now, and HAARP is just our so-far woefully inadequate attempt to catch up, and to combat their weather war against us. America is by no means the leader in this field.
    http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=46670
    "At the end of 1989, a rogue Japanese group composed of the Yakuza (Japanese Mafia) and the Cult of Aum Shinrikyo (Tokyo Nerve Gas attack) leased the earlier scalar weapons from the KGB, on site in Russia. The down payment was $900 million in gold bullion, and though I do not know the exact annual lease charge, I suspect it is a billion dollars per year. So beginning in early 1990, the Yakuza/Aum Shinrikyo assumed (under KGB control) the weather engineering over North America (and elsewhere). They have also shot down several aircraft (including the TWA-800) etc. They plan to take part in the eventual destruction of America."

  • STAR WARS: RUSSIA CLAIMS NEW WEAPON
    3/30/04
    MOSCOW, Russia (AP) -- Russia has designed a "revolutionary" weapon that would make the prospective U.S. missile defense useless, Russian news agencies reported, quoting a senior Defense Ministry official.
    The official, who was not identified by name, said tests conducted during last month's military maneuvers would dramatically change the philosophy behind development of Russia's nuclear forces, the Interfax and ITAR-Tass news agencies reported on Monday.
    If deployed, the new weapon would take the value of any U.S. missile shield to "zero," the news agencies quoted the official as saying.
    The official said the new weapon would be inexpensive, providing an "asymmetric answer" to U.S. missile defenses, which are proving extremely costly to develop.
    Russia, meanwhile, also has continued research in prospective missile defenses and has an edge in some areas compared to other nations, the official said.
    The statement reported Monday was in line with claims by President Vladimir Putin's that experiments performed during last month's maneuvers proved that Russia could soon build strategic weapons that could puncture any missile-defense system.
    At the time, Col-Gen. Yuri Baluyevsky, the first deputy chief of the General Staff of the Russian armed forces, explained that the military tested a "hypersonic flying vehicle" that was able to maneuver between space and the earth's atmosphere.
    Military analysts said that the mysterious new weapons could be a maneuverable ballistic missile warhead or a hypersonic cruise missile.
    While Putin said the development of such new weapons wasn't aimed against the United States, most observers viewed the move as Moscow's retaliation to the U.S. missile defense plans.
    After years of vociferous protests, Russia reacted calmly when Washington withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in 2002 in order to develop of a nationwide missile shield. But U.S.-Russian relations have soured again lately, and Moscow has complained about Washington's plans to build new low-yield nuclear weapons.

  • More Bizarre, 'Ghost Fires' Hit Tiny Sicilian Village
    By Shasta Darlington
    4-2-4
    CANNETO DI CARONIA, Sicily (Reuters) - The gate at the entrance to this tiny Sicilian village has come off its hinges and swings in the wind as cats wander into homes abandoned after a series of mystery fires.
    This is not your average ghost town.
    Canneto di Caronia has been taken over by an endless flow of scientists, engineers, police and even a few self-styled "ghostbusters" searching for clues to the recent spontaneous combustion of everything from microwave ovens to a car.
    The fires started in mid-January and have claimed home appliances and fuse boxes in about half of the 20 odd houses. The blazes originally blamed on the devil himself have not hurt anyone.
    After a brief respite last month, the flames have flared up again almost daily even though electricity to the village was cut off long ago.
    "We're working in the dark. We don't have a single lead so far," said Pedro Spinnato, mayor of the trio of Caronia towns.
    "Every time some new scientist comes to town they arrive thinking the whole thing has been invented or that they're going to solve the mystery in two minutes. They've all been wrong."
    ELECTRICIANS AND EXORCISTS
    The 39 inhabitants of the town halfway between Palermo and Messina were evacuated after the regional government declared a state of emergency in Canneto, which occupies a single street nestled between a railway line and the sea.
    But after weeks of sleeping in a nearby hotel and houses rented for them by the government, they're getting desperate.
    "I've seen an air conditioner burst into flames and burn down in 30 seconds. These are not normal events, but I think we're going to have to start looking for a different kind of help," said Antonio Pezzino, whose house was first hit.
    From the start, Gabriele Amorth, one of the Catholic Church's top exorcists suspected the devil was at work.
    "I've seen things like this before," he told Il Messaggero daily. "Demons occupy a house and appear in electrical goods," he said urging the parish priest to take action.
    The local priest, Don Antonio Cipriani, decided together with residents to let scientists have a first go at the fires.
    After a brief visit to Canneto di Caronia, the head of the Committee for the Control of Paranormal Claims has also ruled out demons or poltergeists -- at least for the time being.
    "The fact that the phenomenon occurs only when there are people present makes it hard to believe that it is a natural, or even supernatural phenomenon," said Massimo Polidoro.
    "But we don't exclude further investigation if things aren't eventually explained," he added.
    UNSOLVED MYSTERY
    Nobody can say the experts aren't trying. Canneto looks increasingly like a set for the TV hit "The X-Files".
    Two fire trucks and a police jeep sit at the entrance of Canneto on alert for the next blaze while a van with a large, rotating antennae on top measures the radio waves.
    A host of three-legged instruments to monitor geomagnetic, meteorological, electromagnetic and electrostatic indicators sit in apartments and next to lemon trees in the gardens. Coloured markings on the street indicate the presence of volcano experts.
    Police ruled out a possible prankster or pyromaniac after they saw wires burst into flames.
    The hypotheses now range from a build-up of electrical energy caused by grounding wires running off the railway to a rare "natural phenomenon" in which surges of electricity rise from the earth's core.
    The fires have even consumed unplugged lamps and an entire apartment. Black scorch marks still scar the apartment walls.
    Italy's big utility Enel cut off electricity to the town and hooked it up to a generator -- but that caught fire as well.
    More recently cellular phones and cars have also been acting up, with lock and alarm systems being set off without any apparent reason.
    SACRIFICIAL GOAT?
    The evacuated families of Canneto di Caronia who gather almost every night in the three-star hotel perched above their abandoned village are giving up hope.
    "I just want to go home," said Rosi Cioffo, a shopkeeper and mother of two. "I don't know what's causing it and I don't care anymore -- even if it's the devil."
    Her nine-year-old daughter, who is frightened every time a TV or bathroom fan switches on, may not agree.
    Spinnato, the mayor, sounds just as desperate.
    http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=4732244

     

  • Ice age to warming - and back?
    March 18, 2004 edition
    Christian Science Monitor

    The Little Ice Age and "the 8,200-year event" are not exactly household terms. Once only a handful of climate scientists puzzled over these episodes of abrupt climate change. Now, the topic is getting close scrutiny from the Pentagon, the halls of Congress, and even Hollywood - where a disaster movie set for release in May depicts a sudden deep freeze.
    One reason for all the interest? While policymakers have worried long and hard about global warming, which might raise Earth's temperature 1.4 to 5.8 degrees C by century's end, a growing body of evidence suggests natural forces could just as easily plunge Earth's average temperatures downward. In the past, the planet's climate has changed 10 degrees in as little as 10 years.
    That may not sound like much. But the last time the planet was 10 degrees colder, it was still in an ice age. "There's the very real potential of the climate system changing dramatically and rapidly" in ways that lie outside modern human experience, says Mark Eakin, who heads the paleoclimatology program of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    The possibility of a sudden freeze doesn't mean mankind can relax efforts to curb global warming, many scientists warn. Indeed, given the complexity of Earth's climate, human activities that spew greenhouse gases into the atmosphere may increase the potential for an abrupt cooling.
    For example: Regional and global climates have undergone quick and dramatic changes even after what would appear to be only gentle prodding by natural influences, Dr. Eakin says. In many cases, that prodding has been far less severe than the changes humans have wrought via industrial emissions of carbon dioxide.
    "In the absence of better knowledge, we have to assume that humans are making abrupt climate change more likely - not because humans are worse than nature, it's just because we're changing the system," says Richard Alley, a Penn State University paleoclimatologist. Dr. Alley led a 2002 National Research Council panel that examined abrupt climate change and laid out recommendations for research priorities and possible adaptation strategies.
    Policymakers are beginning to pay attention. Last week, the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee sent to the full Senate a bill that would give NOAA $60 million for research into the causes of abrupt change. The work could help provide more accurate modeling of past and future climate change, perhaps yielding clues that could serve as an early warning to abrupt change.
    Meanwhile, a report prepared for the Defense Department bids Pentagon planners to elevate the study of abrupt climate change "beyond a scientific debate to a US national security concern." The study was prepared by the Global Business Network, a corporate strategic planning and consulting firm in Emeryville, Calif.
    These actions are fueled by a growing body of evidence over the past five years that Earth's climate has a history of rapid variations - and that if the paleoclimate record is any indication, this history repeats itself. Some periods, like the Little Ice Age, would cause hardships today, but industrial countries probably could adapt, researchers say. The Little Ice Age lasted roughly from 1300 to around 1870 and dropped temperatures in parts of the northern hemisphere by about 1 degree C.
    To the casual observer, that drop may seem small. But from a climate and a social standpoint "it was huge," says Lloyd Keigwin Jr., a senior scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) in Woods Hole, Mass.
    The year without summer
    The Little Ice Age - actually three distinct cooling periods - chilled northern Europe and parts of the United States. It sent the Vikings back to Europe from their outposts in Greenland. Farms in Norway were covered with glaciers and crop failures around Europe caused famines and spikes in grain prices.
    In 1816, New England experienced its "year without summer," when many crops failed. One researcher argues that the storm that wiped out a large part of the Spanish Armada - and made Sir Francis Drake's job easier - was part of the Little Ice Age pattern.
    "The Little Ice Age is the only abrupt climate change that people have experienced in industrial times," says Dr. Keigwin.
    Other abrupt changes, like the rapid cooling event that peaked 8,200 years ago, could be far more disruptive.
    As scientists have studied the climate record trapped in glacial ice from Antarctica and Greenland, and in mud samples extracted from beneath the ocean floor, their respect for the speed of change has grown. In the mid-1950s, a change of roughly 3 degrees C over more than 1,000 years was deemed abrupt. In 1999, a team led by Jeffrey Severinghaus at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, Calif., determined that the last ice age ended with a temperature burst that raised the thermostat at Greenland by some 9 degrees C over a mere decade.
    "We still don't understand the causes" behind the increase, he says. A range of abrupt regional and global changes poses the same challenge.
    Atlantic conveyor belt
    One potential source of change may be the North Atlantic, researchers say. There, warm water moves north along the surface, cooling as it travels. By the time the surface water reaches the far northern portions of the North Atlantic basin, it has cooled and grown denser than the underlying layers of ocean, and it begins to sink. The water then travels south along the bottom, driving an aquatic "conveyor belt" that spans the globe.
    But researchers suspect that if enough fresh water, perhaps from melting ice, is injected into key spots in the North Atlantic, it can virtually shut down the conveyor. Fresh water is more buoyant than salt water and can form a layer that blocks the circulation. The Northern Atlantic region would then cool. Reduce the fresh water, researchers say, and the reverse can happen, warming the North Atlantic region.
    Yet much of the evidence for this comes from records when the planet's climate was already cool, some scientists argue. So the evidence may not hold lessons for today, when the planet is in a warm hiatus between glacial periods. A more timely test of the North Atlantic's role in abrupt climate change, they say, may come through unraveling the mystery of a rapid cooling event that peaked 8,200 years ago.
    By the standards of the Little Ice Age, the 8,200-year event was frosty and global. Although the event lasted only about 100 years, Greenland's temperatures dropped by about 3 degrees C. Indeed, the consultants who argue for upgrading the national security status of abrupt climate change used this event as their model.
    Several researchers say the cooling 8,200 years ago may have been triggered by the collapse of ice dams holding back the waters of Lake Agassiz - a vast glacial reservoir covering the Great Lakes region of the US and Canada at the end of the last ice age. It would have flushed enough fresh water into the right places in the North Atlantic to shut down the conveyor.
    But here, too, the picture grows murky. At a meeting last fall at the WHOI, researchers from the US and Canada looked at the problem and raised more questions than answers. For instance, no one has yet seen conclusive topographical evidence of such a huge outflow. If the waters of Lake Agassiz did surge into the Hudson Straits and the Labrador Sea, they surely would have carved a path in the land. This lack of evidence has sent some searching for an outflow path to the north, into the Arctic Ocean.
    Core samples from the ocean floor also fail to confirm the Hudson Straits-Labrador Sea theory, says Mr. Keigwin of the WHOI. Instead, he has found evidence of freshening in the water much farther south and hugging the coast. This suggests that the water may have entered the Atlantic too far south to affect the conveyor - at least directly.
    "This is an important problem," he says. If scientists can prove that freshening of the ocean did occur during this current period between ice ages, then the possibility of global warming triggering an abrupt climate change would have to be taken more seriously, he adds. "We need a coordinated effort" to answer the riddle.
     
  • North Sea Civilisation baffles archaeologists
    03/11/2004
    http://english.pravda.ru/science/19/94/377/12245_Atlantis.html
    Remains of an ancient civilization discovered in the depths of the Northern sea
    While some scientists spend all their time and efforts in search of Atlantis, others have already discovered remains of an ancient civilization that had existed on the same territory as present-day Northern sea. With the help of modern technology, archaeologists were able to get a better glimpse of the ancient world.
    Approximately 10 000 years ago the entire bottom of the Northern sea had been a blossoming valley, inhabited by ancestors of modern-day Europeans. Scientists from the Birmingham University were able to reach such conclusion after reconstructing local landscape by means of computers. Archaeologists analyzed data of earth's crust's fluctuations and using a specially designed program managed to come up with a 3D image of the area. The region connects today's British Isles with continental Europe.
    The science of anthroposophia is among a few that sincerely believes in the existence of Atlantis, which used to occupy a gigantic territory-from Americas to modern Near East. Tectonic movements, earthquakes and volcano eruptions have split the continent. The major portion of it has sunken. Modern-day British Isles (Great Britain, Ireland, Scotland), Iceland, Canaries, Cabo-Verde (islands of the Green cape) as well as several islands of the Caribbean are considered to be Atlantis' remains.
    The first cataclysms began affecting Atlantis about 800 000 years ago. Some scientists assume that this event has been portrayed in the Biblical story of the Great Flood. Other major shifts took place nearly 200 000 years ago, leaving only miserable fragments of the mighty kingdom of its inhabitants. The civilization has been almost totally destructed about 80 000 years ago. Ancient Greek philosopher Plato describes the fall of Atlantis as the collapse of the legendary island of Poseidonis, which had been consumed by waters in 9564 BC, when volcano eruptions along with powerful earthquakes had destroyed the last stronghold of the island.
    Soon after the first cataclysms started to occur, Atlantes moved to the North-East populating territories of today"s Great Britain and Scandinavia (which used to be connected at the time). British archaeologists managed to reconstruct this particular region. The entire valley used to be divided by a 600 meter wide river. When northern glaciers began to melt (as a result of another shift of the equator's axis) waters completely flooded the valley.
    "This is an amazing virtual project, which allows us to look closer at the past," says Bob Stone, member of the team of archaeologists. "Archaeologists, historians along with other specialists help us to get the most precise picture of the area. We use special data of seismic activity and tectonic movements in the area." Soil samples have already been extracted from the depths of the sea. Scientists discovered traces of fossilized remains of flora and fauna.
     
     

  • Raiders of the Lost Ark
    http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=286935
    Sun., April 04, 2004 Nisan 13, 5764
    The firemen manning the two fire trucks dispatched to the Western Wall on July 28, 1981 were still wondering what they were supposed to do there when they were suddenly told to return to the station. Yehuda Meir Getz, the rabbi of the Western Wall, had ordered the fire trucks and was also the one that hastily canceled the order after he discovered that all the firemen on the way to the Western Wall were Arabs. He feared that his plans - to dig under the foundations of the Dome of the Rock in order to find the site of the Holy of Holies, and the place where the Temple artifacts had been concealed - would be discovered too soon.
    The firemen had been assigned a secondary role in the project: to pump out hundreds of cubic meters of muddy water from the huge tunnel, chiseled eastward. Getz, along with workers from the Religious Affairs Ministry, had cleared the opening secretly during work aimed at uncovering the full length of the Western Wall.
    Rabbi Getz managed to keep the secret for only a few weeks. A violent confrontation broke out in the tunnel, which according to the Western Wall rabbi's calculations, led to Ein Itam: the spring through which impure priests went to immerse themselves on their way from Beit Hamoked on the Temple Mount outside the walls. The Muslims discovered the breach and dozens of them slid down through openings in the Temple Mount area to the tunnel located near the Western Wall plaza. Getz and the yeshiva students who were alerted to the site rushed to block the way of members of the Waqf (Muslim trust) with their bodies. At the end of a turbulent day, with the Temple Mount at the epicenter of international attention, then prime minister Menachem Begin, minister of police Yosef Burg and police commissioner Shlomo Ivstan ordered that the opening that had been made in the wall on the eastern side be resealed.
    That was the only time since 1967 that governmental officials had tried to tunnel eastward underneath the Temple Mount. At the time, it was officially announced that the huge tunnel under the structure of the Dome of the Rock had been discovered by chance during preparation of a niche for a holy ark at the Western Wall. Only years later did two members of the committee appointed by the government to investigate the affair disclose that the story about the niche for a holy ark was merely a cover-up for the real story.
    Archaeologist Meir Ben Dov and the coordinator of the ministerial committee for Jerusalem affairs, Ephraim Shilo, discovered that the tunnel had been opened deliberately, but in order to prevent public relations damage to the state, this essential finding was left out of the final conclusions of the report they authored. Years later, Rabbi Getz explained that he had been motivated by an intense desire to find the lost Temple artifacts, first and foremost the Ark of the Covenant.
    Warning from the Rebbe
    A new book about Rabbi Getz makes new revelations about the affair. The author, Hila Volberstein, reveals that he was not alone in his plan to tunnel from the Western Wall eastward under the Temple Mount. He had a partner - Rafi Eitan, advisor on terrorism and security to three prime ministers (Menachem Begin, Yitzhak Shamir and Shimon Peres), who later gained fame as the man who recruited and handled Jonathan Pollard.
    The book about Getz, who was involved extensively in kabbala and for whom the Western Wall tunnels were a second home, is being published almost eight years after his death. In the volume, which was commissioned by the family, Getz is described as he was: an enterprising man of many talents, a philanthropist (who gave charity in secret), a man with a spiritual approach to life, an army officer and a mystic both in action and dress - with a black robe and white headdress, a prayer book and Bible in his pocket and pistol on his hip. He was among the first to settle in the renewed Jewish Quarter after the Six-Day War. Of his 11 children, most live in Judea and Samaria. One son, Yair, was killed in Samaria in the mid-1980s when the car he was driving was hit by a truck driven by an Arab. Getz was convinced that he had been murdered for nationalistic reasons. Another son, Avner, was killed in the battle for the Old City in the Six-Day War.
    Volberstein reveals extensive excerpts from Getz's diaries, just a small proportion of which had been made public before. She presents numerous testimonies, such as that of Naftali Kidron, formerly an engineer in the Religious Affairs Ministry, according to which the source of the rabbi's almost total devotion to the project to uncover the Western Wall was his intense desire to find the Temple artifacts.
    Getz, who served for many years as rabbi of the Western Wall on behalf of the Religious Affairs Ministry, clung ardently to his plans to find the Temple artifacts, refusing to relinquish his program even after the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, advised him to stop. The Lubavitcher Rebbe warned Getz that anyone who found the Temple artifacts was placing his life in danger, although he did make it clear that finding the artifacts used in the Temple would bring Jewish redemption closer. Rabbi Getz, writes Volberstein, "decided to be the atonement for the Jewish people, to search for the Temple artifacts and to do whatever he could to speed up the redemption. However, he was waiting for the right moment to open the tunnels in the easterly direction."
    Eitan's testimony
    One of the most fascinating testimonies in the book is that of Eitan. "As the excavation of the tunnels progressed," says Eitan, "I met with Rabbi Getz almost daily. Together with him, I studied the structure of the Holy Temple and its dimensions. We drew conclusions as to the location of the Holy Temple and the Holy of Holies. When we arrived at the spot that according to our studies was supposed to be the gate through which the priests set out in order to immerse themselves, we assumed that if we made an opening in the wall to the east, we could move forward and eventually reach the Holy of Holies. But we waited for the right time to make the opening. We told no one about it because we preferred to keep the secret to ourselves, so that if - heaven forfend - it were discovered, the responsibility would not fall on the government or its leaders. That is why Begin, who knew about the excavations along the Western Wall, did not know about our plans to make the opening to the east."
    Eitan reveals that the opening was planned at first for the floor under the level where the excavation to uncover the Western Wall was being carried out at the time, "and in this way, it was not supposed to be discovered at all. We planned to go in, see the tunnels and move ahead in the direction in which we estimated that the foundations of the Holy of Holies would be found. We were of the view that without heavy tools, using a delicate chisel, we could chip away at the soft limestone walls. We thought that in that way, we could advance quietly and secretly to discover the hiding place where the priests had concealed the Temple artifacts and arrive at the spot just under the Holy of Holies, the place where the Ark of the Covenant was hidden."
    Eitan was not the only one privy to Getz's secret. A number of Religious Affairs Ministry officials and students of the rabbi were also aware of his plan. He consulted with Avraham Hanan, described in the book as a man "with supernatural powers" of insight. Many years ago, before the archaeologists had drawn their maps, Hanan marked on a map the route of a tunnel from the direction of the southern wall area, northwest to Solomon's Stables inside the Temple Mount. The excavators indeed discovered a tunnel along the route that Hanan had marked, but refrained from entering the Temple Mount. When Getz began to serve as rabbi of the Western Wall and the project reached a more advanced stage, Hanan designated the spot where in his view the Temple artifacts were buried. Getz was convinced that the Ark of the Covenant was buried in the same spot.
    Catalyst for the Messiah
    The Ark of the Covenant, which has not been seen since the destruction of the First Temple, was perhaps the most important of artifacts in the Temple, defined as the principal seat of the divine spirit. Some believe that it is still hidden in the tunnels excavated by King Solomon under the Holy of Holies. The tractate Shekalim of the Mishna states: "There once was a priest (in the time of the Second Temple) who while working in the Temple noticed that the part of the floor was different from other parts (and realized that at that spot there must be an entrance to a subterranean passage). He told another priest, but barely had he finished speaking before his soul expired, and it was clearly known that that was where the Ark was hidden."
    Jewish sources say that the Ark will be discovered a short time before the coming of the Messiah. Nachmanides wrote that the Ark would be discovered "during the construction of the Temple or in future wars before the coming of the Messiah king." Rabbi Getz also believed that finding the Ark and/or Temple artifacts would serve as a catalyst for the coming of the Messiah. At first, he sought only to find the place at which the altar had stood, thousands of years ago.
    The rabbi had two signs for the location of the site of the altar. The first was that the altar had been placed on level ground. However, the Temple Mount is made up of numerous tunnels, one atop another. If level ground, different from the rest of the surrounding ground, could be found, it would serve as proof of the site of the altar. The second sign was that under the place of the altar, where the sacrifices were brought in the time of the Temple, the floor was made of a mixture of zinc and plaster.
    "If even a speck of zinc is found," stated the rabbi, "we will know where the altar stood and that will advance us considerably."
    In July of 1981, that small niche for a Holy Ark was carved into the wall in the extension of the Western Wall, opposite the spot where Rabbi Getz believed the Holy of Holies was located. Immediately after the excavations began, an opening was created and the huge eastward tunnel carved into the rock under the Temple Mount was discovered. Its dimensions were impressive - 28 meters long and six meters wide. The floor of the tunnel was covered with a great deal of water and mud. "I immediately approached the place and I was seized by an enormous excitement. For a long time I sat, unable to move, with burning tears pouring down my cheeks. I finally gathered up strength and entered. I sat on the steps and said Tikkun Hatzot [midnight prayers] as is our custom."
    The first people brought in on the secret were the then director-general of the Religious Affairs Ministry, Gedalia Schreiber, and the two chief rabbis, Shlomo Goren and Ovadia Yosef. Goren was excited by the discovery as was Getz. He viewed the huge tunnels as a primary means to locate the precise location of the Holy of Holies, the area of the Holy Temple to which all but the High Priest on the Day of Atonement were forbidden entry, on pain of death.
    Agreement on the matter would decide once and for all in the dispute among the rabbinical authorities concerning this major issue. It would also make it possible to define for the general public the boundaries of the area where one could be permitted to enter the Temple Mount, thus abolishing the sweeping prohibition imposed by most authorities on halakha (Jewish religious law) on Jews entering any part of the Temple Mount. Relaxing the prohibition might create yet another and perhaps even more complex problem in the relations between religion and state: All Israeli governments have prohibited Jews from praying on the Temple Mount (as opposed to visiting it). Relaxing the halakhic prohibition on entry to the Temple Mount would considerably widen the circle of those seeking to pray there.
    Mortal danger
    The floor of the tunnel was covered with mud and water, which were removed by hand. The circle of those privy to the secret grew. Among them was Israel Radio reporter Moti Eden who, says Volberstein, participated in the work of uncovering the tunnel. "At night, after my work at the radio station, I came to the tunnel and using hoes and wheelbarrows, helped with the difficult work of cleaning out the tunnel," recalls Eden, today Channel One's reporter in the north.
    Seven weeks after the discovery of the tunnel, news about it was broadcast on Israel Radio. Reporters from all over the world streamed to the site. In late August, on a Friday night, Arabs brought water hoses and very powerful lighting into the tunnel through one of the openings in the floor of the Temple Mount. Getz, who feared the entry of Arabs into the tunnel and the Western Wall plaza, ordered the opening that had been made be boarded up. But just a few hours later, Muslims reentered the tunnel.
    Getz was immediately alerted to come to the site from his home in the Jewish Quarter. His wife called students from the Ateret Cohanim yeshiva to come and ran after him. Seeing her husband standing almost all alone facing a group of Arabs holding tools, sticks and hoes, she ran back to the plaza where the worshipers were praying and cried, "Hurry! The rabbi is in mortal danger!"
    The story ends with the political echelons ordering the opening to the tunnel sealed with reinforced concrete. Rabbi Getz wrote in his diary: "I will now retire from the project with a bitter taste in my mouth. I have never felt the humiliation of Judaism that I felt today in our own sovereign country. I pray that this is the end of the exile ... The media is going wild and self-hatred is rife. However, I must refrain from revealing secrets even to this diary and therefore I will not react or respond to those that condemn us."
    On the evening of September 3, 1981, Getz added in his diary, "I felt during the Tikkun Hatzot prayers closer to the prayers of my forefathers when they saw the flames arising from the house of our Lord at the time of its destruction with their own eyes. The sound of the blows, of the Arabs inside the tunnel. Their every shout pierces my wounded heart. With all intensity, the cry left my mouth, `Gentiles have entered your sanctuary, defiled your Holy Temple, but I must remain strong and must not break down, for I must continue even if I am all alone.'"
    In September 1995, three days after completing the construction of the Beit El yeshiva for the study of kabbala, Rabbi Getz passed away. In the Western Wall tunnels, there remains to this day the synagogue that he built, just opposite the spot where the Holy of Holies is assumed to be. Torah classes and prayers are still held there.
    Getz was a personal friend of numerous public figures, among them Brigadier General (res.) Yossi Ben Hanan and Ma'aleh Adumim Mayor Benny Kashriel. He was careful not to go up on the Temple Mount, but his formal title, "rabbi of the Western Wall and the Temple Mount," testified to his heart's burning quest.
     
  • Israel Accuses BBC Of Anti-Semitism
    By Chris McGreal in Jerusalem
    The Guardian - UK
    4-2-4
    The Israeli government has written to the BBC accusing its Middle East correspondent, Orla Guerin, of anti-semitism and "total identification with the goals and methods of the Palestinian terror groups" over a report on a 16-year-old would-be suicide bomber last week.
    CNN sources say the network has bowed to considerable pressure on its editors. Israeli officials boast that they now have only to call a number at the network's headquarters in Atlanta to pull any story they do not like.
    Natan Sharansky, Israel's minister for diaspora affairs, complained that Guerin had portrayed the army's handling of the arrest of Hussam Abdu, who was captured with explosives strapped to his chest, as "cynical manipulation of a Palestinian youngster for propaganda purposes". He said this revealed "a deep-seated bias against Israel".
    The BBC said it was looking into the complaint, the first by the Israeli government since late last year when it lifted a boycott of the corporation imposed in protest at a documentary on the Jewish state's weapons of mass destruction.
    But the letter comes as several foreign news organizations complain of increasing government pressure to curtail critical coverage or to report stories Israel believes help identify the Palestinian conflict with global Islamist terrorism.
    Officials have presented editors with dossiers on individual reporters and singled out organizations such as Sky News for allegedly having an anti-Israel agenda.
    The Tel Aviv press has called for the expulsion of correspondents from Sky, the Times and several French papers for failing to cover a story the government mobilized embassies worldwide to get into the media last month.
    In her report on Hussam Abdu last week, Guerin noted Israel's desire to gain a public relations advantage from the arrest. She described how the army "paraded the child in front of the international media", and observed that journalists had been prevented from asking him questions and therefore were left only with the army's account of the arrest.
    Mr Sharansky alleged that the BBC reporter "cast aspersions on the meaning of what transpired" that amounted to "such a gross double standard to the Jewish state, it is difficult to see Ms Guerin's report as anything but anti-semitic".
    The Israeli minister also protested at Guerin's conclusion, as the youth was forced to stand forlornly alone at the checkpoint solely for the photographers, that "this is a picture that Israel wants the world to see".
    Yet there is little doubt that the Israeli government viewed the boy's arrest as of considerable propaganda value.
    Israeli embassies urged newspapers across the globe to run the story as part of a campaign by the government to highlight the use of children as potential suicide bombers.
    A week earlier, when a 12-year-old boy, Abdullah Quran, was stopped while unwittingly carrying explosives at an army checkpoint, Israeli embassies called news editors to insist they cover the story and warn that failure to do so would be viewed as bias against Israel.
    When several news organizations failed to report it, an Israeli newspaper called for their correspondents to be expelled, including Sky's Emma Hurd and Stephen Farrell of the Times.
    The government emailed the article around the world and reproduced it on official websites.
    Gideon Meir, the foreign ministry's chief spokesman, said the criticism was legitimate. "Sky News did not cover the Abdullah Quran story but the next day, when the Israeli army targeted an Islamic Jihad terrorist with a missile, immediately Sky was on the air with seven or eight minutes of coverage," he said. "They did not cover the first story because it does not fit into the agenda the editors have."
    Last month the Israeli foreign minister, Silvan Shalom, pulled out of an interview on Sky's Sunday with Adam Boulton after the show refused to cancel an appearance by the Palestinian representative in London.
    CNN sources say the network has bowed to considerable pressure on its editors. Israeli officials boast that they now have only to call a number at the network's headquarters in Atlanta to pull any story they do not like.
    The network's former Middle East correspondent, Jerrold Kessel, who was widely respected for his informed and nuanced reporting, said that while doubtlessly there was pressure on his editors to get him to modify his coverage, he regarded it as irrelevant.
    "The less notice one takes of pressure, the less pressure one invites on oneself," he said. "If you get into a mind where the pressure is a factor, you get into the mind of worrying about what the effect of the pressure is going to be."
    © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2004

  • The Moor's Last Laugh
    Radical Islam finds a haven in Europe.
    BY FOUAD AJAMI
    http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110004879
    Sunday, March 28, 2004 12:01 a.m. EST
    In the legend of Moorish Spain, the last Muslim king of Granada, Boabdil, surrendered the keys to his city on Jan. 2, 1492, and on one of its hills, paused for a final glance at his lost dominion. The place would henceforth be known as El Ultimo Suspiro del Moro--"the Moor's Last Sigh." Boabdil's mother is said to have taunted him, and to have told him to "weep like a woman for the land he could not defend as a man." An Arab poet of our own era gave voice to a historical lament when he wrote that as he walked the streets of Granada, he searched his pockets for the keys to its houses. Al Andalus--Andalusia--would become a deep wound, a reminder of dominions gained by Islam and then squandered. No wonder Muslim chroniclers added "May Allah return it to Islam" as they told and retold Granada's fate.
    The Balkans aside, modern Islam would develop as a religion of Afro-Asia. True, the Ottomans would contest the Eastern Mediterranean. But their challenge was turned back. Turkey succumbed to a European pretension but would never be European. Europe's victory over Islam appeared definitive. Even those Muslims in the Balkans touched by Ottoman culture became a marked community, left behind by the Ottoman retreat from Europe like "seaweed on dry land."
    Yet Boabdil's revenge came. It stole upon Europe. Demography--the aging of Europe on the one hand and, on the other, a vast bloat of people in the Middle East and North Africa--did Boabdil's job for him. Spurred by economic growth in the '60s, which created the need for foreign laborers, a Muslim migration to Europe began. Today, 15 million Muslims make their home in the European Union.
    The earliest migrants were eager to hunker down in this new and (at first) alien world. They took Europe on its own terms, and lived with the initial myth of migration that their sojourn would be temporary. But for the overwhelming majority, Algiers and Casablanca and Beirut and Anatolia became irretrievable places. In time, there would be slaughter and upheaval in Lebanon and Iran, sectarian warfare in Syria, and a long era of sorrow and bloodshed in Algeria, just across the sea from Marseilles. Economic destitution would cut a swath of misery through the lands whence they came. Birth rates worked their way like a wrecking ball: It became impossible to transmit culture and civility and the old familiar world to the young. Migration became the only safety valve.
    In the 1980s, terrible civil wars were fought in Arab and Islamic countries--with privilege on one side, militant wrath on the other. The despots and the military caste in Algeria and Tunisia and Syria and Egypt won that struggle. Their defeated opponents took to the road: From Hamburg and London and Copenhagen, the battle was now joined. If accounts were to be settled with rulers back home, the work of subversion would be done from Europe. Muslim Brotherhoods sprouted all over the Continent. There were welfare subsidies in the new surroundings, money, constitutional protections and rules of asylum to fight the old struggle.
    "The whole Arab world was dangerous for me. I went to London." The words are those of an Egyptian Islamist, Yasser Sirri. In London, Sirri runs an Islamic "observation center" and agitates against the despotism of Hosni Mubarak. But Sirri, a man of 40, is wanted back home. Three sentences have been rendered against him in absentia: One condemns him to 25 years of hard labor for smuggling armed terrorists into Egypt; the second to 15 years for aiding Islamic dissidents; and the third to death for plotting to assassinate a prime minister. Sirri had fled Egypt to Yemen. But trouble trailed him there, so he moved to the Sudan, but it was no better. He turned up in London--there, he would have liberties, and the protections of a liberal culture. There would be no extradition for him, no return to the summary justice of Cairo.
    Sirri was not working in a vacuum. The geography of Islam--and of the Islamic imagination--has shifted in recent years. The faith has become portable. Muslims who fled their countries brought Islam with them. Men came into bilad al kufr (the lands of unbelief), but a new breed of Islamists radicalized the faith there, in the midst of the kafir (unbeliever).
    The new lands were owed scant loyalty, if any, and political-religious radicals savored the space afforded them by Western civil society. But they resented the logic of assimilation. They denied their sisters and daughters the right to mix with "strangers." You would have thought that the pluralism and tumult of this open European world would spawn a version of the faith to match it. But precisely the opposite happened. In bilad al kufr, the faith became sharpened for battle. We know that life in Hamburg--and the kind of Islam that Hamburg made possible--was decisive in the evolution of Mohammed Atta, who led the "death pilots" of Sept. 11. It was in Hamburg where he conceived a hatred of modernity and of women and of the "McEgypt" that the Mubarak regime had brought into being. And it was in Hamburg, too, that a young "party boy" from a secular family in Lebanon underwent the transformation that would take him from an elite Catholic prep school in Beirut to the controls of a plane on Sept. 11, and its tragic end near the fields of Shanksville, Penn. In its economic deterioration, the Arab world is without cities where young Muslims of different lands can meet. A function that Beirut once provided for an older elite had been undone. European cities now provide that kind of opportunity.
    Satellite TV has been crucial in the making of this new radicalism. Preachers take to the air, and reach Muslims wherever they are. From the safety of Western cities, they counsel belligerence and inveigh against assimilation. They forbid shaking hands with women examiners at universities. They warn against offering greetings to "infidels" on their religious holidays, or serving in the armies and police of the new lands. "A Muslim has no nationality except his belief," wrote an intellectual godfather of radical Islamism, the Egyptian Sayyid Qutb, who was executed by Nasser in 1966. While on a visit to Saudi Arabia in 2002, I listened to a caller from Stockholm as he bared his concerns to an immensely popular preacher. He made Qutb's point: We may carry their nationalities, he said, but we belong to our own religion.
    Radical Islamism's adherents are unapologetic. What is laicite (secularism) to the Muslims in France and their militant leaders? It is but the code of a debauched society that wishes to impose on Islam's children--its young women in particular--the ways of an infidel culture. What loyalty, at any rate, is owed France? The wrath of France's Muslim youth in the banlieues (suburbs) is seen as revenge on France for its colonial wars. France colonized Algeria in the 1830s; Algerians, along with Tunisians and Moroccans, return the favor in our own time.
    France grants its troubled Muslim suburbs everything and nothing. It leaves them to their own devices, and grants them an unstated power over its foreign policy decisions on Islamic and Middle Eastern matters; but it makes no room for them in the mainstream of its life. Trouble has come even to placid Belgium. In Antwerp, Dyab Abu Jahjah, a young Lebanese, only 32, has stepped forth to "empower" the Muslims of that country. Assimilation, he says, is but "cultural rape." He came to Belgium in 1991, and he owns up to inventing a story about persecution back home; it was a "low political trick," he says, and in the nature of things. The constitution of Belgium recognizes Dutch, French, and German as official languages. Abu Jahjah insists that Arabic be added, too.
    Europe's leaders know Europe's dilemmas. In ways both intended and subliminal, the escape into anti-Americanism is an attempt at false bonding with the peoples of Islam. Give the Arabs--and the Muslim communities implanted in Europe--anti-Americanism, give them an identification with the Palestinians, and you shall be spared their wrath. Beat the drums of opposition to America's war in Iraq, and the furies of this radical Islamism will pass you by. This is seen as a way around the troubles. But there is no exit that way. It is true that Spain supported the American campaign in Iraq, but that aside, Spain's identification with Arab aims has a long history. Of all the larger countries of the EU, Spain has been most sympathetic to Palestinian claims. It was only in 1986 that Spain recognized Israel and established diplomatic ties. With the sole exception of Greece, Spain has shown the deepest reserve toward Israel. Yet this history offered no shelter from the bombers of March 11.
    Whatever political architecture Europe seeks, it will have to be built in proximity to the Other World, just across the Straits of Gibraltar and in the grip of terminal crisis. There is no prospect that the rulers of Arab lands will offer their people a decent social contract, or the opportunities for freedom. It is a sad fact that the Arab peoples no longer make claims on their rulers. Instead the "drifters," such as the embittered terrorists who blew into Madrid, now seek satisfaction almost solely in foreign lands.
    You can't agitate against Mubarak in Cairo, but you can do it from the safety of Finsbury Park in London. The ferocity of the debate in the Arab world about France's decision to limit Islamic headgear in public schools is a measure of this displaced rage. Spain may attribute the cruelty visited on it to its association with America's expedition into Iraq. But the truth is darker. Jacques Chirac may believe that he has spared France Spain's terror by sitting out the Iraq war. But he is deluded. The Islamists do not make fine distinctions in the bilad al kufr.
    Europe is host to a war between order and its enemies, fuelled by demography: 40% of the Arab world is under 14. Demographers tell us that the fertility replacement rate is 2.1 children per woman. Europe is frightfully below this level; in Germany it is 1.3, Italy 1.2, Spain 1.1, France 1.7 (this higher rate is a factor of its Muslim population). Fertility rates in the Islamic world are altogether different: they are 3.2 in Algeria, 3.4 in Egypt and Morocco, 5.2 in Iraq and 6.1 in Saudi Arabia. This is Europe's neighborhood, and its contemporary fate. You can tell the neighbors across the Straits, (and within the gates of Europe) that you share their dread of Pax Americana. But nemesis is near.
    Five centuries ago, the Castilians took Granada from Boabdil. They were a hardy breed of sheep-herders driven by a Malthusian logic, outgrowing their grazing lands, pushing southward--and into the New World from Seville--to answer Castile's needs. Today there is great turmoil in Islamic lands, and a Malthusian crisis. Were it only true that those in harm's way in Europe are solely the friends of the Americans. The New World is a demon of this Islamism, it is true. But that old border between Europe and Islam has furies all its own.
    Mr. Ajami, a professor at Johns Hopkins, is author of "The Dream Palace of the Arabs" (Vintage, 1999).

  • Bin Laden's British payback target: Heathrow Airport
    The Sydney Morning Herald.
    March 29, 2004
    Osama bin Laden ordered the alleged mastermind of the 9/11 attacks to organise a massive strike on Heathrow Airport to punish Tony Blair for his support of the US, it has been revealed.
    He told his operations boss, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, to target the world's busiest airport at a meeting in Kabul soon after the attacks on the US, according to interrogation transcripts seen by Britain's Sunday Times.
    Bin Laden described the British Prime Minister as his "principal enemy".
    The claims by Mohammed, captured in Pakistan about a year ago, have reportedly been cross-checked with confessions by other al-Qaeda operatives.
    Britain's most senior policeman, Sir John Stevens, head of the metropolitan force, warned after the Madrid bombings earlier this month that an attack on London was "inevitable".
    Heathrow has been on high alert several times in the past 18 months, including a big security operation in February last year in which tanks and more than 400 troops surrounded the airport for several days.
    It has also been revealed that one of the British Government's top advisers has warned that plans to protect the country from a "dirty bomb" attack using radioactive material were flawed because of lack of resources.
    Sir Peter Gershon, in a leaked letter to Mr Blair, said the inadequacies of the dirty-bomb shield, Operation Cyclamen, were cause for the "greatest concerns" and could have a "catastrophic" impact on security.
    Mohammed's account is the first confirmation of al-Qaeda's desire to strike Heathrow Airport. Planning for the attack, which involved operatives from Pakistan, was disrupted by the US bombing of al-Qaeda strongholds in Afghanistan.
    He also reveals that al-Qaeda had originally planned to hijack 10 planes in the September 11 attacks, sending five against targets on the US west coast and five against the east. Potential targets included the Library Tower in Los Angeles and the Sears Tower in Chicago, as well as nuclear plants, Hollywood studios and bridges.
    The west coast plans were foiled when Zacarias Moussaoui was arrested at a US flying school a month before September 11, the Sunday Times reported.


  • New light on the life and death of John O'Neill
    http://www.axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/article_5957.shtml
    March 27, 2004-Former White House counter-terrorism expert Richard Clarke has rocked the Bush administration with his criticism of the "war on terror". However, doubts about the administration's commitment to the fight against al-Qaeda are not new.
    In the immediate aftermath of September 11, another counter-terrorism expert, Irish-American John O'Neill, became the focus for those concerns. O'Neill had been one of the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) leading specialists on al-Qaeda, but he was destined never to play a role in America's response to September 11. In a supremely ironic twist of fate, he was himself killed in the World Trade Center attacks.
    The story of John O'Neill, Richard Clarke and their battle against al-Qaeda began at the Twin Towers eight years earlier, when Islamic fundamentalists made their first attempt to destroy the World Trade Center with the 1993 bombing masterminded by Ramzi Yousef.
    Yousef was eventually tracked down in Pakistan. The intelligence ended up on the desk of Richard Clarke on a Sunday morning. There were only a few hours to act on it. Clarke rang the FBI in the forlorn hope that there would be somebody to take the call. Clarke described what happened next in a 2002 interview.
    "I called and John answered the phone. I said, 'Who's this'? He responded, 'Well, who the hell are you? I'm John O'Neill'. I explained, 'I'm from the White House. I do terrorism. I need some help'."
    O'Neill had never worked on the case before, but together with Clarke he manned the phones coordinating the capture of Yousef before he could slip over the border into Afghanistan. It was, according to Clarke, "the beginning of a beautiful friendship".
    After the capture of Yousef, O'Neill learned everything he could about the threat of Islamic fundamentalist terrorism. He became one of the first people to understand the "new terrorism" which was already taking shape.
    He set about convincing his colleagues of the threat with similar determination. "John would come into the room and there would be a presence about him," Clarke said. "He would go around the room like it was a ward meeting and he was an Irish politician."
    There were some obstacles that O'Neill's charismatic persona couldn't overcome, however. That first became clear after the Khobar Towers bombings in Saudi Arabia in 1996, which killed 19 American soldiers.
    According to his friend Chris Isham, O'Neill "felt the Saudis were definitely playing games and that the senior officials in the US government just didn't get it".
    Similar problems dogged O'Neill's investigation of the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole in Yemen, when he clashed so severely with US ambassador Barbara Bodine that he was refused clearance to enter the country.
    The level of opposition he faced within the US government may have contributed to O'Neill's decision to leave the FBI in July 2001, even though there were signs of increasing al-Qaeda activity. He took up a new post as head of security at the World Trade Center.
    He was in his office on the 34th floor of the North Tower when he was hit by American Airlines Flight 11 at 8.46am on September 11. From there he made his way to an emergency command center, the last place he was seen alive, before entering the South Tower where his body was found.
    The career and untimely death of John O'Neill have given rise to a great deal of speculation about the source of the obstacles he faced. Its clear that the turf battles between O'Neill and diplomats anxious to maintain good relations with Arab states began in the Bill Clinton years.
    There were signs that problems intensified under the Bush administration. When O'Neill retired, someone leaked the story to the New York Times, together with details of an incident when he had lost a briefcase carrying sensitive documents. O'Neill blamed the incoming FBI director Tom Pickard for the disclosure.
    The most serious allegation against the Bush administration came in the controversial French book Bin Laden, la verite interdite (Bin Laden, the forbidden truth), released shortly after September 11.
    Authors Jean-Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquie claimed to have been told by O'Neill that "the main obstacles to investigate Islamic terrorism were US oil corporate interests and the role played by Saudi Arabia in it".
    Brisard and Dasquie drew attention to the strong business links between members of the Bush administration and Saudi Arabia through the oil industry, and even through defense company the Carlyle Group, between the Bush and Bin Laden families.
    Richard Clarke's latest statements do not provide outright support to the thesis that these links led the Bush administration to obstruct O'Neill. Nevertheless, in a CBS interview last weekend, Clarke portrayed an administration that was remarkably reluctant to get to grips with al-Qaeda.
    In the aftermath of September 11, Clarke claimed: "The president dragged me into a room with a couple of other people, shut the door, and said, 'I want you to find whether Iraq did this'. Now he never said, 'Make it up'. But the entire conversation left me in absolutely no doubt that George Bush wanted me to come back with a report that said Iraq did this."
    When Clarke insisted that there was no Iraqi connection, he claimed that the president responded "in a very intimidating way. I mean that we should come back with that answer."
    Clarke followed up that interview on Wednesday with his testimony to America's official September 11 Commission. "By invading Iraq, the president has greatly undermined the war on terrorism," he told the bipartisan commission to applause from an audience which included many relatives of September 11 victims.
    Clarke's insider criticisms of the administration have the potential to be uniquely damaging to a Republican election campaign built around George W Bush, the "war president".
    Accordingly, the administration has hit back hard, asking why Clarke did not make similar points in previous interviews after September 11, given when he was still a public official.
    Those interviews are still so far the only ones in which Clarke has elaborated on the role of John O'Neill, and that means that there may yet be further revelations about the obstacles O'Neill faced, the reasons he left the FBI and the source of the leak to the New York Times about his departure.
    The Bush administration typically moves swiftly to rebut its critics. It may yet find itself having to challenge the memory of a man who died in the twin towers on September 11.

  • 'I saw papers that show US knew al-Qa'ida would attack cities with aeroplanes'
    Whistleblower the White House wants to silence speaks to The Independent
    http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=507514
    02 April 2004
    A former translator for the FBI with top-secret security clearance says she has provided information to the panel investigating the 11 September attacks which proves senior officials knew of al-Qa'ida's plans to attack the US with aircraft months before the strikes happened.
    She said the claim by the National Security Adviser, Condoleezza Rice, that there was no such information was "an outrageous lie".
    Sibel Edmonds said she spent more than three hours in a closed session with the commission's investigators providing information that was circulating within the FBI in the spring and summer of 2001 suggesting that an attack using aircraft was just months away and the terrorists were in place. The Bush administration, meanwhile, has sought to silence her and has obtained a gagging order from a court by citing the rarely used "state secrets privilege".
    She told The Independent yesterday: "I gave [the commission] details of specific investigation files, the specific dates, specific target information, specific managers in charge of the investigation. I gave them everything so that they could go back and follow up. This is not hearsay. These are things that are documented. These things can be established very easily."
    She added: "There was general information about the time-frame, about methods to be used ­ but not specifically about how they would be used ­ and about people being in place and who was ordering these sorts of terror attacks. There were other cities that were mentioned. Major cities ­ with skyscrapers."
    The accusations from Mrs Edmonds, 33, a Turkish-American who speaks Azerbaijani, Farsi, Turkish and English, will reignite the controversy over whether the administration ignored warnings about al-Qa'ida. That controversy was sparked most recently by Richard Clarke, a former counter-terrorism official, who has accused the administration of ignoring his warnings.
    The issue ­ what the administration knew and when ­ is central to the investigation by the 9/11 Commission, which has been hearing testimony in public and private from government officials, intelligence officials and secret sources. Earlier this week, the White House made a U-turn when it said that Ms Rice would appear in public before the commission to answer questions. Mr Bush and his deputy, Dick Cheney, will also be questioned in a closed-door session.
    Mrs Edmonds, 33, says she gave her evidence to the commission in a specially constructed "secure" room at its offices in Washington on 11 February. She was hired as a translator for the FBI's Washington field office on 13 September 2001, just two days after the al-Qa'ida attacks. Her job was to translate documents and recordings from FBI wire-taps.
    She said said it was clear there was sufficient information during the spring and summer of 2001 to indicate terrorists were planning an attack. "Most of what I told the commission ­ 90 per cent of it ­ related to the investigations that I was involved in or just from working in the department. Two hundred translators side by side, you get to see and hear a lot of other things as well."
    "President Bush said they had no specific information about 11 September and that is accurate but only because he said 11 September," she said. There was, however, general information about the use of airplanes and that an attack was just months away.
    To try to refute Mr Clarke's accusations, Ms Rice said the administration did take steps to counter al-Qa'ida. But in an opinion piece in The Washington Post on 22 March, Ms Rice wrote: "Despite what some have suggested, we received no intelligence that terrorists were preparing to attack the homeland using airplanes as missiles, though some analysts speculated that terrorists might hijack planes to try and free US-held terrorists."
    Mrs Edmonds said that by using the word "we", Ms Rice told an "outrageous lie". She said: "Rice says 'we' not 'I'. That would include all people from the FBI, the CIA and DIA [Defence Intelligence Agency]. I am saying that is impossible."
    It is impossible at this stage to verify Mrs Edmonds' claims. However, some senior US senators testified to her credibility in 2002 when she went public with separate allegations relating to alleged incompetence and corruption within the FBI's translation department.


  • DOJ Asked FBI Translator To Change Pre 9-11 Intercepts
    by Tom Flocco
    Washington, DC -- March 24, 2004 --12:15 EST -- FBI translator Sibel Edmonds was offered a substantial raise and a full time job to encourage her not to go public that she had been asked by the Department of Justice (DOJ) to retranslate and adjust the translations of [terrorist] subject intercepts that had been received before September 11, 2001 by the FBI and CIA.
    Edmonds, a ten year U.S. citizen who has passed a polygraph examination, speaks fluent Farsi and Turkish and had been working part time with the FBI for six months--commencing in December, 2001.
    In a 50 reporter frenzy in front of some 12 news cameras, Edmonds said "Attorney General John Ashcroft told me 'he was invoking State Secret Privilege and National Security' when I told the FBI I wanted to go public with what I had translated from the pre 9-11 intercepts."
    "I appeared once on CBS 60 Minutes but I have been silenced by Mr. Ashcroft, the FBI follows me, and I was threatened with jail in 2002 if I went public," Edmonds told tomflocco.com.
    When we asked her if it was really true that she had been bribed by the FBI and DOJ, Edmonds said "You can interpret it as that."
    This writer personally asked Edmonds where the term "State Secret Privilege" was derived. "The term came from an October 18, 2002 DOJ memo to me from DOJ spokesman Barbara Comstock," said Edmonds.
    The former FBI translator said "My translations of the pre 9-11 intercepts included [terrorist] money laundering, detailed and date specific information enough to alert the American people, and other issues dating back to 1999 which I won't go into right now."
    Incredibly, Edmonds said "The Senate Judiciary Committee and the 911 Commission have heard me testify for lengthy periods of time time (3 hours) about very specific plots, dates, airplanes used as weapons, and specific individuals and activities."
    This explosive information has been kept under wraps by the White House, CIA, FBI, and DOJ since Edmonds' 60 Minutes interview segment.
    The former FBI translator told tomflocco.com that "translators before me had ongoing personal relationships with the subjects or targets of the FBI and DOJ pre 9-11 investigations--linked to intercepts and other intelligence--in June - July - August, just prior to the attacks."
    "I also became aware of a [terrorist] criminal investigation going on since 1998," said Edmonds.
    Patty Casazza, one of the 9-11 "Jersey Girls," said "Sibel Edmonds told me that color coding terrorist threat alerts for the American people is reflective of the intercept translations received." Casazza and Edmonds gave no indication as to whether FBI translators had doctored or adjusted translations [used in the decision-making process] for Homeland Security terrorist threat alerts, for political reasons.
    "This whole situation is outrageous and I am going public," said Edmonds, adding "I am currently being advised by counsel. Thank you."
    Kristen Breitweiser, 9-11 family member and also one of the nick-named Jersey girls, arranged to have Ms. Edmonds address the gathered media right after Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet testified.

  • 9/11 widows bonded by tragedy
    Monday, April 14, 2003
    http://www.southjerseynews.com/issues/april/m041403p.htm
    A year and a half ago, four Garden State women in Middlesex and Monmouth counties - unknown to each other - were living their suburban dreams, raising kids and redecorating while their husbands trekked to well-paying jobs at Manhattan's World Trade Center.
    All that changed Sept. 11, 2001.
    Now the four - dubbed the "Jersey Girls" by the lawmakers and lobbyists they encountered - are fast friends, bound by grief and an effort to get the government to investigate the terrorist attack.
    As the federal 9-11 Commission they fought to create began taking testimony on March 31 - a police officer described the sound of bodies falling, a firefighter said he was lucky to recover his dead son whole, and other horror stories - the women shook with sobs, reaching out to each other with clean tissues and hugs to ease the pain.
    "We've become a family. It's like having three new sisters," said East Brunswick's Mindy Kleinberg, whose husband Alan worked at Cantor Fitzgerald.
    "We've really come to love each other and rely on each other for sanity checks," added Lorie Van Auken, another East Brunswick resident. Although the women live less than five minutes apart and their husbands worked for the same firm - Kenneth Van Auken was in Cantor Fitzgerald's 105th floor offices - they had not met.
    "Now we'll be friends for life," Van Auken added. Kristen Breitweiser, of Atlantic Highlands, and Patty Casazza, of Colts Neck, complete the quartet. The women talk almost daily by telephone or e-mail.
    Report due in '04
    While the women are pleased the investigation they fought for is up and running, they're discouraged by initial delays and a lack of full funding. Led by former New Jersey Gov. Tom Kean, the 10-member panel is to issue a report by May 2004. The women pledged to follow the commission's work and make sure it lives up to its promises for a thorough and complete investigation.
    "We'd like them to do their jobs. But you know if they don't have outside pressure, people won't cooperate. And that's very sad," Kleinberg said, recalling how an earlier congressional inquiry failed to secure all the subpoenas it needed.
    "It's unbelievable how politics works. It's not about what's right, it's not about what the facts are," Kleinberg added, recalling the fight to create the probe. "That was a horrifying thing to find out. . . . But we did get meetings. We were able to make a difference. And that's pretty amazing."
    The women said their relationships developed as they emerged from a fog of initial grief and were forced to deal with a host of unimaginable realities: obtaining a death certificate without a body; what to do with a recovered body part; how do you raise children alone?
    Kleinberg and Van Auken met through a support group. Breitweiser, the mother of 4-year-old Caroline, whose husband, Ron, worked for Fiduciary Trust, had already been lobbying for a two-year income tax break with other wives.
    The three met when they joined Casazza, who was launching a fight to change the controversial Victims Compensation Fund, which offered the families a lump sum in exchange for a promise not to sue the government or airlines. Casazza's husband, John, also worked for Cantor Fitzgerald. She has an 11-year-old son.
    "We felt like we left the planet. But at least we left the planet together," Van Auken said. "We pulled each other out of that coma. The reason we really stayed sane and kept breathing was because we could call each other."
    As these battles began, the women started reading anything they could find about the Sept. 11 attack, e-mailing articles and comments back and forth. One day, they met at Kleinberg's to compile their findings.
    Doubts
    "We realized the official story just didn't make sense," said Van Auken, a painter and designer with two teenagers, Sarah and Matthew.
    The women said they'd thought the government would protect them, but clearly that hadn't happened. They realized a full investigation was necessary. But while the Columbia space shuttle crash and the Pennsylvania mining disaster quickly prompted probes, they wondered why, with nearly 3,000 dead, there was no immediate review of what went wrong Sept. 11.
    "We live in a country where everything is under investigation, and yet we have to ask the government, and it's not interested in an investigation? They dragged their heels," Breitweiser said when the commission was created by a Congressional compromise in November.
    Kleinberg, a certified public accountant who left her job to raise three children - Jacob, now 11, Lauren, 8, and Sam, 4 - laughs as she talks about her newfound computer skills. Before the attack, she had never been online.
    "We got very good at Googling," Kleinberg said. She arrived to testify two weeks ago with a stack of documents - like incomplete immigration forms filed by some of the hijackers - she obtained through the Internet and a host of new questions.
    "My husband always wanted me to go downstairs and look at the computer," Kleinberg said. "And here I am."
    But the women credit Cherry Hill's Bob Monetti, who lost his son in the 1988 Pan Am Flight 103 bombing over Lockerbie, Scotland, for sparking their action. They met Monetti through a Princeton support group he organized. He told them they would have to fight to make the investigation happen.
    That led to an effort to lobby Congress, with a rally and a candlelight vigil to push the process along when opposition arose. Stylish and articulate, the women testified at a congressional inquiry into intelligence failings related to 9/11 and became a force in Washington, towing a cart filled with ring binders bursting with evidence they'd amassed.
    Adding to their clout, they formed an activist group called September 11th Advocates, and now serve on the steering committee for the federal investigatory commission, formally the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States.
    Inseparable
    "We became closer and closer with all of our meetings," Van Auken said. "Social time for us was, `Let's get bagels and meet at Mindy's.' "
    These days, they go shopping together or out for dinner with their kids. "It's what regular life used to be," Van Auken said.
    The friends share the same sense of humor, the same doggedness, Van Auken noted. Their children have bonded. It is a safe environment in which they can talk about the horrors of DNA testing, the failings of the CIA, or the unfathomable pain of losing your best friend, lover and spouse.
    "You look at them and you just know there is this bond there," Kleinberg said. "They just know what you're going through. . . . It's like you can start a thought and they'll finish it."

  • Global Warming: Arctic ice cap, 1979 and 2003.
    Photo: NASA/New York Times.

    Alarm over melting Arctic ice cap
    October 24, 2003
    The north polar ice cap is melting at an alarming rate due to global warming, NASA scientists said today, with satellite images showing the ice cap continuing to shrink.
    "It is happening now. We cannot afford to wait a long period of time for technological solutions," said David Rind of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York.
    "Change is in the air - literally."
    The part of the Arctic Ocean that remains frozen all year round shrank at a rate of 10 per cent per decade since 1980, NASA researcher Josefino Comiso said.
    That cap reached record lows in 2002 and 2003, he added.
    Researchers at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration are worried because global warming speeds up as the ice cap melts, forming a vicious cycle.
    "Snow and sea-ice are highly reflective because they are white," Comiso said.
    "Most of the sun's energy is simply reflected back to space. With retraction of the ice cover, that means that less of surface is covered by this highly reflective snow and sea-ice, and so more energy has been absorbed and the climate warms."
    US and Canadian scientists reported in September that the largest ice shelf in the Arctic off Canada's coast has broken up due to climate change and could endanger shipping and drilling platforms in the Beaufort Sea.
    The Ward Hunt Ice Shelf had been in place on the north coast of Ellesmere Island in Canada's Nunavut territory for at least 3000 years.
    AFP sjb

    Salty Sea Covered Part of Mars
    'Excellent' Site To Search For Past Life
    By Robert Roy Britt
    Senior Science Writer
    SPACE.com
    3-23-4
    A salty sea once washed over the plains of Mars at the Opportunity rover's landing site, creating a life-friendly environment more earthlike than any known on another world, NASA scientists announced today.
    The rover found evidence for the shores of a large body of surface water that contained currents, which left their marks in rocks that developed at the bottom of the sea. Opportunity found a distinct chemical makeup in the rocks and unique layering patterns that must have been generated by slow-moving water in an evaporating sea, researchers said.
    The discovery casts fresh light on the possibility that critters could have gained a toehold on the red planet when it was younger, warmer and wetter. Geologists inside and outside NASA are elated over the discovery, saying it could resolve a decades-long debate over whether Mars ever was in fact warmer.
    Scientists don't yet know how deep the ocean was, exactly when it existed or for how long.
    The finding builds on the March 2 announcement that Meridiani Planum, where Opportunity landed, had long ago been soaked with water. Geologists could not tell from those initial results whether the water was above the surface or only underground.
    "We think Opportunity is now parked on what was once the shoreline of a salty sea on Mars," Cornell University's Steve Squyres, principal science investigator for the Mars rover mission, said in a statement provided to SPACE.com prior to a press conference today.
    The rocks would be excellent preservers of biological signs, if life ever existed on Mars, Squyres said. That makes Meridiani Planum a prime target for future missions that would search for evidence of past biology.
    An ancient sea also implies that early Mars was warmer than today, said University of Colorado geologist Bruce Jakosky, who was not directly involved in the finding. And he said it suggests that any possible microbes on Mars would not have had to rely only on relatively inefficient subsurface, geochemical energy, but might have used direct sunlight as an energy source.
    "If it's surface water, that would allow the possibility of photosynthetic organisms," Jakosky told SPACE.com. "Once you can tap into sunlight, it leaves open the possibility for a much greater abundance of life if it was ever there."
    Scientists so far have no firm evidence that Mars was ever inhabited, however.
    Sedimentary signs
    The crucial clues that came together in recent days included the detection of chlorine and bromine, indicating a salty sea had evaporated over time, scientists said. Also significant were crisscrossing layers of sediment in the rock that revealed they formed beneath currents of moving water.
    Early interpretations of the same lines of research led to the previous discovery that the rocks were once soaked in water, but it wasn't clear if the water was present when the rocks formed, or if the water came later. Increased confidence in the bromine finding strengthened the case that the particles which formed the rocks had precipitated out of surface water, with salt concentrations that increased as the water evaporated.
    Some layers within the rock are at telltale angles to the main layers. Scientists call the patterns "crossbedding." Other features, called festooned layers, involve smile-shaped curves produced by shifting, rippled shapes of loose sediments under a current of water.
    The patterns indicate sediment the size of sand grains had bonded together into ripples in water that was at least 2 inches (5 centimeters) deep -- and possibly much deeper, said John Grotzinger, a rover science team member from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The water flowed at a rate somewhere between 4 and 20 inches every second (10 to 50 centimeters per second). That's up to about 1 mile an hour.
    "Ripples that formed in wind look different than ripples formed in water," Grotzinger said.
    The rocks may have been cast in a salt flat that was alternately wet and dry, Grotzinger added. Similar environments on Earth, at the edge of oceans or in desert basins, sometimes have currents of water that produce the type of ripples seen in the Mars rocks.
    The researchers cautioned that their results so far do not allow them to determine if the sea was deep and long-lasting, or if it was very shallow and receded rapidly. Squyres said, however, that they'd found something "you could swim in" as opposed to the sort of water that could only be drawn from a well.
    The findings were vetted by six scientists not on the rover team, prior to being released today. Included in the data were several dozen close-up images of the smiling structures.
    "I was astonished," said one of the outside experts, Dave Rubin, a sedimentologist with the U.S. Geological Survey. "There on Mars were sedimentary structures that we see on Earth." Rubin said he knew of no processes that could better explain what the images show. "I think the explanation the team put together is the best explanation for those rocks."
    Brighter prospects
    The discovery re-ignited enthusiasm over Mars as a potential well for biology, at least in the past. (Researchers are unsure whether any life that ever developed on Mars -- if it did -- could have endured into the present era, with Mars being cold and dry.)
    "The particular type of rock Opportunity is finding, with evaporite sediments from standing water, offers excellent capability for preserving evidence of any biochemical or biological material that may have been in the water," said Squyres, the rover mission's chief scientist.
    The discovery quite literally brightens the prospects for past life in another important way.
    Had the water been only subsurface, life would have had to rely on geochemical energy, such as the decay of rocks into methane. On Earth, dependence on geochemical energy is a limiting factor for underground microbes, said Jakosky, the University of Colorado geologist who is also director of the university's NASA-sponsored Center for Astrobiology. He helped pick the rover landing sites but has not been directly involved in the science explorations.
    Organisms that depend on geochemical energy are less diverse and of more limited scope than life that flourishes in sunlight, Jakosky explained.
    "This dramatic confirmation of standing water in Mars' history builds on a progression of discoveries about that most earthlike of alien planets," said Ed Weiler, NASA associate administrator for space science. "This result gives us impetus to expand our ambitious program of exploring Mars to learn whether microbes have ever lived there and, ultimately, whether we can."
    Weiler said the results are "beyond our wildest expectations" for the rover mission. "If you have an interest in searching for fossils on Mars, this is the first place you'd want to go."
    Any such fossils would almost surely be microbial and not detectable by the current rovers.
    Most scientists agree that finding signs of past or present life will likely require sending human geologists or, in the near term, sending a robot to bring back samples for study in laboratories on Earth. Meridiani Planum is, for now, the best destination for such a mission, which NASA has slated for launch sometime in the next decade.
    "Someday we must collect these rocks and bring them back to terrestrial laboratories to read their records for clues to the biological potential of Mars," said James Garvin, lead scientist for Mars and lunar exploration at NASA Headquarters.
    Hints at 'warm and wet' Mars
    Finding a sea on Mars also suggest the planet was once warmer. Scientists have been arguing for decades over whether Mars was once warm and wet or just wetter and cold.
    "I think that this seems to point toward Mars being warm enough and wet enough to allow standing water" in the distant past, Jakosky said.
    Squyres cautioned against making climate interpretations from the new finding just yet. He said it's possible the sea might have existed under a cover of ice in a cold climate.
    But geologist Bob Craddock, science advisor to the under secretary for science at the Smithsonian Institution, says he can't figure any way to develop the sedimentary deposits seen by Opportunity other than in a salty sea that evaporates in a climate warmer than what exists on Mars today.
    "You need a sediment supply for those ripples," Craddock told SPACE.com. "If the lake is frozen with any appreciable depth, then the surrounding rivers and streams are frozen solid and are not providing any sediments."
    Craddock, who is not involved in the rover mission, concluded: "These deposits and their mineralogy clearly indicate that the climate of Mars was different in the past. For the first time we're looking evidence that an alien planet that was earthlike at one point in its history."
    Shorelines everywhere?
    Opportunity had spent its entire time on Mars, since landing in late January, inside a shallow crater studying soil and the exposed shelf of bedrock. The most recent and telling observations came by taking 152 microscopic pictures of a rock named Last Chance.
    The findings add to previous rover discoveries of hematite, a mineral typically formed in water, and the layered rocks being laden with salts, which led scientists to conclude the region was at least soaked with groundwater.
    Other investigations from orbiting spacecraft have revealed possible shorelines elsewhere on Mars, but no ground measurements have confirmed any of those findings, and some scientists had remained skeptical that Mars ever harbored any significant surface water.
    Scientists have said they see no visible shorelines surrounding the Meridiani Planum, another reason they can't yet deduce the size of the ancient body of water. And Squyres said the apparent shoreline that Opportunity has detected may have been part of a moving phenomenon -- meaning that many shorelines may have developed through time as the body of water evaporated.
    The rover left the crater this week and will now try to examine what scientists think is a larger rock outcropping nearly a half-mile (700 meters) away at the Endeavor crater. To get there, the rover will roam across a vast, flat plain that is, overall, the size of Oklahoma.
    At the larger Endeavor outcropping, researchers hope to find more extensive layers and read them like pages of a history book, to learn more about the depth, breadth and timing of the ocean that long ago graced the red planet.

     

  • That ghostly visitation may be sound of a wind turbine
    BUILDING more wind farms in Britain could lead to an increase in reports of ghosts.
    http://www.yorkshiretoday.co.uk/ViewArticle2.aspx?SectionID=55&ArticleID=756913
    15 March 2004
    There is considerable evidence that noises which are too low to hear through the ears can cause symptoms attributed to hauntings, such as palpitations and the rattling of windows and doors.
    Now a GP in the West Country has come up with evidence that the low-frequency noise caused by wind turbines might be felt by a lot of people.
    And the Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, has hired a university to look at ways of measuring low-frequency noise.
    Amanda Harry, a GP in Plymouth, is conducting a survey of low-frequency noise sensitivity among people who live close to wind farms and would like to hear from anyone from Yorkshire interested in taking part.
    Her survey began with 14 people living within a mile of the Bears Down wind farm near Padstow, Cornwall, and, she says, all but one of them reported getting more headaches since the 16 turbines were put up two years ago. Some also blame the turbines for insomnia, migraines, nausea and depression.
    She said yesterday: "I now have results from 36 people, from Wales, Cumbria and Cornwall, and two thirds of them feel that their quality of life has been adversely affected by living near the turbines."
    The British Wind Energy Association says her survey is not a scientific one and more organised surveys have found no evidence of a problem.
    A spokeswoman said: "Wind energy is a mature technology, with over 50,000 wind turbines installed around the world, some of which have been operating for over 20 years. During all this time and with all these machines, there have been no medical conditions arising from the normal operation of a wind turbine."
    But a report for the Government, delivered last year, said: "Low frequency noise causes extreme distress to people who are sensitive to its effects."
    An low-frequency noise specialist at Salford University, Andrew Moorhouse, said it could make people think they were being haunted.
    An Italian professor had told him about reports of a haunting in a village. He found a weir had been modified so the water fell in such a way that it set up vibrations in a pipe. It was resounding like an organ pipe, strongly enough to rattle windows.
    Vic Tandy, a Coventry University researcher who solved a "haunting" by tracking down a faulty ventilation fan which was causing temperature drops, said: "I have wondered if more wind farms might mean more ghosts. It is a difficult area to research. If you ask about ghosts, you tend to pre-empt a response."
    Dr Amanda Harry can be contacted via [email protected] or 0113 238 8426.

  • Purported Al Qaeda Letter Calls Truce in Spain
    Wed Mar 17, 2004
    By Opheera McDoom
    CAIRO (Reuters) - A group claiming to have links with al Qaeda said on Wednesday it was calling a truce in its Spanish operations to see if the new Madrid government would withdraw its troops from Iraq, a pan-Arab newspaper said.
    In a statement sent to the Arabic language daily al-Hayat, the Abu Hafs al-Masri Brigades, which claimed responsibility for the Madrid bombings that killed 201 people, also urged its European units to stop all operations.
    "Because of this decision, the leadership has decided to stop all operations within the Spanish territories... until we know the intentions of the new government that has promised to withdraw Spanish troops from Iraq," the statement said.
    "And we repeat this to all the brigades present in European lands: Stop all operations."
    Skepticism has greeted previous claims of responsibility by the group for attacks in Turkey and Iraq. U.S. officials say its links with Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network are unclear.
    An unrelated videotape of a man describing himself as al Qaeda's European military spokesman also claimed responsibility for the Madrid bombing, saying it was in retaliation for outgoing Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar's domestically-unpopular support for the U.S.-led Iraq war.
    In a shock election result three days after the Madrid bombs, Spain voted in the Socialist party, which has since said it will probably withdraw its troops from Iraq.
    "The Spanish people... chose peace by choosing the party that was against the alliance with America," the statement said.
    WE WANT BUSH TO WIN
    The statement said it supported President Bush in his reelection campaign, and would prefer him to win in November rather than the Democratic candidate John Kerry, as it was not possible to find a leader "more foolish than you (Bush), who deals with matters by force rather than with wisdom."
    In comments addressed to Bush, the group said "Kerry will kill our nation while it sleeps because he and the Democrats have the cunning to embellish blasphemy and present it to the Arab and Muslim nation as civilization."
    "Because of this we desire you (Bush) to be elected."
    The group said its cells were ready for another attack and time was running out for allies of the United States.
    "Whose turn is it next? Will it be Japan or America, or Italy, Britain or Oslo or Australia?" the statement said, adding Pakistan and Saudi Arabia were also targets.
    The group is named after Muhammed Atef, also known as Abu Hafs, a close bin Laden aide killed in the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan.

     

  • Secret at the heart of Putin's rise to power
    By Julius Strauss in Ryazan
    http://news.telegraph.co.uk
    (Filed: 13/03/2004)
    By rights Tatyana ought not to be alive today. Along with the other residents of the red-brick housing block on Novosyolov Street in the Russian city of Ryazan, she should have died with husband and son on Sept 23, 1999.
    At 5.30 that morning three sacks of high explosive hidden in the basement of their building were set to blow up. The explosion would have brought down the block.
    "Of course we're lucky to be here," said Tatyana, 39, in the hallway of her building this week. She was too scared to give her surname.
    "They had decided to blow up the building and we would all have died. Even today I shiver when I think about it."
    More than 240 other Russians were less fortunate. They died that autumn in a wave of bombings that destroyed three blocks of flats, two in Moscow and one in the town of Volgodonsk.
    The Russian authorities were swift to lay the blame at the door of Chechen separatists. But no supporting evidence has emerged. Two men from the Caucasus were convicted of involvement after a closed trial this year, but it was widely denounced as a charade.
    Instead a growing body of proof has surfaced that links the bombings, and the Ryazan incident in particular, to the FSB - the revamped KGB. Independent investigators, including several MPs, who have sought to look into the case have been intimidated, arrested or beaten.
    Analysts and investigators claim that President Vladimir Putin, who was FSB chief until August of that year and subsequently prime minister, must know the truth.
    Lilia Shevtsova, a senior associate with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said: "He would know not just what happened but who the suspects were. The truth will not damage him because it won't be told until after he is gone."
    The 1999 bombings proved to be Mr Putin's political making. He positioned himself as a strongman who would crush the Chechen rebels and restore order to the ailing country.
    Riding a wave of nationalist fervour, in eight months he went from being a virtual political unknown to winning the presidency by an easy margin. Now, after winning nearly complete control over parliament in December and installing a loyal new cabinet days before tomorrow's presidential election, Mr Putin is poised to seal another four years at Russia's helm.
    In Novosyolov Street the day before the bomb was due to detonate, residents noticed a white Lada parked with a man sitting in the back and a woman standing nervously by the front door. Then another man emerged from the cellar and the three drove away. The residents called the police who found the bomb - three sacks of hexogene, a military explosive used in the other attacks that autumn.
    The railway station and airport were cordoned off and roadblocks set up. To general approval, Mr Putin announced that Russian planes had begun strafing Grozny, the Chechen capital.
    That evening the bombers made a mistake. Using a public telephone one of them called a number in Moscow for instructions, saying it was impossible to leave the city undetected. An operator traced the call. The number called belonged to the FSB.
    Shortly afterwards the two men were arrested. Each produced documents showing that he worked for the FSB. Later an order came down from Moscow ordering the local police release them.
    The next day Nikolai Patrushev, the head of the FSB, announced that the entire thing had been a training drill to raise public awareness. The white substance was not hexogene, he said, but sugar. The residents who called the police and the telephone operator were each given a colour television to reward them for their vigilance.
    For a while the controversy refused to die down. Boris Berezovsky, the exiled tycoon and a bitter enemy of Mr Putin, sponsored a film and a book about the incident but both were confiscated by Russian authorities.
    A human rights activist, Veniamin Ioffe, who tried to show the film in St Petersburg was beaten up and later died.
    In 2002 several liberals, including the MPs Ivan Rybakin and Sergei Yushenkov, set up a citizens' commission to investigate the bombings.
    On April 17 last year, Mr Yushenkov was shot dead outside his home. In July, another MP and commission member died mysteriously after alleged food poisoning. A third commission member was beaten unconscious in the lift of his building.
    Last December, Mr Rybakin lost his seat in the State Duma. He has now all but given up on the investigation.
    "The men behind this were definitely FSB employees," he told the Telegraph. "Whether they got their orders from the very top, or were a criminal grouping inside the organisation, is impossible to say.
    "Since they are guarding this so carefully I am afraid there is something really horrible there. As for Putin, its possible he didn't know at the time. But he certainly knows the truth now, better than anyone."
    Tatyana said: "We still don't know who is guilty. We probably never will. Life is hard here and after a while we stopped asking. I'm sorry to say it, but that's the Russian way."

  • Bipartisan Bonesmen
    March 8, 2004
    by William F. Jasper
    http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/2004/03-08-2004/bonesmen.htm
    The two leading contenders for the U.S. presidency are both members of Skull and Bones, one of the oldest secret societies in America. Why is this not a major election-year issue?

    Mr. Russert: You both were members of Skull and Bones, a secret society at Yale. What does that tell us?
    Senator Kerry: Not much, because it’s a secret.
    — Meet the Press, August 31, 2003
    Mr. Russert: You were both in Skull and Bones, the secret society.
    President Bush: It’s so secret we can’t talk about it.
    — Meet the Press, Taped on February 7, 2004

    Every politician, it is said, has skeletons in his closet, but this is ridiculous. In the cases of President George W. Bush and Senator John F. Kerry (D-Mass.), we have two politicos whose careers, literally, were launched in a crypt full of skeletons. The crypt we refer to is the hulking mausoleum on the Yale campus that houses The Order of the Skull and Bones, the infamous, occultic fraternity that both men joined in the 1960s during their senior year at the university. Both Bush and Kerry have been asked in recent interviews about their membership in this very old, super-secret club. Each has waved off the question with a laugh and refused to say anything further on the matter. And the Establishment media have politely dropped the subject.
    For the first time in history the race for the U.S. presidency is shaping up to be completely a "Bonesman" affair. What are the odds that out of a population of nearly 300 million the two front-runners for the most powerful political office in the world would be "brothers" in a super-elite, secret society that numbers probably fewer than 800 living members? The odds are even slimmer than that, since only a handful of that already minuscule number actually hold political office and would, therefore, be potential candidates. Nevertheless, a pair of Bonesmen are poised to carry the Republican and Democrat banners in the forthcoming quadrennial contest. We’ll leave the statistical computing to the mathematicians, but it’s obvious even to those of us who are mathematically challenged that the Bush-Kerry match-up in the current White House run is a bizarre "coincidence" that strains the laws of probability.
    Why So Secret?
    In his autobiography, A Charge to Keep, then-Governor Bush disposed of his membership in the furtive Yale society with a single sentence. "My senior year I joined Skull and Bones," wrote Bush, "a secret society, so secret I can’t say anything more."
    He dealt with the issue similarly in a February 7, 2004 Oval Office interview that aired the next day on NBC’s Meet the Press. NBC’s interviewer, Tim Russert, broached the topic, noting that Senator Kerry is also a member of The Order. The very brief exchange that ensued may be more revealing than a voluble response would have been. Here’s the text:
    Russert: "You were both in Skull and Bones, the secret society."
    President Bush: "It’s so secret we can’t talk about it."
    Russert: "What does that mean for America? The conspiracy theorists are going to go wild."
    President Bush: "I’m sure they are. I don’t know. I haven’t seen Web pages yet." (Laughs)
    Mr. Russert then said: "Number 322." President Bush ignored Russert’s reference to the Bonesmen’s secret code number and went in another direction, noting that Kerry has not yet been selected as the Democrats’ candidate. Those familiar with Skull and Bones (S&B) know that "322" is the room number of the initiation room — the sanctum sanctorum or "holy of holies" — in the organization’s forbidding structure on the Yale campus. That structure is commonly known to insiders and outsiders alike as "the Tomb," but is also referred to by members as "the Temple." The "322" also refers to the society itself; it is "Chapter 322" of an older German secret society.
     
    Secrets of the Crypt: This mausoleum-style building known as the "Crypt"serves as the Yale campus headquarters of the Order of Skull & Bones. The Order is an offshoot of an immensely powerful German secret society. For more than a century and half, the Crypt has been an incubator for fledgling members of the American Power Elite--including both President George W. Bush and likely Democratic nominee John Kerry.
    However, when the president evaded the question, Mr. Russert, who has displayed a dogged persistence in other interviews (indeed, he had shown some of the same pointed tenacity in his earlier questions for the president), conspicuously dropped that line of questioning and accommodated Mr. Bush with cream-puff questions that allowed scripted responses about the president’s vision and leadership.
    Likewise, Senator Kerry has been given a free pass on his S&B membership. On August 31 of last year, Kerry was asked on Meet the Press: "You both were members of Skull and Bones, a secret society at Yale. What does that tell us?" His response: "Not much, because it’s a secret."
    The Mafia has its infamous oath of omerta (silence), by which initiates vow never to reveal any secrets of their criminal enterprise. The slightest violation, or suspicion of violation, of this oath can earn one a death sentence. We have no proof that Skull and Bones enforces its equivalent of omerta with similarly severe means, but there is no question that Bonesmen take it very seriously; members are instructed never to mention or discuss S&B with any "barbarian," which means all the rest of us outsiders — including Bonesmen’s own spouses and biological family members. If barbarians ever broach the subject in their presence, Bonesmen are instructed to turn on their heels immediately and leave.
    This kind of secrecy by men in positions of power should be a natural magnet to investigative reporters and members of the Fourth Estate who posture as the watchdogs of our political system. But it would seem that our media mavens, who insist on prying into every other private crevice of politicians’ lives, have a curious lack of curiosity when it comes to The Order. Like NBC’s Russert, the denizens of the controlled elite media tend to laugh off the S&B connection as something that would only concern paranoid "conspiracy theorists." Thus, Elizabeth Bumiller began her February 2 New York Times column on the Bonesmen election race with this opening line: "It will be a field day for conspiracy theorists."
    Bones of Contention
    After noting that a Kerry-Bush race would be "the first skull-to-skull match-up of Bonesmen in history," the Times’ Bumiller asks: "Does this mean anything at all?"
    What it means, the Times would have us believe, is that we will be fortunate if either of these elite Bonesmen helms our ship of state. "Historically, Yale’s best and brightest — only 15 a year — were tapped for Skull and Bones," an approving Bumiller tells her readers. "The larger question is whether Skull and Bones inculcated values of leadership … in Mr. Kerry and Mr. Bush, beyond what was already driven home by Yale." Then she follows a familiar pattern of quoting sympathetic sources who extol S&B as a training ground that transforms callow, shallow youth into men of caliber dedicated to higher purpose and the public good.
    Bumiller continues:
    Skull and Bones has, after all, a particularly illustrious alumni roster: two previous presidents (Mr. Bush’s father and William Howard Taft), Averell Harriman, McGeorge Bundy, Henry Luce, Potter Stewart, the writer John Hersey and numerous officials in the Central Intelligence Agency, a traditional career path for Bonesmen.
    U.S. presidents, Supreme Court justices, senators, governors, university presidents, foundation presidents, business titans, banking barons, media moguls, CIA spooks. S&B’s history indicates that it has long been a prime recruiting ground where candidates are "tapped" and groomed for future service to The Order. The organization uses its connections to advance its members into positions of power and influence to an inordinate degree. In addition to its high-profile members in government service, Skull and Bones is intimately tied to semi-secret globalist organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderbergers, which have so come to dominate U.S. political and economic policy as to constitute a separate American government. Bonesmen have played prominent roles in leading these groups for the past several generations.
    Yes, The Order boasts a membership roll that elicits oohs and ahs. Speaking of ahs, the most widely quoted so-called critic of the S&B likens the secret group to the beneficent and mysterious Wizard of Oz. In her highly praised 2002 "exposé," Secrets of the Tomb, Alexandra Robbins writes: "If the Wizard of Oz can represent Skull and Bones, then one must point out that, for a while, Oz needed its Wizard to provide balance and a constant current of reassurance." (Emphasis in the original.) You see, according to Robbins, we silly little Munchkin mortals need the paternalistic ministrations of The Order’s superior Wizards.
    Alexandra Robbins has been much quoted and interviewed as a leading authority on S&B. Her book’s first chapter, "The Legend of Skull and Bones," begins with this description:
    Sometime in the early 1830s, a Yale student named William H. Russell — the future valedictorian of the class of 1833 — traveled to Germany to study for a year. Russell came from an inordinately wealthy family that ran one of America’s most despicable business organizations of the nineteenth century: Russell and Company, an opium empire.... While in Germany, Russell befriended the leader of an insidious German secret society that hailed the death’s head as its logo. Russell soon became caught up in this group, itself a sinister outgrowth of the notorious eighteenth-century society the Illuminati.
    According to Robbins, this is all lurid legend, much of it invented and spread by the Bonesmen themselves to enhance the sense of mystery and importance surrounding Skull and Bones. Ms. Robbins’ opening chapter combines descriptions of The Order’s bizarre initiation rituals with stories and rumors of the group’s wealth and power in a way calculated to discredit the most serious concerns about the group. Sure, it’s the ultimate "old boys network," with lots of juvenile mumbo-jumbo, but nothing to get worked up over.
    Truth Behind the "Legend"
    Much of what Robbins disingenuously dismisses as legend is verifiable fact, and much else is very probably fact, based on what can be determined from available evidence. Skull and Bones founder William H. Russell did indeed come from a wealthy opium-empire family. He did found S&B at Yale after spending 1831-32 studying in Germany. From S&B’s own documents, it seems that The Order may be but a U.S. chapter of a German secret society. And it is quite possible that the German society was (is) directly connected to the infamous Order of the Illuminati, which was founded in Germany in 1776. The Illuminati, which played a central role in the French Revolution and in spreading subversion and revolution throughout Europe, actually sent agents to the United States to overthrow our republic while it was still in its infancy. In a 1798 letter to Rev. G. W. Snyder, President George Washington acknowledged that these agents were then active here, spreading the Illuminati’s "diabolical tenets."*
    That same year, 1798, Yale President Timothy Dwight warned that the Illuminati’s conspiratorial schemes "strike at the root of all human happiness and virtue … [seeking] the overthrow of religion, government, and human society civil and domestic." These conspirators, said Dwight, are so committed to their evil ends "that murder, butchery, and war, however extended and dreadful, are declared by them to be completely justifiable, if necessary for these great purposes."
    A few years later, in 1805, John Wood, a prominent political writer, surveyor and cartographer, wrote an important work entitled A Full Exposition of the Clintonian Faction, Society of the Columbian Illuminati. Mr. Wood’s exposé provided evidence that a number of prominent American individuals, including New York Governor DeWitt Clinton, were members of Illuminati lodges that had been established in this country.
    So, it is not at all outlandish to suppose that there could have been a direct Illuminati link with the S&B founding, especially since the Illuminati and its subsidiaries were very active in Germany at the time Mr. Russell attended school there. The initiation methods of the Order of the Skull and Bones also closely parallel those of the Order of the Illuminati. Robbins’ book records that S&B initiates must engage in self-criticism and group criticism sessions that are so harrowing that some initiates have near nervous breakdowns. Author and Bones watcher Ron Rosenbaum has written that this self-abasement includes lying in a coffin naked and revealing one’s entire sexual history.
    Ultimately, this "group therapy" helps bind the Bonesmen more closely than family. Robbins notes: "Eventually a member’s self-perception is so intertwined with his secret-society identity … that if he were to betray or leave Skull and Bones, he would lose what has become a major part of the way that he identifies himself."
    If one reads the Illuminati’s initiation rites and the diabolical purpose for them, as described by Illuminati founder Adam Weishaupt, the similarity to the Bonesmen’s experience is striking. The purpose, according to Weishaupt, was not only to psychologically strip each initiate and create a powerful group identity through this shared experience; it also served an equally important objective of learning the weaknesses of each individual and any crimes or deeds of which he might be ashamed, for possible blackmail use in the future, should he decide to oppose or expose The Order. These same techniques were adopted and perfected by the Communists, and are used to varying degrees by the Mafia and other criminal conspiracies to maintain ironclad control over their members.
    Secret societies are always inimical to a free society. It is impossible to judge whether elected and appointed officials are truly acting as public servants or are serving an agenda of hidden confederates, if membership in secret societies is permitted or winked at. Our constitutional republic is meant to function in an atmosphere of openness and transparency; it will not long survive if we allow those who fashion policies and legislation to operate in the shadowy corridors and chambers of secret societies. Members of Skull and Bones have occupied (and do today occupy) some of the most powerful positions in American public and private institutions. We should not allow the membership in this organization to be lightly dismissed, especially when it comes to candidates for the highest office in the land.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    * Washington’s letter to Rev. Snyder appears in Volume 36 of The Writings of George Washington (U.S. Government Printing Office) and pertains to an important book on the Illuminati, entitled Proofs of a Conspiracy, by a distinguished Scottish professor, John Robison. Washington shared Robison’s alarm over the dangers posed by this nefarious sect. At the same time as Robison, but working completely independently, Abbe Augustin Barruel authored an even more detailed indictment of the Illuminati, entitled Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism. Both of these important works are now back in print and can be obtained from www.aobs-store.com/conspiracy/ (click on "additional books" for ordering information on Memoirs).
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Who Knew Whom, and When?
    by William F. Jasper
    Did John Kerry (Bones 1966) and George W. Bush (Bones 1968) know each other at Yale? Kerry says they did while Bush says they didn’t. But neither will talk about Skull and Bones.
    In his televised February 9 White House interview with George W. Bush, Tim Russert quoted a derogatory statement by Senator John Kerry concerning President Bush’s "lack of knowledge" and the heavy image management by the president’s handlers. Kerry’s quote ended with this gibe at Bush: "I know this guy. He was two years behind me at Yale. I knew him, and he’s still the same guy."
    After reading this quote Russert asked the president: "Did you know him at Yale?"
    President Bush responded with a single word: "No."
    It could be, of course, that Mr. Kerry is lying (or is the victim of a faulty memory) about knowing Mr. Bush at Yale. The New York Times’ Elizabeth Bumiller treats their acquaintance at Yale as a matter of fact. "Did Mr. Kerry, class of ’66, and Mr. Bush, class of ’68, know each other at Yale?" she asks in her February 2 column. "More to the point, did they ever participate together in a Skull and Bones rite in the club’s windowless crypt?" "The answer to the first question," she writes, "is yes, and the answer to the second question is no, at least not as far as anyone knows or admits." She does not reveal the provenance of her information; perhaps it was the same Kerry quote mentioned above, perhaps other sources, possibly a resident Bonesman at the Times.
    Bumiller then quotes an interesting statement from David Wade, Senator Kerry’s spokesman. "Rest assured," said Mr. Wade, "there are no pictures of them dancing together naked," a reference to S&B rituals of dancing and mud-wrestling naked. Note, he didn’t say that such casual perversion didn’t occur, just that there were no photos of such an event.
    Based on what we know of the exclusive culture of Yale and the far more exclusive (and intimate!) S&B culture, Mr. Kerry’s statement is more plausible than Mr. Bush’s. The Order is closely integrated horizontally and vertically and it would seem highly unlikely that their paths would not have crossed. Did the president lie about this? If so, why? Was Kerry invited to the hush-hush Skull and Bones reunion that President Bush hosted at the White House in 2001? Which Bonesmen attended this ultra-exclusive soiree? These are fair questions that demand answers.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Bush-Bones Doctrine: "Deny Everything"
    "There’s three things to remember: claim everything, explain nothing, deny everything."
    — Senator Prescott Bush (Bones 1917)
    The Bush family patriarch made the above statement in a 1966 interview for Columbia University’s oral history project on the Eisenhower administration. Prescott Bush said that political dictum had been explained to him by Claire Boothe Luce, congresswoman, ambassador and wife of Time-Life media magnate Henry Luce (Bones 1920).

  • Pin Heads
    Friday, Mar. 12, 2004.
    By Chris Floyd
    Yuricareport.com
    One of the sticking points in crafting the just-signed "interim constitution" of the Pentagon cash cow formerly known as Iraq was the question of acknowledging Islam as the fundamental source of law. After much wrangling, a fudge was worked out that cites the Koran as a fundamental source of legal authority, with the proviso that no law can be passed that conflicts with Islam.
    We in the enlightened West smile at such theocratic quibbling, of course: Imagine, national leaders insisting that a modern state be governed solely by divine authority! Governments guaranteeing the right of religious extremists to impose their views on society! What next -- debates about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin? Oh, those poor, ignorant barbarians in Babylon!
    Well, wipe that smile off your face. For even now, the ignorant barbarians in Washington are pushing a law through Congress that would "acknowledge God as the sovereign source of law, liberty [and] government" in the United States. What's more, it would forbid all legal challenges to government officials who use the power of the state to enforce their own view of "God's sovereign authority." Any judge who dared even hear such a challenge could be removed from office.
    The "Constitution Restoration Act of 2004" is no joke; it was introduced last month by some of the Bush Regime's most powerful Congressional sycophants. If enacted, it will effectively transform the American republic into a theocracy, where the arbitrary dictates of a "higher power" -- as interpreted by a judge, policeman, bureaucrat or president -- can override the rule of law.
    The Act -- drafted by a minion of television evangelist Pat Robertson -- is the fruit of decades of work by a group of extremists known broadly as "Dominionists." Their openly expressed aim is to establish "biblical rule" over every aspect of society -- placing "the state, the school, the arts and sciences, law, economics, and every other sphere under Christ the King." Or as Attorney General John Ashcroft -- the nation's chief law enforcement officer -- has often proclaimed: "America has no king but Jesus!"
    According to Dominionist literature, "biblical rule" means execution -- preferably by stoning -- of homosexuals and other "revelers in licentiousness"; massive tax cuts for the rich (because "wealth is a mark of God's favor"); the elimination of government programs to alleviate poverty and sickness (because these depend on "confiscation of wealth"); and enslavement for debtors. No legal challenges to "God's order" will be allowed. And because this order is divinely ordained, the "elect" can use any means necessary to establish it, including deception, subversion, even violence. As Robertson himself adjures the faithful: "Zealous men force their way in."
    Again, this is no tiny band of cranks meeting in some basement in Alabama, as recent reports by investigators Karen Yurica and David Neiwert make clear. The Dominionists are bankrolled and directed by deep-pocketed, well-connected business moguls and political operatives who have engineered a takeover of the Republican Party and are now at the heart of the U.S. government. They've made common cause with the "American Empire" faction -- Cheney, Rumsfeld, the neo-conservatives -- who seek "full-spectrum dominance" over the globe. The Dominionists provide money and domestic political muscle for the Dominators' imperial ambitions; in return, the Dominators provide a practical vehicle -- overwhelming military might and state power -- for making the Dominionists' dreams a reality.
    The Dominionist movement was founded by the late R.J. Rushdoony, a busy beaver who also co-founded the Council for National Policy. The CNP is the politburo of the American conservative movement, filled with top-rank political and business leaders who set the national agenda for the vast echo chamber of right-wing foundations, publishers, media networks and universities that have schooled a whole generation in obscurantist bile -- just as the extremist Wahabbi religious schools funded by Saudi billionaires have poisoned the Islamic world with hatred and ignorance.
    One of the chief moneybags behind the rise of Dominionism was tycoon Harold Ahmanson, Rushdoony's protege and fellow CNP member. In addition to establishing theocracy in America, Ahmanson has another abiding interest: computerized voting machines. As reported here last year, Ahmanson, a fervent Bush backer, was instrumental in establishing two of the Republican-controlled companies now rushing to install their highly hackable machines -- with untraceable, unrecountable electronic ballots -- across the country in time for the November election.
    The Dominionists also have strong backing on the Supreme Court, Yurica notes. Justice Antonin Scalia, author of the unconstitutional ruling that gave Bush the presidency, declared in the theological journal First Things that the state derives its moral authority from God, not the "consent of the governed," as that old licentious reveler Thomas Jefferson held in the Declaration of Independence. No, government "is the 'minister of God' with powers to 'revenge,' to 'execute wrath,' including even wrath by the sword," Scalia wrote. He railed against the "tendency of democracy to obscure the divine authority behind government."
    Meanwhile, the tools of dominion keep expanding. Just days after the Congressional Bushists launched their theocratic missile, General Ralph Eberhart, head of America's first domestic military command, said the Regime must now bring the experience learned on foreign battlefields to the "Homeland" itself, including the integration of police, military and intelligence forces, "wide-area surveillance of the United States" and "urban warfare tactics," GovExec.com reports.
    Put this juggernaut at the service of democracy-hating extremists with no legal restraints on their enforcement of "God's sovereign authority" -- plus a proven track record of subverting the law to gain political power -- and what would you have? A mullah state? A military theocracy?
    Or should we just call it "a second term"?

  • `Religious Liberties Restoration Act'.
    A BILL
    To restore religious freedoms.
    Congress finds the following:
    (1) The Declaration of Independence declares that governments are instituted to secure certain unalienable rights, including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, with which all human beings are endowed by their Creator and to which they are entitled by the laws of nature and of nature's God.
    (2) The organic laws of the United States Code and the constitutions of every State, using various expressions, recognize God as the source of the blessings of liberty.
    (3) The first amendment to the Constitution secures rights against laws respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof made by the Federal Government.
    (4) The rights secured under the first amendment have been interpreted by the Federal courts to be included among the provisions of the 14th amendment.
    (5) The 10th amendment reserves to the States, respectively, the powers not delegated to the Federal Government nor prohibited to the States.
    (6) Disputes and doubts have arisen with respect to public displays of the Ten Commandments and to other public expression of religious faith.
    (7) Section 5 of the 14th amendment grants Congress the power to enforce the provisions of the 14th amendment.
    (8) Article III, section 2 of the Constitution grants Congress the authority to except certain matters from the jurisdiction of the Federal courts inferior to the Supreme Court.
    SEC. 3. RELIGIOUS LIBERTY RIGHTS DECLARED.
    (a) DISPLAY OF TEN COMMANDMENTS- The power to display the Ten Commandments on or within property owned or administered by the several States or political subdivisions of such States is among the powers reserved to the States, respectively.
    (b) WORD `GOD' IN PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE- The power to recite the Pledge of Allegiance on or within property owned or administered by the several States or political subdivisions of such States is among the powers reserved to the States, respectively. The Pledge of Allegiance shall be, `I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with Liberty and justice for all.'.
    (c) MOTTO `IN GOD WE TRUST'- The power to recite the national motto on or within property owned or administered by the several States or political subdivisions of such States is among the powers reserved to the States, respectively. The national motto shall be, `In God we trust'.
    (d) EXERCISE OF CONGRESSIONAL POWER TO EXCEPT- The subject matter of subsections (a), (b), and (c) are excepted from the jurisdiction of Federal courts inferior to the Supreme Court.
    END

  • AL QAEDA GROUP CLAIMS MADRID BOMBINGS
    Friday March 12, 2004
    A group claiming to be acting in the name of al Qaeda says it was behind yesterday's devastating Madrid train bombings, which killed at least 192 people and injured 1,200 others.
    An email to the London-based Al-Quds Al-Arabi newspaper said the Brigade of Abu Hafs al-Masri was responsible for the worst terrorist attack on a European city since the second world war.
    It also warned that a "big attack" on the US was "90% ready".
    "The death squad (of the Abu Hafs Al-Masri Brigades) succeeded in penetrating the crusader European depths and striking one of the pillars of the crusader alliance - Spain - with a painful blow," the email said.
    "We bring the good news to Muslims of the world that the expected 'Winds of Black Death' strike against America is now in its final stage...90 % (ready) and God willing near. "
    Bari Atwan, the newspaper's editor, told Sky News he was certain the claim was authentic.
    It comes after investigators found an Arabic language tape with Koranic verses in a van carrying bomb detonators near Madrid.
    The letter and the discovery of the van may throw into doubt the Spanish government's claim that the Basque separatist group Eta - rather than al Qaeda - was behind the multiple bombings.
    Spain's interior minister Angel Acebes said: "Because of this, I have just given instructions to the security forces not to rule out any line of investigation."
    But he stressed Eta was the main suspect.
    Ten bombs went off in a devastating wave of attacks on trains passing three different railway stations at the height of the Madrid's rush-hour.
    The government said the bombs were probably set off by remote control at 4-5 minute intervals starting at 6.30am GMT.
    It said the bombs were made of a form of dynamite previously used by Eta.
    But earlier, the leader of Eta's banned political wing Batasuna blamed the blasts on "Arab resistance". Arnaldo Otegi said he "refused to believe" Eta was responsible.
    And the scale of the attack, absence of a phone warning and lack of any claim of responsibility prompted speculation that al Qaeda was responsible.
    Eta's worst previous atrocity killed 21 people in a bomb attack on a Barcelona supermarket in 1987.
    Osama bin Laden has threatened nations who suppported the US-led war in Iraq, including Spain.
    In an audiotape released in October, a voice purported to be Osama bin Laden said: "We reserve the right to respond at the appropriate time and place against all the countries participating in this unjust war, particularly Britain, Spain, Australia, Poland, Japan and Italy."
    Spanish prime minister Jose Maria Aznar declared three days of mourning and told the nation he would bring the "mass murderers" to justice.
    Mr Aznar vowed to go ahead with a scheduled general election on Sunday, although political parties have suspended campaigning.
    US President George Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair condemned the attacks, saying they underlined the need for international co-operation to fight global terror.
      
     
  • Britain, US and Spain accused of plotting coup
    Harare
    March 12, 2004
    http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/03/11/1078594497129.html
    Zimbabwe has accused Britain, the US and Spain of plotting a coup in the oil-rich African nation of Equatorial Guinea and threatened 67 alleged mercenaries arrested at Harare airport with the death penalty.
    Kembo Mohadi, Zimbabwe's Home Affairs Minister, claimed that Simon Mann, the British leader of the group and a former member of the SAS, confessed under questioning to a plan to oust President Teodoro Obiang Nguema of Equatorial Guinea.
    The leader of the small west African state was in no doubt that the arrested men were preparing to oust him and said South African President Thabo Mbeki had warned him that mercenaries were heading to his country.

  • Venezuela Leader Vows War If US Invades
    Herald Sun
    3-9-4
    CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) -- President Hugo Chavez on Sunday vowed to freeze oil exports to the United States and wage a "100-year war" if Washington ever tried to invade Venezuela.
    The United States has repeatedly denied ever trying to overthrow Chavez, but the leftist leader accuses Washington of being behind a failed 2002 coup and of funding opposition groups seeking a recall referendum on his presidency.
    Chavez accused the United States of ousting former Haitian President Jean-Bertrand Aristide and warned Washington not to "even think about trying something similar in Venezuela."
    Venezuela "has enough allies on this continent to start a 100-year war," Chavez said during his weekly television show.
    He added that "U.S. citizens could forget about ever getting Venezuelan oil" if the United States ever tried to invade.
    Venezuela provides about 15 percent of U.S. oil imports, but relations between the two countries are rocky over Chavez's friendship with Cuban President Fidel Castro, his criticism of U.S.-led negotiations for a free trade zone in the Americas and his opposition to the war in Iraq.
    The United States was slow to condemn the 2002 coup, initially accusing Chavez of provoking his own downfall.
    Chavez has increasingly railed against U.S. meddling in Venezuelan affairs as his opponents step up protests to demand the recall vote.
    On Saturday, at least 500,000 Venezuelans marched in Caracas to protest the National Elections Council's ruling last week that an opposition petition for the recall vote lacked enough valid signatures. Opponents turned in more than 3 million signatures Dec. 19, but the council ruled only 1.8 million were valid. The council ordered more than 1 million citizens to confirm they signed and rejected more than 140,000 signatures outright.
    Rioting over the decision killed eight people and hurt scores more. The violence subsided after the Organization of American States and the U.S.-based Carter Center pledged to help give citizens a fair chance to prove they signed.
    Venezuela is deeply divided between those who fear Chavez is trying to impose Cuba-style socialism and those who say he has given an unprecedented political voice to the impoverished majority.
    Chavez insists the recall petition is fraud-ridden. He claims many signatures belong to dead people, minors and foreigners.
    On Sunday, Chavez promised his government would investigate the deaths and injuries from last week's violence. Opposition leaders accuse National Guard troops of committing abuses while trying to keep rock-throwing protesters from blocking roads with burning tires. Chavez accuses his opponents of instigating chaos.
    "The government is investigating all the acts of violence and especially those in which people died," Chavez said. "Violence only takes place when a group of the opposition leaders decide there will be violence."


  • U.S. Bunker-Buster Program More Robust Than Expected
    Wednesday, March 10, 2004
    Global Security Newswire
    WASHINGTON — A Bush administration program to study a controversial new earth-penetrating nuclear weapon is much more ambitious than previously indicated, according to a congressional analysis released Monday (see GSN, Jan. 23).
    A report by the Congressional Research Service says the Energy Department’s Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator (RNEP) program is projected to proceed beyond the study phase and cost as much as $485 million over the next five years.
    Senior administration officials previously tried to dismiss criticism of the program by saying it only involves a three-year study projected to cost just $45 million.
    The program “is a study. It is nothing more and nothing less,” said Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld during a May 2003 press briefing.
    The congressional analysis of the Energy Department’s fiscal 2005 budget request documents says the study is now projected to run four years, from fiscal 2003 to 2006, and cost $71 million between those years.
    Furthermore, the budget documents project $484.7 million in program costs through fiscal 2009 with post-study development work, for which specific congressional approval is required.
    The Energy request “seems to cast serious doubt on assertions that RNEP is only a study,” says the report, authored by analyst Jonathan Medalia.
    The program is controversial, with congressional critics charging that U.S. interest in new nuclear weapons capabilities undermines efforts to persuade other countries to forgo nuclear weapons and raises questions about an international commitment the United States made in 2000 to move toward eventual disarmament.
    A manager for the Energy Department’s National Nuclear Security Administration, the CRS report says, dismissed the budget projection as a “placeholder” to protect the option of proceeding with the program for avoiding any future delay in funding. The official said no decision had been made on whether to proceed beyond the study phase.
    Congress appropriated $15 million for the study in fiscal 2003 and $7.5 million in fiscal 2004, following criticism by congressional Democrats. The administration is seeking $27.6 million for next year and is planning to extend the study through fiscal 2006.
    NNSA attributed the increases to the need for an additional participant in the study, additional project management requirements, better definition of the study’s requirements and costs and an increase in safety of the proposed weapon.

  • 5.5 Nevada Quake Not Reported by USGS - Why?
    12-25-03
    rense.com
    It is posted here:
    http://www.gfz-potsdam.de/geofon/alerts/ev031223182946/
    Region: Nevada
    Magnitude: 5.5
    Origin time: 2003/12/23 18:17:43 UTC
    Longitude: 118.7°W
    Latitude: 40.9°N
    Focal depth: n.d.
    LocSAT solution (with start solution, 5 stations used, weigth 9):
    NEVADA mb=5.5 2003/12/23 18:17:43 40.9 N 118.7 W
    Stat Net Date Time Amp Per Res Dist Az mb ML
    MOX GR 03/12/23 18:29:46.9 246.4 2.9 -0.3 79.0 324.0 5.7 0.0
    NKC CZ 03/12/23 18:29:50.6 94.1 2.0 -0.1 79.7 324.6 5.4 0.0
    GRFO GR 03/12/23 18:29:51.2 92.9 1.5 0.6 79.6 323.8 5.5 0.0
    SUW GE 03/12/23 18:29:52.3 59.5 1.2 0.1 80.0 331.7 5.4 0.0
    WET GR 03/12/23 18:29:56.2 303.4 4.1 -0.2 80.7 325.0 5.7 0.0
    But it does NOT show on the USGS Site:
    http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/bulletin.html
    2003/12/23 23:54:48 26.38N 125.92E 33.0 4.9 NORTHEAST OF TAIWAN
    2003/12/23 23:15:27 26.27N 125.63E 33.0 5.6 NORTHEAST OF TAIWAN
    2003/12/23 23:01:15 26.28N 125.68E 33.0 5.3 NORTHEAST OF TAIWAN
    2003/12/23 18:17:11 35.65N 121.04W 6.9 4.9 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
    2003/12/23 15:37:23 13.06N 88.45W 33.0 4.7 EL SALVADOR
    2003/12/23 14:02:03 40.03N 29.62W 10.0 5.6 AZORES ISLANDS REGION


  • The Case Of The Missing Wyoming Earthquake
    Underground Hiroshima-Sized Blast Called 'Mine Blast' By USGS
    From Craig DeMott
    3-8-4
    Rumor Mill News
    Posted By Esclarmonde
    It wasn't the first (such event). Indeed, there was a pattern of quakes at this general East Central Wyoming, most in the area of 2-3 Magnitude. But this was the largest one at 5.3. When we went looking for it, we noticed that it was being picked up by a Seismograph in South Dakota, which seemed to be registering some sort of rather pointed activity nearly every other day at the same general timeslot. Indeed, there is one showing up yesterday at nearly EXACTLY the same time as the original quake at 19:03
    http://mbmgquake.mtech.edu/earthworm/wavef_
    disp/RSSD_SPZ_US.2004030500.gif
    THE COVER UP
    When the 5.3 showed up, Mitch Battros got involved. What he did not know at the time was that the 5.3 EQ had INDEED been read by the USGS and the European site he found it on, had actually linked directly to that very USGS report.
    2004/02/06 19:03:33.3 43.5N 105.1W 264 mb5.3 A NEIA WYOMING
    There is now a great coverup underway to presume this did not happen. (the quake has since been deleted from the official European seismologicial site.) I SAW the linked report with my own two eyes. At the time, I had no idea how important it would become and I did not save it.
    Those ignorant voices that presume to 'cover it up' at this juncture are saying it was only picked up by a Seismo in France. Well, think about it: How big does a quake have to be to be picked up by a Seismo in France? Duh...
    The renowned Syzygy Geologist himself, Jim Berkland, became sufficiently curious to at least comment on the quake's potentiality. From the Syzygy Phenom Board:
    "How's this for a rumor? The 5.3M was not officially recorded in this country except as a "mine blast". That would have been stronger than the Hiroshima Nuclear bomb. Perhaps it was a transposed 3.5M for February 7, 2004? What Mine? I have heard that the area in eastern Wyoming is close to some property owned by Vice President Cheney.
    Then, a week later a 3.5M "earthquake" was officially recorded in the same area.
    Is it possible that we are looking at blasts being used to hollow out a military (or civilian) underground shelter? If circular chambers are used for the explosions, much of the energy stays inside. (This was the way we tried to mislead the Soviets about our tests during the Cold War.)
    Intriguing?
    job (Jim Berkland) "
    Shortly after Mitch Battros got involved, something strange happened: The most prestigious of Navy educated Scientists, Tom Bearden, jumped right into the middle of it with his Scalar Technology. Everyone began pointing fingers at RUSSIA!
    [Here is a link to his article. He posts Mitch Battros' article at bottom. You might want to come back to this later for backup info. It is posted here for your convenience:
    http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/020804.htm
    But Mitch had actually written to the USGS and asked for an an answer. What happened next boggles the mind. Here is the full text of his next post to the world:
    USGS Answers Probe to Yellowstone Area Quake 02/11/04
    by Mitch Battros (ECTV)
    I have now received an official response to the reported 5.3 earthquake in Wyoming. The response comes from Pam Benfield of the USGS/NEIC office.
    Here is her unedited response:
    (Pam Benfield, USGS - Denver)
    "This event was an unchecked, fully automatic location that our system located and distributed. When reviewed by our geophysicists, it was determined that this event was a mine blast and deleted since it was not a seismic event. The event should have been deleted from the EMSC site as well. I would recommend that in the future you use the site of the Wyoming State Geological Survey to check for events against the EMSC site."

  • 300 Wyoming Elk Dead After Baffling Paralysis
    http://www.earthfiles.com/news/news.cfm?ID=679&category=Environment
    March 9, 2004 Cheyenne, Wyoming
    Fifteen miles south of Rawlins, Wyoming, in a 50-square-mile area
    owned and managed by the Wyoming Game and Fish Department (WGFD)
    300 elk have been disabled by baffling paralysis and subsequently euthanized by the WGFD.

  • The Pentagon's Secret Scream
    Sonic devices that can inflict pain--or even permanent deafness--are being deployed
    Los Angeles Times | March 8 2004
    SOUTH POMFRET, Vt. - Marines arriving in Iraq this month as part of a massive troop rotation will bring with them a high-tech weapon never before used in combat - or in peacekeeping. The device is a powerful megaphone the size of a satellite dish that can deliver recorded warnings in Arabic and, on command, emit a piercing tone so excruciating to humans, its boosters say, that it causes crowds to disperse, clears buildings and repels intruders.
    "[For] most people, even if they plug their ears, [the device] will produce the equivalent of an instant migraine," says Woody Norris, chairman of American Technology Corp., the San Diego firm that produces the weapon. "It will knock [some people] on their knees."
    American Technology says its new product "is designed to determine intent, change behavior and support various rules of engagement." The company is careful in its public relations not to refer to the megaphone as a weapon, or to dwell on the debilitating pain American forces will be able to deliver with it. The military has been equally reticent on the subject.
    And that's a problem. The new sound weapon might, in some scenarios, save lives. It might provide a good alternative to lethal force in riot situations, as its proponents assert. But the U.S. is making a huge mistake by trying to quietly deploy a new pain-inducing weapon without first airing all of the legal, policy and human rights issues associated with it.
    This is a weapon unlike any other used by the military, and it is certain to provoke public outcry and the conspiracy theories that often greet new U.S. military technology. If the military feels that its new-style weaponry brings something important to the battlefield, and if testing has shown it to be safe, then why not make our reasoning - and research - transparent to the world?
    Nonlethal weapons have been promoted by a small circle of boosters for nearly 15 years as something increasingly necessary for the U.S. military in its growing peacekeeping, urban-combat and force-protection missions. Some of the weaponry championed by the group, like rubber bullets, flash-bang grenades and, more recently, electromuscular disruptive devices, or Tasers, has already been deployed.
    But the more exotic weapons - including acoustic, laser, and high-powered microwave devices - have not until now been fielded, held up by legal and ethical questions. Despite intense lobbying, over the years the Pentagon leadership has been skeptical of such "wonder weapons." In 1995, then-Secretary of Defense William Perry decided to ban Pentagon development of nonlethal laser weapons intended to permanently blind. His decision led to a subsequent international ban.
    So shouldn't we have a similar discussion about high-intensity sound, which can cause permanent hearing loss or even cellular damage? The new megaphone being deployed to Iraq can operate at 145 decibels at 300 yards, according to American Technology, well above the normal threshold for pain. The company posits a scenario in which Al Qaeda terrorists would run screaming from caves after being subjected to a blast of high-decibel sound from the devices, their hands covering their ears. But in Baghdad or other Iraqi towns, where there are crowds and buildings, the sick and elderly, as well as children, are likely to be in the weapon's range.
    Proponents of nonlethal weapons argue that pain and hearing loss, if they were to occur, are certainly preferable to death, which is always possible when lethal force is applied. But this argument ignores realities on the ground. Last week, as I watched televised images of angry Iraqis pelting U.S. soldiers with rocks when they arrived to assist those injured in suicide bombings at mosques, I couldn't help but wonder whether the presence of a sound weapon to disperse those crowds would just escalate hostilities.
    Last month, the Council on Foreign Relations issued a task force report on nonlethal weapons, arguing that their widespread availability might have helped in the immediate post-combat period in Iraq to reduce looting and sabotage. The council threw its weight behind greater investment in these technologies partly based on a Joint Chiefs of Staff "mission needs statement" signed last December. "U.S. military forces lack the ability to engage targets located where the application of lethal [weapon fire] would be counterproductive to overall campaign objectives," the Joint Chiefs concluded.
    The Council on Foreign Relations recognized that the effect of nonlethal weapons is mostly "psychological - persuading people that they would much rather be someplace else, or on our side rather than opposing U.S. military forces." It warned that "television coverage of encounters involving [nonlethal weapons] can still be repugnant, and it would be desirable to provide reliable information to minimize unwarranted criticism."
    Yet after paying lip service to the very psychological and political fallout that could result from the employment of novel technologies like acoustic weapons or high-powered microwaves, the council task force urged that prototype nonlethal weapons - that is, weapons just like American Technology's new sound weapon - "be placed with our operating forces" to test their efficacy and create greater demand among combat commanders.
    Is actual combat in a foreign country the appropriate place to test a new weapon? Apparently, we are about to find out.
     
  • The Lie Factory
    MotherJones.com / News / Feature
    Robert Dreyfuss, Jason Vest. Mother Jones. San Francisco: Jan/Feb 2004. Vol. 29, Iss. 1; pg. 34
    http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2004/01/12_405.html
    Only weeks after 9/11, the Bush administration set up a secret Pentagon unit to create the case for invading Iraq. Here is the inside story for how they pushed disinformation and bogus intelligence and led the nation to war. BY ROBERT DREYFUSS & VEST
    IT'S A CRISP FALL DAY IN WESTERN VIRGINIA, a hundred miles from Washington, D.C., and a breeze is rustling the red and gold leaves of the Shenandoah hills. On the weather-beaten wood porch of a ramshackle 90-year-old farmhouse, at the end of a winding dirt-and-gravel road, Lt. Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski is perched on a plastic chair, wearing shorts, a purple sweatshirt, and muddy sneakers. Two scrawny dogs and a lone cat are on the prowl, and tne air is filled with swarms
    So far, she says, no investigators have come knocking. Not from the Central Intelligence Agency, which conducted an internal inquiry into intelligence on Iraq, not from the congressional intelligence committees, not from the president's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. All of those bodies are ostensibly looking into the Bush administration's prewar Iraq intelligence, amid charges that the White House and the Pentagon exaggerated, distorted, or just plain lied about Iraq's links to Al Qaeda terrorists and its possession of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons. In her hands, Kwiatkowski holds several pieces of the puzzle. Yet she, along with a score of other career officers recently retired or shuffled off to other jobs, has not been approached by anyone.
    Kwiatkowski, 43, a now-retired Air Force officer who served in the Pentagon's Near East and South Asia (NESA) unit in the year before the invasion of Iraq, observed how the Pentagon's Iraq war-planning unit manufactured scare stories about Iraq's weapons and ties to terrorists. "It wasn't intelligence-it was propaganda," she says. "They'd take a little bit of intelligence, cherry-pick it, make it sound much more exciting, usually by taking it out of context, often by juxtaposition of two pieces of information that don't belong together." It was by turning such bogus intelligence into talking points for U.S. officials-including ominous lines in speeches by President Bush and Vice President Cheney, along with Secretary of State Colin Powell's testimony at the U.N. Security Council last February-that the administration pushed American public opinion into supporting an unnecessary war.
    Until now, the story of how the Bush administration produced its wildly exaggerated estimates of the threat posed by Iraq has never been revealed in full. But, for the first time, a detailed investigation by Mother Jones, based on dozens of interviews-some on the record, some with officials who insisted on anonymity-exposes the workings of a secret Pentagon intelligence unit and of the Defense Department's war-planning task force, the Office of Special Plans. It's the story of a close-knit team of ideologues who spent a decade or more hammering out plans for an attack on Iraq and who used the events of September 11, 2001, to set it into motion.
    SIX MONTHS AFTER THE END of major combat in Iraq, the United States had spent $300 million trying to find banned weapons in Iraq, and President Bush was seeking $600 million more to extend the search. Not found were Iraq's Scuds and other long-range missiles, thousands of barrels and tons of anthrax and botulism stock, sarin and VX nerve agents, mustard gas, biological and chemical munitions, mobile labs for producing biological weapons, and any and all evidence of a reconstituted nuclear-arms program, all of which had been repeatedly cited as justification for the war. Also missing was evidence of Iraqi collaboration with Al Qaeda.
    The reports, virtually all false, of Iraqi weapons and terrorism ties emanated from an apparatus that began to gestate almost as soon as the Bush administration took power. In the very first meeting of the Bush national-security team, one day after President Bush took the oath of office in January 2001, the issue of invading Iraq was raised, according to one of the participants in the meeting-and officials all the way down the line started to get the message, long before 9/11. Indeed, the Bush team at the Pentagon hadn't even been formally installed before Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy secretary of Defense, and Douglas J. Feith, undersecretary of Defense for policy, began putting together what would become the vanguard for regime change in Iraq.
    Both Wolfowitz and Feith have deep roots in the neoconservative movement. One of the most influential Washington neoconservatives in the foreign-policy establishment during the Republicans' wilderness years of the 1990s, Wolfowitz has long held that not taking Baghdad in 1991 was a grievous mistake. He and others now prominent in the administration said so repeatedly over the past decade in a slew of letters and policy papers from neoconservative groups like the Project for the New American Century and the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq. Feith, a former aide to Richard Perle at the Pentagon in the 1980s and an activist in far-right Zionist circles, held the view that there was no difference between U.S. and Israeli security policy and that the best way to secure both countries' future was to solve the Israeli-Palestinian problem not by serving as a broker, but with the United States as a force for "regime change" in the region.
    Called in to help organize the Iraq war-planning team was a longtime Pentagon official, Harold Rhode, a specialist on Islam who speaks Hebrew, Arabic, Turkish, and Farsi. Though Feith would not be officially confirmed until July 2001, career military and civilian officials in NESA began to watch his office with concern after Rhode set up shop in Feith's office in early January. Rhode, seen by many veteran staffers as an ideological gadfly, was officially assigned to the Pentagon's Office of Net Assessment, an in-house Pentagon think tank headed by fellow neocon Andrew Marshall. Rhode helped Feith lay down the law about the department's new anti-Iraq, and broadly anti-Arab, orientation. In one telling incident, Rhode accosted and harangued a visiting senior Arab diplomat, telling him that there would be no "bartering in the bazaar anymore.... You're going to have to sit up and pay attention when we say so."
    Rhode refused to be interviewed for this story, saying cryptically, "Those who speak, pay."
    According to insiders, Rhode worked with Feith to purge career Defense officials who weren't sufficiently enthusiastic about the muscular anti-Iraq crusade that Wolfowitz and Feith wanted. Rhode appeared to be "pulling people out of nooks and crannies of the Defense Intelligence Agency and other places to replace us with," says a former analyst. "They wanted nothing to do with the professional staff. And they wanted us the fuck out of there."
    The unofficial, off-site recruitment office for Feith and Rhode was the American Enterprise Institute, a right-wing think tank whose 12th-floor conference room in Washington is named for the dean of neoconservative defense strategists, the late Albert Wohlstetter, an influential RAND analyst and University of Chicago mathematician. Headquartered at AEI is Richard Perle, Wohlstetter's prize protege, the godfather of the AEI-Defense Department nexus of neoconservatives who was chairman of the Pentagon's influential Defense Policy Board. Rhode, along with Michael Rubin, a former AEI staffer who is also now at the Pentagon, was a ubiquitous presence at AEI conferences on Iraq over the past two years, and the two Pentagon officials seemed almost to be serving as stage managers for the AEI events, often sitting in the front row and speaking in stage whispers to panelists and AEI officials. Just after September 11, 2001, Feith and Rhode recruited David Wurmser, the director of Middle East studies for AEI, to serve as a Pentagon consultant.
    Wurmser would be the founding participant of the unnamed, secret intelligence unit at the Pentagon, set up in Feith's office, which would be the nucleus of the Defense Department's Iraq disinformation campaign that was established within weeks of the attacks in New York and Washington. While the CIA and other intelligence agencies concentrated on Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda as the culprit in the 9/11 attacks, Wolfowitz and Feith obsessively focused on Iraq. It was a theory that was discredited, even ridiculed, among intelligence professionals. Daniel Benjamin, co-author of The Age of Sacred Terror, was director of counterterrorism at the National Security Council in the late 1990s. "In 1998, we went through every piece of intelligence we could find to see if there was a link between Al Qaeda and Iraq," he says. "We came to the conclusion that our intelligence agencies had it right: There was no noteworthy relationship between Al Qaeda and Iraq. I know that for a fact." Indeed, that was the consensus among virtually all anti-terrorism specialists.
    In short, Wurmser, backed by Feith and Rhode, set out to prove what didn't exist.
    IN AN ADMINISTRATION devoted to the notion of "Feith-based intelligence," Wurmser was ideal. For years, he'd been a shrill ideologue, part of the minority crusade during the 1990s that was beating the drums for war against Iraq. Along with Perle and Feith, in 1996 Wurmser and his wife, Meyrav, wrote a provocative strategy paper for Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu called "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm." It called on Israel to work with Jordan and Turkey to "contain, destabilize and roll back" various states in the region, overthrow Saddam Hussein in Iraq, press Jordan to restore a scion of the Hashemite dynasty to the Iraqi throne, and, above all, launch military assaults against Lebanon and Syria as a "prelude to a redrawing of the map of the Middle East which would threaten Syria's territorial integrity."
    In 1997, Wurmser wrote a column in the Wall Street Journal called "Iraq Needs a Revolution" and the next year co-signed a letter with Perle calling for all-out U.S. support of the Iraqi National Congress (INC), an exile group led by Ahmad Chalabi, in promoting an insurgency in Iraq. At AEI, Wurmser wrote Tyranny's Ally: America's Failure to Defeat Saddam Hussein, essentially a book-length version of "A Clean Break" that proposed an alliance between Jordan and the INC to redraw the map of the Middle East. Among the mentors cited by Wurmser in the book: Chalabi, Perle, and Feith.
    The purpose of the unnamed intelligence unit, often described as a Pentagon "cell," was to scour reports from the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, and other agencies to find nuggets of information linking Iraq, Al Qaeda, terrorism, and the existence of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction (WMD). In a controversial press briefing in October 2002, a year after Wurmser's unit was established, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld acknowledged that a primary purpose of the unit was to cull factoids, which were then used to disparage, undermine, and contradict the CIA's reporting, which was far more cautious and nuanced than Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, and Feith wanted. Rumsfeld particularly enjoyed harassing the CIA staffer who briefed him every morning, using the type of data produced by the intelligence unit. "What I could do is say, 'Gee, what about this?'" Rumsfeld noted. "'Or what about that? Has somebody thought of this?'" Last June, when Feith was questioned on the same topic at a briefing, he acknowledged that the secret unit in fact looked at the connection between Iraq and terrorism, saying, "You can't rely on deterrence to deal with the problem of weapons of mass destruction in the hands of state sponsors of terrorism because [of] the possibility that those state sponsors might employ chemical weapons or biological weapons by means of a terrorist organization proxy...."
    Though Feith, in that briefing, described Wurmser's unit as an innocent project, "a global exercise" that was not meant to put pressure on other intelligence agencies or create skewed intelligence to fit preconceived policy notions, many other sources assert that it did exactly that. That the White House and the Pentagon put enormous pressure on the CIA to go along with its version of events has been widely reported, highlighted by visits to CIA headquarters by Vice President Cheney and Lewis Libby, his chief of staff. Led by Perle, the neocons seethed with contempt for the CIA. The CIA'S analysis, said Perle, "isn't worth the paper it's printed on." Standing in a crowded hallway during an AEI event, Perle added, "The CIA is status quo oriented. They don't want to take risks."
    That became the mantra of the shadow agency within an agency.
    Putting Wurmser in charge of the unit meant that it was being run by a pro-Iraq-war ideologue who'd spent years calling for a pre-emptive invasion of Baghdad and who was clearly predisposed to find what he wanted to see. Adding another layer of dubious quality to the endeavor was the man partnered with Wurmser, F. Michael Maloof. Maloof, a former aide to Perle in the 1980s Pentagon, was twice stripped of his high-level security clearances-once in late 2001 and again last spring, for various infractions. Maloof was also reportedly involved in a bizarre scheme to broker contacts between Iraqi officials and the Pentagon, channeled through Perle, in what one report called a "rogue [intelligence] operation" outside officiai CIA and Defense Intelligence Agency channels.
    As the momentum for war began to build in early 2002, Wolfowitz and Feith beefed up the intelligence unit and created an Iraq war-planning unit in the Pentagon's Near East and South Asia Affairs section, run by Deputy Undersecretary of Defense William Luti, under the rubric "Office of Special Plans," or OSP; the new unit's director was Abram N. Shulsky. By then, Wurmser had moved on to a post as senior adviser to Undersecretary of State John Bolton, yet another neocon, who was in charge of the State Department's disarmament, proliferation, and WMD office and was promoting the Iraq war strategy there. Shulsky's OSP, which incorporated the secret intelligence unit, took control, banishing veteran experts-including Joseph McMillan, James Russell, Larry Hanauer, and Marybeth McDevitt-who, despite years of service to NESA, either were shuffled off to other positions or retired. For the next year, Luti and Shulsky not only would oversee war plans but would act aggressively to shape the intelligence product received by the White House.
    Both Luti and Shulsky were neoconservatives who were ideological soulmates of Wolfowitz and Feith. But Luti was more than that. He'd come to the Pentagon directly from the office of Vice President Cheney. That gave Luti, a recently retired, decorated Navy captain whose career ran from combat aviation to command of a helicopter assault ship, extra clout. Along with his colleague Colonel William Bruner, Luti had done a stint as an aide to Newt Gingrich in 1996 and, like Perle and Wolfowitz, was an acolyte of Wohlstetter's. "He makes Ollie North look like a moderate," says a NESA veteran.
    Shulsky had been on the Washington scene since the mid-1970s. As a Senate intelligence committee staffer for Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, he began to work with early neoconservatives like Perle, who was then an aide to Senator Henry Jackson. Later, in the Reagan years, Shulsky followed Perle to the Pentagon as Perle's arms-control adviser. In the '90s, Shulsky co-authored a book on intelligence called Silent Warfare, with Gary Schmitt. Shulsky had served with Schmitt on Moynihan's staff and they had remained friends. Asked about the Pentagon's Iraq intelligence "cell," Schmitt-who is currently the executive director of the Project for the New American Century-says that he can't say much about it "because one of my best friends is running it."
    According to Lt. Colonel Kwiatkowski, Luti and Shulsky ran NESA and the Office of Special Plans with brutal efficiency, purging people they disagreed with and enforcing the party line. "It was organized like a machine," she says. "The people working on the neocon agenda had a narrow, well-defined political agenda. They had a sense of mission." At NESA, Shulsky, she says, began "hot-desking," or taking an office wherever he could find one, working with Feith and Luti, before formally taking the reins of the newly created OSP. Together, she says, Luti and Shulsky turned cherry-picked pieces of uncorroborated, anti-Iraq intelligence into talking points, on issues like Iraq's WMD and its links to Al Qaeda. Shulsky constantly updated these papers, drawing on the intelligence unit, and circulated them to Pentagon officials, including Rumsfeld, and to Vice President Cheney. "Of course, we never thought they'd go directly to the White House," she adds.
    Kwiatkowski recalls one meeting in which Luti, pressed to finish a report, told the staff, "I've got to get this over to 'Scooter' right away." She later found out that "Scooter" was none other than Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Cheney's chief of staff. According to Kwiatkowski, Cheney had direct ties through Luti into NESA/OSP, a connection that was highly unorthodox.
    "Never, ever, ever would a deputy undersecretary of Defense work directly on a project for the vice president," she says. "It was a little clue that we had an informal network into Vice President Cheney's office."
    Although Feith insists that the OSP did not seek to gather its own intelligence, Kwiatkowski and others sharply disagree. Staff working for Luti and Shulsky in NESA/OSP churned out propaganda-style intelligence, she says. As an example, she cited the work of a U.S. intelligence officer and Arabic specialist, Navy Lt. Commander Youssef Aboul-Enein, who was a special assistant to Luti. "His job was to peruse the Arabic-language media to find articles that would incriminate Saddam Hussein about terrorism, and he translated these." Such raw intelligence is usually subject to a thorough vetting process, tracked, verified, and checked by intelligence professionals. But not at OSP-the material that it produced found its way directly into speeches by Bush, Cheney, and other officials.
    According to Melvin Goodman, a former CIA official and an intelligence specialist at the National War College, the OSP officials routinely pushed lower-ranking staff around on intelligence matters. "People were being pulled aside [and being told], 'We saw your last piece and it's not what we're looking for,'" he says. "It was pretty blatant." Two State Department intelligence officials, Greg Thielmann and Christian Westermann, have both charged that pressure was being put on them to shape intelligence to fit policy, in particular from Bolton's office. "The Al Qaeda connection and nuclear weapons issue were the only two ways that you could link Iraq to an imminent security threat to the U.S.," Thielmann told the New York Times. "And the administration was grossly distorting the intelligence on both things."
    BESIDES CHENEY, key members of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board, including Perle and ex-House Speaker Newt Gingrich, all Iraq hawks, had direct input into NESA/OSP. The offices of NESA were located on the Pentagon's fourth floor, seventh corridor of D Ring, and the Policy Board's offices were directly below, on the third floor. During the run-up to the Iraq war, Gingrich often came up for closed-door meetings with Luti, who in 1996 had served as a congressional fellow in Speaker of the House Gingrich's office.
    As OSP got rolling, Luti brought in Colonel Bruner, a former military aide to Gingrich, and, together, Luti and Bruner opened the door to a vast flow of bogus intelligence fed to the Pentagon by Iraqi defectors associated with Chalabi's Iraqi National Congress group of exiles. Chalabi founded the Iraqi National Congress in 1992, with the help of a shadowy CIA-connected public-relations firm called the Rendon Group, one of whose former employees, Francis Brooke, has been a top aide to Chalabi ever since. A scion of an aristocratic Iraqi family, Chalabi fled Baghdad at the age of 13, in 1958, when the corrupt Iraqi Hashemite monarchy was overthrown by a coalition of communists and the Iraqi military. In the late 1960s, Chalabi studied mathematics at the University of Chicago with Wohlstetter, who introduced him to Richard Perle more than a decade later. Long associated with the heart of the neoconservative movement, Chalabi founded Petra Bank in Jordan, which grew to be Jordan's third-largest bank by the 1980s. But Chalabi was accused of bank fraud, embezzlement, and currency manipulation, and he barely escaped before Jordanian authorities could arrest him; in 1992, he was convicted and sentenced in absentia to more than 20 years of hard labor. After founding the INC, Chalabi's bungling, unreliability, and penchant for mismanaging funds caused the CIA to sour on him, but he never lost the support of Perle, Feith, Gingrich, and their allies; once, soon after 9/11, Perle invited Chalabi to address the Defense Policy Board.
    According to multiple sources, Chalabi's Iraqi National Congress sent a steady stream of misleading and often faked intelligence reports into U.S. intelligence channels. That information would flow sometimes into NESA/OSP directly, sometimes through Defense Intelligence Agency debriefings of Iraqi defectors via the Defense Human Intelligence Service, and sometimes through the INC's own U.S.-funded Intelligence Collection Program, which was overseen by the Pentagon. The INC's intelligence "isn't reliable at all," according to Vincent Cannistraro, a former CIA chief of counterterrorism.
    "Much of it is propaganda. Much of it is telling the Defense Department what they want to hear, using alleged informants and defectors who say what Chalabi wants them to say, [creating] cooked information that goes right into presidential and vice presidential speeches."
    Bruner, the aide to Luti and Gingrich's former staffer, "was Chalabi's handler," says Kwiatkowski. "He would arrange meetings with Chalabi and Chalabi's folks," she says, adding that the INC leader often brought people into the NESA/OSP offices for debriefings. Chalabi claims to have introduced only three actual defectors to the Pentagon, a figure Thielmann considers "awfully low." However, according to an investigation by the Los Angeles Times, the three defectors provided by Chalabi turned up exactly zero useful intelligence. The first, an Iraqi engineer, claimed to have specific information about biological weapons, but his information didn't pan out; the second claimed to know about mobile labs, but that information, too, was worthless; and the third, who claimed to have data about Iraq's nuclear program, proved to be a fraud. Chalabi also claimed to have given the Pentagon information about Iraqi support for Al Qaeda. "We gave the names of people who were doing the links," he told an interviewer from PBS'S Frontline. Those links, of course, have not been discovered. Thielmann told the same Frontline interviewer that the Office of Special Plans didn't apply strict intelligence-verification standards to "some of the information coming out of Chalabi and the INC that OSP and the Pentagon ran with."
    In the war's aftermath, the Defense Intelligence Agency-which is not beholden to the neoconservative civilians at the Pentagon-leaked a report it prepared, concluding that few, if any, of the INC's informants provided worthwhile intelligence.
    SO FAR, DESPITE ALL of the investigations underway, there is little sign that any of them are going to delve into the operations of the Luti-Shulsky Office of Special Plans and its secret intelligence unit. Because it operates in the Pentagon's policy shop, it is not officially part of the intelligence community, and so it is seemingly immune to congressional oversight.
    With each passing day, it is becoming excruciatingly clearer just how wrong U.S. intelligence was in regard to Iraqi weapons and support for terrorism. The American teams of inspectors in the Iraq Survey Group, which has employed up to 1,400 people to scour the country and analyze the findings, have not been able to find a shred of evidence of anything other than dusty old plans and records of weapons apparently destroyed more than a decade ago. Countless examples of fruitless searches have been reported in the media. To cite one example: U.S. soldiers followed an intelligence report claiming that a complex built for Uday Hussein, Saddam's son, hid a weapons warehouse with poison-gas storage tanks. "Well," U.S. Army Major Ronald Hann Jr. told the Los Angeles Times, "the warehouse was a carport. It still had two cars inside. And the tanks had propane for the kitchen."
    Countless other errors and exaggerations have become evident. The thousands of aluminum tubes supposedly imported by Iraq for uranium enrichment were fairly conclusively found to be designed to build noncontroversial rockets. The long-range unmanned aerial vehicles, allegedly built to deliver bioweapons, were small, rickety, experimental planes with wood frames. The mobile bioweapon labs turned out to have had other, civilian purposes. And the granddaddy of all falsehoods, the charge that Iraq sought uranium in the West African country of Niger, was based on forged documents-documents that the CIA, the State Department, and other agencies knew were fake nearly a year before President Bush highlighted the issue in his State of the Union address in January 2003.
    "Either the system broke down," former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, who was sent by the CIA to visit Niger and whose findings helped show that the documents were forged, told Mother Jones, "or there was selective use of bits of information to justify a decision to go to war that had already been taken."
    Edward Luttwak, a neoconservative scholar and author, says flatly that the Bush administration lied about the intelligence it had because it was afraid to go to the American people and say that the war was simply about getting rid of Saddam Hussein. Instead, says Luttwak, the White House was groping for a rationale to satisfy the United Nations' criteria for war. "Cheney was forced into this fake posture of worrying about weapons of mass destruction," he says. "The ties to Al Qaeda? That's complete nonsense."
    In the Senate, Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) is pressing for the Intelligence Committee to extend its investigation to look into the specific role of the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans, but there is strong Republican resistance to the idea.
    In the House, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) has introduced legislation calling for a commission to investigate the intelligence mess and has collected more than a hundred Democrats-but no Republicans-in support of it. "I think they need to be looked at pretty carefully," Waxman told Mother Jones when asked about the Office of Special Plans. "I'd like to know whether the political people pushed the intelligence people to slant their conclusions."
    Congressman Waxman, meet Lt. Colonel Kwiatkowski.

  • Need to build a case for war? Step forward Mr Chalabi
    If governments are going to rely on intelligence, its reliability is critical
    Isabel Hilton
    Saturday March 6, 2004
    http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/comment/0,12956,1163522,00.html
    The Guardian
    In the mayhem that followed the explosions in Baghdad and Karbala this week, Ahmad Chalabi, an ever more powerful member of the Iraqi Governing Council and a Pentagon favourite, was swiftly at the scene, behaving like a politician come to offer sympathy. It was a shrewd piece of public relations - if you forget the responsibility Chalabi bears for Iraq's present tragic condition. It was Chalabi, more than any other individual, who helped persuade the US that toppling Saddam Hussein would bring peace and democracy, and break the link that he alleged existed between the Iraqi leader and al-Qaida.
    The argument surrounding the decision to go to war in Iraq, Tony Blair said yesterday, is not about trust or integrity but about judgment and intelligence. That is also the case his critics make. In the approach to war, both the US and the UK governments mobilised a mishmash of arguments in a campaign of persuasion that was based not on rigorous analysis of intelligence but on the selective use of data and informants. And in this sorry tale, no one played a more critical role than the man many proclaim the most likely future leader of Iraq, Ahmad Chalabi.
    He has been working to take power in Iraq for a long time. The son of a wealthy and influential family in Iraq that lost its place with the fall of the monarchy, Chalabi has a long association with US intelligence. In the early 1990s, he was considered a serious asset by the CIA - but they soon found him to be unreliable. By then, however, he had found other supporters, among them the staff and advisers of one of the neo-cons' favourite thinktanks, the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (Jinsa) in Washington. In 1997, Jinsa declared: "Jinsa has been working closely with Iraqi National Council leader Dr Ahmad Chalabi to promote Saddam Hussein's removal from office and a subsequently democratic future for Iraq."
    Jinsa describes its mandate as two-fold: "To educate the American public about the importance of an effective US defence capability...and to inform the American defence and foreign affairs community about the important role Israel can and does play in bolstering democratic interests in the Mediterranean and the Middle East." Their interests, Chalabi persuaded them, coincided: Saddam, the supporter of Palestinian suicide bombers, the strongest and most troublesome leader in the Arab world and a menace to Israel, should be replaced with a friendly government that would make peace with Israel and become the US's best Arab friend.
    The advocates of radical action in the Middle East came to power with Bush. The next steps are now well documented. As Richard Perle once complained: "The CIA has been engaged in a character assassination of Ahmad Chalabi for years now, and it's a disgrace." To bypass such obstacles, an alternative intelligence group - the Office of Special Plans - was created. But there was still a shortage of evidence on two key points: that Saddam had WMD and that he had links to al-Qaida. Step forward Ahmad Chalabi, whose INC benefited from nearly $100m of US taxpayers money, despite Chalabi's conviction for a $300m bank fraud in Jordan. Chalabi, who knows a market when he sees one, claimed his sources inside and outside Iraq could supply the necessary evidence.
    In 2001, Colin Powell declared: "He [Saddam Hussein] has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction...our policies have strengthened the security of the neighbours of Iraq." Tony Blair told the Commons in November 2000 that, "We believe that the sanctions regime has effectively contained Saddam Hussein." These assessments coincided with the view of the intelligence services and the inspectors.
    The alternative intelligence, marshalled to make the case for war, came overwhelmingly from Chalabi's INC and their carefully coached "sources". Among the INC allegations that have not been borne out were that Hussein had built mobile biological weapons facilities, that he was rapidly rebuilding his nuclear weapons programme and that he had trained Islamic warriors at a camp south of Baghdad. Now defence officials acknowledge that the defectors' tales were "shaky" at best.
    On whose judgment was this shaky information included in official pre-war intelligence estimates of Iraq's illicit weapons programmes and key statements by US and UK politicians? On September 12 2002, for instance, claims by Iraqi military officers supplied by the INC that Iraq had been training Arabs in "hijacking planes and trains, planting explosives in cities, sabotage and assassinations" were given uncritical prominence in a White House report. And what is now described as an INC "fabrication" - that Iraq had mobile biological warfare research facilities - was included in Powell's presentation to the UN security council in February 2003.
    To give wider credibility to this dubious narrative, Chalabi planted stories in mainstream newspapers such as the New York Times, stories that were then quoted as independent corroborative evidence by administration officials. The paper's now much-criticised specialist on WMD, Judith Miller, has acknowledged her 10-year association with Chalabi.
    Chalabi has admitted that the "evidence" he supplied was wrong. Unlike Blair, he is no longer interested in pretending that there are any WMD in Iraq, but nor is he repentant. Bush may lose the election and Blair is trapped in the political minefield of the war's aftermath, but Chalabi is a clear winner. "We are heroes in error," he told the Telegraph. Since Saddam was gone, "What was said before is not important."
    When the US flew Chalabi into Iraq by helicopter early in the war, along with 700 friends and supporters, he was not remotely electable. He did, though, look like a man positioning himself to be at the centre of power. This week, Iraq's provisional constitution was agreed. Given Bush's need to create a puppet government in time for the US elections, power will now remain in the hands of the governing council until such time as elections might be held - a promise that recedes into the future with each terrorist outrage. The first drafts of the Iraqi transitional administrative law were written by Chalabi's nephew. The longer elections are postponed, the better for Chalabi, who is now in control of Iraq's finances and of de-Ba'athification.
    Perhaps his greatest coup was to gain possession of 25 tonnes of captured Saddam documents that could prove useful in the future. Before the war, for instance, the Jordanian foreign minister criticised Chalabi as untrustworthy. Chalabi then threatened to "expose" documentary evidence of the Jordanian royal family's close relations with Saddam. The public criticisms stopped. Since the war several forged documents have come into circulation. Some have been used to animate dead arguments, others to discredit critics of the war, such as George Galloway.
    With power there also come opportunities for enrichment. US authorities in Iraq have awarded more than $400m in contracts to a company that has extensive family and business ties to Chalabi. One, for $327m, to supply equipment for the Iraqi armed forces, is now under review after protests to Congress.
    If intelligence, Blair tells us, is to be of even greater importance in the future, its reliability is critical - an argument, perhaps, to learn from recent experience. Not for the US Defence Department. It plans to spend $4m over the next year buying intelligence on Iraq. And who does it plan to buy that intelligence from? Step forward Ahmad Chalabi.

  • Iraq: the missing billions
    23.10.03
    A staggering US$4 billion in oil revenues and other Iraqi funds earmarked for the reconstruction of the country has disappeared into opaque bank accounts administered by the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA), the US-controlled body that rules Iraq. By the end of the year, if nothing changes in the way this cash is accounted for, that figure will double.
    • Iraq: the missing billions - Transition and transparency in post-war Iraq
    The financial black hole, uncovered by a Christian Aid investigation, is revealed as delegates gather for the donors' conference in Madrid. Before pledging money from their own countries' coffers to boost the reconstruction efforts, as requested by the US and UK governments, these delegates should first demand: 'What has happened to the missing billions?'
    It is expected that a separate fund, managed by the UN and the World Bank, will be announced at the conference for donors' money, to allay fears of how this cash will be spent. But this should not stop donors from pushing for accountability of the original, massive reconstruction fund - most of it Iraqi oil money.
    In particular the British government, which has promised financial transparency in dealings with Iraqi oil funds, should use its influence to ensure that the missing money is accounted for. Christian Aid is calling on Prime Minister Tony Blair to deliver on his promises.
    The fact that no independent body knows where this cash has gone is in direct violation of the UN resolution that released much of it for the rebuilding of Iraq's shattered infrastructure. The agency that is supposed to oversee these funds has not even been set up yet.
    Christian Aid is calling for the full and immediate disclosure of how this money has been spent, and for urgent moves to establish a proper means of regulation. For the future, the British government should seek to ensure that a proportion of all Iraqi oil revenues are earmarked for the country's development - as a binding condition on future oil exploitation.
    'This is Iraqi money. The people of Iraq must know where it is going and it should be used for the benefit of all the country's people - particularly the poorest,' said Roger Riddell, Christian Aid's international director.
    The current situation goes to the heart of claims and counter-claims about how Iraqi oil revenue should be used. It can only fuel the serious suspicion in Iraq that a disproportionate amount of cash is being creamed off for the benefit of US companies - money that should be spent on alleviating the chronic unemployment and other serious problems faced by Iraqis, including the poorest and most vulnerable.
    Independent observers agree that, despite the huge amounts of money allocated to repair a country shattered by decades of war and sanctions, not nearly enough has been done and not nearly fast enough in the six months since the US announced an end to hostilities. There are still power cuts, fuel shortages, and a lack of medicine and equipment in hospitals. Clean drinking water is not available in many areas and raw sewage can be seen on the streets of many towns, including Basra - which is controlled by British forces.
    The fact that billions of dollars of Iraq's own money cannot now be accounted for can only add to a burning sense of injustice.
    'We have absolutely no idea how the money [from Iraqi oil revenues] has been spent,' one senior European diplomat to the UN told Christian Aid. 'I wish I knew, but we just don't know. We have absolutely no idea.'
    The missing billions are a combination of pre- and post-war oil revenues now controlled by the CPA, plus seized Iraqi government assets and funds vested overseas. Conservative estimates put the total at US$5 billion, of which less than US$1 billion can be accounted for. Estimated oil revenues between now and the end of the year are expected to total a further US$4 billion.
    This money is distinct from the reconstruction funds promised by the US and UK governments, and from any cash that is raised from other governments at the Madrid conference. This is Iraqi money that should be spent for the benefit of all Iraq's people, not sat on in secret by an unelected foreign administration.
    'The situation is little short of scandalous,' said Roger Riddell. 'The British government must use its position of second in command of the CPA to demand full disclosure of this money and its proper allocation in the future.'
    The dangers of such a situation persisting in the future were highlighted in the Christian Aid report Fuelling Poverty - Oil, War and Corruption, published in May. Compared with countries of similar size, the report found that oil-producing developing countries are characterised by greater degrees of:
    • Poverty (for the great majority of the population)
    • Dictatorial, authoritarian or unrepresentative government
    • War and/or civil strife
    • Corruption.
    'A properly constituted, democratic government must be established for all the people of Iraq as soon as possible,' said Roger Riddell. 'Otherwise, once again, oil could prove a curse rather than a blessing.'

  • Pentagon Pays Chalabi Group for Dubious Data
    By The Houston Chronicle
    Thursday 11 March 2004
    WASHINGTON -- The Pentagon is paying $340,000 a month to the Iraqi political organization led by Ahmad Chalabi, a member of the interim Iraqi government who has close ties to the Bush administration, for "intelligence collection" about Iraq, according to Defense Department officials.
    The classified program, run by the Defense Intelligence Agency since summer 2002, continues a long-standing partnership between the Pentagon and the organization, the Iraqi National Congress, even as the group jockeys for power in a future government. Internal government reviews have found that much of the information generated by the program before the U.S. invasion last year was useless, misleading or even fabricated.
    Under the unusual arrangement, the CIA is required to get permission from the Pentagon before interviewing informants from the Iraqi National Congress, according to government officials who have been briefed on the procedures.
    The CIA has been working with another Iraqi group, the Iraqi National Accord, to help establish an independent Iraqi intelligence service. The relationship between the CIA and Chalabi's group has been strained for years.
    A U.S. intelligence official said the maintenance of the separate, exclusive channel between Chalabi's group and the Defense Intelligence Agency was not interfering with the CIA's effort to set up the new Iraqi service.
    Among several defectors introduced by Chalabi's organization to U.S. intelligence officials before the war, at least one was formally labeled a fabricator by the DIA. Others were viewed as having been coached by the Iraqi group to provide intelligence critical of Saddam Hussein's rule. Internal reviews by the Pentagon agency and the National Intelligence Council this year concluded that little of the information from the group had any value.
    The payments to the group as part of an "intelligence collection program" was authorized by Congress in 1998.

  • Rove Admits Smear Campaign Against Wilson
    The American Prospect
    Monday 08 March 2004
    More details emerge on the Plame investigation, as Karl Rove's testimony is revealed for the first time.
    President Bush's chief political adviser, Karl Rove, told the FBI in an interview last October that he circulated and discussed damaging information regarding CIA operative Valerie Plame with others in the White House, outside political consultants, and journalists, according to a government official and an attorney familiar with the ongoing special counsel's investigation of the matter.
    But Rove also adamantly insisted to the FBI that he was not the administration official who leaked the information that Plame was a covert CIA operative to conservative columnist Robert Novak last July. Rather, Rove insisted, he had only circulated information about Plame after it had appeared in Novak's column. He also told the FBI, the same sources said, that circulating the information was a legitimate means to counter what he claimed was politically motivated criticism of the Bush administration by Plame's husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson.
    Rove and other White House officials described to the FBI what sources characterized as an aggressive campaign to discredit Wilson through the leaking and disseminating of derogatory information regarding him and his wife to the press, utilizing proxies such as conservative interest groups and the Republican National Committee to achieve those ends, and distributing talking points to allies of the administration on Capitol Hill and elsewhere. Rove is said to have named at least six other administration officials who were involved in the effort to discredit Wilson.
    Rove, through an aide, declined to comment for this story. The White House also declined comment, referring any further inquiries to the Department of Justice because of the ongoing criminal investigation.
    These revelations come on the heels of a Newsday report that Justice Department officials had subpoenaed the phone records of Air Force One for several days in July before the Novak column ran. In addition, according to Newsday, officials subpoenaed records from the same time period of the White House Iraq Group, an internal task force created to strengthen the case for war made to Congress and the American public. In addition to Rove, prominent members of the task force included National Security Council deputy Stephen J. Hadley; I. Lewis Libby, chief of staff to Vice-President Dick Cheney; and former Assistant to the President for Legislative Affairs Nicholas E. Calio.
    The leak of Plame's name to Novak last July came at a time when Plame's husband was criticizing the Bush administration for using faulty intelligence to bolster its case to go to war with the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein. Wilson had led an eight-day, CIA-sponsored mission to Niger to investigate allegations that Iraq had attempted to purchase uranium to build an atomic weapon. Wilson reported back to the CIA that the allegations were contrived and that documents purportedly revealing the scheme were crude forgeries.
    Still, President Bush, in making the case to go to war with Iraq, cited the allegations in his 2003 State of the Union address. Bush has since admitted that using the Niger information was a mistake, and he has appointed a presidential commission to investigate that and other instances of faulty intelligence considered by Congress before it authorized war.
    It was last July, when Wilson first made public his criticisms, that Novak wrote his now-infamous newspaper column alleging that Wilson had received his assignment because his wife had recommended him for the position. The claim has since turned out to be untrue. Novak revealed that Plame was a covert CIA operative in the context of incorrectly asserting that she was responsible for her husband's appointment.
    According to sources, Rove, in his interview with the FBI, said that he and others on the White House's political staff wanted to contain the political fallout from Wilson's allegations, and that they thought the charge of favoritism was a legitimate issue. Rove added that when he steered others in the direction of the now-disproved charges, he believed them to be true, in part because he regarded Novak as a credible news source.
    When the Justice Department investigation began last September, the White House press corps repeatedly questioned White House press secretary Scott McClellan as to whether Rove was the person who leaked Plame's name to Novak. Initially, McClellan said that Rove had denied that he was the leaker.
    Then, on September 28, The Washington Post reported:
    "Yesterday, a senior administration official said that before Novak's column ran, two top White House officials called at least six Washington journalists and disclosed the identity and occupation of Wilson's wife. 'Clearly, it was meant purely and simply for revenge,' the senior official said of the alleged leak. A source said reporters quoted a leaker as describing Wilson's wife as 'fair game.'"
    A subsequent Newsweek story suggested that the Post had been incorrect in some details. According to the magazine's account, the calls to "at least six Washington journalists" took place after Novak's column appeared, rather than before. Furthermore, Newsweek made an assertion (confirmed by Wilson) that MSNBC talk-show host Chris Matthews called Wilson in July, a full week after Novak's column appeared, telling the former ambassador that "Karl Rove … said your wife was fair game."
    When grilled on this variation of Rove's involvement, McClellan became evasive. McClellan insisted that the criminal investigation only centered on "whether someone leaked classified information;" questions regarding the "fair game" report were "down the road of rumor and innuendo and unsubstantiated accusations."
    McClellan then warned reporters "not to read anything into what I said," refusing to answer questions about whether it was, in one reporter's words, "ethical for a senior administration official to advance a story about an illegal disclosure of a CIA operative, basically giving that story legs."
    McClellan then repeatedly refused to exonerate Rove, according to a transcript of his remarks, instead insisting that any White House comments were merely a matter of "setting the record straight" rather than "spreading information to punish someone for speaking out," something the White House "would not condone."
    As a result of the Post report, federal investigators are now hunting for not only the identity of the administration official who leaked Plame's name to Novak but also the administration official who told the paper about the telephone calls to the six other reporters. The investigators believe it likely, according to an attorney familiar with some aspects of the criminal investigation, that the source of the Post story may very well know the identity of the person who leaked Plame's name to Novak.
    In interviews with potential witnesses, investigators have taken to referring to the story and its mysterious source as "one by two by six," meaning that one official may know the identity of two other administration officials who spoke to the six reporters.
    "If they find 'one by two by six,' then just maybe… they have also found their guy," said one attorney familiar with the criminal investigation.
    Still, little else is known regarding special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald's investigation of the Plame leak. A federal grand jury only recently began hearing evidence in the matter. FBI agents working on the probe have signed unprecedented secrecy agreements as a condition for working for the special counsel, and Fitzgerald has asked government officials and their attorneys appearing before his grand jury to agree not to disclose anything to the press or the public.
    Media attention has so far focused largely on four current and former White House aides who have testified: McClellan; Claire Buchan, a deputy press secretary; Adam Levine, a former White House communications aide, and Mary Matalin, a former adviser to Vice-President Dick Cheney.
    But several sources have said that some news reports were reading too much into the recent grand-jury appearances. One government official familiar with the inquiry suggested that the grand jury was focusing on the "periphery of the action" and working toward "ruling certain people out and certain theories wrong." Reporters, meanwhile, were "maligning people simply because they did not know anything and had nothing to write." Questioning of more than one witness who has appeared before the grand jury, said an attorney familiar with the inquiry, was "truncated ... and over fairly quickly," adding that "they gave every impression they were closing some doors."

  • Did Ufo Bring Down Beagle?
    Mon 8 Mar 2004
    http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=2623746
    European scientists are examining an image of the Beagle 2 Mars lander, taken moments after it was spun off from its mother ship, that also shows an unidentified object.
    The mysterious blot on the photograph is being scrutinised as one of several potential reasons for the failure of the mission – Europe’s first attempt to land a probe on the Red Planet.
    Mission controllers told a London meeting that they were also considering the possibility that Beagle 2 simply crashed onto the surface of Mars because the atmosphere on the planet was less dense than expected.
    Scientists said they are examining photographs of the landing site that show four bright spots, dubbed the ”string of pearls,” that might be Beagle 2’s remains.
    Beagle 2 has not been heard from since it was ejected from the European Space Agency’s Mars Express orbiter in mid-December. The 143 pound probe gave no answering signal to scheduled attempts to contact it on Christmas Day and has remained stubbornly silent ever since.

  • US researchers will soon publish strong evidence of a recipe to generate fusion power with tiny bubbles
    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20040306/FUSION06/TPScience/
    March 6, 2004
    Double, bubble, boil and generate energy like the sun? It may not scan into Shakespearean prose, but U.S. researchers will soon publish strong evidence of a recipe to generate fusion power with tiny bubbles, which does sound like a modern witch's brew.
    The power source is ultrasonic noise aimed at a clear glass canister whose size would qualify as a grande latte in a coffee house. The sound waves rattle through a liquid solvent in the glass and, as they do, create minute (on the order of a thousandth the width of a human hair) bubbles. Further sound causes the bubbles to expand, compress and then collapse. When they do, some of the hydrogen atoms in the liquid seem to fuse and give off light and energy.
    This is potentially revolutionary, because atomic fusion is exactly what the sun does to generate its gigantic outflows of energy, and the search to create energy through a fusion reaction on Earth has been the dream of physicists for the better part of half a century.
    "What we are doing, in effect, is producing nuclear emissions in a simple desktop apparatus," says Rusi Taleyarkhan, a professor of nuclear engineering at Purdue University and a co-author of a paper on the research. "That really is the magnitude of the discovery -- the ability to use simple mechanical force for the first time in history to initiate conditions comparable to the interior of stars."
    If this all sounds vaguely familiar, then you may be recalling that an earlier form of the experiment was announced in 2002 to loud scorn from other nuclear physicists. "The paper's kind of patchwork, technically, and each of the patches has a hole in it," one critic said at the time. The uproar was so heated that officials at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee, where the experiments were conducted, wrote to Science magazine urging its editors to delay, if not kill, the controversial paper.
    The new data were generated with what is reported to be a bit less than $1-million (U.S.) provided by the U.S. Defence Department's Advanced Research Project Agency. The money allowed for the use of much more precise instruments that could gather more data over a longer period of time.
    The researchers have estimated that, to create fusion, the energy inside the imploding bubbles reached 10 million degrees C and pressures equal to 1,000 million times that which Earth's atmosphere exerts at sea level.
    While nobody is saying sound-wave fusion is proved, the new research, which will be published in the journal Physical Review E this month, is turning at least some former critics into agnostics.
    "I think it [the phenomenon] is difficult to ignore; it is still improbable that it is right, but is becoming increasingly difficult to say that it is wrong," says Lawrence Crum, a University of Washington physicist who was one of the reviewers on the 2002 paper and a strong critic of it.
    However, it also must be said that despite the new, peer-reviewed publication, some of the original critics of the research remain as intransigent as ever. "All I can say is that the same set of characters are doing the same thing all over again. What should be done is someone independent should look at it. . . . I don't think it is true," says Dan Shapira, another nuclear engineer at Oak Ridge who had been unable to replicate Prof. Taleyarkhan's research.
    While they are clearly ebullient about what looks like a validation of their sketchier, early findings, Prof. Taleyarkhan and his U.S. and Russian co-authors are not saying we will see usable fusion energy generated in a big coffee cup any time soon. This is largely because they have not achieved fusion's breakthrough nirvana: a system that generates more energy than energy that has to be put in.
    "I don't know it will happen, but I am hopeful it will," Prof. Taleyarkhan says.
    Failing the grand advance, the scientists suggest that some day their findings might still lead to security detectors that use neutrons to probe the contents of suitcases or devices using the neutron emissions that follow from fusion to manufacture new materials.
    Stephen Strauss writes on science for The Globe and Mail.
     


  • Biophotons And The
    Universal Light Code
    By William F. Hamilton
    3-6-4
    I have been reading a book entitled The Field by Lynne McTaggert, a book that could revolutionize our view of the universe once again. One of the key notions in this book is the discovery of biophotons, a new study in the field of biophysics that could have a far-reaching impact on our ideas of life and consciousness in the universe.
    What are biophotons and how were they discovered?
    "Biophotons, or ultra weak photon emissions of biological systems, are weak electromagnetic waves in the optical range of the spectrum - in other words: light. All living cells of plants, animals and human beings emit biophotons which cannot be seen by the naked eye but can be measured by special equipment developed by German researchers.
    This light emission is an expression of the functional state of the living organism and its measurement therefore can be used to assess this state. Cancer cells and healthy cells of the same type, for instance, can be discriminated by typical differences in biophoton emission. After an initial decade and a half of basic research on this discovery, biophysicists of various European and Asian countries are now exploring the many interesting applications which range across such diverse fields as cancer research, non-invasive early medical diagnosis, food and water quality testing, chemical and electromagnetic contamination testing, cell communication, and various applications in biotechnology.
    According to the biophoton theory developed on the base of these discoveries the biophoton light is stored in the cells of the organism - more precisely, in the DNA molecules of their nuclei - and a dynamic web of light constantly released and absorbed by the DNA may connect cell organelles, cells, tissues, and organs within the body and serve as the organism's main communication network and as the principal regulating instance for all life processes. The processes of morphogenesis, growth, differentiation and regeneration are also explained by the structuring and regulating activity of the coherent biophoton field. The holographic biophoton field of the brain and the nervous system, and maybe even that of the whole organism, may also be basis of memory and other phenomena of consciousness, as postulated by neurophysiologist Karl Pribram and others. The consciousness-like coherence properties of the biophoton field are closely related to its base in the properties of the physical vacuum and indicate its possible role as an interface to the non-physical realms of mind, psyche and consciousness.
    The discovery of biophoton emission also lends scientific support to some unconventional methods of healing based on concepts of homeostasis (self-regulation of the organism), such as various somatic therapies, homeopathy and acupuncture. The "ch'i" energy flowing in our bodies' energy channels (meridians) which according to Traditional Chinese Medicine regulates our body functions may be related to node lines of the organism's biophoton field. The "prana" of Indian Yoga physiology may be a similar regulating energy force that has a basis in weak, coherent electromagnetic biofields."
    First discovered in 1923 by Russian medical scientist Professor Alexander G.Gurvich (who named them "mitogenetic rays") and in the 1930s widely researched in Europe and the USA, biophotons have been rediscovered and backed since the 1970s by ample experimental and theoretical evidence by European scientists. In 1974 German biophysicist Fritz-Albert Popp has proved their existence, their origin from the DNA and later their coherence (laser-like nature), and has developed biophoton theory to explain their possible biological role and the ways in which they may control biochemical processes, growth, differentiation etc. Popp's biophoton theory leads to many startling insights into the life processes and may well provide one of the major elements of a future theory of life and holistic medical practice based on such an approach. The importance of the discovery has been confirmed by eminent scientists such as Herbert Froehlich and Nobel laureate Ilya Prigogine. Since 1992, the International Institute of Biophysics, a network of research laboratories in more than 10 countries, based in Germany, is coordinating research in this field which promises rapid development in the next decade. "(1)
    There are so many ramifications to the study of biophotonic emissions that it is difficult to elucidate at this time. Biophoton studies seem to indicate that the emission is coherent and that biophotons may be modulated and communicate information not only throughout the body but into the extended environment. It may be the process by which DNA actually communicates its information to protein molecules in the process of morphogenesis. It may have relevance to extra-sensory modes of communication with other life forms and explain many mysteries of life.
    Here is a list of some of the properties and characteristics of biophotons so far discovered (2):
    "Some steps in revealing important properties of biophotons are (1) careful measurements of the spectrum, (2) the analysis of the photo count statistics, (3) connecting the spontaneous and delayed "luminescence", (4) investigations of the temperature dependence of biophotons and (5) correlating physical properties of biophoton emission and biological parameters such as growth, differentiation, DNA -content, and anomalies.
    As far as results are available, a brief summary justifies at present the following statements:
    · The spectral distribution of biophotons covers at least the range from 200 to 800 nm [1].
    · The spectrum is not a line spectrum but rather flat, following approximately the rule f(w) = constant, where f describes the probability of occupying the phase space cells of energy . This is a significant difference from a closed system, where f(w) is the well-known Boltzmann distribution, where T is the absolute temperature [2].
    · The probability of counting 0,1,2,...., n biophotons in a preset time interval Dt follows accurately a Poissonian distribution p(n,Dt) = exp (-) n/n! , where is the mean value of photon numbers n during the preset time interval Dt[2].
    · This Poissonian probability distribution is fulfilled even in non-stationary biophoton emission. It holds to time intervals down to at least Dt of 10-5 s [2].
    · Instead of following an exponential decay, delayed luminescence can be described rather accurately by a "hyperbolic relaxation" of the type A/(1+tz), where A and z are constant (including complex) values, while t is the time after external excitation [2].
    · The temperature dependence follows a Curie-Weiss law rather than the Arrhenius factor [3].
    · It is evident that at least a significant part of biophoton emission originates from DNA [4].
    · There are manifold non-linear dependencies of biophoton emission on cell densities [5].
    One of the leading researchers in this new field of biophotons is Fritz-Albert Popp of the International Institute of Biophysics (Biophotonics). Popp was one of those brilliant scientist who risked his career when he became interested in biophotons and there potential for healing. Experiments have even revealed that persons with deceased cells may be healed remotely by those who transmit coherent states of information via biophoton transmission.
    Popp says, "Biophotons are photons emitted spontaneously by all living systems.1-3 In particular, this phenomenon is not confined to "thermal" radiation in the infrared range. It is well known at present that biophotons are emitted also in the range from visible up to UV. Actually, the intensity of "biophotons" can be registered from a few photons per second and square centimeter surface area on up to some hundred photons from every living system under investigation. The spectral distribution never does display small peaks around definite frequencies. Rather, the quite flat distribution within the range of at least 300 to 800 nm has to be assigned to a thermodynamical system "far away" from equilibrium, since the probability f(n)(see Footnote) of occupying the phase space is on average almost constant and exceeds the Boltzmann distribution in this spectral range by at least a factor of 1010(in the red) up to 1040 (in the UV-range). Fig. 1 displays a typical frequency distribution of a living system, where the spectral intensity of biophotons (at the outside of the living system) has been averaged over several measurements and then expressed in terms of the excitation temperatures (upper figures and lower, left figure) or the occupation probability f(n ) (lower right figure). The term "bio-" in biophotons has been introduced4 in the same way as it has been done in the term "bio-luminescence", pointing to the biological source of the emission, and the term "photons" in the word ,,biophotons" has been chosen to express the fact that the phenomenon is characterized by measuring single photons, indicating that this phenomenon has to be considered as a subject of quantum optics rather than of "classical" physics." (3)
    Though biophoton emissions are weak and various instruments are needed to detect these biophotons, the possibility exists that it may give rise to methods of detecting extraterrestrial life forms and determining their vital signatures.
    "Whereas an incoherent source relaxes according to an exponential relationship between light intensity and time of measurement, a coherent emission decays according to a hyperbolic relationship. Popp et al. and others have done considerable research to measure the kinetics of the decay of biological light emission from many organisms, with the result that almost all of the decay curves show a hyperbolic relationship. Although hyperbolic decay might also be observed for systems with a large number of independent emitters, Popp and Li10 maintain that under the particular conditions in which they have measured hyperbolic decay for light from organisms, the long-lasting hyperbolic decay observed for induced light emission is a sufficient condition for coherence." (4)
    It is possible that biophotons may even be carriers of psi information and that a coherent coupling can be established between two conscious life forms resulting in a transference of information from a higher potential field to a field at lower potential. Even though this is conjecture at this point, it suggests other means by which disparate life forms can communicate. We know there is a process by which trees communicate and even signal each other in the face of danger. We may be exchanging information with pets and other animals through biophotonic communication. This may be how some people who have a green thumb affect plants they care for. The possibilities have not been fully explored, but I suspect that biophotonics will be a growing science in the 21st century.
    (1) http://www.transpersonal.de/mbischof/englisch/webbookeng.htm
    (2) http://www.lifescientists.de/ib0205e_1.htm
    (3) http://www.datadiwan.de/iib/ib0204e_1.htm
    (4) http://www.noetic.org/Ions/publications/review_archives/26/issue26_10.html

  • In the not-so-distant future, a new kind of weapon could appear that would change the balance of political power in the world. This main principle behind this weapon: seek and destroy according to genetics.
    Vasili Sychev
    http://www.gateway2russia.com/st/art_217290.php
    02 March 2004 10:56
    American scientists have declared that in ten years they will succeed in creating a radically new type of biological weapon. This weapon would be capable of infecting people according to a genetically predetermined marker such as skin color or eye shape. Infection could have a delayed effect or only begin once a certain type of medicine was taken. A recent closed seminar held by the CIA was devoted to the topic. The event took place as part of the Project for the New American Century.
    A slow sickness
    Scientists have been exploring the possibilities of selective biological weapons for some time now. This is roughly how these weapons would work. Genetic information is implanted into bacteria’s “programming,” reflecting the gene structure or gene combination of a certain targeted group of people. Once the programmed bacteria enter someone’s system, they “recognize” their target and kill the person. If the genetic structure of the infected person does not correspond, the microbe dies without harming him.
    Even specialists will have a hard time differentiating bacterial ethnic cleansing from a regular epidemic, if only because the countries leading the development of these weapons could purposefully misinform the public. There will be few direct clues.
    Another difficulty is that this weapon could have a delayed effect. It could be turned on by a trigger mechanism, meaning it could target not only specific people but also people under very specific conditions. This means that illness could be delayed not just by days but for an indefinite period of time. Yet the moment the infected person, say, comes down with strep throat and takes antibiotics, the bacteria begin to multiply, leading to a severe illness that eludes diagnosis.
    “It is already possible today to create antibiotic resistant cultures,” Alexander Prozorov, a professor in the microorganism genetics lab at the Russian Academy of Science Institute for General Genetics, told Expert. The most striking examples of this type of culture are streptomycin-dependent bacteria that only grow in the presence of the antibiotic streptomycin. This will make it hard for doctors to do much, as traditional pharmaceuticals won’t help. On the contrary, treatment will only make the patient sicker.
    Political germs
    Yet the most terrifying new possibility is the hypothetical biological weapon that could infect people according to genetic markers. Not only would it allow for genocide; it would be created specifically for that purpose. A recent report by the British Medical Association stated that “the rapid progress in genetics could become the basis for ethnic cleansing on an unheard of scale in the near future.”
    Three years ago, ideologues like US Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and PNAC Director William Crystal were already discussing genetic weapons. They recommended that the Pentagon consider the possibility for using this type of weapon not only to successfully wage war, but also to reconfigure world politics. According to a PNAC report, genetic weapons could completely change the politics of the entire planet: “cutting-edge biological warfare targeting a certain genotype could turn the reign of terrorism into a politically useful tool.”
    According to information from PNAC, Israel has also recently begun to work actively on mutagenic weapons. Israel geneticists confirm that Arabs carry a unique gene that no one else in the world has. This gene forms the basis for the Israeli research, believe American experts.
    Things look far more frightening, in fact. Genetic weapons could do more than destroy an ethnic group. They could kill according to a person’s “usefulness” or “talents.” American journalist and bestselling author Thom Hartmann has argued that it would even be possible to kill those with the gene for attention deficit disorder. This means that if you are easily distracted and have a hard time concentrating (there could be other selection criteria as well), you could end up marked for destruction.
    We will survive
    Fortunately, it is not as easy to create a selective biological weapon as some scientists are claiming. Though it may be possible to create bacteria that multiple only when a person takes a specific medication, the creation of an effective genetic weapon that would not harm the developers themselves seems unrealistic in the foreseeable future.
    “It is hard to imagine how a microbe would determine the presence or absence of a certain gene or its structure. Even a researcher armed with the last word in scientific technology has a hard time doing this. It would impossible for bacteria to accomplish such a task,” believes Prozorov.
    And so on. Even if bacteria could learn how to identify specific genes, how would this information be transformed into infection? That bacteria multiply in the presence of certain antibiotics is clear, but how would information about eye and hair color turn into certain doom for the world’s blue-eyed blonds? For this kind of weapon to become a reality, its creators would have to stuff the bacteria with a powerful “computer” to identify genes and at the same time arm them with the means to begin an infection.
    There is one more reason why this kind of biological weapon is unlikely to be as effective as the ideologues would wish. As Nazi doctor Josef Mengele put it, “Scratch a Frenchman and find an African.” Humanity has existed for many millennia. In the context of all our past tribal and intertribal connections, it is not far from the truth to say that we are all brothers. “Over the many years of human existence, ethnics groups have intermingled to such an extent that the genetic structures determining ethnic identity have blurred and become difficult to recognize,” notes Prozorov.

  • Politically Desireable, Genetically Unviable
    02 March 2004 13:11
    http://www.gateway2russia.com/st/art_217728.php
    Sergei Netesov, Deputy General Director of the Vektor Novosibirsk State Research Center for Bioengineering and Virology, reveals whether it will be possible to develop mutagenic biological weapons in the future.
    - How realistic would it be to develop biological weapons that could kill people according to a genetic marker?
    - You know, there are politician who set goals for scientists. These goals are often never accomplished, but nonetheless, why not set goals and why not get money for research? Creating genetic weapons is a goal of this kind.
    In reality, it would be quite difficult to create this kind of weapon. A lot of currently published research is dedicated to the structure of the human genome and the difference between various races. It has been proven that the differences are very slight, and scientists have only begun to identify them. We probably could find particular, very important genes that control immunity or receptor proteins in cells that vary significantly among different races but that major task is far from complete. The problem is that there are millions of genes in the human body and to try to pick out the ones responsible for ethnic difference is like looking for a needle in a haystack. But in principle, there is a lot of money behind this project and with time someone might be able to do it at some point.
    - How realistic is it to create bacteria that after entering the body only begin to multiple when the person takes a certain medication?
    - It would be possible to create this kind of bacteria. The thing is that there are regions of genes or entire genes that work like on-off switches. They are responsible for turning on or off certain genes or clusters. But again, it is completely unclear how this could be applied. The overwhelming majority of countries, including the US and Russia, signed a convention that prohibits developing, testing, manufacturing, and storing biological weapons. If they begin conducting research and tests, they will be violating this convention and giving other countries an excuse to start this kind of research themselves.
    - Would it be possible to create bacteria that could change the structure of the DNA in the cells it infects?
    - The overwhelming number of bacteria do not penetrate cells during the infection process. They live in bodily fluids and as a consequence do not come into physical contact with the functioning genetic material inside cells. Even when bacteria destroy a cell, its genetic material does not come into contact with the genetic material of the bacteria. They are always separated by at least one membrane. Even if contact does occur after the cell has been destroyed, it happens as a rule with genetic material that has already been broken down. No other cell will be able to use this material, except as nucleotide building blocks.
    However, some viruses can penetrate a cell’s genetic material. Fragments of their genomes can establish themselves in a cell’s genome. These adenoviruses, retroviruses, and a few other viruses can already be used theoretically (and now practically) for gene therapy and cancer treatment. Yet to create viruses that could target only a certain race or people is nearly impossible in my opinion, at least at the current stage of biology.
    - Would it be even theoretically possible to create a microbe that would be able to resist all pharmaceuticals, including antibiotics?
    - In part we already know bacteria, whole varieties and cultures, that are resistant to an entire range of antibiotics. They frequently appear in nature without any help from people. This is encouraged by the uncontrolled human use of antibiotics. For this reason in developed countries over-the-counter antibiotics have been practically banned for quite some time. You must have a prescription.
    You would not need to create a microbe to do something with a virus. There are no effective medicines against many viruses. Out of all the many varieties of viruses that exist today, we know only about 5-10% according to some experts. The rest remain a mystery but their numbers are steadily falling. Researchers have identified more than three dozen human pathogens over the last thirty years.
    - After the SARS epidemic in China last year, some believed that the virus was man-made. In China, the theory that the epidemic was a test of an ethnic weapon became very popular. What do you think about this?
    - There are many writers, especially those with good imaginations, who link up facts in a way that leads to very strange conclusions. However, when more meticulous people begin to dig a bit deeper, it becomes clear that the authors of this kind of book often toss out an entire range of facts that would show a different side of the matter. This is most likely what happened with the Chinese book you are referring to. In part, I would like to note that the patients that died from SARS weren’t just Chinese. They were also Italians, Canadians, and Germans, as well as other nationalities.
    Moreover, the SARS virus (a coronavirus) has a very complex structure and the notion that it was artificially created is, to put it mildly, highly unlikely at the current level of virology and genetic engineering. If it was created by someone, this person is either a genius of a caliber as yet unseen by humanity or had an incredible stroke of luck. The same kind of luck that would make a monkey pounding on a typewriter produce a significant portion (say, thirty thousand letter) of War and Peace by sheer coincidence.


  • CDC's 'X-Files' probes mysterious deaths
    Project takes on cases that stumped others
    ATLANTA, Georgia (AP) --In a project resembling something out of television's "The X-Files," federal health officials say the causes of a quarter of the deaths that have stumped coroners in recent years appear to be from ordinary, treatable conditions.
    The "Unexplained Deaths Project" is a collection of data on the mysterious deaths of 227 children and adults from 1995 to 2003.
    Despite advances in medical technology, a specific cause of death was found for just 53 of the cases, slightly more than a quarter. The findings were presented this week at the International Conference on Emerging Infectious Diseases.
    More than half of the 53 deaths were caused by bacteria that could have been treated with medicines, said Sarah Reagan, a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention epidemiologist with the project. Vaccines would have prevented other cases.
    Nineteen children's deaths were blamed on flu.
    Thirty-seven percent of the determined causes of death involved a respiratory illness and 36 percent were from sepsis, a common bloodstream infection from toxin-producing bacteria. The causes of the remaining deaths included pneumonia and heart problems.
    The project was launched by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to serve as an early warning system for emerging diseases. About a dozen health departments around the country participate.
    AIDS, Legionnaires' disease and hantavirus sickened people for years before the diseases were first identified by health officials, said Reagan.

  • Anthrax Cleanup Starts at American Media
    Three Years Later, Anthrax Decontamination Starts at Former Home of American Media
    The Associated Press
    BOCA RATON, Fla. Feb. 15 — Decontamination has finally started at the former headquarters of tabloid publisher American Media Inc., the first target of the 2001 anthrax attacks that killed five people.
    Crews from the company Bio-ONE spent Saturday setting up decontamination areas in the basement and preparing for detailed scouting trips on other floors this week.
    More than a dozen people entered the building Saturday, staying only about an hour each before leaving to be decontaminated themselves and undergoing medical checks, said Sandra Schuh, a director of Sabre Technical Services. Sabre is half of Bio-ONE, created with former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani's security consulting firm, Giuliani Partners.
    The American Media building had been the home of the National Enquirer, Star and Weekly World News tabloids.
    A photo editor at The Sun is believed to have contracted anthrax from a tainted letter sent to the headquarters. He died Oct. 5, 2001, from inhalation anthrax.
    No one has been arrested in connection with the anthrax attacks.
    The building was quarantined and the FBI held it as a crime scene until September 2002. American Media sold the building for $40,000 last April and the cleanup by the company Bio-ONE wasn't announced until January. Since then, Bio-ONE had been making preparations and obtaining permits needed before the decontamination could begin.
    Bio-ONE will be based in the Boca Raton building after the cleanup is complete.
     


  • From butterfly wings to single e-mail, if one action can cause a torrent, Cornell researchers find the best place to start
    EMBARGOED UNTIL SUNDAY, FEB. 15, 2004, AT 5:30 P.M. EST
    Contact: Bill Steele
    Office: 607-255-7164
    E-Mail: [email protected]
    SEATTLE -- "Does the flap of a butterfly's wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas?" Zoologist Konrad Lorenz once asked in postulating the "butterfly effect," the idea that the flapping of fragile wings could start a chain reaction in the atmosphere. In today's world of the Internet the question might be rephrased: Can a single e-mail from Brazil set off a torrent of action in Texas?
    Sociologists postulate that what a few influential leaders think and say can spread and grow and bring about big changes in the thinking of large numbers of people. The Internet offers a compelling new place to look for this phenomenon by studying very large groups and especially, seeing how groups change over time.
    But how do you find those influential people? Computer scientists at Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., have some suggestions. Their ideas could be applied to such diverse goals as selling a new product, promoting new agricultural techniques in developing countries, predicting the spread of a disease or identifying leaders of terrorist organizations.
    Jon Kleinberg, Cornell professor of computer science, discussed the problem, and some computer algorithms to solve it, in a talk on Feb. 15 at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Seattle. His talk was part of a symposium on "Community Structure of the Internet and World Wide Web: Mathematical Analyses." His research collaborators were Eva Tardos, Cornell professor of computer science, and former post-doctoral research associate David Kempe, now at the University of Washington.
    A common approach used by sociologists is to interview every member of a group and find out who associates with whom -- essentially a snapshot of one moment. Collaboration with computer scientists now makes it possible to send out Web crawlers to map the communications links in a group, something that can be done repeatedly over time, and with much larger groups.
    Groups on the Internet can take many forms, including Usenet and chatroom discussion groups, e-mail mailing lists and links between Web sites on related topics. Most recently, the writers of personal online journals known as Web logs, or "blogs," have begun to link to one another and comment on each other's work.One way to find the influential people would be to identify those who have the most links to others, or the ones who can reach the largest number of others with the fewest "hops" through other people. That, Kleinberg says, introduces redundancy: the two or three top candidates could all link to the same subset of the network. So, Kleinberg suggests, "After targeting the first few people you discount others, then you look for people who are still influential but in diverse parts of the network."
    The researchers tested their algorithm on another kind of network, the pattern of co-authorship in scientific papers. Their data pool was the online E-print Archive of physics and mathematics publications, commonly known as the arXiv, maintained by Cornell University Library. People were considered to be linked when they co-authored papers. The studies ignored any real-world information, such as whether two people might be at the same institution. In simulations Kleinberg and colleagues found that their method significantly outperformed methods that rely solely on counting links or measuring the distance between candidates and the rest of the network.
    Kleinberg also has been studying the way networks grow over time, working with David Liben-Nowell, a Ph.D. student at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. One goal is to try to predict where new links will form in a network. In the arXiv network, the researchers hypothesized that two people who haven't been linked would be likely to form a link if they are near one another in linkage terms. What they found, however, was that the number of hops was not the best measure of nearness. The reason, Kleinberg says, is the "small world phenomenon" -- the fact that everyone is on average "six degrees of separation" from everyone else -- so counting the number of hops between people doesn't help. "It's better to look for people who have many different short paths connecting them, " he says. "This is an interesting open question with a lot of room for further research."

  • Mood Ring Measured in Megahertz
    http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,62069,00.html
    02:00 AM Jan. 29, 2004 PT
    Your computer -- that auxiliary brain that lives outside your skull -- soon may be issuing public updates on what's happening inside your body.
    Using tiny sensors, transmitters and some software, researchers at Sandia National Laboratories have turned personal computers into advanced polygraph machines that they say are capable of monitoring people's emotions and abilities.
    Here's how it would work: You're in a meeting, and each person in attendance is hooked up to a computer that's monitoring their perspiration and heartbeat, reading their facial expressions and head motions, analyzing their voice tones and then presenting them with a running account of how they are feeling. This information will also be transmitted to everyone else in the meeting.
    Talking too much? A pop-up window appears on the screen to tell you to shut up. Feeling edgy? A message reminds you to calm down. Got a big account or project to assign? Scan the feed to see which employee is feeling the perkiest that morning.
    The idea, according to Peter Merkle, who heads the Mentor/PAL program at Sandia, is to develop ways to understand and improve human performance, particularly in military or other high-risk situations.
    "The future of human-machine systems can be a bright one, if we develop technology that enables us to be more fully human," Merkle said.
    Preliminary tests of Mentor/PAL indicated that using the system improved teamwork and resulted in a calmer, less-stressed workplace since everyone had insight into how their team members were feeling, Merkle added.
    But privacy advocates think that Mentor/PAL is eerily similar to HAL, the computer that took over the spaceship in the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey, and believe that monitoring physical information such as heartbeat and perspiration is a violation of an individual's right to keep personal medical information private.
    "This is very troubling from a privacy standpoint. There is no universal protection for medical information, and certainly no national standard for protecting medical information gathered in the workplace," said Tena Friery of the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, a nonprofit consumer information and advocacy program.
    "HIPAA, the national medical privacy standard, only covers medical privacy in the workplace in very limited ways, such as when it has to do with medical insurance provided by the employer in a group health plan or self-insured plan. This seems to be one more example of a growing trend of employers to gather worker's medical information to address some business issue," Friery said.
    Merkle pointed out that Mentor/PAL is being developed primarily for military use, for situations where people are making high-consequence decisions.
    "Professionals like soldiers in Special Forces units and technical professionals in positions of high trust in the homeland security community must give up degrees of personal privacy in exchange for the privilege of serving others," said Merkle.
    "In those kinds of roles, mission success is the most important concern," Merkle said. "A Navy SEAL knows that concealing a knee injury from their team leadership is not a good thing to do. Their personal desire to be on active duty is outweighed by the need to give the team commander reliable information about their ability to perform their job, because lives may depend on it."
    Mentor/PAL relies on precedent to decide whether people are currently functioning at a highly reliable, moderate or poor level. It's no different from making coaching decisions based on baseball statistics, said Merkle. "Against left-handed batters in the last 200 night games, this person hits .207, so pinch-hit the .298 person for him.
    "So it's not so much about figuring out when people are insufficient," Merkle said. "It is about enabling them as individuals and teams to be their best."
    Mentor/PAL uses commercial face-recognition software and off-the-shelf sensors to measure muscle activity, heartbeat, blood oxygen, and breathing depth and rapidity.
    The only custom-built components are the wire interfaces by Autonomechs and software by MindTel.
    Sandia researchers tested Mentor/PAL by observing how the system worked while two teams played the military strategy game Rainbow Six: Raven Shield.
    "If someone got really excited during the game and that's correlated with poor performance, the machine told him to slow down via a pop-up message," said Merkle. "Or it told the team leader, 'Take Bill out of loop, he's had too much coffee and too little sleep. Sally, though, is giving off the right signals to do a great job.'"
    Team members reported that the whole process was a little awkward at first, but they soon forgot they were being monitored.
    One corporate executive who heard about the project e-mailed Merkle and asked, "Where do we get the version that tells people they are boring in meetings? Please hurry and send that system to us. A truck full or two should cover us."
    The commercial release schedule for the system is still undetermined. Sandia researchers intend to further develop Mentor/PAL first, in joint projects with the University of New Mexico and Caltech.
    "I honestly can't see corporations daring to use this monitoring system on their employees. People would not accept this -- it's just plain spooky," said Joe Aldrama, who counsels companies and individuals on how to increase their efficiency.
    "But I could see it being used on a personal level, as a sort of biofeedback tool to monitor your own performance," Aldrama added. "Say you are a person who tends to overreact to things, you could use this to remind yourself to take a few deep breaths before you commence with the biting off of heads."
    The Sandia team agreed that figuring out ways to provide personal control of the information flow would be paramount to protect privacy when and if Mentor/PAL is used by private enterprises.
    Merkle added that science still has a way to go in developing software systems that can accurately predict what people are capable of doing.
    People and their behaviors cannot be described or re-created by a computer program realized in binary code in a silicon substrate. But Merkle believes the key is in gathering physical information and correlating it with an ever-evolving database of statistical probabilities.
    "Our brains and our bodies are as one, it seems," said Merkle. "Our gut feelings are as essential to our higher thought processes as the power plant is to your PC."

  • Malnutrition in West Bank as bad as in sub-Saharan Africa -UK MPs
    02/05/04
    LONDON (Reuters) - Malnutrition in the Gaza Strip and West Bank is as bad as in sub-Saharan Africa because the Palestinian economy has all but collapsed under Israeli restrictions, British lawmakers said Thursday.
    A report by the cross-party International Development Select Committee also called on Britain to press the European Union to impose trade sanctions on Israel until it lifts its restrictions on Palestinian trade.
    The World Bank said last year the Palestinian economy was in steep decline after the Israeli army blockaded and raided Palestinian towns and set up road checkpoints to crack down on a Palestinian uprising for statehood begun in September 2000.
    Citing charity figures, the report said rates of malnutrition were as bad in Gaza and the West Bank "as anywhere one would find in sub-Saharan Africa."
    It added: "Palestinians ... are not, as yet, dying of starvation. But they are suffering from malnutrition, as stocks are stretched to feed more and more people."
    "We therefore urge the UK government to propose to the EU Council of Trade Ministers that Israel's preferential terms of trade with the EU be suspended until it lifts the movement restrictions which it has placed on Palestinian trade."
    A controversial Israeli security barrier has also carved up West Bank land, cutting off thousands of Palestinian farmers from their crops, markets and some water supplies. Israel calls the barrier a security precaution that has already stopped at least two dozen suicide bombings.
    "Measures, such as the construction of a security barrier higher than the Berlin Wall, may bring the mirage of immediate security to Israelis, but the level of despair felt by ordinary Palestinians at being denied an ordinary life can only increase the supply of suicide bombers," committee chairman Tony Baldry said. Any such fence should be built on Israeli land, he added.
    A World Bank report last year said around 60 percent of Palestinians were living below a poverty line of $2 a day, up from 21 percent on the eve of the latest Palestinian uprising. Israeli gross domestic product per capita was $16,300 last year.
    "The Palestinian economy has all but collapsed. Unemployment rates are in the region of 60 to 70 percent and many of those who are employed are dependent upon NGOs or international relief organizations for employment," the committee report said.
    A spokeswoman for Britain's Department for International Development said the government would respond to the committee's report "well before" the normal 60-day limit "given the urgency of the situation the region."
    The committee took oral and written evidence for the report "Development Assistance and the Occupied Palestinian Territories" and visited the Palestinian territories last year.

  • Fireball seen in Alaskan sky
    BLUISH FIREBALL: Witnesses say burn lasted six or seven seconds.
    Anchorage Daily News
    February 27, 2004
    A meteor streaked across the skies over the Susitna River Valley on Tuesday night, producing a bluish fireball seen by people in Homer and Anchorage, according to the National Weather Service.
    Two witnesses reported seeing the burn last for six or seven seconds about 10:20 p.m., said meteorologist Dave Vonderheide.
    "It was unusually bright," he said.
    Based on their reports, Vonderheide estimated that the object entered Earth's atmosphere somewhere over Montana Creek and moved southwest toward Skwentna before fading from sight.
    Most meteors are small rocks or grains from space that hurtle into the upper atmosphere 50 to 60 miles above the surface at extraordinary speeds, sometimes more than 100,000 mph.
    "Globally on any 24-hour night, there's probably several of these (large) fireballs because there's a lot of stuff out there in space," Vonder-heide said. "There's just a lot of rock out there. ... I see two to three of these a year."
    Thousands of meteors burn up over Earth each day, most above oceans or uninhabited areas or during daylight when they can't be seen, according to a Web site maintained by the American Meteor Society.
    The color comes from the meteor's composition and velocity as it heats up and disintegrates. Magnesium generates blue-white light, and so do meteors that are streaking especially fast. The superheating of atmospheric gases around the object can also influence the color.
    Tracking down meteors for excited observers is all part of answering the phone at the local weather service office, Vonderheide said. "Do you know that the word 'meteorology' has the word 'meteor' in it? And the Latin 'meteor' means 'something in the air.'

  • Did a Comet Trigger The Great Chicago Fire?
    Discovery News
    March 5, 2004 — Perhaps it was not Mrs. O'Leary's cow kicking over a lantern that sparked the Great Chicago Fire of 1871, which destroyed the downtown area and claimed 300 lives.
    New research lends credence to an alternative explanation: The fire, along with less-publicized and even more deadly blazes the same night in upstate Wisconsin and Michigan, was the result of a comet fragment crashing into Earth's atmosphere.
    The comet theory has been around — and most often discarded — since at least 1883, but Robert Wood, a retired McDonnell Douglas physicist, said never before has the orbital parameters of the rogue comet been taken into consideration.
    The likely suspect, in Wood's eyes, is a fragment from Biela's Comet, which had been circling the sun every six years and nine months before a close encounter with Jupiter caused it to break into two large fragments in 1845. During its next passage, astronomers noted a 1.5-million mile, 15-day gap between the two pieces.
    Wood said his analysis of the fragments' positions during subsequent orbits shows that Jupiter's gravity again affected their speed and trajectory, sending the smaller fragment on a path toward Earth that ended in October 1871. He presented his findings at a conference last week titled "Planetary Defense: Protecting Earth from Asteroids," held in Garden Grove, Calif.
    Wood cited eyewitness reports of spontaneous ignitions, lack of smoke and "fire balloons" falling from the sky to bolster his theory. If the fire had been caused by comet debris, which is believed to have consisted of small pieces of frozen methane, acetylene or other highly combustible chemicals, it also would explain the cause of the fires blazing north of Chicago, which wiped out 2,000 people and burned 4 million acres of farm and prairie lands.
    The deceased included many who showed no signs of being burned, Wood said. "This would be consistent with either the absence of oxygen or the presence of carbon monoxide or carbon dioxide above lethal levels," — a rare — but not unprecedented — situation in large forest fires.
    In all, over a 24-hour period, an area of land the size of Connecticut was burned. Wood speculates the main body of the comet crashed into Lake Michigan, with peripheral fragments causing the fires in Chicago, Wisconsin and Michigan.
    NASA is among a handful of agencies and organizations working on cataloging potentially threatening near-Earth asteroids and comets. What would be done about any threatening asteroids, however, remains the domain of science fiction.
    "What's important about these findings," Wood said, "is that they show you people can actually get killed from something from out of space."

     

  • Collision with comet may have hastened first plague epidemic
    By Steve Connor, Science Editor
    04 February 2004
    http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_medical/story.jsp?story=487550
    A collision between Earth and a passing comet in the 6th century AD may have caused the collapse of agriculture, mass famine and indirectly led to the bubonic plague in Europe, a study has suggested.
    Scientists have calculated that a relatively small comet, or fragment of a comet, could have caused huge amounts of dust and debris to be ejected into the atmosphere, blocking the sun for months at a time.
    The resulting crop failures and famine would have allowed bubonic plague to spread easily among a physically weakened population.
    Studies of tree rings - from preserved oaks retrieved from Irish bogs to ancient American pine trees - have shown that plant growth around the world almost stopped between about 536AD to 545AD. Chinese records from this time refer to a "dust veil" obscuring the skies. Mediterranean historians record a "dry fog" that blocked out much of the sun's heat for more than a year.
    Scientists have suggested two causes, both involving the ejection of dust or debris into the atmosphere to block the sun and so prevent photosynthesis.
    One idea is that a super-volcano erupted, but neither the volcano nor its acidic deposits have been identified, Derek Ward-Thompson, who carried out the latest study at Cardiff University, said. The other proposal involved a collision with a big asteroid or comet, but there was no direct evidence such as a crater.
    However, Dr Ward-Thompson and his colleagues Mel Symonds and Emma Rigby believe a much smaller comet which exploded in the atmosphere could easily have generated the dust and debris in the 6th century catastrophe. "The surprising result of these calculations is just how small a comet fragment we have estimated was needed to cause the observed effects," Dr Ward-Thompson said.
    "A comet less than 1km in diameter has not been previously considered to represent a global hazard - as opposed to a local hazard - let alone one 0.5km across," he said.
    Using information gathered from the impact of Comet Shoemaker-Levy with Jupiter in 1994, the scientists have produced a model of how comet fragments would behave if they collided with Earth. "The comet plunges into the upper atmosphere leaving an effectively hollow tube behind it, where it has been, and into which the surrounding air has not yet had time to diffuse," the scientists write in the journal Astronomy and Physics.
    "This tube then acts rather like a gun barrel, focusing much of the energy of the airburst explosion along the tube and carrying with it much of the comet debris," they write.
    As a result, the plume would have spread around the world in a massive fountain of debris. "This period coincides with a mass population decrease in Europe. This is commonly known as the Justinian plague, and is believed to be the first appearance of the Black Death in Europe," the scientists say.
    They said that if such an event happened today, a large percentage of the population could face starvation.

  • Scientists Say Bird Flu More Virulent, Can Live For Years
    By Tan Ee Lyn
    1-28-4
    HONG KONG (Reuters) -- The unusually large number of ducks dying from bird flu in southern China indicates the bug has become more virulent, which will put more people at risk of contracting it, Hong Kong scientists said on Wednesday.
    They also raised the alarm about chilled and frozen poultry meat, saying the deadly H5N1 virus could survive for years in temperatures as low as minus 70 degrees Celsius (-94 F), but repeated that it can be killed if meat is cooked properly.
    China confirmed on Tuesday that H5N1 had killed ducks in southern Guangxi province, making it the tenth place in Asia to be afflicted with a disease that has killed eight people in the region in the last few weeks.
    "H5 viruses are generally less fatal to ducks, so it is uncommon for so many ducks to die. This means this particular H5N1 strain has become more virulent," said virologist Leo Poon from the University of Hong Kong.
    "This means it can cause extensive deaths in poultry and this may in turn increase the chance of more people contracting it (if they come in direct contact with sick birds)."
    The flu has devastated poultry populations wherever it has appeared, and the greatest fear is that the H5N1 avian flu virus might latch onto human influenza and unleash a pandemic among people with no immunity to it.
    The avian flu strain first jumped from chicken to human in 1997 in Hong Kong, infecting 18 people and killing six of them. Then, experts considered ducks to be the original host of the H5N1, although the waterfowl were usually not taken ill by the bug.
    Scientists said they could not rule out the possibility that the new, more powerful bird flu strain might make the jump from human to human less difficult. So far, most of those infected were in close contact with chickens at home or on farms.
    "If virulence goes up, it would trigger larger outbreaks and more poultry deaths...and this increases the chance of human to human transmission," Poon said.
    SIGNS VIRUS HAS MUTATED
    Hong Kong has already banned the import of chicken from places affected by the bird flu, and Poon urged the government to begin stringent checks on chilled and frozen chicken and ducks in stores and warehouses and on future imports.
    "We must check the source of chilled and frozen chicken and we must do it at once," Poon said.
    Although the virulence of the current strain indicates the virus has mutated, experts were divided over whether the vaccine used in Hong Kong and parts of mainland China to inoculate chickens against the bird flu is still useful.
    The vaccine was cultured from the milder H5N2 virus.
    "It still serves to prevent H5N1," Poon said.
    But Frederick Leung, dean of science at the University of Hong Kong, was more circumspect.
    "This H5N2 vaccine provides cross-protection and effectiveness in 80 percent of chickens. But it is based on the 1997 strain. If there has been a mutation, any scientist will tell you the protection will be less than 80 percent, or even none," Leung said.


  • US Plans Al Qaeda Offensive In Pakistan
    By Christine Spolar
    Foreign Correspondent
    Chicago Tribune
    1-30-4
    The Bush administration, deeply concerned about recent assassination attempts against Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf and a resurgence of Taliban forces in neighboring Afghanistan, is preparing a U.S. military offensive that would reach inside Pakistan with the goal of destroying Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda network, military sources said.
    U.S. Central Command is assembling a team of military intelligence officers that would be posted in Pakistan ahead of the operation, according to sources familiar with details of the plan and internal military communications. The sources spoke on the condition they not be identified.
    As now envisioned, the offensive would involve Special Operations forces, Army Rangers and Army ground troops, sources said. A Navy aircraft carrier would be deployed in the Arabian Sea.
    Referred to in internal Pentagon messages as the "spring offensive," the operation would be driven by certain undisclosed events in Pakistan and across the region, sources said. A source familiar with details of the plan said this is "not like a contingency plan for North Korea, something that sits on a shelf. This planning is like planning for Iraq. They want this plan to be executable, now."
    The Defense Department declined to comment on the planned offensive or its details.
    Such an operation almost certainly would demand the cooperation of Musharraf, who previously has allowed only a small number of U.S. Special Operations forces to work alongside Pakistani troops in the semi-autonomous tribal areas. A military source in Washington said last week, "We are told we're going into Pakistan with Musharraf's help."
    Yet a large-scale offensive by U.S. forces within the nuclear-armed Islamic republic could be political dynamite for Musharraf.
    The army general, who took power in a bloodless coup in 1999, has come under growing political pressure from Islamic parties, and his cooperation with U.S. anti-terrorism efforts is widely unpopular among average Pakistanis. Nor can Musharraf count on the loyalty of all of Pakistan's armed forces or its intelligence agency, members of which helped set up and maintain the Taliban in Afghanistan and are suspected of ties to militant Islamic groups.
    Speaking on Friday at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Musharraf again rejected the need for U.S. forces to enter Pakistan to search for bin Laden.
    "That is not a possibility at all," Musharraf said. "It's a very sensitive issue."
    The U.S. military is operating under the belief that, despite his recent statements, Musharraf's thinking has changed, sources said. Musharraf said last week that bin Laden and his followers likely were hiding in the mountains along the Afghan border. He also said "we are reasonably sure that it is Al Qaeda" who was behind the two attempts on his life.
    An offensive into Pakistan to pursue Al Qaeda would be in keeping with President Bush's vow to strike wherever and whenever the United States feels threatened and to pursue terrorist elements to the end.
    "The best way to defend America... is to stay on the offensive and find these killers, one by one," Bush said last week. "We're going to stay on the hunt, which requires good intelligence, good cooperation, good participation with friends and allies around the world."
    Musharraf's vulnerability is of deep concern to U.S. officials. If he were killed, Bush administration officials say, it is unlikely that any successor would be as willing to work toward U.S. goals to eliminate Islamic extremists.
    The U.S. military plan is characterized within the Pentagon as "a big effort" in the next year. Military analysts had previously judged that a bold move against Islamic extremists and bin Laden, in particular, was more likely to happen in spring 2005.
    A series of planning orders--referred to in military jargon as warning orders--for the offensive were issued in recent weeks. The deadline for key planning factors to be detailed by the U.S. military was Jan. 21.
    Sources said the plan against Al Qaeda would be driven by events in the region rather than set deadlines and that delays could occur. But military sources said the push for this spring appeared to be triggered by the assassination attempts on Musharraf, both of which came in December, and, to some extent, the capture of Saddam Hussein in Iraq.
    Hussein was captured after eight months of an intense military and intelligence effort on the ground in Iraq. Pentagon and administration officials, buoyed by that success, believe a similar determined effort could work in Pakistan and lead to the capture or killing of bin Laden, said sources familiar with the planning.
    Thousands of U.S. forces would be involved, as well as Pakistani troops, planners said. Some of the 10,600 U.S. troops now in Afghanistan would be shifted to the border region as part of regular troop movements; some would be deployed within Pakistan.
    "Before we were constrained by the border. Musharraf did not want that. Now we are told we're going into Pakistan with Musharraf's help," a well-placed military source said.
    Internal Pentagon communications indicate the U.S. offensive would rely on several areas of operation, including Afghanistan, Pakistan and other countries in the region.
    The U.S. also is weighing how and if Iran can be persuaded, through direct or indirect channels, to lend help, according to internal Pentagon communications. The U.S. is eager to avoid a repeat of the Afghan war in 2001, when some Al Qaeda fighters were believed to have escaped into Iran.
    Military planners said the offensive would not require a significant increase in U.S. troops in South Asia. But Special Operations forces that shifted from Afghanistan to Iraq in 2003 will return.
    "We don't have enough forces but we can rely on proxy forces in that area," said a military source, referring to Pakistani troops. "This is designed to go after the Taliban and everybody connected with it."
    Copyright © 2004 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
    http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=2027&ncid=2027&e=2&u=
    /chitrib_ts/20040128/ts_chicagotrib/usplansalqaedaoffensive


  • WMD Found in Texas -CBS 11 Investigates Poison Gas Plot
    Nov 26, 2003 3:30 pm US/Central
    By Robert Riggs
    With Investigative Producer Todd Bensman
    Federal authorities this year mounted one of the most extensive investigations of domestic terrorism since the Oklahoma City bombing, CBS 11 has learned.
    Three people linked to white supremacist and anti-government groups are in custody. At least one weapon of mass destruction - a sodium cyanide bomb capable of delivering a deadly gas cloud - has been seized in the Tyler area.
    Investigators have seized at least 100 other bombs, bomb components, machine guns, 500,000 rounds of ammunition and chemical agents. But the government also found some chilling personal documents indicating that unknown co-conspirators may still be free to carry out what appeared to be an advanced plot. And, authorities familiar with the case say more potentially deadly cyanide bombs may be in circulation.
    Since arresting the three people in May, federal agents have served hundreds of subpoenas across the country in a domestic terror investigation that made it onto President Bush’s daily intelligence briefings and set off national security alarms among the country’s most senior counter-terror officials.
    William J. Krar, originally from New Hampshire, last week pleaded guilty in Tyler federal court to possession of a chemical weapon near the East Texas town of Noonday. He faces up to ten years in prison. His common-law wife, Judith Bruey, pleaded guilty to lesser weapons charges and faces up to five years in prison.
    Also arrested this past Spring was Newark, New Jersey resident Edward Feltus. The New Jersey Militia member has pleaded guilty to attempting to purchase fake United Nations and Department of Defense identity cards from Krar.
    All three have steadfastly maintained their silence, even though talking could reduce their prison sentences, and the investigation has stalled for now. Evidence seized and the fact that none of the defendants will talk has given rise to speculation that unknown conspirators may be still be involved in a broader plot to use Krar’s home-built chemical weapons, government officials say.
    “One would certainly have to question why an individual would feel compelled to stockpile sodium cyanide, hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, acetic acid, unless they had some bad intent,” said Assistant U.S. Attorney Wes Rivers, who is prosecuting the case. “They certainly had the capacity to be extremely dangerous.”
    Terrorism investigators suspect that Krar, who has paid no federal income taxes since 1988, made his living as a traveling arms salesman who pedaled illicit bomb components and other weapons to violent underground anti-government groups across the country.
    Sources familiar with the investigation say authorities especially fear that Krar may have manufactured more than one sodium cyanide bomb and sold them. After a traffic stop earlier this year while Krar was traveling through Tennessee, state troopers seized sodium cyanide among other weapons, one government source confirmed.
    During the same stop, troopers found notes in Krar’s car.
    One of the notes titled “Trip” recommends, “You will need cash, pre-charged phone card, spare gas can and all planning in place.”
    Another note titled “Procedure” appears to represent instructions for carrying out some kind of covert operation. It lists code words for cities where meetings can take place at motels. Other codes appear to be warnings about how close police might be to catching the plotters. “Lots of light storms are predicted,” for instance, means “Move fast before they look any harder. We have a limited window remaining.”
    The same note goes on to recommend ways to divert pursuers and suggests, “We want all looking in the wrong direction.”
    Since the attacks of September 11, 2001, counter-terrorism agencies have been consumed by national efforts to ferret out U.S.-based foreign terrorist cells whose members hail from the Middle East. Federal investigators were not looking for white supremacist groups when they stumbled across Krar by accident.
    He drew the FBI’s attention when he sent a package of counterfeit ID’s for the United Nations and Defense Intelligence Agency to Feltus’ New Jersey home earlier this year. The package was mistakenly delivered to a Staten Island man, who opened it and called police.
    A note found inside and signed by Krar stated, “Hope this package gets to you O.K. We would hate to have this fall into the wrong hands.”
    The discovery led to surveillance operations in and around Tyler, and then search warrants that turned up the Sodium cyanide bomb and other illegal weapons at locations controlled by Krar.
    Little is known about Krar and Bruey.
    Two years ago, the couple quietly set up business as a gun parts manufacturer at a remote storage locker in Noonday, Texas. Krar apparently has similarly operated his businesses under the radar for years in other states before coming to Texas. As he did in Tyler, Krar rented local post office boxes and storage units.
    In one affidavit for a search warrant, an FBI agent noted that Krar was “actively involved in the militia movement…a good source of covert weaponry for white supremacist and anti-government militia groups in New Hampshire.”
    Until now, the little town just south of Tyler was best known locally for the sweet onions grown there.
    Teresa Staples, who owns the storage facility, said Krar pretended to buy and sell army surplus goods at flea markets. Only later, when FBI agents swarmed the place, did she learn that the surplus goods hid dangerous chemicals and weapons.
    “Why did they pick such a small storage facility? Why did they pick this town, because I know they’re from up north,” she said. “How did they find us?”
    This was not the first time that Krar has drawn the attention of federal investigators. In 1995, the ATF investigated Krar and another man on weapons charges. The other suspect told authorities at the time that he and Krar shared an abiding hatred of the federal government and had been planning to bomb government facilities, court records show. But the suspect later recanted the story about plotting terror attacks with Krar. Krar denied the allegation and was not arrested, according to records.
    According to a more recent FBI affidavit, on the day of the 9-11 terrorist attacks, Krar raised suspicion at a New Hampshire storage unit he was renting. An employee called the FBI that day and reported that Krar was “wicked anti-American.”
    While authorities work for a new break in the case, some counter-terrorism experts question whether the government might be overlooking dangers closer to home while fighting the War on Terror in the Middle East.
    The Southern Poverty Law Center, which monitors domestic hate groups, says the number of openly violent groups dropped from more than 1,000 to about 100 after the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing because of negative public sentiment. Groups that call East Texas home include the Ku Klux Klan, the Aryan Nations and Christian Identity.
    In 1997, the Dallas FBI broke up a terror plot by members of the Ku Klux Klan to blow up a Wise County power plant.
    Former Dallas FBI Special Agent in Charge Danny Coulson was involved in the nation’s first stand-offs with domestic anti-government groups and mounted some of the first intensive domestic terror investigations. He cautioned that authorities should take care not to forget about domestic groups while concentrating on foreign ones.
    “It’s scary when you look at their capabilities,” he said. “Look at the vulnerabilities of our society. We don’t have to concern ourselves only with foreign terrorists, but we need to concern ourselves with domestic terrorists too. And these guys are very dangerous.”


  • The Pentagon's Weather Nightmare
    The climate could change radically, and fast. That would be the mother of all national security issues.
    FORTUNE
    Monday, January 26, 2004
    By David Stipp
    Global warming may be bad news for future generations, but let's face it, most of us spend as little time worrying about it as we did about al Qaeda before 9/11. Like the terrorists, though, the seemingly remote climate risk may hit home sooner and harder than we ever imagined. In fact, the prospect has become so real that the Pentagon's strategic planners are grappling with it.
    The threat that has riveted their attention is this: Global warming, rather than causing gradual, centuries-spanning change, may be pushing the climate to a tipping point. Growing evidence suggests the ocean-atmosphere system that controls the world's climate can lurch from one state to another in less than a decade—like a canoe that's gradually tilted until suddenly it flips over. Scientists don't know how close the system is to a critical threshold. But abrupt climate change may well occur in the not-too-distant future. If it does, the need to rapidly adapt may overwhelm many societies—thereby upsetting the geopolitical balance of power.
    Though triggered by warming, such change would probably cause cooling in the Northern Hemisphere, leading to longer, harsher winters in much of the U.S. and Europe. Worse, it would cause massive droughts, turning farmland to dust bowls and forests to ashes. Picture last fall's California wildfires as a regular thing. Or imagine similar disasters destabilizing nuclear powers such as Pakistan or Russia—it's easy to see why the Pentagon has become interested in abrupt climate change.
    Climate researchers began getting seriously concerned about it a decade ago, after studying temperature indicators embedded in ancient layers of Arctic ice. The data show that a number of dramatic shifts in average temperature took place in the past with shocking speed—in some cases, just a few years.
    The case for angst was buttressed by a theory regarded as the most likely explanation for the abrupt changes. The eastern U.S. and northern Europe, it seems, are warmed by a huge Atlantic Ocean current that flows north from the tropics—that's why Britain, at Labrador's latitude, is relatively temperate. Pumping out warm, moist air, this "great conveyor" current gets cooler and denser as it moves north. That causes the current to sink in the North Atlantic, where it heads south again in the ocean depths. The sinking process draws more water from the south, keeping the roughly circular current on the go.
    But when the climate warms, according to the theory, fresh water from melting Arctic glaciers flows into the North Atlantic, lowering the current's salinity—and its density and tendency to sink. A warmer climate also increases rainfall and runoff into the current, further lowering its saltiness. As a result, the conveyor loses its main motive force and can rapidly collapse, turning off the huge heat pump and altering the climate over much of the Northern Hemisphere.
    Scientists aren't sure what caused the warming that triggered such collapses in the remote past. (Clearly it wasn't humans and their factories.) But the data from Arctic ice and other sources suggest the atmospheric changes that preceded earlier collapses were dismayingly similar to today's global warming. As the Ice Age began drawing to a close about 13,000 years ago, for example, temperatures in Greenland rose to levels near those of recent decades. Then they abruptly plunged as the conveyor apparently shut down, ushering in the "Younger Dryas" period, a 1,300-year reversion to ice-age conditions. (A dryas is an Arctic flower that flourished in Europe at the time.)
    Though Mother Nature caused past abrupt climate changes, the one that may be shaping up today probably has more to do with us. In 2001 an international panel of climate experts concluded that there is increasingly strong evidence that most of the global warming observed over the past 50 years is attributable to human activities—mainly the burning of fossil fuels such as oil and coal, which release heat-trapping carbon dioxide. Indicators of the warming include shrinking Arctic ice, melting alpine glaciers, and markedly earlier springs at northerly latitudes. A few years ago such changes seemed signs of possible trouble for our kids or grandkids. Today they seem portents of a cataclysm that may not conveniently wait until we're history.
    Accordingly, the spotlight in climate research is shifting from gradual to rapid change. In 2002 the National Academy of Sciences issued a report concluding that human activities could trigger abrupt change. Last year the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, included a session at which Robert Gagosian, director of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts, urged policymakers to consider the implications of possible abrupt climate change within two decades.
    Such jeremiads are beginning to reverberate more widely. Billionaire Gary Comer, founder of Lands' End, has adopted abrupt climate change as a philanthropic cause. Hollywood has also discovered the issue—next summer 20th Century Fox is expected to release The Day After Tomorrow, a big-budget disaster movie starring Dennis Quaid as a scientist trying to save the world from an ice age precipitated by global warming.
    Fox's flick will doubtless be apocalyptically edifying. But what would abrupt climate change really be like?
    Scientists generally refuse to say much about that, citing a data deficit. But recently, renowned Department of Defense planner Andrew Marshall sponsored a groundbreaking effort to come to grips with the question. A Pentagon legend, Marshall, 82, is known as the Defense Department's "Yoda"—a balding, bespectacled sage whose pronouncements on looming risks have long had an outsized influence on defense policy. Since 1973 he has headed a secretive think tank whose role is to envision future threats to national security. The Department of Defense's push on ballistic-missile defense is known as his brainchild. Three years ago Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld picked him to lead a sweeping review on military "transformation," the shift toward nimble forces and smart weapons.
    When scientists' work on abrupt climate change popped onto his radar screen, Marshall tapped another eminent visionary, Peter Schwartz, to write a report on the national-security implications of the threat. Schwartz formerly headed planning at Royal Dutch/Shell Group and has since consulted with organizations ranging from the CIA to DreamWorks—he helped create futuristic scenarios for Steven Spielberg's film Minority Report. Schwartz and co-author Doug Randall at the Monitor Group's Global Business Network, a scenario-planning think tank in Emeryville, Calif., contacted top climate experts and pushed them to talk about what-ifs that they usually shy away from—at least in public.
    The result is an unclassified report, completed late last year, that the Pentagon has agreed to share with FORTUNE. It doesn't pretend to be a forecast. Rather, it sketches a dramatic but plausible scenario to help planners think about coping strategies. Here is an abridged version:
    A total shutdown of the ocean conveyor might lead to a big chill like the Younger Dryas, when icebergs appeared as far south as the coast of Portugal. Or the conveyor might only temporarily slow down, potentially causing an era like the "Little Ice Age," a time of hard winters, violent storms, and droughts between 1300 and 1850. That period's weather extremes caused horrific famines, but it was mild compared with the Younger Dryas.
    For planning purposes, it makes sense to focus on a midrange case of abrupt change. A century of cold, dry, windy weather across the Northern Hemisphere that suddenly came on 8,200 years ago fits the bill—its severity fell between that of the Younger Dryas and the Little Ice Age. The event is thought to have been triggered by a conveyor collapse after a time of rising temperatures not unlike today's global warming. Suppose it recurred, beginning in 2010. Here are some of the things that might happen by 2020:
    At first the changes are easily mistaken for normal weather variation—allowing skeptics to dismiss them as a "blip" of little importance and leaving policymakers and the public paralyzed with uncertainty. But by 2020 there is little doubt that something drastic is happening. The average temperature has fallen by up to five degrees Fahrenheit in some regions of North America and Asia and up to six degrees in parts of Europe. (By comparison, the average temperature over the North Atlantic during the last ice age was ten to 15 degrees lower than it is today.) Massive droughts have begun in key agricultural regions. The average annual rainfall has dropped by nearly 30% in northern Europe, and its climate has become more like Siberia's.
    Violent storms are increasingly common as the conveyor becomes wobbly on its way to collapse. A particularly severe storm causes the ocean to break through levees in the Netherlands, making coastal cities such as the Hague unlivable. In California the delta island levees in the Sacramento River area are breached, disrupting the aqueduct system transporting water from north to south.
    Megadroughts afflict the U.S., especially in the southern states, along with winds that are 15% stronger on average than they are now, causing widespread dust storms and soil loss. The U.S. is better positioned to cope than most nations, however, thanks to its diverse growing climates, wealth, technology, and abundant resources. That has a downside, though: It magnifies the haves-vs.-have-nots gap and fosters bellicose finger-pointing at America.
    Turning inward, the U.S. effectively seeks to build a fortress around itself to preserve resources. Borders are strengthened to hold back starving immigrants from Mexico, South America, and the Caribbean islands—waves of boat people pose especially grim problems. Tension between the U.S. and Mexico rises as the U.S. reneges on a 1944 treaty that guarantees water flow from the Colorado River into Mexico. America is forced to meet its rising energy demand with options that are costly both economically and politically, including nuclear power and onerous Middle Eastern contracts. Yet it survives without catastrophic losses.
    Europe, hardest hit by its temperature drop, struggles to deal with immigrants from Scandinavia seeking warmer climes to the south. Southern Europe is beleaguered by refugees from hard-hit countries in Africa and elsewhere. But Western Europe's wealth helps buffer it from catastrophe.
    Australia's size and resources help it cope, as does its location—the conveyor shutdown mainly affects the Northern Hemisphere. Japan has fewer resources but is able to draw on its social cohesion to cope—its government is able to induce population-wide behavior changes to conserve resources.
    China's huge population and food demand make it particularly vulnerable. It is hit by increasingly unpredictable monsoon rains, which cause devastating floods in drought-denuded areas. Other parts of Asia and East Africa are similarly stressed. Much of Bangladesh becomes nearly uninhabitable because of a rising sea level, which contaminates inland water supplies. Countries whose diversity already produces conflict, such as India and Indonesia, are hard-pressed to maintain internal order while coping with the unfolding changes.
    As the decade progresses, pressures to act become irresistible—history shows that whenever humans have faced a choice between starving or raiding, they raid. Imagine Eastern European countries, struggling to feed their populations, invading Russia—which is weakened by a population that is already in decline—for access to its minerals and energy supplies. Or picture Japan eyeing nearby Russian oil and gas reserves to power desalination plants and energy-intensive farming. Envision nuclear-armed Pakistan, India, and China skirmishing at their borders over refugees, access to shared rivers, and arable land. Or Spain and Portugal fighting over fishing rights—fisheries are disrupted around the world as water temperatures change, causing fish to migrate to new habitats.
    Growing tensions engender novel alliances. Canada joins fortress America in a North American bloc. (Alternatively, Canada may seek to keep its abundant hydropower for itself, straining its ties with the energy-hungry U.S.) North and South Korea align to create a technically savvy, nuclear-armed entity. Europe forms a truly unified bloc to curb its immigration problems and protect against aggressors. Russia, threatened by impoverished neighbors in dire straits, may join the European bloc.
    Nuclear arms proliferation is inevitable. Oil supplies are stretched thin as climate cooling drives up demand. Many countries seek to shore up their energy supplies with nuclear energy, accelerating nuclear proliferation. Japan, South Korea, and Germany develop nuclear-weapons capabilities, as do Iran, Egypt, and North Korea. Israel, China, India, and Pakistan also are poised to use the bomb.
    The changes relentlessly hammer the world's "carrying capacity"—the natural resources, social organizations, and economic networks that support the population. Technological progress and market forces, which have long helped boost Earth's carrying capacity, can do little to offset the crisis—it is too widespread and unfolds too fast.
    As the planet's carrying capacity shrinks, an ancient pattern reemerges: the eruption of desperate, all-out wars over food, water, and energy supplies. As Harvard archeologist Steven LeBlanc has noted, wars over resources were the norm until about three centuries ago. When such conflicts broke out, 25% of a population's adult males usually died. As abrupt climate change hits home, warfare may again come to define human life.
    Over the past decade, data have accumulated suggesting that the plausibility of abrupt climate change is higher than most of the scientific community, and perhaps all of the political community, are prepared to accept. In light of such findings, we should be asking when abrupt change will happen, what the impacts will be, and how we can prepare—not whether it will really happen. In fact, the climate record suggests that abrupt change is inevitable at some point, regardless of human activity. Among other things, we should:
    • Speed research on the forces that can trigger abrupt climate change, how it unfolds, and how we'll know it's occurring.
    • Sponsor studies on the scenarios that might play out, including ecological, social, economic, and political fallout on key food-producing regions.
    • Identify "no regrets" strategies to ensure reliable access to food and water and to ensure our national security.
    • Form teams to prepare responses to possible massive migration, and food and water shortages.
    • Explore ways to offset abrupt cooling—today it appears easier to warm than to cool the climate via human activities, so there may be "geo-engineering" options available to prevent a catastrophic temperature drop.
    In sum, the risk of abrupt climate change remains uncertain, and it is quite possibly small. But given its dire consequences, it should be elevated beyond a scientific debate. Action now matters, because we may be able to reduce its likelihood of happening, and we can certainly be better prepared if it does. It is time to recognize it as a national security concern.
    The Pentagon's reaction to this sobering report isn't known—in keeping with his reputation for reticence, Andy Marshall declined to be interviewed. But the fact that he's concerned may signal a sea change in the debate about global warming. At least some federal thought leaders may be starting to perceive climate change less as a political annoyance and more as an issue demanding action.
    If so, the case for acting now to address climate change, long a hard sell in Washington, may be gaining influential support, if only behind the scenes. Policymakers may even be emboldened to take steps such as tightening fuel-economy standards for new passenger vehicles, a measure that would simultaneously lower emissions of greenhouse gases, reduce America's perilous reliance on OPEC oil, cut its trade deficit, and put money in consumers' pockets. Oh, yes—and give the Pentagon's fretful Yoda a little less to worry about.

  • 'Helium 3' US Goal On Moon?
    By Vladimir Radyuhin
    MOSCOW, JAN. 25. The United States is planning to use the Moon as a source of energy fuel that should help it establish ultimate supremacy on the Earth, a Russian newspaper said.
    An ambitious programme to build a manned base on the Moon by 2020 unveiled by the U.S. President, George W. Bush, earlier this month was not a re-election gimmick as American and international media described it, but a strategic economically project, the authoritative Izvestia newspaper said.
    A lunar base will enable the U.S. to bring back to Earth shiploads of Helium-3, a valuable fuel for thermonuclear reactors, which is abundant on the Moon but practically absent on the Earth. The newspaper quoted academician, Erick Galimov, as saying that a couple of shuttle spacecraft can bring to Earth enough liquified Helium-3 to meet all global energy needs for 12 months.
    "If we had a thermonuclear reactor technology, it would be economically more efficient to deliver Helium-3 from the Moon today than generate power from fossil fuels or uranium," said Mr. Galimov, who heads the Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences. "Using Helium-3 in thermonuclear synthesis may prove the best way to meet global energy needs." The paper draws attention to the fact that the 2020 deadline Mr. Bush set for building a lunar base coincides with the expected construction of a thermonuclear reactor and a global energy crisis. With energy consumption in industrially developed countries growing at a rate of 10 per cent a year, thermonuclear power stations may be the only way to overcome an impending energy crux.
    "Helium is ideal ecologically-safe fuel for thermonuclear technology," Mr. Galimov said. "The cost of bringing Helium from the Moon will be a fraction of the price of electric power generated today at nuclear plants." The Moon has an estimated 500 million tonnes of Helium-3 trapped in the upper layers of the lunar rock, whereas the Earth may have no more than a few hundred kg of the isotope, which is moreover embedded deep inside our planet.
    The Moon colonisation plan announced by Mr. Bush will "enable the U.S. to establish its control of the global energy market 20 years from now and put the rest of the world on its knees as hydrocarbons run out," the daily said.
    However, Mr. Galimov believes that Russia can complete with the U.S. in the race for the Moon. "Russia can well afford an economically profitable and inexpensive project to mine Helium-3 on the Moon," the Russian scientist said. "It will cost a mere $25-30 millions to extract Helium-3 by warming lunar soil and scraping the isotope from the surface with the help of lunar bulldozers."

  • US Hawks Present War Manifesto To Bush - Tell Bush How To Win War On Terror
    The Telegraph - UK
    12-31-3
    WASHINGTON -- President George W Bush was sent a public manifesto yesterday by Washington's hawks, demanding regime change in Syria and Iran and a Cuba-style military blockade of North Korea backed by planning for a pre-emptive strike on its nuclear sites.
    The manifesto, presented as a "manual for victory" in the war on terror, also calls for Saudi Arabia and France to be treated not as allies but as rivals and possibly enemies.
    The manifesto is contained in a new book by Richard Perle, a Pentagon adviser and "intellectual guru" of the hardline neo-conservative movement, and David Frum, a former Bush speechwriter. They give warning of a faltering of the "will to win" in Washington.
    In the battle for the president's ear, the manifesto represents an attempt by hawks to break out of the post-Iraq doldrums and strike back at what they see as a campaign of hostile leaking by their foes in such centres of caution as the State Department or in the military top brass.
    Their publication, An End to Evil: How to Win the War on Terror, coincided with the latest broadside from the hawks' enemy number one, Colin Powell, the secretary of state.
    Though on leave recovering from a prostate cancer operation, Mr Powell summoned reporters to his bedside to hail "encouraging" signs of a "new attitude" in Iran and call for the United States to keep open the prospect of dialogue with the Teheran authorities.
    Such talk is anathema to hawks like Mr Perle and Mr Frum who urge Washington to shun the mullahs and work for their overthrow in concert with Iranian dissidents.
    It may be assumed that their instincts at least are shared by hawks inside the government, whose twin power bases are the Pentagon's civilian leadership and the office of the vice-president, Dick Cheney.
    Such officials prevailed over invading Afghanistan and Iraq, but have been seen as on the back foot since the autumn as their post-war visions of building a secular, free-market Iraq were scaled back in favour of compromise and a swift handover of power next June.
    The book demands that any talks with North Korea require the complete and immediate abandonment of its nuclear programme.
    As North Korea will probably refuse such terms, the book urges a Cuba-style military blockade and overt preparations for war, including the rapid pullback of US forces from the inter-Korean border so that they move out of range of North Korean artillery.
    Such steps, with luck, will prompt China to oust its nominal ally, Kim Jong-il, and install a saner regime in North Korea, the authors write.
    The authoritarian rule of Syria's leader, Bashar Assad, should also be ended, encouraged by shutting oil supplies from Iraq, seizing arms he buys from Iran, and raids into Syria to hunt terrorists.
    The authors urge Mr Bush to "tell the truth about Saudi Arabia". Wealthy Saudis, some of them royal princes, fund al-Qa'eda, they write.
    The Saudi government backs "terror-tainted Islamic organisations" as part of a larger campaign to "spread its extremist version of Islam throughout the Muslim world and into Europe and North America".
    The book calls for tough action against France and its dreams of offsetting US power. "We should force European governments to choose between Paris and Washington," it states. Britain's independence from Europe should be preserved, perhaps with open access for British arms to American defence markets.
    © Copyright of Telegraph Group Limited 2003.
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/12/31/wcons31.xm
    l&sSheet=/portal/2003/12/31/ixportaltop.html&secureRefresh=true&_requestid=120459

  • Perle's Manifesto And The State Of The Union
    By Terrell E. Arnold
    1-8-4
    The writer is a retired Senior Foreign Service Officer of the US Department of State.
    If you were wondering on the first day of 2004 how the United States could take the fermenting mess in Iraq and parlay it into a global disaster, relax. The answers to that and other questions about how to destroy our country and its reputation are contained in the latest writings of Richard Perle and co-author David Frum in their year-end book, The End of Evil: How to Win the War on Terror. If you were also wondering why United States leadership made so many mistakes in assessing the Iraqi situation, in justifying a pre-emptive war on Iraq and failing to plan for the occupation, read this book to find the ideological warp that President George W. Bush would go on experiencing if he continues to follow the advice of the neo-conservatives who led him down this path.
    Both writers are well-known, experienced policy professionals who can get to where they arrive in this book only by ignoring reams of data and suppressing much of what they must know about the human condition. Example: The neo-conservatives advised George W. Bush that Iraq was a slam-dunk. Enough said? Example: Perle and Frum argue in their book that the US should ignore the Islamic leaders in Iran and work with dissidents to overthrow the present regime. Iran is a country of 70 million people, however, and many millions of them are on the side of the Muslim clerics. That, therefore, has the makings of an insurgency that could bog down a million troops the US does not have.
    A similarly blithe appraisal of regime change in Syria is put forward, the assumption apparently being that the Bashar Assad regime in that country which, by the way, is the most current state of the political art that country has managed to achieve in more than half a century since World War II, can easily be put down and replaced by something more to our liking. Note: the emphasis is on something more to our liking, not necessarily something the Syrian people would arrive at given their druthers. Both the Syrian and the Iranian scenarios also appear to involve unilateral US attacks, maybe special operations, and little or no consultation with anyone else. Meanwhile, if the President follows the manifesto, he can order a Cuban missile crisis style blockade of Korea. Those actions, of course, are how to take a gaping hole in American credibility and rip it wide open.
    But one can ask, why publish this book now when what the book does is reiterate the messages of the neo-conservative hard core that the leadership of the Project for a New American Century has been promoting for years? Could it be because cooler heads, led by Secretary of State Colin Powell, are beginning successfully to argue against the neo-con agenda? Could it be because Bush campaign managers now see that by taking the advice of the neo-cons the President comes across as an uninformed ideologue with no regard for truth, no understanding of his country,s laws, history, alliances, or foreign policy and no concern about its reputation? And could it therefore be that the President now sees the neo-con image as a potential killer for the 2004 election as well as for his place in history? Yes, answers to such questions could arouse fear that the President indeed has changed his mind and could well drive the neo-cons to publish their manifesto, to slam it down on the President, desk, in case his dedication to hard line unilateralism and preemptive war appears to wander.
    While no direct answers to such questions are available, or are likely to be, the President and his campaign advisers are said to be repackaging him to make him more attractive for the 2004 elections. If such a conversion is indeed occurring, this surely must qualify as a political deathbed conversion, because both the President,s reputation (ignore the captive media version) and the country,s good name (listen to the critics) have been thoroughly dragged through the mud by the Bush administration experience.
    Or is it premature to suggest that such a conversion has occurred? Some Washington pundits are suggesting that recent events such as US reactions to Qadhafi,s decision to renounce Libyan plans for weapons of mass destruction (which he did not have either), Korea,s recent decision to admit US inspectors to nuclear sites ( a private initiative by the way), and the US response to the devastating earthquake ( a natural disaster) in Iran are all signs the transition is underway. This kind of post hoc argument is also a Washington commonplace but there is no necessary substance in it. The most telling argument so far made is the President and his immediate campaign advisers see the neo-con label as damaging, even potentially fatal to re-election prospects. That would not be the noblest of rationales, and the alleged change of heart could be a fraud, but it is an eminently practical reason for at least parting public company with the neo-cons.
    If the change of heart is real, the President can do himself and our country a great service by carrying out the programs that the change requires. Herein lie the acid tests of presidential conversion, true abandonment of the neo-con agenda, and reaffirmation of the policies and practices that have made our country great and greatly admired.
    Seek an immediate leading role for the United Nations in restoring civil order in Iraq. The most convincing departure from unilateralism will be willing acceptance of a need for multi-national leadership and program direction in Iraq. In the wake of former Secretary of State Baker,s debt management efforts, there are signs that most governments understand the realities of the situation in Iraq and see no gain for anyone in allowing the situation further to fester. Events to date show clearly that unilateral US management of Iraq,s achievement of self-government will progress only at great cost in blood and treasure toward an uncertain end. The cards here are stacked against us, and this change will cost us, or the Iraqis, less than any other option for Iraq,s future.
    Follow a similar path in Afghanistan. Get the United States out of any unilateral role in state building as soon as possible. Whether we like it or not, countries with complex tribal and religious histories are going to seek solutions to their problems of governance within their own frames of reference. Western rules may or may not qualify. We can enforce our choices on those people at our peril.
    Bring the conduct of the War on Terrorism under the aegis of normal US law and practice. The FBI has made the point repeatedly that Title 18 of the United States Code contains laws adequate for dealing with any conceivable terrorist crime. Many Americans now feel more threatened by the response to terrorism than by possible acts of terrorism. The intrusive, invasive practices introduced by the Patriot Act and by the classification of suspected terrorists as non-people is an enormous price to pay for little to no protection.
    Rejoin the worldwide effort to protect the environment. Pick up the task of applying the best science we can harness to assess the practical steps necessary to contain and reduce damage to the environment. Recognize that there are immediate costs and consequences for individuals and organizations in taking corrective action, but be prepared to pay those costs and to justify them as matters of public policy and common interest. Start by signing the Kyoto Protocols and vigorously pursue their ratification by the Senate.
    Sponsor repeal of the Patriot Act and cancel pending additions to it. All the tools we need, except specific information on terrorist group intentions, are already in the American law enforcement and intelligence kit. Making the United States behave and look more and more like a police state only serves our enemies by making their case that America is a bully.
    Reverse the trend toward media and communications monopoly. Years of effort to assure that every American voice has both a right and a medium to be heard have been prejudiced by recent trends toward bigness, including exclusiveness in regional markets. Up to now we have lost nothing by the diversity of thought and opinion that is protected by our Constitution, but we are on the verge of stifling this diversity by turning our media into elitist propaganda organs.
    Recognize that the watchwords of our system are government of the people, by the people and for the people. This idea is not a mere piece of rhetoric, but it is in danger of being smothered in a system of growing distance between rich and poor. It is now threatened, even frontally challenged, by a process of diminishing the progressive nature of our tax system, favoring the richest few at the expense of the weakest many. With ten percent of the American people at or below the poverty line, the United States is behaving financially like a third world country. Adequate income and opportunity for everyone are the American dream, but the present dream is realistic only for some.
    Become the President of all the people. Excessive affiliation with a hard line cabal of superpower extremists and big business cronies has cost the United States dearly not only in its international reputation but in the very representiveness of our system. Moreover, a President who spends at least a quarter of his time in raising funds for electioneering, his own and his party associates, is not doing the nation,s business. Ways must be found for the President to be far more a leader than a politician or a party partisan.
    Rid the Cabinet, especially the Pentagon, the State Department and the White House staff, of the Neo-Con Cabal. The group around and affiliated with Cheney and Rumsfeld have shown conclusively that they cannot be relied upon to tell the President the truth about groups and events, nor to advise him soundly on the consequences of severe changes in American policy. Falsehood, misinformation and deceit are not the tools of a superpower, and first resort to military options is not the governing style of a truly democratic society. The neo-con "manifesto contains only Perles of great arrogance and stupidity, not sound guidelines for the President of the United States. If the President does not rid himself of this group, he will constantly be blind sided by advocates of the neo-con agenda.
    Distance the United States from Israel and Cut Assistance To It. Even with all of the chaos and confusion generated by US led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the cause of the Palestinian people and the abuses they have suffered for the past fifty years are still the prime generators of terrorism in the Middle East and the prime motivators for exports of terrorism to the west. A success story in Iraq will not take Palestine off the table, and continued adherence to a Middle East peace plan that tolerates the Sharon model of incremental land theft in the West Bank, Gaza and the Golan Heights, while funding Israeli excesses will continue to go nowhere because it does not recognize the main elements of the problem: the incredible losses of their homes, property and spirit by the Palestinian people.
    Get a new Vice President. No Vice President in memory has exercised as much influence, at times apparent control, over Presidential decisions, and no Vice President has remained so openly affiliated with a dangerous right wing partisan group as Cheney has with the neo-cons. Therefore, the Vice President must take much of the blame for the horrifying range of screw-ups on planning for Iraq and on formulating the American foreign policy agenda. His role has hardly been that of constitutional president in waiting, and many would pray for a return to that model.
    Get a new Attorney General. Unless the aim is to turn the United States into a police state, the role of the Attorney General is to assure that the constitution and the laws of the land are applied and enforced in a manner consistent with the interests of all Americans and properly conscious of the interests of all people who come here or deal with this country. Decisions made or sanctioned by this Attorney General have resulted in denial of the civil liberties of hundreds of people and have turned federal law enforcement functions into intrusive spy missions that far exceed the requirements of protecting the United States from terrorists. In fact in no instance has the marginal utility of the post 9-11 changes in US law and practice to the war on terrorism been demonstrated.
    Forcefully put the United States in favor of arms control and stop new nuclear and electronic weapons programs. Stop trying to have it both ways: to prevent the acquisition of powerful weapons by all others while continuing to develop them ourselves. Immediately stop the use of UN banned weapons that depend on depleted uranium for their effectiveness but spread lingering trauma and illness as well as soil contamination. Recognize that the bargaining power of nuclear weapons is their driving appeal to countries that do not have them and therefore the fatal attraction will be there so long as any nation has these weapons. The current standoff between nuclear and non-nuclear powers is therefore not a sustainable condition.
    Move the war on terrorism from its narrow focus on attacks against terrorists to a concerted effort to mitigate the causes of terrorism. Helping or "rewarding the people one likes, as proposed in the President,s Millennium Challenge Account, when most of the world,s nations fall outside that category, will no doubt do the preferred ones some good, but it will increase the anger and frustration of the rest. Thus, such a program is more a self-satisfying gesture like feeding the poor than a concerted attempt to advance the human condition. Moreover, it is likely to leave untreated the principal terrorism generators and conditions that form the pools of potential new terrorists, so that its contribution to global safety will probably be negative. There is a perverse logic in any case in the notion that we will improve our safety by dealing only with the least threatening elements of the human condition.
    Introduce more detachment into national governance. Partisan politics are a common Washington failing, although the present administration has gone well beyond the norm with its strong attachments for business, especially energy and military industries, large media and communications. However, our relations with the rest of the world must be based more on the needs of situations than on catering narrowly to a few support groups at home. Moreover, a growing number of our problems and requirements at home are ill served by attempted partisan solutions. Somehow we must achieve a proper distinction between the needs of electioneering to select leadership and the processes of running the world,s largest business, which is the United States Government. A president who spends at least a quarter of his time, as this one, on electioneering for himself and his party candidates is doing what comes naturally to party politics, but he is not doing his job. The incredible accumulation of mistakes on Iraq, both information and management, are partly due to the fact that we have not had either a fully informed or a full-time President. It is about time he really went to work 24/7 exclusively for us, all of us.
    The writer is a retired Senior Foreign Service Officer of the US Department of State. He will welcome comment at [email protected]

  • Revealing Arrogance Of Israeli Generals In Pentagon
    -A Strange Thing Happened On The Way To The War
    By Karen Kwiatkowski
    © 2004 The American Conservative
    1-10-4
    Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, a former Pentagon insider, concludes her observations on the run-up to the Iraq war in this last of a three-part series.
    As the winter of 2002 approached, I was increasingly amazed at the success of the propaganda campaign being waged by President Bush, Vice President Cheney, and neoconservative mouthpieces at the Washington Times and Wall Street Journal. I speculated about the necessity but unlikelihood of a Phil-Dick-style minority report on the grandiose Feith-Wolfowitz-Rumsfeld-Cheney vision of some future Middle East where peace, love, and democracy are brought about by pre-emptive war and military occupation.
    In December, I requested an acceleration of my retirement after just over 20 years on duty and exactly the required three years of time-in-grade as a lieutenant colonel. I felt fortunate not to have being fired or court-martialed due to my politically incorrect ways in the previous two years as a real conservative in a neoconservative Office of Secretary of Defense. But in fact, my outspokenness was probably never noticed because civilian professionals and military officers were largely invisible. We were easily replaceable and dispensable, not part of the team brought in from the American Enterprise Institute, the Center for Security Policy, and the Washington Institute for Near East Affairs.
    There were exceptions. When military officers conspicuously crossed the neoconservative party line, the results were predictable-get back in line or get out. One friend, an Army colonel who exemplified the qualities carved in stone at West Point, refused to maneuver into a small neoconservative box, and he was moved into another position, where truth-telling would be viewed as an asset instead of a handicap. Among the civilians, I observed the stereotypical perspective that this too would pass, with policy analysts apparently willing to wait out the neocon phase.
    In early winter, an incident occurred that was seared into my memory. A coworker and I were suddenly directed to go down to the Mall entrance to pick up some Israeli generals. Post-9/11 rules required one escort for every three visitors, and there were six or seven of them waiting. The Navy lieutenant commander and I hustled down. Before we could apologize for the delay, the leader of the pack surged ahead, his colleagues in close formation, leaving us to double-time behind the group as they sped to Undersecretary Feith's office on the fourth floor. Two thoughts crossed our minds: are we following close enough to get credit for escorting them, and do they really know where they are going? We did get credit, and they did know. Once in Feith's waiting room, the leader continued at speed to Feith's closed door. An alert secretary saw this coming and had leapt from her desk to block the door. "Mr. Feith has a visitor. It will only be a few more minutes." The leader craned his neck to look around the secretary's head as he demanded, "Who is in there with him?"
    This minor crisis of curiosity past, I noticed the security sign-in roster. Our habit, up until a few weeks before this incident, was not to sign in senior visitors like ambassadors. But about once a year, the security inspectors send out a warning letter that they were coming to inspect records. As a result, sign-in rosters were laid out, visible and used. I knew this because in the previous two weeks I watched this explanation being awkwardly presented to several North African ambassadors as they signed in for the first time and wondered why and why now. Given all this and seeing the sign-in roster, I asked the secretary, "Do you want these guys to sign in?" She raised her hands, both palms toward me, and waved frantically as she shook her head. "No, no, no, it is not necessary, not at all." Her body language told me I had committed a faux pas for even asking the question. My fellow escort and I chatted on the way back to our office about how the generals knew where they were going (most foreign visitors to the five-sided asylum don't) and how the generals didn't have to sign in. I felt a bit dirtied by the whole thing and couldn't stop comparing that experience to the grace and gentility of the Moroccan, Tunisian, and Algerian ambassadors with whom I worked.
    In my study of the neoconservatives, it was easy to find out whom in Washington they liked and whom they didn't. They liked most of the Heritage Foundation and all of the American Enterprise Institute. They liked writers Charles Krauthammer and Bill Kristol. To find out whom they didn't like, no research was required. All I had to do was walk the corridors and attend staff meetings. There were several shared prerequisites to get on the Neoconservative List of Major Despicable People, and in spite of the rhetoric hurled against these enemies of the state, most really weren't Rodents of Unusual Size. Most, in fact, were retired from a branch of the military with a star or two or four on their shoulders. All could and did rationally argue the many illogical points in the neoconservative strategy of offensive democracy-guys like Brent Scowcroft, Barry McCaffrey, Anthony Zinni, and Colin Powell.
    I was present at a staff meeting when Deputy Undersecretary Bill Luti called General Zinni a traitor. At another time, I discussed with a political appointee the service being rendered by Colin Powell in the early winter and was told the best service he could offer would be to quit. I heard in another staff meeting a derogatory story about a little Tommy Fargo who was acting up. Little Tommy was, of course, Commander, Pacific Forces, Admiral Fargo. This was shared with the rest of us as a Bill Luti lesson in civilian control of the military. It was certainly not civil or controlled, but the message was crystal.
    When President Bush gave his State of the Union address, there was a small furor over the reference to the yellowcake in Niger that Saddam was supposedly seeking. After this speech, everyone was discussing this as either new intelligence saved up for just such a speech or, more cynically, just one more flamboyant fabrication that those watching the propaganda campaign had come to expect. I had not heard about yellowcake from Niger or seen it mentioned on the Office of Special Plans talking points. When I went over to my old shop, sub-Saharan Africa, to congratulate them for making it into the president's speech, they said the information hadn't come from them or through them. They were as surprised and embarrassed as everyone else that such a blatant falsehood would make it into a presidential speech.
    When General Zinni was removed as Bush's Middle East envoy and Elliot Abrams joined the National Security Council (NSC) to lead the Mideast division, whoops and high-fives had erupted from the neocon cubicles. By midwinter, echoes of those celebrations seemed to mutate into a kind of anxious anticipation, shared by most of the Pentagon. The military was anxiously waiting under the bed for the other shoe to drop amidst concerns over troop availability, readiness for an ill-defined mission, and lack of day-after clarity. The neocons were anxiously struggling to get that damn shoe off, gleefully anticipating the martinis to be drunk and the fun to be had. The other shoe fell with a thump on Feb. 5 as Colin Powell delivered his United Nations presentation.
    It was a sad day for me and many others with whom I worked when we watched Powell's public capitulation. The era when Powell had been considered a political general, back when he was Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, had in many ways been erased for those of us who greatly admired his coup of the Pentagon neocons when he persuaded the president to pursue UN support for his invasion of Iraq. Now it was as if Powell had again rolled military interests-and national interests as well.
    Around that same time, our deputy director forwarded a State Department cable that had gone out to our embassy in Turkey. The cable contained answers to 51 questions that had been asked of our ambassador by the Turkish government. The questions addressed things like after-war security arrangements, refugees, border control, stability in the Kurdish north, and occupation plans. But every third answer was either "To be determined" or "We're working on that" or "This scenario is unlikely." At one point, an answer included the "fact" that the United States military would physically secure the geographic border of Iraq. Curious, I checked the length of the physical border of Iraq. Then I checked out the length of our own border with Mexico. Given our exceptional success in securing our own desert borders, I found this statement interesting.
    Soon after, I was out-processed for retirement and couldn't have been more relieved to be away from daily exposure to practices I had come to believe were unconstitutional. War is generally crafted and pursued for political reasons, but the reasons given to Congress and the American people for this one were so inaccurate and misleading as to be false. Certainly, the neoconservatives never bothered to sell the rest of the country on the real reasons for occupation of Iraq-more bases from which to flex U.S. muscle with Syria and Iran, better positioning for the inevitable fall of the regional sheikdoms, maintaining OPEC on a dollar track, and fulfilling a half-baked imperial vision. These more accurate reasons could have been argued on their merits, and the American people might indeed have supported the war. But we never got a chance to debate it.
    My personal experience leaning precariously toward the neoconservative maw showed me that their philosophy remains remarkably untouched by respect for real liberty, justice, and American values. My years of military service taught me that values and ideas matter, but these most important aspects of our great nation cannot be defended adequately by those in uniform. This time, salvaging our honor will require a conscious, thoughtful, and stubborn commitment from each and every one of us, and though I no longer wear the uniform, I have not given up the fight.
    January 19, 2004 issue
    Copyright © 2004 The American Conservative
    http://www.amconmag.com/1_19_04/article1.html

  • Wellstone said that Cheney told him, "If you vote against the war in Iraq, the Bush administration will do whatever is necessary to get you. There will be severe ramifications for you and the state of Minnesota."
    Latest government report on Wellstone 'accident' finds its scapegoats, many questions remain
    By: Jackson Thoreau - 12/30/03
     "I'm for the little fellers, not the Rockefellers." - Sen. Paul Wellstone
    Shortly before he died in a mysterious airplane crash 11 days prior to the 2002 elections, Minnesota Sen. Paul Wellstone met with Vice President Dick Cheney, probably the Bush administration's most evil public face.
    Cheney was rounding up Senate support for the October 2002 vote on giving the administration carte blanche to invade Iraq, with or without blessing from the United Nations. Cheney strong-armed opposing politicians like the most vindictive of mafioso leaders, and opponents usually gave in.
    But not Wellstone. Whatever you thought of his progressive brand of politics, he wasn't a wimp. And that's what made him more than dangerous in the eyes of people like Cheney.
    At a meeting full of war veterans in Willmar, Minn., days before his death, Wellstone told attendees that Cheney told him, "If you vote against the war in Iraq, the Bush administration will do whatever is necessary to get you. There will be severe ramifications for you and the state of Minnesota."
    Wellstone cast his vote for his conscience and against the Iraq measure, the lone Democrat involved in a tough 2002 election campaign to do so. And a few weeks later on Oct. 25, as he appeared to be winning his re-election bid, Wellstone, his wife, Sheila, his daughter, Marcia Markuson, three campaign staffers, and two pilots died in a plane crash in Minnesota.
    Talk about "severe ramifications."
    My first hunch upon hearing about the tragedy was that the Beech King Air A-100 was tampered with by right wingers, possibly the CIA, either directly or through electromagnetic rays or some psychic mind games.
    And nothing I have heard or read since then has made me drift from that hunch.
    I'm not alone. The Duluth News Tribune featured a column by Jim Fetzer, a University of Minnesota-Duluth philosophy professor and author, in November 2003. Fetzer wrote that an FBI "recovery team" headed out to investigate the Wellstone plane crash BEFORE the plane went down. "I calculate that this team would have had to have left the Twin Cities at about the same time the Wellstone plane was taking off," Fetzer wrote.
    That apparent prior knowledge was similar to Dallas police putting out an all-points bulletin for accused John F. Kennedy assassin Lee Harvey Oswald at 12:43 p.m. in 1963 for shooting a police officer. The problem was the officer was not shot until 23 minutes later.
    Fetzer also noted that Wellstone's plane was "exceptional, the pilots well-qualified, and the weather posed no significant problems." He wrote that "we have to consider other, less palatable, alternatives, such as small bombs, gas canisters or electromagnetic pulse, radio frequency or High Energy Radio Frequency weapons designed to overwhelm electrical circuitry with an intense electromagnetic field. An abrupt cessation of communication between the plane and the tower took place at about 10:18 a.m., the same time an odd cell phone phenomenon occurred with a driver in the immediate vicinity. This suggests to me the most likely explanation is that one of our new electromagnetic weapons was employed."
    Michael Ruppert, publisher of From the Wilderness, wrote that the day after the crash he received a message from a former CIA operative who was familiar with those kinds of assassinations. The message read, "As I said earlier, having played ball [and still playing in some respects] with this current crop of reinvigorated old white men, these clowns are nobody to screw around with. There will be a few more strategic accidents. You can be certain of that."
    Ruppert also interviewed two Democratic Congress representatives who said they believed Wellstone was murdered. One said, "I don't think there's anyone on the Hill who doesn't suspect it. It's too convenient, too coincidental, too damned obvious. My guess is that some of the less courageous members of the party are thinking about becoming Republicans right now."
    Even National Transportation Safety Board officials found aspects of Wellstone's accident puzzling. An article in the Duluth News Tribune a few days after the tragedy said that "for some still unexplained reason - [the plane] turned off course and crashed." It quoted Carol Carmody, the NTSB's acting chair and reportedly a former CIA employee, as saying, "We find the whole turn curious."
    NTSB blames pilots
    But in November 2003, the NTSB blamed the two pilots of Wellstone's plane, Richard Conry and Michael Guess, for the crash. The pilots flew too high and too fast when they began a left turn toward the runway, then let it slow to dangerous levels, the NTSB said.
    The NTSB also accused Conry and Guess of not even monitoring the instruments. "One of them should have been monitoring the instruments," said Bill Bramble, a human performance investigator for the NTSB.
    Still, NTSB board member Richard Healing called the conclusion "speculative," pointing out that the report did not say how the pilots missed the red flags or why they failed to make adjustments.
    "We don't know why," Healing said. "It's quite speculative."
    The conclusion was especially disturbing considering the NTSB's own simulations, which included flying a plane at abnormally slow speeds and being unable to bring it down. That by itself should have forced consideration of other possible causes.
    The NTSB said that Conry made mistakes on previous flights that were covered by his co-pilots and was convicted of mail fraud related to a home-building business in 1990. But Wellstone had used Aviation Charter since 1992 and had flown numerous other times with Conry, with whom he was reportedly comfortable. Conry passed a proficiency test just two days before the tragedy, and some attorneys said regulations did not require revocation of a pilot's license because of a criminal conviction unless it involved drugs or alcohol.
    While the NTSB said some fellow pilots questioned the skill levels of Conry and Guess, Conry had more than 5,000 hours of flying time, according to his management company, Aviation Charter Inc. of Eden Prairie, Minn..
    Family members of Wellstone reached a $25 million settlement in mid-2003 with Aviation Charter.
    Several pilots said the NTSB was just looking for scapegoats. "It is hard to believe that two experienced pilots would fail to monitor airspeed," one said.
    As in the case of JFK, the scapegoats who took the blame were conveniently dead.
    And many questions remained.
    Electromagnetic pulse device suspected
    More people than Fetzer and I believe that Wellstone's plane could have been hit with an electromagnetic pulse [EMP] device that caused the aircraft to suddenly turn off course.
    Electromagnetic pulses from military craft may have been responsible for several civilian airline disasters in the late 1990s, according to an article in The London Observer. In particular, Swissair 111 in 1998 and TWA 800 in 1996 both took the same route over Long Island, experienced trouble in the same region, suffered catastrophic electrical malfunctions, and were flying at a time when military exercises involving submarines and U.S. Navy P3 fighter planes were being conducted.
    Experts have even testified before Congress about concerns that terrorists may use EMPs, which they said were capable of short-circuiting computers, satellites, radios, radar, and traffic lights. An EMP shockwave can be produced by a device small enough to fit in a briefcase, they said. Stanley Jakubiak, senior civilian official for nuclear command, control, communications, and EMP policy for the Defense Department, admitted in 1999 Congressional testimony that the feds have studied EMPs for years.
    U.S. Marine Corp Major M. CaJohn went farther than that in a 1988 report, writing that officials had sought remedies for the effects of EMPs at least since the early 1960s. The Air Force built an EMP testing facility called TRESTLE in 1980 at Kirkland Air Force Base in New Mexico. The Navy also erected an EMP testing facility called EMPRESS I at Point Patience on the Patuxent River in Maryland. Other agencies have their own EMP facilities.
    Fetzer also reports on other instances and reports, including nuclear tests by Soviets and Americans in the 1960s resulting in gigantic releases of electromagnetic energy. There is also this 1998 U.S. Department of Justice document describing these devices:
    http://www.ncjrs.org/txtfiles/sl298.txt.
    First developed in the 19th century, EMPs now are relatively easy to obtain. Anyone can acquire an EMP generator through the Internet, such as at http://www.amazing1.com/emp.htm.
    Theoretically, a person a few miles from the runway could bombard the aircraft with an intense electromagnetic pulse, which could cause an electrical failure, instantly knock out radio communication, disrupt normal engine ignition, and cause loss of steering control. The steering control surfaces on these airplanes are controlled by individual electrical actuators that are mechanically linked to the rudder, ailerons, and flaps.
    This type of sabotage would leave no physical evidence on the aircraft, although it's possible that people at the airport or in the general vicinity might have noticed electrical anomalies like radio noises, a crashed computer, telephone disruption, and so on.
    A Texas software engineer wrote me that EMPs damage systems by generating an electrical pulse in the system wiring. Therefore, a component would not have to be directly exposed to an EMP to be damaged. An aircraft struck by an EMP pulse would not likely die, unless the plane was hit by an extremely powerful EMP pulse.
    "More likely, an EMP strike would disable delicate electronic systems, leaving electrical systems intact," the engineer wrote. "After being struck by an EMP, the aircraft would likely function more or less normally, but without any control systems, instruments, or radios. This would account for the assertion that the Wellstone plane's engines were still running when the plane hit the ground."
    Another electrical engineer wrote, "You don't need anything as elaborate as an EMP generator. Standard issue radio transmitters can screw up a landing."
    Lawrence Judd, an Illinois attorney, wrote the NTSB to ask whether it has or will investigate the possibility that EMF weapons were used to bring down the planes of Senators Wellstone and Carnahan. Robert Benzon wrote him back, thusly, "The NTSB is unaware of any mobile EM force or EM pulse weapon system capable of disabling an aircraft at the ground-to-air ranges that existed in either of the accidents you mention in your email."
    But Fetzer noted that what the NTSB may or may not be "aware of" depends on its state of actual or feigned ignorance. "In this day and age, there is no excuse for any such lack of knowledge about increasingly familiar weapons," Fetzer wrote me in an email. "It reminds me of the Warren Report's conclusion that there was ‘no credible evidence’ of conspiracy in the death of JFK. It all depends on what you are willing to consider ‘credible.’ Today, such a statement would be considered laughable - similarly that of the NTSB."
    Weird cell phone interference reported
    John Ongaro, a Minnesota lobbyist, wrote to Fetzer about his experience the day Wellstone died. Ongaro said he was driving to the same funeral that Wellstone and his party were flying to in Eveleth, Minn. While traveling north on Hwy. 53 near the Eveleth-Virginia Municipal Airport in the same area as Wellstone's plane, he received a call on his cell phone at precisely the same time Wellstone's King Air veered off course.
    "This call was in a league of its own," Ongaro said. "When I answered it, what I heard sounded like a cross between a roar and a loud humming noise. The noise seemed to be oscillating, and I could not make out any words being spoken. Instead, just this loud, grotesque, sometimes screeching and humming noise."
    What he heard may very well have been electronic interference from an EMP or microwave weapon.
    One writer to talk show host Jeff Rense suggested a scenario involving "black op specialists" in a van or truck full of radio/instrument landing jamming equipment. "As Wellstone's plane approaches the airport, the VOR/ILS jamming equipment is activated, and a 'decoy' VOR signal is sent to the plane, thus tricking the plane's instruments [and the pilot] into believing the airport is somewhere several degrees off the true course to the runway," S.H. wrote. "The pilot follows that signal straight into the ground. The non-descript van, full of covert electronic jamming equipment, casually leaves the area, looking just like any other TV repair truck or moving van."
    Witnesses hear an explosion, see a flash of light
    One witness of Wellstone's crash, Megen Williams, who lived near the Eveleth airport, told the St. Paul Pioneer Press that she heard "a diving noise and then an explosion" as she prepared for work as a nurse in her home near the crash site. At first, she thought it was blasting at a nearby iron ore mine, and she didn't call authorities.
    Another local resident, Rodney Allen, said the plane flew right over his house. "It was so close the windows were shaking," Allen said. He added that the craft was "crabbing to the right," then less than a minute later, he felt an impact and heard what he thought sounded like a loud rifle shot. St. Paul Pioneer Press, Oct. 26, 2002
    Investigators from the National Transportation Safety Board said the plane was last seen on air traffic control radar at 10:21 a.m., flying at an elevation of 1,800 feet. Radar tapes indicate Wellstone's plane had descended to about 400 feet and was traveling at only 85 knots near the end of its flight.
    Another person saw a blond-haired man on CNN saying he observed a flash of light at the rear of the plane.
    Don Sipola, a former president of the Eveleth Virginia Municipal Airport Commission, said "something" caused Wellstone's plan to veer off course at low altittude. "This was a real steep bank, not a nice, gentle don't-spill-the-coffee descent," Siploa said. "This is more like a space shuttle coming down. This was not a controlled descent into the ground."
    The pilots of Wellstone's plane radioed that they were two miles out, clicked up the runway lights, and had the airstrip in sight, said Traci Chacich, the airport's office manager. That was the last that airport employees heard from them.
    Weather not that bad
    Some officials and media reports blamed bad weather, but witnesses said conditions were not that bad at the time of Wellstone's accident. It was cloudy with a little ice, but there was little wind. Other pilots landed without problem during that same time and said the conditions were not bad. Airport visibility was about 3 miles at the time the plane went down, which was adequate.
    Another pilot who landed a slightly larger twin-engine plane at the same airport that same day a couple of hours before Wellstone's plane crashed, told the St. Paul Pioneer Press that he experienced no significant problems. There was very light ice, "but nothing to be alarmed about," pilot Ray Juntunen said. "It shouldn't have been a problem."
    According to the NTSB, Wellstone's pilots received warnings of icing at 9,000 to 11,000 feet and were allowed to descend to 4,000 feet. Juntunen said he was able to see the airport from five miles out, and another pilot landed 30 minutes later and said the clouds were a little lower, but still not bad.
    Frank Hilldrup, lead investigator for the NTSB, said the landing gear of Wellstone's plane appeared to be down.
    The King Air had a reputation as one of the safest turboprops around, many manufacturers and pilot said. Some 50 accidents involving King Air A100s had occurred between 1975 and 2002, according to the FAA. Five were fatal, but three of those weren't the plane's fault.
    Wellstone was target of apparent assassination in 2000
    Wellstone was the target of an apparent assassination plot before. In 2000, as he visited Colombia to survey conditions there, a bomb was found along his route from the airport. He was also sprayed with the herbicide glyphosate by a helicopter above him while watching the Colombian police demonstrate its fumigation of coca plants. Officials called the incident an accident.
    Wellstone was a vocal opponent of military aid to the Colombian government. While there, he visited human rights activists who said the government did not protect civilians. Wellstone told reporters he thought his Colombian hosts created the bomb story to dissuade him from traveling to certain areas of the country. "I don't know whether I was targeted, but I certainly know that the human rights activists are targeted," Wellstone said.
    Among the weird events since Wellstone's death was that his successor in the U.S. Senate, Republican Norm Coleman, was named chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. As Fetzer said, that's a practically unheard of position for a freshman senator with no previous experience. Could that be why Congress has not opened a formal investigation into Wellstone's death?
    For my part, I'm not a big conspiracy nut who worries about this kind of thing all the time - just an average one like Oliver Stone who knows there's something sinister and weird going on in our world. I have done extensive research into the JFK assassination in Dallas. The right wing of the CIA was heavily involved in that, from Oswald's CIA connections to the Dallas mayor at that time being the brother of the former CIA deputy director who lost his job after the Bay of Pigs fiasco and blamed that on JFK. The Dallas mayor may even have approved the change in the parade route on that fateful day so it would go right by the grassy knoll and building where Oswald and probably other snipers were, where JFK met his death.
    I have interviewed numerous people who reported weird things that occurred during that time, such as key witnesses dying in strange ways like mysterious plane crashes and being run over by trains in the middle of the night. I have written numerous stories on this and covered it in my book on Dallas history - and have received my share of threatening phone calls, mail opened, and the like to know I was stepping on some powerful toes.
    There were also numerous JFK murder witnesses committing suicide in the months after that tragedy. The CIA has done extensive mind control work for decades - I know at least one psychic personally who started working for the CIA in the 1980s - and could possibly convince someone through such mind games to commit suicide. Could they psychically work on making a plane crash? Who knows? Anything is possible.
    Similarities with Carnahan, Kennedy crashes
    What about Democratic Missouri Gov. Mel Carnahan, who was killed during a close Senate race when his small plane crashed right before the 2000 election? What about John F. Kennedy Jr., who had intelligence, political ambitions, charisma, and the name, dying in a 1999 plane crash?
    In both of those cases, the planes were already descending towards their landing and then suddenly wandered off their approach paths and crashed, similar to Wellstone's craft. In all three cases, radio contact appears to have been cut off while the planes were still in the air, possibly indicating electrical failures on board.
    In Kennedy's case, at least one witness saw a flash in the sky and heard an explosion before the plane went down, as in Wellstone's situation. Kennedy's plane was also left unguarded at Teeterborough Airport in New Jersey, and almost anyone could have placed something inside it.
    The list of high-profile Democratic politicians killed in plane crashes goes on - Commerce Secretary Ron Brown in 1996, Rep. Mickey Leland of Texas in 1989, Rep. Jerry Litton of Missouri in 1976 [who was also involved in a hard-fought election at the time], House Majority Leader Hale Boggs of Louisiana and Rep. Nick Begich of Alaska in 1972. High-profile Republicans have died in crashes, including Sen. John Heinz of Pennsylvania and Sen. John Tower of Texas in 1991, but not as many as Democrats.
    In fact, of 22 air crashes involving state and federal officials, including one ambassador and one cabinet official, From the Wilderness found that 14 - 64 percent - were Democrats and eight - 36 percent - were Republicans.
    Add to that Raytheon Co., one of the biggest U.S. military contractors and manufacturer of the plane that crashed with Wellstone in it, being a huge donor to Republicans, and the mind continues to wonder. U.S. House Republican Majority Leader Dick Armey of Texas, for instance, received $48,201 alone from Raytheon in 1997-98. The Republican National Committee received at least $170,000 from Raytheon since 1999. Raytheon donates to Democrats, too, but more than twice as much money goes to Republicans.
    Raytheon has all kinds of CIA connections, as does Bush, whose father, remember, was once director of the CIA. One of the more intriguing discoveries that emerged from the NTSB's own investigation of this case was that Raytheon not only not only manufactured EM force and EM pulse weapons, but also manufactured the King Air A100. No other entity would have been better positioned to have taken it down. See http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/2003/AAR0303.htm for more details.
    Bush, for his part, issued some strange comments immediately after Wellstone's crash, even for him. He called Wellstone - who was an articulate, energetic, intelligent political science professor for 21 years before he was a senator - a "plain-spoken fellow." He said he wanted to issue his "condolences for the loss of the Senate." Did he mean the Democrats' sudden loss of the Senate, which occurred the day Wellstone died? Did he know something more than he let on?
    Bush once called Wellstone a 'chicken shit'
    There was no love lost between the Bush clan and Wellstone. In 1990, as Wellstone challenged the Persian Gulf War preparations, Bush Sr. even referred to Wellstone as a "chicken shit." When Wellstone first met Bush Jr. in 2001, the latter disrespectfully called him "Pablo."
    As The Nation said in May 2002, getting rid of Wellstone was a passion for Bush, Karl Rove, and Cheney. "There are people in the White House who wake up in the morning thinking about how they will defeat Paul Wellstone," a senior Republican aide told The Nation. "This one is political and personal for them."
    No senator had a more consistent record of voting against Bush administration proposals in 2001. Wellstone voted against the Homeland Security Act and many of Bush's judicial nominees. He pushed for stronger environmental programs, for genuine measures to counter corporate fraud, and for investigations into Sept. 11 and $350 million that was missing from the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
    Freepers' comments I read about this tragedy were mostly tasteful - on the surface - though some jokes and conspiratorial posts were published on their right-wing site. Right after the news of the crash, some posted comments like "prayers for control of the Senate." Several comments were removed by the moderator. One that was not said, "You do realize that as we sit here praying for one of our biggest political enemies' safety, President Bush will be blamed by the Democrats [including the rabid leftists at DU and other brain-sucking sites] for the crash."
    Another joked, "Maybe it was shot down by a right wing militia. We've got to ban handguns." And another said, "Ted Kennedy may have been on [the plane]." Then there was this ramble: "Politically speaking, would this be good or bad news for the GOP if he's dead? I could see him winning now like Carnahan in 2000 so that Gov. Jesse could appoint his successor. I'm thinking this is probably not good news."
    And this comment: "Any bets on how quickly the Democrats will have his wife take his place on the ballot?" Hello? Sen. Wellstone's wife died in the tragedy, remember? Another post predicted that "[Republican Senate candidate in Minnesota] Coleman's campaign is dead." And then there was this message: "I pray that Wellstone and all of his aides survive, and live to see themselves defeated handily on Nov 5th...unless this is yet another of Tom 'Caligula' Daschle's election schemes." Someone else added, "Carnahan II? Ventura is the governor, not a D...this time."
    Such conservatives' glee at the demise of probably the most powerful real progressive in the country was entirely evident in such comments. Many contained themselves, but we know what they're really thinking, don't we?
    And a few days after Wellstone's death, right wingers were selling and displaying on their vehicles insensitive bumper stickers with messages like, "He's dead, get over it." How's that for "compassionate conservatism?"
     
  • Woman Who Filed Sex Suit Against Bush Dead
    (RENSE.com)
    Clipped from a Yahoo board:
    11-10-3
    Woman who filed sexual assault lawsuit against bush confirmed dead, cause of death listed as "gunshot wound to head"...
    I finally got some confirmation from an obit in the Houston Chronicle that Margie Schoedinger, the woman who filed a sexual assault lawsuit against Bush last year, died in September.
    I called the Harris County Medical Examiner's office, which lists her cause of death as a "gunshot wound to the head" and "suicide." Anyone versed in CIA/Mafia lingo knows that "suicide" sometimes means "murder" or at least carries with it some pressure to commit suicide by outside parties, such as those against whom that person has filed a lawsuit. I'm not yet saying this is a murder - you draw your own conclusion.
    When I talked to Schoedinger in July she sounded in good health. She was only 38. It's another weird tragedy surrounding the Bush administration - and this one has received NO mention from the media.
    Here is the info and link from the paper:
    Paper: Houston Chronicle
    Date: Saturday 09/27/03
    Section: A
    Edition: 3
    SCHOEDINGER
    MARGIE D. SCHOEDINGER expired Monday, 9/22/03 . Visitation: Friday, 9/26/03 , 7 to 9pm, McCoy & Harrison Chapel. Funeral Service: Saturday, 9/27/03 , 1:30pm, McCoy & Harrison Chapel. Interment, Houston Memorial Gardens.
    http://www.chron.com/class/obits/archive/qsearch.hts?operation=getdoc&database=Obituaries%3B
    &databases=Obituaries%3BObituaries%3BObituaries%3BObituaries%3B&docid=76532&docids=
    76532%3B76200%3B76168%3B46566%3B&query=schoedinger+NOT+3:RSEC&pos=1&numhits=
    25&start=&type=&user=houston&sview=1&hview=2&dview=1
    Here are the two stories about the lawsuit which were widely circulated on the net:
    http://www.rense.com/general32/charged.htm
    http://www.rense.com/general32/bhh.htm

  • Bush's Worst Enemy
    By William Rivers Pitt
    Truthout.org - Perspective
    12-30-3
    When Ambassador Joseph Wilson speaks of the White House, he tries to take the high road. "It's hard to imagine the government being irrational," he told me over the telephone on Monday afternoon, "and revenge is an irrational act." One breath later, however, Wilson showed why the Bush administration has a great deal to be worried about. "If they thought I was going to go away after they raped my wife," said Wilson, "they were dead wrong."
    Wilson best explains who he is in the New York Times editorial he had published on July 6, 2003 entitled 'What I Didn't Find in Africa.' "For 23 years, from 1976 to 1998, I was a career foreign service officer and ambassador," wrote Wilson. "In 1990, as chargÈ d'affaires in Baghdad, I was the last American diplomat to meet with Saddam Hussein. (I was also a forceful advocate for his removal from Kuwait.) After Iraq, I was President George H. W. Bush's ambassador to Gabon and So Tome and Principe; under President Bill Clinton, I helped direct Africa policy for the National Security Council. It was my experience in Africa that led me to play a small role in the effort to verify information about Africa's suspected link to Iraq's nonconventional weapons programs. Those news stories about that unnamed former envoy who went to Niger? That's me."
    July 6, 2003. That's pretty much when the madness began.
    Joseph Wilson had been tasked by the CIA, after a request from Vice President Dick Cheney, to travel to Niger and investigate claims that Saddam Hussein had attempted to procure uranium 'yellowcake' from that African nation to develop a nuclear weapons program. He spent several days there in February of 2002 investigating the matter fully, and returned to state flatly that no evidence of such a transaction existed.
    "It did not take long to conclude that it was highly doubtful that any such transaction had ever taken place," Wilson wrote in his Times editorial. "Given the structure of the consortiums that operated the mines, it would be exceedingly difficult for Niger to transfer uranium to Iraq. Niger's uranium business consists of two mines, Somair and Cominak, which are run by French, Spanish, Japanese, German and Nigerian interests. If the government wanted to remove uranium from a mine, it would have to notify the consortium, which in turn is strictly monitored by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Moreover, because the two mines are closely regulated, quasi-governmental entities, selling uranium would require the approval of the minister of mines, the prime minister and probably the president. In short, there's simply too much oversight over too small an industry for a sale to have transpired."
    Before Wilson left Niger, he briefed the American ambassador to that country, availing her of findings that matched her own. He returned to the United States and briefed the CIA on his findings, as well as the State Department. In short, he covered all the bases and returned home to his normal life. Later, it was revealed that the "evidence" used to support the claim that such a transaction had taken place was a pile of crudely forged documents.
    In January of 2003, George W. Bush used the debunked Niger uranium claims during his State of the Union address to buttress his argument that war in Iraq was necessary. This begat the "16 words" scandal that burned briefly this summer before disappearing with nary a ripple. Why did the President use grossly inadequate intelligence data in such an important speech? Was it a deliberate attempt to mislead the American public, a deliberate attempt to fill them with the fear of terrorist mushroom clouds from Iraq? Or was it an incredible failure on the part of the National Security apparatus that this flawed and forged data made it into the speech? A 'yes' answer to any of these questions was profoundly unacceptable, which was the motivation for Wilson's editorial on July 6th.
    The publication of Wilson's editorial brought about a rare day of discomfort for a White House that is normally insulated by a friendly Congress, a subordinate Justice Department, and a tamed media. "The day after I wrote the article," said Wilson on Monday, "the White House said those 16 words shouldn't have been there. For me, that was the end of the story. Others could decide if the White House had deliberately deceived the American people. I'd gotten my answer, and afterwards refused all interviews on the subject, beyond the ones I'd already committed to."
    Agents within the Bush administration, most notably Condi Rice and Don Rumsfeld, claimed they had never been informed of the corrupted nature of the Niger evidence. Some days later, CIA Director George Tenet took public responsibility for the fact that those 16 words made it into the State of the Union speech. The CIA, said Tenet, had never told the White House that the Niger evidence was phony.
    Amusingly, few people believed what Tenet was trying to sell. First of all, Wilson had informed not only the CIA, but the State Department as well, that the Niger claims were empty. Many people beyond Mr. Tenet had the data, and the standard operating procedure would have such important data climbing a number of administration ladders. Second of all, it was Dick Cheney who asked for the investigation in the first place. Is it reasonable to assume that, after having demanded the investigation, Cheney refused to be briefed on the findings?
    A number of intelligence community veterans likewise did not buy what Tenet was trying to sell. I spoke with Andrew Wilkie in those July days when all of this was unfolding. Wilkie is a former senior intelligence analyst for the Office of National Assessments, the senior Australian intelligence agency which provides intelligence assessments to the Australian prime minister. "In the last week in Australia," said Wilkie, "the Defense Intelligence Organization has admitted they had the information on the Niger forgeries and says they didn't tell the Defense Minister. The Australian Department of Foreign Affairs has admitted they had the information on the Niger forgeries and didn't tell the Foreign Minister. The place I used to work, the Office of National Assessments, has admitted publicly that they knew the Niger evidence was fake and didn't tell the Prime Minister about it."
    "You've got three intelligence organizations in Australia, the intelligence organizations in the US," continued Wilkie, "and every one is saying they knew this was bad information, but not one political leader reckons they were told. All three organizations have said they didn't give this information to their political leaders. It is unbelievable to the point of fantasy."
    Ray McGovern, a 27 year veteran and former senior analyst for the CIA, was likewise unconvinced after Tenet made his dubious confession. "Tenet's confession is designed to take the heat off," said McGovern when I spoke to him in July, "to assign some responsibility somewhere. It's not going to work. There's too much deception here. For example, Condoleezza Rice insisted that she only learned on June 8 about Ambassador Wilson's mission to Niger back in February 2002. That means that neither she nor her staff reads the New York Times, because Nick Kristof on May 6 had a very detailed explication of Wilson's mission to Niger. In my view, it is inconceivable. Her remark this week - that she didn't know about Joe Wilson's mission to Niger until she was asked on a talk show on June 8 - is stretching the truth beyond the breaking point."
    This situation, for Wilkie and McGovern, was an interesting case study in the incredible malfeasance of the Bush administration. For Joseph Wilson, however, it became much more personal. Before long, it became about his integrity, and about keeping his wife alive.
    "After my editorial came out," said Wilson on Monday, "the President went to Africa. Then White House slimeball press secretary, Ari Fleischer, started spreading rumors that maybe my information wasn't that good, maybe he has some ulterior motives. Cap Weinberger, a lifelong friend of Dick Cheney, wrote an article saying I'd had less than a stellar career. Rather than let bygones be bygones and deal with the issue - the issue being that someone had apparently put lies in the President's mouth - they decided to get the messenger who had said, 'Mr. President, someone put a lie in your mouth.'"
    The manner in which the White House decided to "get" the messenger cuts straight to the heart of the integrity of this administration. The Bush administration, in order to silence the politically discomforting Joseph Wilson, along with any other analyst insiders who might speak out about the shady way intelligence surrounding the Iraq invasion was handled, attacked Joseph Wilson's wife.
    Wilsons' wife is named Valerie Plame, and she has worked for the CIA for years. Plame is not an analyst or a secretary. Plame is what the CIA calls a NOC, which stands for "non-official cover." A NOC designation means that Valerie Plame was working under such deep cover that she could not be associated with the American intelligence community in any way, shape or form. Plame worked out of a CIA front company called Brewster Jennings & Associates while she performed her service to America's defense. Her service? Valerie Plame ran a clandestine global network designed to track any person, group or nation that might try to deliver weapons of mass destruction to terrorists.
    Not long after Wilson's editorial ran in the Times, individuals within the Bush administration cold-called several journalists and informed them that Valerie Plame worked for the CIA. One of these calls went to Robert Novak, who wrote about it in his column. "Wilson never worked for the CIA," wrote Novak on July 14, "but his wife, Valerie Plame, is an Agency operative on weapons of mass destruction."
    This revelation, and the subsequent firestorm that followed, had a number of effects. Most prominently, it annihilated an intelligence network dedicated to keeping weapons of mass destruction out of the hands of terrorists. It destroyed the viability of Brewster Jennings & Associates as a front company, thus wrecking the work of every other agent who worked from there. It put the lives of Plame's informants within her network in mortal peril; when an agent gets blown, foreign intelligence agencies - especially ones in unfriendly countries - tend to erase the people that agent associated with as a matter of national security. It put Plame's life in peril as well; those same foreign intelligence services would prefer Plame be dead for revealing sensitive data about their activities.
    "They couldn't resist letting Novak and those others know my wife worked with CIA," said Wilson on Monday. "Did they know she was a clandestine operator? The number of people in the administration who knew what my wife did for a living is very small. Only those who had means and motive could have done this, someone who has keys to our most precious national security secrets along with a political agenda. It occurred right at that nexus of policy and politics."
    Why do this? Agents within the Bush administration destroyed a network dedicated to what is roundly broadcast as this administration's main mission: Keeping weapons of mass destruction out of the hands of terrorists. According to the rhetoric, this was why we invaded Iraq.
    "I operate from the assumption," said Wilson on Monday, "that the reason for doing this was to discourage others who were talking to press - and there were many - from coming forward more openly. The message was 'Be very careful: Do a Wilson on us, and we will do a Plame on you.' Its one thing to be political and put up with this crap. I'm used to it, after having been around for so long. But it's another thing for an analyst to deal with threats like this. Analysts aren't used to dealing with pressures like this. This act may have discouraged many of them from coming forward. I don't know to be sure, but have been far less insider stories about what we were hearing, stories of Cheney pressuring CIA analysts and the like, than there were a few months ago. There are far fewer unattributed sources talking about it. What they did to my wife was a political act to discourage others from coming forward."
    For the record, the United States of America invaded Iraq because the Bush administration spent months terrifying the American people with the specter of Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction in the hands of terrorists. The record is clear:
    "Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction." - Dick Cheney, August 26 2002
    "Right now, Iraq is expanding and improving facilities that were used for the production of biological weapons." - George W. Bush, September 12 2002
    "If he declares he has none, then we will know that Saddam Hussein is once again misleading the world." - Ari Fleischer, December 2 2002
    "We know for a fact that there are weapons there." - Ari Fleischer, January 9 2003
    "Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent." - George W. Bush, State of the Union address, January 28 2003
    "We know that Saddam Hussein is determined to keep his weapons of mass destruction, is determined to make more." - Colin Powell, February 5 2003
    "We have sources that tell us that Saddam Hussein recently authorized Iraqi field commanders to use chemical weapons." - George Bush, February 8 2003
    "Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised." - George Bush, March 17 2003
    "Well, there is no question that we have evidence and information that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, biological and chemical particularly . . . all this will be made clear in the course of the operation, for whatever duration it takes." - Ari Fleischer, March 21 2003
    "There is no doubt that the regime of Saddam Hussein possesses weapons of mass destruction. As this operation continues, those weapons will be identified, found, along with the people who have produced them and who guard them." - Gen. Tommy Franks, March 22 2003
    "We know where they are. They are in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad." - Donald Rumsfeld, March 30 2003.
    All of these claims were wrapped around the rhetoric of September 11, making a clear connection for the American people: If we do not invade Iraq and get those weapons, they will be given to terrorists for use against you. This rhetoric is further buttressed by claims on a page on the White House's own website titled 'Disarm Saddam Hussein.' That page outlines, in specifics, why Iraq was a threat. The threat: 26,000 liters of anthrax, 38,000 liters of botulinum toxin, 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX gas (500 tons = 1,000,000 lbs.), nearly 30,000 munitions to deliver these poisons, and al Qaeda connections just itching to take possession of it all.
    In a bit of black comedy, the Niger uranium claims - so thoroughly debunked that America stands ashamed before the world because Bush used them publicly to augment his case for war - still remain on this official White House page. The tens of thousands of liters of anthrax and botulinum toxin, the million pounds of sarin, VX and mustard gas, have thoroughly failed to turn up after nearly a year's worth of occupation and investigation, after almost 500 American soldiers have died, after thousands more have been horribly wounded, to defend America against a threat that did not exist in the first place.
    The White House lied. George W. Bush lied. Dick Cheney lied. Don Rumsfeld lied. Ari Fleischer, perhaps predictably, lied. Joseph Wilson called them on just one of their lies, and that same White House reached out and destroyed his wife's career in order to protect itself politically, and to warn any other whistleblowers that public criticism might well amount to complete personal destruction. In doing so, the White House trashed an intelligence network that was working to keep weapons of mass destruction out of the hands of terrorists.
    As the New Year approaches, all sorts of retrospectives will be broadcast across the spectrum of television networks. Famous people who died will be remembered, and the most interesting news stories of the year will be rehashed. You'll see Saddam Hussein's capture many times, and you will see his statue toppled in Baghdad many times.
    You won't hear about Valerie Plame, or her savaged intelligence network that was protecting you. You won't hear about the missing weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. You won't hear the names, nor see the faces, of the nearly five hundred American soldiers who have died because of the Bush administration's lies. You won't see the ripped flesh or bloody stumps on the thousands of American soldiers who were torn up because of the Bush administration's lies.
    All of that happened, however. All those dead and wounded soldiers happened. Valerie Plame happened. Joseph Wilson happened, and he is not finished yet. Not by a long chalk. What would you do if someone attacked your wife?
    -------
    William Rivers Pitt is the Managing Editor of truthout.org. He is a New York Times and international best-selling author of three books - "War On Iraq," available from Context Books, "The Greatest Sedition is Silence," available from Pluto Press, and "Our Flag, Too: The Paradox of Patriotism," available in August from Context Books.
    http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/123003A.shtml

  • Black crisis gets even blacker
    Former Hollinger chief under siege as investigation widens.
    James Robinson reports
    Sunday December 7, 2003
    The Observer
    Telegraph proprietor Conrad Black is spending the weekend in New York, a city in the grip of a dramatic snowstorm.
    The weather may be a bad omen for Black, who is at the centre of a corporate scandal that threatens to engulf his global newspaper empire.
    If he hoped to escape the frenzy of negative publicity that followed his resignation as chief executive of Hollinger, the Telegraph's parent company, Black will be disappointed. Barely a day passes without fresh revelations about his business dealings.
    Black is in New York 'on business' according to his spokesman. Hollinger International is quoted on the New York Stock Exchange.
    He has been promoting his new book on President Roosevelt, attending private parties at the Four Seasons hotel and the Harvard Club - the type of exclusive venues he has grown accustomed to. Black has enjoyed an opulent existence, bankrolled in part by Hollinger. Perks included an account at glitzy New York restaurant Le Cirque and travelling in two corporate jets.
    That lifestyle has already been curtailed as an internal investigation into £19 million of unauthorised payments received by Black and his fellow directors drags on. The tab at Le Cirque has been closed and the jets grounded.
    The investigation is being carried out by Richard Breeden, a former US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) chairman. It looks certain to continue well into next year. The activities of some of the most powerful figures in US political and financial circles are now being scrutinised by Breeden.
    The list of Hollinger directors makes impressive reading. They include Henry Kissinger, Richard Perle, a prominent neo-conservative and a member of President's Bush's inner circle, and former Illinois Governor James Thompson.
    It emerged last week that Breeden is examining Hollinger's dealings with companies with links to Kissinger and Perle. Hollinger put £8m into UK firm Cambridge Display Technology, in which Perle has a stake, and £1.5m in Trireme Associates, which has links to venture capital fund Trireme Partners, co-managed by Perle. Kissinger served as a board member of Trireme.
    There is no suggestion that either of the investments was illegal, but they do call into question the independence of the Hollinger board. Both men are long-time associates of Black. Perle joined the Hollinger board in 1994. Kissinger has been a director since 1996.
    Directors have also been paid $202m in non-compete arrangements and management fees since 1995. These payments are also being investigated. Under US law, Hollinger's directors could be held legally responsible for failing to prevent the payments if they were unnecessary.
    The SEC, America's stock market regulator, is conducting a separate investigation into Hollinger International and Hollinger Inc, a Toronto-listed company that owns 30 per cent of Hollinger International.
    Ravelston, a private company controlled by Black, is Hollinger Inc's parent company. Hollinger paid management fees to Ravelston. Hollinger's shareholders, led by minority shareholder Tweedy Browne, are demanding to know why the payments were made.
    The complex web of transactions between the three companies is delaying a strategic review being carried out by investment bank Lazards, which is likely to lead to a sale of some or all of Hollinger's assets. Lazards was expected to complete its review by the end of the year, but sources close to the bank say it is unlikely to do so until January.
    That gives Black's rivals more time to prepare bids for his flagship Telegraph titles. Express proprietor Richard Desmond told guests at an Express business lunch last week that it represents 'the chance of a lifetime'. Desmond talked of paying £400m for the Telegraph titles, slightly less than than the value placed on them by analysts. Royal Bank of Scotland is thought to be willing to lend Desmond part of the money he needs to buy the papers. His other backers include Commerzbank.
    DMGT, owner of the Daily Mail and the Evening Standard, views the Telegraphs as the perfect fit. Other likely bidders include the Barclay brothers and private equity companies Candover, 3i and Apax Partners.
    Black has promised to pay back any money that he was not entitled to, but that may not prevent Hollinger shareholders from taking legal action to try and recover their cash. If they do so, Black could face criminal charges. It would be an inglorious end to Black's 30-year career as a newspaper proprietor.
    The directors' cuts
    May 22: Hollinger International shareholder Tweedy Browne demands details of non-compete payments made to directors. Conrad Black sets up a special committee to investigate the payments.
    November 14: Hollinger tells the SEC that it has discovered 'inaccuracies' in previous filings.
    November 17: Hollinger admits directors received £19m in unauthorised payments. Black steps down as CEO of Hollinger.
    November 18: Daily Mail owner DMGT, Richard Desmond's Northern & Shell and The Washington Post are potential bidders.
    November 19: The SEC begins an investigation into the payments at Hollinger.
    November 21: Four non-executive directors at Hollinger Inc, which controls Hollinger, resign.
    December 1: Hollinger Inc says it may not be able to meet interest payments on loans.
    December 4: Investigators examine Hollinger's investments in two companies with close links to two directors.


  • Firstborn dolphins are dying in disproportionate numbers, and biologists can't pinpoint exactly why.
    National Geographic
    January 8, 2004
    Off Florida's Gulf Coast, firstborn bottlenose dolphins are dying in disproportionate numbers, and biologists can't pinpoint exactly why.
    Scientists working with the Sarasota Dolphin Research Program in Florida have added this question to their research agenda. Now when they collect dolphin data, they run lab tests to determine the level of man-made toxins they've accumulated in their bodies.
       In search of information on dolphin behavior and health, a team of researchers, veterinarians, and dolphin handlers periodically takes to the sea to study them in the wild.
    On a recent expedition, a flotilla of nine boats with 60 scientists aboard converged on a group of bottlenose dolphins frolicking near the shoreline in Sarasota Bay.
    The lead boat encircled the dolphins in a net "pen," and a few researchers jumped in with them. Working quickly and gently, they wrapped each dolphin in a bear hug, conducted a quick exam, and took a blood sample from a vein in their tail. If the animal wasn't pregnant, a veterinarian gently placed it aboard a second boat on a stretcher for some quick measurements and additional body fluid samples, carefully monitoring for any signs of distress.
    Polluted Milk
    Although dolphin numbers in these waters have risen slightly over the last few decades, the scientists are trying to understand why so many firstborn calves die: Less than a quarter live out their first year, compared with 70 to 80 percent of subsequent births.
    One reason may be man-made pollutants—and the transfer of chemical contaminants to calves through milk, according to Randy Wells, a conservation biologist with the Chicago Zoological Society and director of the Mote Marine Laboratory for Marine Mammal and Sea Turtle Research in Sarasota. Since 1970, Wells has led the world's longest-running dolphin study.
    "There's thousands of contaminants that man has put in the water," he said. "Finding a smoking gun is very challenging, but the weight of evidence shows that environmental contamination is one factor in calf mortality." However, exposure is difficult to quantify—and it's difficult to link exposure with symptoms or death.
    Accumulating Chemicals
    Sea mammals sit high on the food chain and are long-lived. Through the fish they eat, they accumulate high concentrations of an array of pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and other chemicals in their blubber. "Some of the highest levels we find anywhere in the animal kingdom are found in dolphins," said John Kucklick, an environmental chemist with the National Institute of Standards and Technology in Charleston, South Carolina.
    When a female dolphin is producing milk, she's using up blubber, says Wells, and the chemicals stored there pass into the milk—and to her calf. Mothers give birth at about eight years old, so their firstborn calves receive an extra-large dose compared to later-born calves that come every two to three years, when the toxic load is lighter.
    Northern fur seals in the Bering Sea and killer whales off the Alaskan coast also lose firstborns, said Todd Ohara, a wildlife veterinary toxicologist at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. "We're very worried about neonatal exposure. But trying to link specific contaminants [with the deaths] is difficult," he said.
    Since the Second World War, more than 75,000 new chemicals have been developed and put into use according to the Washington D.C.-based Environmental Working Group. Many of these chemicals are dumped into oceans or waterways. United States law does not require chemical companies to conduct health and safety tests on their products, so no data exists for the vast majority of chemicals.
    Dolphin Studies
    Florida's Gulf Coast provides an excellent natural laboratory to study dolphins. Mote researchers have followed families of dolphins here for over three decades and still track about one-third of their original 47 subjects—as well as their calves, grand-calves, and great-grand calves.
    "We currently have about 140 dolphins regularly using Sarasota Bay, with another 2,400 individuals roaming up and down the central west coast from Tampa Bay to Charlotte Harbor," said Wells. Studying the environmental effects of contaminants is just one of 20 studies currently underway under the Sarasota Dolphin Research Program.
    The Gulf carries higher concentrations of contaminants than the open ocean, says Kucklick—and firstborn dolphin deaths are higher there, too. In a study of Atlantic spotted dolphins in pristine Bahamas waters, just 25 percent of firstborns die, says Denise Herzine, research director of the Wild Dolphin Project in Jupiter, Florida.
    An Array of Toxins
    Pesticides are chemicals that were designed to act on the central nervous system, explains Olson; they impair immunity and disrupt hormonal activity in the thyroid and other glands. PCBs have been linked to premature births, sterility, and other reproductive failure. "The levels are at those where we can expect to see some of these effects," said Kucklick.
    PCBs are a family of 209 chemical compounds originally used as flame retardants and electrical insulators that were eventually used in products from cereal boxes and varnishes to bread wrappers until they were banned in the U.S. in 1979.
    Toxic Consequences
    But the effects of these chemicals can be subtle. Studies on humans have shown that PCBs affect learning and hearing development—both of which are particularly important to dolphins, famously social creatures who communicate via sound.
    Lowered immunity may mean that a calf doesn't recover from a wound or minor infection. When combined with other factors, like the less-than-optimal attention of inexperienced, first-time mothers, firstborn dolphins are at a clear disadvantage. "We know much more about the effects of these chemicals in people than we do in wildlife," said Kucklick. Little is known about chemical interactions in mammals.
    Last year, a study in the journal Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry pointed out that chronic exposure to PCBs hampered the reproductive success of dolphin populations in Sarasota Bay; Beaufort, North Carolina; and Matagordu Bay, Texas.
    The mystery of the firstborn dolphin die-offs reflects the complexity of the species. Dolphins are highly intelligent creatures, and "nothing about them is simple," said Wells. "I wouldn't be surprised if a number of factors might contribute to the deaths."
     
  • The second-largest extinction in the Earth's history may have been caused by UV radiation from the Sun.
    Associated Press
    08 January 2004
    ATLANTA (AP) - The second-largest extinction in the Earth's history, the killing of two-thirds of all species, may have been caused by ultraviolet radiation from the Sun after gamma rays destroyed the Earth's ozone layer.
    Astronomers are proposing that a supernova exploded within 10,000 light years of the Earth, destroying the chemistry of the atmosphere and allowing the Sun's ultraviolet rays to cook fragile, unprotected life forms.
    All this happened some 440 million years ago and led to what is known as the Ordovician extinction, the second most severe of the planet's five great periods of extinction.
    "The prevailing theory for that extinction has been an ice age,'' said Adrian L. Melott, a University of Kansas astronomer. "We think there is very good circumstantial evidence for a gamma ray burst.''
    Melott is the leader of a team, which includes some astronomers from NASA, that presented the theory Wednesday at the national meeting of the American Astronomical Society.
    Fossil records for the Ordovician extinction show an abrupt disappearance of two-thirds of all species on the planet. Those records also show that an ice age that lasted more than a half million years started during the same period.
    Melott said a gamma ray burst would explain both phenomena.
    He said a gamma ray beam striking the Earth would break up molecules in the stratosphere, causing the formation of nitrous oxide and other chemicals that would destroy the ozone layer and shroud the planet in a brown smog.
    "The sky would get brown, but there would be intense ultraviolet radiation from the Sun striking the surface.'' he said. The radiation would be at least 50 times above normal, powerful enough to killed exposed life.
    In a second effect, the brown smog would cause the Earth to cool, triggering an ice age, Melott said.
    The extinction "could have been a one-two punch,'' said Bruce S. Lieberman, a paleontologist at the University of Kansas and a co-author of the theory. "Our theory builds on earlier theories'' that included an ice age.
    Before the extinction, the Earth was unusually warm. Melott said climate experts have been unable to find a model that would explain the sudden onset of massive glaciers.
    "They need something to jump start the ice age,'' he said. "The gamma ray burst could have done it.''
    Jere H. Lipps, a paleobiologist at the University of California, Berkeley, said gamma rays as a source of the Ordovician extinction should be regarded as only one of several theories. "It is a hypothesis that should be tested,'' Lipps said.
    He said the widely-accepted idea that the dinosaurs were wiped out by an asteroid 65 million years ago started out as a "wild idea'' but that it gained wide support after other research.
    Most of the life killed in the Ordovician extinction were primitive sea creatures. Those that lived at or near the surface would be greatest risk from the ultraviolet radiation. Melott the species killed lived in shallow waters or reproduced with larvae that spent part of their lives near the water surface. Animals living in deep water were not harmed.
    There were only primitive plants living on land, but they, too, would have been affected, he said.
    Melott said it is almost certain that Earth has been zapped by a gamma rays several times in its 4.5 billion year history.
    "You can expect a dangerous gamma ray burst every few hundred million years,'' he said. "It could happen tomorrow or it could be millions of years.''
    Supernovae, the source of gamma rays, usually leave behind remnant clouds of dust, shock waves and black holes that can be detected for millions of years. Melott said there is no known evidence of such a nearby supernova, but that in 440 million years the Milky Way would have rotated almost twice and traces of the explosion could have been moved during that time.
    The Ordovician was the first of five great extinctions in history.
    The Devonian, 360 million years ago, killed 60 percent of all species; the Permian-Triassic, 250 million years ago, killed 90 percent of all life; the late Triassic, 220 million years ago, killed half of all species; and the Cretacious-Tertiary event destroyed the dinosaurs and half of all other species about 65 million years ago.

  • Giant Space Shield Plan To Save Planet
    The Observer - UK
    1-10-4
    Humanity could not exist without it - yet in an extraordinary plan that underlines the catastrophic implications of climate change, scientists now want to curb the Sun's life-giving influence to save mankind from its biggest threat: global warming.
    Key talks involving the Government's most senior climate experts have produced proposals to site a massive shield on the edge of space that would deflect the Sun's rays and stabilise the climate.
    Hundreds of thousands of tonnes of metallic 'scatterers' would be ejected into the upper atmosphere under the plans. In addition, billions of tiny barrage balloons could serve as a secondary barrier to block rays from the Earth's nearest star.
    On land, giant reservoirs holding saline water could be built to offset the rise in sea levels caused by the melting of the polar ice-caps. The oceans, too, would be modified to cope with the planet's increasingly warmer weather. Massive floating cloud-making machines would be dotted across their surface while, below, large plantations of algae would be grown to absorb greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.
    The theories were discussed by Britain's most eminent climatologists at a meeting in Cambridge last week to analyse the latest theories to tackle the problem of the planet heating up. They included the Government's chief scientist, Sir David King, who warned last week that climate change was the most severe problem facing civilisation.
    Professor John Schellnhuber, former chief environmental adviser to the German government and head of the UK's leading group of climate scientists at the Tyndall Centre, said: 'These are exotic ideas and we probably will have to come up with the right mixture. But the problem has not gone away, so we think this analysis is just in time.
    'The present climate policy does not seem to be working. We are not saying we have the magic bullet, but this is a desperate situation and people should start thinking about the unconventional. Preventative plans on a larger scale are needed.'
    Environmentalists maintain that the solutions are so radical they serve only to underscore how unprepared governments are to deal with the threat. Last week researchers predicted that a quarter of land animals and plants will die out because of global warming over the next 50 years.
    Scientists, however, argue that until the United States and Russia ratify international agreements to limit the emission of greenhouse gases they will have little choice but to explore new methods to save the planet.
    Extreme technological fixes include deploying tens of billions of wafer-thin metal plates less than a centimetre wide into the Earth's low orbit via space rockets. These would be specially built to allow space-bound rays to pass while at the same time absorbing a significant amount of solar energy before bouncing it back into space. They would be designed to stay in place for a century.
    Similar solutions include the release of massive nets of ultra-fine metal mesh into the upper atmosphere by aircraft to prevent the Sun's rays from reaching Earth. Alternatively, millions of metallic-coated super-pressure balloons - similar in design to a children's party version, although a fraction of the size - would be filled with helium and released until they reach the stratosphere 35,000ft above the Earth. Trapped in parcels of air, they would stay up for about five years before falling to earth and being replaced.
    All the methods are designed to block about 1 per cent of the Sun's rays, enough to protect at least one million square kilometres of the Earth and significantly cool the planet.
    Inspiration came from studying the effects of volcanic eruptions in Indonesia in 1814. During these explosions, enough material was spewed into the upper atmosphere to cause temperatures to fall by up to 30 per cent for almost three years, roughly the amount some predict that they will rise to by the end of this century.
    Academics from California's Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, who told government scientists about the billion-pound scheme, claim it will increase crop yields, because plants would be less damaged by the Sun's harmful rays. The scheme would create more spectacular sunrises and sunsets, deeper blue skies and would reduce the cancer risk for sunbathers and children.
    Pumping nutrients into the world's oceans remains another weapon under consideration. This would encourage the growth of vast underwater algae blooms to absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Scientists believe 'large-scale ocean fertilisation' could act as a substitute for the world's disappearing forests, which act as a huge natural sponge for soaking up carbon dioxide from the air.
    Massive floating cloud-making machines could also become a feature of the oceans. These solar-powered contraptions would spray seawater droplets of a precise size into the sky to help encourage the formation of low-level clouds.
    Other ideas being looked at include the burial of carbon dioxide emissions underground. Friends of the Earth climate campaigner Roger Higman said: 'Climate change is the biggest environmental threat the world faces. It is important for scientists to explore imaginative ways to tackle its impacts, but technical fixes must not be used as an excuse for failing to reduce the growing levels of greenhouse gases.'
    This week the Government will announce how it proposes to implement the most significant piece of climate change legislation since the Kyoto protocol, Europe's greenhouse gas emissions trading scheme.


  • Hundreds see fireballs fall from sky in Spain
    Jan. 4, 2004
    Reuters News Service
    MADRID - Hundreds of witnesses reported seeing fireballs cross the skies of northern Spain today in what authorities said may have been a disintegrating meteorite, Spanish radio said.
    The bright flashes were spotted in a swathe across the northern half of Spain, from the eastern city of Valencia to the northwestern pilgrimage site of Santiago de Compostela.
    In some cases, objects were reported to have fallen to earth.
    "I left the house at around 12 minutes to six. I heard a big explosion, like an earth tremor, and a white cloud of smoke formed around a nearby mountain which took a long time to disappear," a local official from the northern region of Palencia told the radio.
    Civil Guard officials told the radio an object had plunged from the skies in the northern province of Leon.
    Spain's civil aviation authority ruled out the possibility of a plane crash.
    Jose Angel Docobo, director of the University of Santiago's observatory, said the phenomenon could have been caused by a rock orbiting the sun which had collided with the earth.

  • Brits Will Require A Visa To Visit The US
    1-8-4
    Agence France-Presses
    British travellers to the United States will soon need a visa even for short visits under new security measures imposed by the US Congress, a British newspaper said.
    Under the new rules, after October 26 this year all passports must contain "biometric indicators" -- computer chips carrying a digitally encoded record of the bearer's face and possibly fingerprints, The Daily Telegraph said.
    British officals have reportedly said that these cannot be produced until the middle of 2005 at the latest, requiring all new British passports issued in the interim to be accompanied by a visa obtained from offices in either London or Belfast.
    The ruling will affect all British passports issued after October 26 and passports issued before then will still entitle people to enter the US without a visa, The Daily Telegraph said.
    Currently, Britons can enter America for up to three months without a visa, under the "visa waiver programme".
    On Monday, stringent new security regulations were introduced at 115 of the US's international airports and 14 major seaports, requiring people entering on a visa now to be fingerprinted and have their photographs taken.
    Those on the visa waiver scheme are not currently affected, but those on work visas are.
    The system allows officials to instantly check an immigrant or visitor's criminal background.
    Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge said the US aimed to be "open to visitors but closed to terrorists".

  • Who Made The AA 'Put' Options The Days Prior To 911?
    Can You Amplify On This Comment, Please?
    By Walter J. Burien, Jr.
    http://CAFR1.com
    12-30-3
    Question from:
    John Kaminski
    [email protected]
    12-30-3
    Gentlemen:
    Can we all unite on a single task: finding out who placed the orders for the "put" options in the days immediately before 9/11?
    Discussions I've had in the enclosed e-mail seem to indicate this information is available and not protected by financial disclosure restrictions.
    Please examine the enclosed and brainstorm how we can get this information into the public sphere. It could be the thread to unravel the mystery.
    Discovering the names of those who apparently had prior knowledge of 9/11 as indicated by their "savvy" bets on the fortunes of United and American airlines are a necessary first step toward interrogating these individuals to find out where they got their information, something the law enforcement community should be doing but obviously isn't.
    Best wishes,
    John Kaminski

    REPLY FROM
    Walter Burien
    [email protected]
    12-30-3
    John:
    The five million dollars generated from the unclaimed 911 American Airline put option is truly chump change.
    The morning of 911, US Bonds moved in 3 to 4 minutes by 1.5 points back and forth three times or $1,500 per contract in seconds three times in less than 4 minutes.
    Most institutional traders trade in blocks of 500 to 3,000 contracts. Daily transactions are 350,000 to 400,000 contracts traded. The bond market trading was suspended about one half hour after the attack. When it reopened it moved in several days by 5 points. Someone holding 1000 contracts would have reaped five million dollars using one million. International and domestic stock index futures would have reaped over fifteen million using one million. Guess who made the biggest killing on short international and domestic stock index positions? What one group was holding tens of thousands of short positions going into 911 that reaped about 250 billion dollars in the blink of an eye? Hint! Begins with a G and ends with a T.
    The following disclosures are critical in understanding what you are and have seen taking place in the Markets.
    I will start off with a clip from Allen Greenspan, who was quoted in the Wall Street Journal in 2000 as saying he was: "Concerned about the eighty (80) trillion dollar international derivative market."
    What he did not say was that the composite US Government investment funds were the primary user, player, manipulator, and profiteers within that 80 trillion dollar derivative market. The government investment funds are professional short players with no equal in opposition.
    A derivative gives the ability for selling the market "short" on paper even if you do not own the stock, commodity, currency, bonds, etc.
    The government investment managers over the last 30 years have become VERY familiar with using this tactic to reap in hundreds of billions of dollars each year!
    The government, who controls the economic reports, media coverage, and wealth is in a position to manipulate the above and create an environment to secure substantial revenue while everyone else is lying on the shoulder of the road bleeding to death. For three months prior and going into 911 the government investment funds had increased their short positions to the largest diversified short positions ever held by them.
    Look at any chart for a commodity or stock. Prices collapse four to five times faster than they rise. By selling on the domestic and international derivative markets, this makes the largest "quick" profits, and it is all on paper! You do not have to own the physical stock or commodity. By using derivatives, and if you have the ability to manipulate the market as was the case on 911 you take the money from those that do own the physical stock or commodity.
    EXAMPLES: Sell a gold futures contract (on paper) at $400 / oz then buy it back at $200, margin requirement to do so on 100 ounces is $1000. Now $400 - $200 = $200 x 100 ounces = $20,000 using $1000
    Sell a call option or buy a put option on Microsoft stock at $100 per share and then liquidate the option at $50, you just made $50 per share on your "short" option.
    If the price moves in the direction of your short derivative position substantial moneys are made and you accomplish this not owning the physical stock, commodity, or currency. A monopoly (Such as: US Composite Government Funds) controlling the swings in the markets will reap unheard of profits on each and every dramatic swing. If there is no volatility, up or down then profits using derivatives are substantially reduced.
    The OVERALL government investment funds are in the trillions of dollars!
    Less than 450 managers control 80% of that revenue!
    They all, in so many words, subscribe to the same newsletter, and discuss strategy at the same club!
    As the public had hundreds of billions of dollars liquidated from their 401k plans as the market dove lower and lower, in a quick yo yo fashion, the government investment funds through the use of derivatives, transfers that wealth into their management accounts and hands.....
    Look at the bottom line on the government investment portfolios! They will have taken substantial losses on their physical stock holdings but, their derivative profits will greatly offset those losses or in fact in many a case show a net profit towards the overall results! (Look carefully at cash withdraws / transfers made offsetting those profits to give the appearance of an annual operating loss)
    The public provides liquidity in the market place to allow the biggest monopoly the world has ever known to secure more wealth. Your government at work! Compare the private sector's return on investments over 2001, 2002 (dismal) compared to government's "NET" return over the same period of time. (Substantial)
    US Government investment funds have and are doing the same on the International markets as well. Through the use of derivatives, the "substantial" US Government investment funds control the stock market, gold prices, currency prices, etc. Absolute financial control by the largest monopoly on Earth!
    Any, commodity, International Stock market, or corporate complex's value can be strongly suppressed or over inflated for years by a monopoly using derivatives. Controlled by paper transactions for commitments to buy or sell without physical ownership of what is bought or sold.
    It does not matter if prices go up or collapses. When the US Government investment managers are moving in tandem, controlling the events and news, they reap obscene returns THROUGH THE USE OF DERIVATIVES!
    If you look at "WHO" was holding the majority of "SHORT" derivative positions on the domestic and international stock index markets prior to 911, and then reaped over a trillion dollars in profits within weeks from the ensuing collapse of those physical markets, you will find in that group who was responsible for 911. There is one problem in finding this out. That being, government controls the release of that information by and through the Federal agencies of the SEC (Securities Exchange Commission) and CFTC (Commodities Futures Trading Commission).
    A small conflict of interest exists here, being that the results of that study would show US government was holding the majority of the international and domestic "SHORT" positions! The airline stock option transaction at issue and that most people have heard about promoted in the news is truly minuscule chump change in comparison.
    Exchange members have access to and keep archive records of the data from their brokerage houses and all other member houses and they are under a nondisclosure agreement. BUT, it would not prevent them, if they wished to do so, too tabulate the transactions and issue a "Generic" report, a specific and targeted generic report.
    Here, you would need to have a significant contact in the financial community of members. Even though this type of generic report would not violate their nondisclosure agreement, they would be dead if they issued the report based on what it would show and strongly evidence (government investment funds were the primary benefactor), so anonymity would have to be kept when the generic report of the specific stream findings was released. The generic report would mandate disclosure of the specifics behind the report by public and international outcry.
    Yes, government is preparing for an uprising in this country. So they needed to direct the public eye to a far away enemy so that they can secure control here. Greed has thrived within government circles. The results of that greed have been obscene and the resulting damage to the morals and health of this country in response is sickening.
    The results of the takeover of the American wealth has been done almost exclusively on paper through manipulation of legislature, the judiciary, and Attorney complex over the last 60 years with the cooperation of the syndicated news media and education. With the conquest being done by transferring the wealth on paper, the consequences for the "takers" was virtually nonexistent!
    The government trading accounts push 65% of the paper in these markets. Government investment funds are required disclosure if pursued. The CFTC and SEC data tape is definitive for volume and positions held every second of the day.
    The general position streams have no restrictions from disclosure between exchange members. They archive and share it live within the financial community of exchange members who are producing and clearing the data.. When it comes down to individual accounts, private are confidential but government investment funds handled by private managers are not and cannot be held confidential if pried open by any definitive court order from a competent jurisdiction.
    Management for all intents and purposes waves enforcement of nondisclosure rules when handling government funds. An intentional cover-up on any disclosure coming forth in this arena per overall government investment funds positions held would be nothing other than treason of the strongest degree, under any color of refusal.
    The showing of derivative transactions both on the domestic and international fronts would burn the government's facade alive. Based on the fund trackers, government fund accounts were holding their largest short positions "ever" going into 911.
    Well, the natives are getting restless! The prize is great, ownership of this country and future control of the planet!
    Hmm! Homeland Security! But you must ask yourself, "security for whom?" Is the answer becoming obvious to you yet?
    Natives can be pesky little creatures when they realize their families, wives, and children have been raped. They can become very hostile when they realize that their wealth was slipped right out of their hands with no consequence to the "takers." Natives can revolt when they realize these things, and take resentment for the "takers" continued push to indoctrinate them and their children so that what has been taken and is being taken will continue unabated.
    Here is an age old tactic the takers use when the natives get restless: When the takers hear the random war drums starting to beat at home stronger and stronger from the natives due to the abuses of the takers, the takers will use their well structured organization to re-create the pounding of the war drums at home with their selected target afar now being marketed to the natives. By doing so the native's attention and hostility can be carefully controlled and directed away from the takers and towards some "other" entity, the created enemy afar.
    When, and as this happens, look out! The takers create a scenario of absolute control, and within this type of environment, the takers will become ruthless beyond all measures after solidifying additional control. WW1, WW2, WW3? The war drums are being played consistently louder by the takers!
    The natives cannot afford to sit on the sidelines here!
    Walter Burien P. O. Box 2112 Saint Johns, Arizona 85936
    http://CAFR1.com Video Release - 12/12/03 - TNT (The National Tea-Party) Self Sufficiency in Government "Without" Taxation
    Walter Burien (AKA: Bubien) CTA (Commodity Trading Advisor) of 14 years (1978-92)
    National Sales Manager:
    US Trading Championship Money Managers Verified Ratings 10 years. (1982-1992) Tenant - 1WTC, NY, NY 1979 - 81
    Video Release - 12/12/03 TNT (The National Tea-Party) Self Sufficiency in Government "Without" Taxation
    SUGESTION FROM: Walter Burien
    The one thing I would love to see someone do is:
    Show on the Internet the video of Bush's reactions when he was told 1 WTC tower was hit and then a few minutes later after the second was hit as he addressed that group of kids at school in FL. (Many have seen this) He showed almost zero (0) reaction and continued addressing the kids for some 20 - 25 minutes after being told.
    AND THEN SHOW A "WHAT IF" INTERNET VIDEO THAT SHOWS:
    The same setting but this time the person comes in and tells Bush two planes attempted to hit the WTC Towers but were shot down before they did. And now Bush spins away from the podium and yells "What" and he immediately leaves the classroom, being upset and startled as he immediately leaves with his aids.
    ~//~
    Visual reality speaks tons... I would LOVE to see someone put the above up on the Web, and do it soon! The hit counter on that page would start smoking, if not burst into flames.
    I was a tenant at WTC1 in 1979-81
    The primary concern any of the tenants had 20 years ago was a hijacked plane being flown into the towers.
    Here is the "Key" to unlock the door: The extensive flight logs for 20 years from the 3 military bases in the area, and Port Authority responding to air threats is exemplary.
    Thousands of sorties run in response to threats, practice runs, false alarms, done weekly or daily over 20 years. Back in the late seventies the NY Post ran an article about the Port Authority bragging how their manned 24/7 response helicopter would be in the air within 4 minutes of an alert call going out per possible air threats to the WTC towers.
    There is one occasion that I am aware of, or in most probabilities that any one else is aware of in this exemplary record of response to air threats covering a period of over twenty years that the intercepts did not launch and were told to stand down, after going on high alert within a minute or two of the threat, not from just one threat but then by two, then three. That date was 9/11/01
    This in itself is the most condemning fact of them all when that 20-year record is brought to light. The motive then becomes crystal clear in review of that exemplary response record to threats from the air against the WTC towers.
    No, off course or negligent aircraft came close. They were always intercepted and told to change their course or they would be blown out of the sky. It was a no fly zone and this happened to many pilots that intentionally or unintentionally flew to close to the WTC towers over those 20 years.
    "Don't turn you back and look the other way. Shoot a wolf in the chicken coop today!"
    Walter Burien http://CAFR1.com

  • The Coincidences Keep On Coming - Bush's Military Record
    By Ian Gurney
    1-7-4
    While getting my daily dose of "real" news from Rense.com this morning I happened upon an article documenting "The Military records of George Walker Bush" at http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/document.htm
    I scrolled down the page and opened up document 30 dealing with George W Bush's suspension from flying. This document can be found at :- http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/grounded.gif
    Sure enough, the document relates that George W Bush was, on the 1st. August 1972, suspended from flying. The reason for the suspension was a failure to accomplish an annual medical examination. Just below the documentation of Bush's suspension is another notice of suspension from flying of a major in the Texas Air National Guard. It reads as follows:- Verbal orders of the Commander on 1st. September 1972 suspending Major James R Bath, Texas Air National Guard, HQ 147 Fighter Group, Ellington Air Force Base, Houston, Texas from flying status. Reason for suspension: Failure to accomplish an annual medical examination.
    Nothing unusual in that, apart from one thing. I remembered writing an article I posted on Rense.com on the 19th. December 2001 documenting the profitable symbiosis between BioPort, the US anthrax vaccine manufacturer, the bin Laden family and their investments in the Carlyle Group, one of America's most successful investment companies.
    http://www.rense.com/general18/prp.htm
    In paragraph 14 of the article I describe how the Bush family first became associated with the bin Ladens:-
    "The story behind the Carlyle Group and the links between George Bush Sr. and the bin Ladens is interesting to say the least. Let's start at the beginning. In the 1970's, Salem Bin Laden, the eldest of Osama Bin Laden's 55 brothers and sisters, invested heavily in George H. W. Bush's first business venture, Arbusto Energy. Salem became Bush's business partner through James Bath, a close friend of the future American president. Salem appointed Bath as his representative in Houston, Texas.
    It was Bath who invested $50,000 in Bush's company Arbusto and also bought Houston Gulf Airport on behalf of Osama's elder brother."
    So, is this the same James Bath that was suspended from flying a month after the suspension of George W Bush? And what of the reason for Bath's suspension. Was it really "Failure to accomplish an annual medical examination" or was James Bath too busy at that time for flying, prefering instead to ingratiate himself with the bin Ladens and the Bush's for political and economic gain? Of course the truth could be far simpler. Perhaps Bush and Bath were good friends at the Texas Air National Guard and would, from time to time, creep behind the aircraft hangars for a crafty "toke" or a quick snort of "charlie". This would, of course, explain their reluctance to take an annual medical.
    © Copyright: Ian Gurney Janauary 2004. Ian Gurney is the author of the bestselling book "The Cassandra Prophecy-Armageddon Approaches" http://www.caspro.comwww.caspro.com

  • American super-quake caused Japanese deluge
    Historic texts link tsunami to record-breaking groundswell.
    25 November 2003
    The tsunami took just 14 hours to cross the Pacific.
    An earthquake that struck North America in 1700 was one of the most powerful ever seen, new research suggests. It triggered a 5-metre-high tsunami that traversed the Pacific Ocean and crashed into Japan's shoreline, flooding fields and destroying homes.
    The quake stretched from Vancouver in Canada to Mendocino, California, and was a chart-topping magnitude 9 on the Richter scale, a team of geologists from Japan, Canada and the United States now concludes1. Were it to occur today, a quake of this intensity in the now densely populated region would be a massive disaster.
    The new analysis suggests that the entire zone, called the Cascadia fault, leapt seawards in a matter of seconds. "Imagine this piece of North America more than 1,000 kilometres long lurching forward by 20 metres," says geologist Brian Atwater of the US Geological Survey in Seattle, Washington.
    In 1996, Kenji Satake of the Geological Survey of Japan in Tsukuba surprised North American geologists by suggesting that a Japanese tsunami in 1700 was caused by a quake on the Cascadia fault2.
    Geologists studying the fault knew there had been a large earthquake at around that time. But they did not believe that it could have been large enough to send a tsunami surging 8,000 kilometres across the world.
    Undeterred, Satake joined forces with Atwater and geophysicist Kelin Wang of the Geological Survey of Canada in Sidney, British Columbia.
    By poring over ancient government land records and documents from coastal businesses, they remodelled the impact of the 1700 tidal wave. Different scenarios for movement at the fault were then matched to fit the historic tsunami. The quake that best fit the tsunami was indeed a massive magnitude 9.
    Rare danger
    Big earthquakes have occurred in the Cascadia fault zone every few centuries, geologists estimate - the average interval is around 500 years. It is unclear how many hit the magnitude-9 mark, but the possibility of one in our lifetime is real, says Atwater.
    Only three such quakes were recorded in the twentieth century. Because all took place in remote areas, building engineers have no idea of how such massive quakes shake the ground - so they don't know what will happen if another one hits.
    "We have no idea what to expect with these Cascadia earthquakes," says engineering seismologist Thomas Heaton of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena.
    In 1700, British Columbia and Northern California were yet to be settled by Europeans. Now millions live in the Vancouver and Seattle conurbation. A repeat of the event "could be a big catastrophe", says Heaton.

  • Predator theory for whale mass stranding
    26 November 03
    NewScientist.com news service
    Over 100 whales and 20 dolphins stranded on a remote beach in Tasmania may have been driven to their deaths in a desperate attempt to escape a predator, Australian scientists have suggested.
    The beached carcasses of 110 long-finned pilot whales and 20 bottle-nosed dolphins were discovered by an abalone diver on the west coast of the island on Monday.
    A team of five scientists from Tasmania's Nature Conservation Branch have flown out to the shallow bay, 50 kilometres south of Strahan, to examine the corpses. They believe the large seafaring mammals had been dead for at least a week when they were found.
    The investigators now believe a predator such as a killer whale or shark may be responsible for the mysterious mass stranding.
    Pilot whales are highly social animals, and strandings can happen if a lead animal becomes sick and fails to navigate properly or simply makes a mistake and the others follow. But the fact that two species were stranded together is unusual and backs the idea that a predator may be involved, experts suggest.
    "There may have been a killer whale offshore driving them in. The predator angle is the best we can come up with at this stage," Aleks Terauds, a marine biologist at NCB told the Melbourne Herald Sun newspaper. The team also say that bite marks on the bodies of some of the mammals may provide supporting evidence.
    Social cohesion
    However, Mark Simmonds, director of science at the UK's Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society, says the animals may well have teeth marks anyway from previous attacks.
    Nonetheless, he agrees that a pursuing predator could have caused the mass stranding. Pilot whales have a strong social cohesion system which helps them stick together in the open sea, but this means if one gets into trouble, they all do. However, it is unusual for bottle-nosed dolphins to become beached in this way, he says.
    "When you get more than one species stranded together then that tends to raise question marks - it suggests they may have been driven ashore by something," he told New Scientist.
    Seismic activity
    However, other whale experts disagree. Juan Romero and Rolf Williams at the UK's National Marine Aquarium in Plymouth are sceptical that such numbers of two different species would be driven ashore by a predator. Romero thinks the two groups would be more likely to split.
    Williams says the incident "smacks of something better hidden" than a predator but believes that the beaching of two species strongly implies a common factor.
    One he suggests is a blast of underwater sound which would interfere with animals' sonar navigation. Low frequency seismic activity or sounds from shipping could have "spooked" the animals, he says.
    Mass strandings of pilot whales are not uncommon, but usually the death toll is a few dozen. A cull of over 100 is out of the ordinary.
    The NCB team is now carrying out DNA and pollutant load tests on the whales in the hope the results will reveal more about the species.

  • Thirty-six pilot whales beached in St. Martin
    Tuesday, November 25, 2003
    ©2003 Associated Press
    URL: sfgate.com/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2003/11/25/international1400EST0593.DTL
    (11-25) 11:45 PST MARIGOT, St. Martin (AP) --
    Thirty-six whales beached themselves on the coast of this Caribbean island and died within hours despite the efforts of people who tried to push some back out to sea.
    The short-finned pilot whales were believed to have beached themselves Monday night, and by noon Tuesday all were dead.
    The animals were found before dawn by a man on his way to a dump in the French Caribbean territory, which shares an island with Dutch St. Maarten. Residents and tourists later gathered around the whales, which were up to 15 feet long.
    People were able to push two whales back into the water, but they returned and beached themselves again, appearing exhausted, said Paul Ellinger, of the St. Maarten Nature Foundation. He said it seemed the whales had become disoriented.
    "What's clear is that they got off course. What caused them to go off course? We'll have to check," Ellinger said. "It could be all kinds of reasons; the temperature of the water, their sonar system. It could have been anything."
    Short-finned pilot whales usually swim in pods, and when a leader goes astray the entire pod often follows, Ellinger said.
    Biologists were keeping three carcasses to investigate.
    The whales covered the beach along the shallow Grand Cailles Bay, the mouth of which is fringed with coral reefs. The whales bore injuries apparently sustained when they ran aground.
    French police arrived Tuesday morning and closed off the spot as workers dug beach-side graves to bury the remaining whales.

  • Trees blamed for North American blackout
    20.11.2003 - 02:45
    By Chris Baltimore
    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Shoddy tree-trimming around major power lines by Ohio utility FirstEnergy led to the failure of
    three key transmission lines and was the root cause of August's massive power outage, U.S. and Canadian blackout
    investigators say.
    Industry experts say this is not the first time that trees have caused problems, pointing to widespread West Coast outages
    in August 1996 triggered by one offending tree that took out the entire grid. Big utilities typically spend millions of dollars
    each year to clear away tree limbs that can pull down key transmission lines during ice storms or high winds.
    The joint government task force said the unprecedented August 14-15 power outage which cascaded through eight U.S.
    states and part of Canada began with something as simple as improper tree-trimming by FirstEnergy.
    "The blackout was initiated when three high-voltage transmission lines operated by FirstEnergy short-circuited and went
    out of service when they came in contact with trees that were too close to the lines," U.S. Energy Secretary Spencer
    Abraham said.
    FirstEnergy failed to conduct "vegetation management," a euphemism for chopping away overgrown limbs and brush
    around its high-voltage transmission wires.
    FirstEnergy was aware of the problem, the report said. Aerial inspections it conducted on its lines in 2001 and 2002
    showed "significant numbers of trees and brush that needed clearing or trimming" along many transmission lines, it said.
    Industry critics have cited deregulation of the nation's power industry for cost-cutting by utilities to boost profits. The
    maintenance, or tree-trimming, budget is often a target.
    "It's one of the things that can get moved around in a budget," said Clark Gellings, a power grid expert with the Electric
    Power Research Institute, an industry-funded group based in California.
    "Your boss tells you to cut 10 percent from this year's budget because things aren't looking very good, and so you look
    around and say, well maybe we'll delay this," Gellings said, describing industry-wide utility practices.
    Trees are a vexing subject for utilities due to landowner concerns, Gellings said. Utilities are caught between the need to
    keep trees away from their wires, and landowners' desire to preserve prized tree specimens.
    FirstEnergy said in a statement that the task force report "falls far short" of addressing all the factors that contributed to
    the blackout. The company did not comment on its tree-trimming practices.
     
     
     
  • The Carlyle Group may bail out Conrad Black
    'Ex-Presidents Club' ready to throw lifeline to embattled Telegraph owner
    Sunday November 23, 2003
    The Observer
    A powerful banking group with close links to the Pentagon, which has also invested money on behalf of the Bin Laden family, is in talks to bail out beleaguered Daily Telegraph owner Conrad Black.
    The revelation suggests that Britain's bestselling broadsheet - coveted by rival newspaper barons because of its political influence - may not go under the hammer after all, as Lord Black tries to quell a shareholder rebellion in the face of allegations that he and several acolytes pocketed millions of dollars that was not theirs to take.
    Daily Express owner Richard Desmond and the Daily Mail & General Trust, which owns the Daily Mail, are keen to buy the Telegraph titles, despite the fact that questions over the concentration of media ownership would be raised.
    The Carlyle Group, known as the Ex-Presidents Club because of the number of former world leaders it employs, is considering taking a stake in Hollinger International, which owns the Telegraph titles, the Jerusalem Post and the Chicago Sun-Times, according to those close to the firm.
    'It's unusual for a group of assets to come to the market like this. We would look to sell off the Jerusalem Post and Hollinger's stake in the New York Sun. Conrad [Black] would have to step out of management, but that does not mean he would have to let go of his equity stake,' said a Carlyle source. 'Ideally, we would look to take a 25-40 per cent stake. That would allow us to put people on the board,' the source added.
    The move would represent a coup for Black, who is desperate not to sell the Telegraph titles, which have given him considerable influence within British politics and earned him a close friendship with Margaret Thatcher.
    Carlyle, - which employs former Prime Minister John Major as a director, boasts George Bush Snr and his Secretary of State, James Baker, as advisers, and is headed by Frank Carlucci, Ronald Reagan's Defence Secretary - has invested in media firms previously. The group once owned 40 per cent of France's Le Figaro, and more recently acquired part of French conglomerate Vivendi's publishing assets.
    It also part-owns Qinetiq, the Government's privatised defence research laboratories, and CSX Lines, a logistics firm that specialises in shipping heavy equipment for the military. In the past, Carlyle has owned Vinnell, a company that trained the Saudi army.
    If Carlyle - which, despite being only 15 years old, manages more than $14 billion in funds on behalf of investors such as George Soros and the Bin Laden family (who are estranged from their son Osama) - does take a stake in Hollinger, questions are bound to be asked over the links between the two firms, both of which have powerful links to the military.
    Leading foreign policy hawks Richard Perle and Henry Kissinger sit on the Hollinger board. Black himself is a member of the secretive Bilderberg group, an organisation comprising the world's leading businessmen and politicians, which some have accused of being an alternative world government.
    In a separate move, it has emerged that Wall Street fund manager Tweedy Browne will take legal action against the Hollinger board if it is not satisfied with the company's actions.
    Shareholders are angry that tens of millions of dollars that Black and fellow directors took in 'non-compete' fees did not go to Hollinger.
    'I want to know how this board came to pay out a red cent to these people,' said Tweedy Browne analyst Laura Jeresky.
    Hollinger is the subject of an inquiry by the US Securities and Exchange Commission. Investigators are keen to understand the company's relationship with Ravelston Corporation, which is privately owned by Black and has been the beneficiary of millions of dollars which shareholders say should be returned to them.
    Toronto-based Ravelston pays millions of dollars in management fees to Ravelston Management Inc (RMI). There are suggestions that RMI may be based in a tax haven. Hollinger spokesman Paul Healy declined to comment.


  • Georgia Update: The Not-So-Great Game
    Issue #179, 25/11/03:
    By Mark Ames ( [email protected] )
    When I was in Georgia two weeks ago, as the "Velvet Revolution" was just building momentum, one thing that amazed me was how accessible all the opposition players were. Part of the reason they were so accessible was thanks to Shalva, a well-connected Georgian whose son is a friend of mine in Moscow. He seemed to know everyone, from shopkeepers on Rustaveli Prospekt to senior members of the opposition. Among the many interviews he helped arrange was one with EU postergirl Nino Burdzhanadze, who took over as acting President of Georgia on Sunday. She spoke to me on the steps in front of Parliament, where the opposition had just started its sit-in. She preferred to speak in Russian over English.
    The only interviewees whose mouths I was unable to pry open were the flag-waving youths who acted as the opposition’s Marines. Any time I approached one of the youths—most were in their late teens—they would tell me that they had nothing to say, and point to a kind of flag platoon leader. This flag platoon leader would be in charge of handing out flags (different opposition flags, some with symbols, others with slogans) to the kids, then arranging them so that the flag-kids were placed strategically within the crowd, color-coordinated accor-ding to flag type. The platoon leader would yell out when to raise the flags, when to wave them, and when to put them down. Unfortunately, none of the flag platoon leaders would talk to me either.
    If you watched the storming of the Parliament building on Saturday, you saw these same guys. That was them.
    On the streets, I noticed another type of flag—a stencil-shaped clenched fist in black and white with a slogan in Georgian. The design of the fist was the exact same as the youth organization in Serbia which helped overthrow Milosevic in 1999-2000. That organization was called "Otpor" or "resistance," and its slogan was a clenched fist with the words "Gotov Je" meaning "Enough." Milosevic’s people accused Otpor of being CIA-funded, and after the successful coup to overthrow him, Otpor admitted that they had received heavy funding from the United States. Indeed a Newsweek article after Milosevic’s overthrow, headlined "Madeleine’s Victory," claimed that the United States was deeply involved in orchestrating the coup, including the pacing, funding, timing and the defections.
    The kids with the Otpor-like flags were much more forthcoming than the flag-waving kids from Burdzhanadze’s Democratic party.
    "Our organization is called ‘Kmera,’" one of them told me. "It means ‘Enough.’"
    "That reminds me a lot of Otpor in Serbia," I told him.
    "Yes, we are the same as Otpor," he said. He handed me a pen, which I still have, with the clenched fist symbol and the slogan "Kmera!"
    As I wrote in the last issue, the coup in Georgia was shaping up remarkably like the coup in Serbia. The order of events, including the storming of parliament, were nearly identical, while the circumstances were roughly the same. Shevardnadze may not have been as blood-stained as Milosevic, but he was far less popular at home, far more corrupt by Transparency International standards, propped up by nothing more than American aid and troops. Tactically, the two "democratic" coups were effected quite similarly, and as I said in my last article, both occurred under the tutelage of Ambassador Richard Miles, who looks set to earn a post-season coup berth with his 2-0 record.
    But there are also some major differences. While America considered Milosevic an enemy for years before his ouster, we backed Shevardnadze, dollar-for-voter, more than any leader in the world besides Rabin/Barak/Sharon.
    And then there is the Russia factor. While Russia’s interest in Serbia/Milosevic is more sentimental than strategic, its interest—and influence—in Georgia is treated more as a matter of life or death. In a seemingly-bizarre late-in-the-game twist, Shevardnadze clearly switched sides and was backed by the Russians. Which means that it appears the Russians have suffered a huge setback with their man out.
    However, Russia still has four military bases in Georgia and control, via proxy, of vast swathes of their territory, not to mention control over Georgia’s energy supplies. Life is not going to be easy for Burdzhanadze and the more popular opposition leader, Harvard-trained Mikhail Saakashvili, who are going to try to move Georgia even more forcefully and rapidly into the West’s orbit. As Shalva told me, the Russians will be patient, tightening and loosening screws until the Georgians cave. They’re in it for the long-haul.
    What’s next? If you take the example of Serbia, then what’s next is this: in about six to nine months, vast disappointment and disillusionment with the Velvet Revolution will set in. Burdzhanadze will be too weak to control the brutal politics, and Saakashvili, a nationalist who at one time was compared to Zhirinovsky (not apt, but he’s definitely a populist), will find that the struggle to maintain and expand his powers will take up all of his energies and enmesh him into all the ugly tactics used by his predecessors: corruption, corruption and more corruption.
    I don’t mean to take anything away from the Georgians or Serbs who bravely ousted their unpopular leaders—Georgians and Serbs in fact have a lot in common. Their leaders were horrible. I don’t have a single friend or acquaintance in either country who supported Shevardnadze/Milosevic. However, I am convinced, after witnessing both coups, that neither could have happened without deep American involvement.
    The sad thing is that after the coup in Serbia, the West focused narrowly on one issue: extraditing war criminals to the Hague. The result has been that life has gotten steadily worse for Serbians, corruption has increased and the voters are turning increasingly back towards Milosevic-like nationalists. In Georgia, expect the same: the West, namely America, will focus exclusively on securing the Baku-Ceyhan oil pipeline. All aid, all choices of whom to support, will rest on that oil pipeline, even if it means propping up another round of corruption and increasingly unpopular leaders. And the Russians will do all they can to make the Americans’ cronies’ job as difficult as possible.
    In the end, as always, it will be the Georgian people—the most charming, proud, cultured people in Europe, in my opinion—who lose out.
    So this is it, The Great Game. As the monobrow wop says to Joe Pesci in Goodfellas: "Nice fucking game."

  • Georgian revolt carried mark of Soros
    Globe and Mail
    Nov. 26, 2003
    Tbilisi — It was back in February that billionaire financier George Soros began laying the brickwork for the toppling of Georgian President Eduard Shevardnadze.
    That month, funds from his Open Society Institute sent a 31-year-old Tbilisi activist named Giga Bokeria to Serbia to meet with members of the Otpor (Resistance) movement and learn how they used street demonstrations to topple dictator Slobodan Milosevic. Then, in the summer, Mr. Soros's foundation paid for a return trip to Georgia by Otpor activists, who ran three-day courses teaching more than 1,000 students how to stage a peaceful revolution.
    Last weekend, the Liberty Institute that Mr. Bokeria helped found was instrumental in organizing the street protests that eventually forced Mr. Shevardnadze to sign his resignation papers. Mr. Bokeria says it was in Belgrade that he learned the value of seizing and holding the moral high ground, and how to make use of public pressure — tactics that proved so persuasive on the streets of Tbilisi after this month's tainted parliamentary election.
    In Tbilisi, the Otpor link is seen as just one of several instances in which Mr. Soros gave the anti-Shevardnadze movement a considerable nudge: He also funded a popular opposition television station that was crucial in mobilizing support for this week's "velvet revolution," and he reportedly gave financial support to a youth group that led the street protests.
    He also has a warm relationship with Mr. Shevardnadze's chief opponent, Mikhail Saakashvili, a New York-educated lawyer who is expected to win the presidency in an election scheduled for Jan. 4. Last year, Mr. Soros personally presented Mr. Saakashvili with the foundation's Open Society Award.
    "It's generally accepted public opinion here that Mr. Soros is the person who planned Shevardnadze's overthrow," said Zaza Gachechiladze, editor-in-chief of The Georgian Messenger, an English-language daily based in the capital.
    In the eyes of Mr. Soros's employees, it was all done in the name of building democracy. Laura Silber, a senior policy adviser at Open Society, said the foundation sponsored the exchange because "some of the experiences are very translatable" between Georgia and Serbia. In Georgia's current political climate, she said, "it looks more charged than it is."
    That's not how Mr. Shevardnadze saw it, however.
    "George Soros is set against the President of Georgia," he said during a news conference in Tbilisi a week before his resignation — it was at least the third time during the protests that he had complained about Mr. Soros. He threatened to shut down Open Society's Georgia offices, saying it was not Mr. Soros's business "to get involved in the political processes."
    Mr. Bokeria, whose Liberty Institute received money from both Open Society and the U.S. government-backed Eurasia Institute, says three other organizations played key roles in Mr. Shevardnadze's downfall: Mr. Saakashvili's National Movement party, the Rustavi-2 television station and Kmara! (Georgian for Enough!), a youth group that declared war on Mr. Shevardnadze last April and began a poster and graffiti campaign attacking government corruption.
    All three have ties to Mr. Soros. According to Georgian press reports, Kmara received a $500,000 (U.S.) start-up grant in April, some of which may have been used during the three weeks of street protests when it bused demonstrators in from the countryside and set up loudspeakers and a giant television screen amid the crowds surrounding the parliament building.
    Rustavi-2 got start-up money from Mr. Soros when it launched in 1995 and more funding a year ago when it began the anti-Shevardnadze newspaper 24 Hours.
    Observers say that Rustavi-2's role during the protests is hard to overestimate. The channel began its campaign years ago when it produced a popular cartoon called Our Yard, in which the animated president was portrayed as a crooked double-dealer.
    The government twice tried to shut down the station after its reporters exposed corruption in various government ministries and Mr. Shevardnadze's inner circle. And it was Rustavi-2 that showed the Georgian people how flawed the Nov. 2 parliamentary election was, broadcasting exit polls conducted by American non-governmental organizations that contradicted the official results. During the protests that followed, it was the channel everyone watched for the latest news.
    "They were a tribune," Mr. Bokeria said. "People knew where to get real information. They were informed about the details of the election, when to go into the streets, where and how."
    Meanwhile, Mr. Saakashvili, the man expected to replace Mr. Shevardnadze, has a relationship with Mr. Soros that dates back to late 2000, when the financier paid the first of several visits to Tbilisi.
    Mr. Soros arrived in the country then at Mr. Shevardnadze's invitation — the two have known each other since the 1980s, when the Georgian was Soviet foreign minister — to set up Open Society Georgia, with the stated aim of building democratic institutions and civil society. On that same trip, however, he met with Mr. Saakashvili and publicly praised a program the then-justice-minister was promoting to tackle the country's corruption problem.
    Less than a year later, Mr. Saakashvili quit his post over Mr. Shevardnadze's slow progress in implementing the program and went into opposition. After his departure, Mr. Soros's relationship with Mr. Shevardnadze began to sour.
    In mid-2002, Mr. Shevardnadze made his first of many complaints about Mr. Soros's political interference in the country, and shortly afterward, more than a dozen young people stormed the offices of Mr. Bokeria's Liberty Institute, smashing computers and beating up several members of the staff. Mr. Soros responded by suggesting during a news conference in Moscow that Mr. Shevardnadze's government could not be trusted to hold a proper parliamentary election in 2003.
    "It is necessary to mobilize civil society in order to assure free and fair elections because there are many forces that are determined to falsify or to prevent the elections being free and fair," Mr. Soros said. "This is what we did in Slovakia at the time of [Vladimir] Meciar, in Croatia at the time of [Franjo] Tudjman and in Yugoslavia at the time of Milosevic."
    Mr. Soros's money and seeming good intentions were initially welcomed in former Soviet states when Open Society moved in after the fall of the Iron Curtain, but some of those relationships have since broken down. Ukraine and Belarus expelled Open Society, accusing the organization of political interference, and the foundation's offices in Moscow were raided recently by masked gunmen over an apparent real-estate dispute.
    Mr. Soros, whose large-scale currency market interventions have been blamed by some for the 1997 currency crisis in Southeast Asia, has said that his next goal is making sure U.S. President George W. Bush does not win re-election.
     

  • Chemical terror plot foiled in London
    Saturday November 22, 2003
    LONDON (Reuters) - An attempt by a London-based terror group to buy half a tonne of toxic chemicals was foiled after the supplier became suspicious and alerted police, the Financial Times has reported.
    It said the group had attempted to buy 500 kgs (1,102 lb) of the toxin saponin from Amersham Biosciences late last year but the sale was refused after staff became concerned about the size of the order.
    A spokesman for London's Metropolitan Police told Reuters on Saturday that police were "not prepared to discuss the matter" at this time.
    The Financial Times quoted experts as saying the chemical could have been mixed with another toxin, such as ricin, and smeared in public places, causing widespread poisoning.
    Saponin is sometimes used in laboratories to enhance the transmission of molecules through biological cell walls, while ricin is highly toxic, with less than one milligram sufficient to kill an adult.
    Lennart Arlinger, business development director of Amersham, said it was possible the would-be purchasers were looking to use saponin "as an enhancer of the efficacy of a biological weapon".
    He told the paper the order was so large that it "raised a red flag" and encouraged further inquiries.
    The order was refused and the company informed police in Britain and Sweden, where Amersham handled the order, he added.


  • Cosmic Dust Storm is Coming
    17:20 05 August 03
    NewScientist.com news service
    The Sun's shifting magnetic field is set to focus a decade-long storm of galactic dust grains towards the inner Solar System, including Earth.
    The effect this will have on our planet - if any - is unknown. But some researchers have speculated that sustained periods of cosmic dust bombardment might be related to ice ages and even mass extinctions.
    During the last decade, the magnetic field of the Sun acted like a shield, deflecting the electrically charged galactic dust away from the Solar System. However, the Sun's regular cycle of activity peaked in 2001.
    As expected, its magnetic field then flipped over, so that south became north and vice-versa. In this configuration, rather than deflecting the galactic dust, the magnetic field should actually channel the dust inwards.
    This pattern may have been repeated during previous solar cycles but it is only now that astronomers are beginning to have the data they need to prove it.
    Cosmic debris
    The data come from the galactic dust grains impacts detected by DUST, an experiment on the ESA/NASA mission Ulysses, which was launched in 1990. The measurements, collected by ESA scientist Markus Landgraf and colleagues at the Max-Planck-Institute in Heidelberg, show that three times more galactic dust is now entering the Solar System than during the 1990s.
    The effects of space dust on the Earth are currently unknown, but hotly debated. Every year, about 40,000 tonnes of cosmic debris fall onto the Earth, much of it creating meteors.
    Some researchers have suggested recently that high dust inputs into the Earth's atmosphere, sustained for centuries or longer, could be responsible for ice ages and mass extinctions. Langraf is cautious about such claims but told New Scientist: "Everything in interplanetary space eventually affects the planets, but exactly how is very speculative."
    High-altitude aircraft
    He hopes Ulysses can provide some concrete data. "We get about two dust detections a week. We need to observe from now until 2006 in order to have enough data to see evidence of focusing," he says.
    This data could then be correlated with the results from high-altitude aircraft experiments that routinely catch the space dust falling onto Earth. Historical comparisons might also be possible if deep polar ice cores are analysed for galactic dust.
    At present, the Ulysses mission is only funded until September 2004. However, an extended mission is currently being considered.

  • Superpower Intrigue On Remote South Pacific Atoll
    By Geoffrey York
    Globe and Mail
    11-13-3
    BEIJING -- On a remote atoll in the South Pacific, a mysterious Chinese satellite base is provoking a surge of superpower rivalry and diplomatic intrigue that could shape the future of the U.S. missile defence shield and China's space program.
    The obscure and impoverished Pacific country of Kiribati, with a population of just 96,000 people scattered across 33 coral atolls, is so tiny that its latest election was a presidential race between two brothers. But its strategic location -- near a top-secret U.S. missile-testing base -- has made it a target for high-level geopolitical jostling and allegations of espionage that grew even more intense this month when China suffered an unexpected setback there.
    Kiribati abruptly switched its diplomatic loyalties from China to Taiwan last week, one of only 26 countries that still recognize the breakaway province.
    Taiwanese Foreign Minister Eugene Chien boasted that Kiribati's decision was a "brilliant" diplomatic coup for Taipei, but a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman called it "an open betrayal" and warned of "serious consequences" for the sprawling chain of equatorial islands, home to an important Chinese communications base.
    Chinese state media alleged that Taiwan, a close military partner of the United States, contributed more than $1-million (U.S.) to the President and governing party of Kiribati, enabling them to win July's election.
    China normally severs all relations with a country that gives diplomatic recognition to Taiwan. But if it took this action against Kiribati, it would have to shut down its embassy and put at risk its satellite station, which is critical to its growing space program but has long worried the United States.
    "If it shuts down the embassy . . . it risks losing the satellite monitoring facility that is apparently crucial to its nationalism-priming space program and to monitoring some U.S. missile-defence tests," said Daniel Lynch, a professor of international relations at the University of Southern California.
    "Beijing is hopping mad, but what can it do? Any heavy-handedness out in the middle of the Pacific Ocean would be extremely hard to justify."
    The satellite base, built by the Chinese military in 1997, is officially for tracking China's orbiting spaceships. As one of three foreign tracking bases, it is crucial to the fast-growing Chinese space program, which sent its first man into space last month.
    But many observers are convinced it is more than just a civilian space facility. When a reporter managed to slip inside the guarded compound, he found its satellite dishes pointing northward -- toward one of the most secret military bases on Earth, the Ronald Reagan Missile Test Site, a U.S. ballistic missile base on the atoll of Kwajalein in the Marshall Islands.
    Kwajalein is the bulls-eye for test missiles launched from California and is a crucial test site for the Pentagon's missile-defence system, the controversial program under development to protect the United States from ballistic missile attack by "rogue" nations.
    Last year, two U.S. Navy F-16 fighter jets buzzed the Chinese satellite base in Kiribati, delivering a loud signal of suspicion about the true purpose of the mysterious facility with its big satellite dishes and rocket tracking equipment.
    Before Taiwan's diplomatic coup, Beijing had spent lavishly on projects in Kiribati, as well as other Pacific island states. Its embassy, looming over the capital, Tarawa, is the biggest building in the town.
    The satellite facility became a key issue in Kiribati's election when opposition leader Anote Tong's camp questioned the secrecy surrounding the base. His party suggested that the base was a spy station, and demanded the details of the Chinese lease. (Mr. Tong went on to defeat his older brother Harry and a third candidate in the election.)
    The decision of Mr. Tong's government to show favour to Taiwan could be a blow to China's long-term political ambitions. The victory for Taipei could make it easier for Taiwan's pro-independence President, Chen Shui-bian, to win his bid for re-election next March, something that Beijing desperately hopes to avoid.
    "This is an important boost for President Chen's re-election campaign," said Chien-min Chao, a political scientist in Taipei. "It proves that Taiwan is capable of fighting back. It was very important for the President to win one country back."

  • Rival Russian Jewish Leaders Lend Backing to Putin
    By NATHANIEL POPPER
    FORWARD STAFF
    http://www.forward.com/issues/2003/03.11.14/news9.russia.html
    NOVEMBER 14, 2003
    Russia's arrest of a Jewish oil magnate has drawn heavy criticism from abroad, but the feuding leaders of the country's two major Jewish organizations are both voicing support for the government action.
    In a rare moment of agreement between bitter rivals, Berel Lazar, chief rabbi for the Chabad-Lubavitch-dominated Federation of Russian Jews, and Yevgeny Satanovsky, president of the Russian Jewish Congress, both defended the arrest of business tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky, whose father is Jewish. Indeed, while some foreign observers have detected whiffs of antisemitism in the prosecution of Khodorkovsky, the two Russian Jewish leaders said that his arrest might actually be a step forward in the battle against anti-Jewish bigotry.
    In interviews with the Forward, Lazar and Satanovsky said that Khodorkovsky had been trying to gain too much power in the political arena, criticizing, in particular, his support of Russia's Communist Party, which contains strong strains of Soviet-era antisemitism.
    "The future of the country shouldn't be in the hands of one man who has money," Lazar said. "[Khodorkovsky] supported the Communist Party, and that is not for the best of the country."
    Satanovsky told the Forward that Khodorkovsky's "activity was destructive for the country. And there were too many personal ambitions."
    Both Lazar and Satanovsky, however, were careful to add that Khodorkovsky's case would have been better handled without his dramatic arrest on a Siberian airport tarmac. Since his October 25 arrest, Khodorkovsky, the former chairman of Yukos Oil, has been in jail on charges of theft and tax evasion.
    The arrest has been criticized abroad by many media outlets in the West. Many see it as a ploy by Russian President Vladimir Putin to quash a political foe. It also caused turmoil in the Russian economy and led to the October 30 resignation of Putin's chief of staff, Alexander Voloshin.
    Several officials at American Jewish groups who monitor Russian affairs speculated that the words for the government represented an effort on the part of both Jewish communal leaders to strengthen their relationships with Putin.
    Lazar's federation and Satanovsky's congress have been fighting a long battle for recognition as the central body representing Russian Jewry. Lazar's federation boasts a larger number of member congregations, most of them Orthodox. But Satanovsky has said that his congress should be the official representative because of its commitment to religious pluralism.
    The rivalry has been particularly intense since 2001, when the Kremlin officially recognized Lazar as the religious leader of the Russian Jewish community, pushing aside the congress's Rabbi Adolf Shayevich, who until then had occupied the post.
    In discussing the Khodorkovsky affair, the two leaders did not miss an opportunity to continue this old fight.
    Satanovsky said that Lazar's vocal endorsement of the Kremlin's actions was aimed at cultivating a "role as the special Jew" for Putin in order to strengthen the position of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement. He claimed that Lazar's strain of chasidic Judaism was a dangerous "new religion" built around the worship of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the deceased Brooklyn rebbe who is considered the messiah by some Lubavitcher chasidim.
    For his part, Lazar said that reconciliation with the congress is not easy: "Satanovsky has claimed he is ready to come closer to us, but we have seen only words, no actions."
    Despite their differences they agreed on the fundamental issues at stake in Khodorkovsky's arrest.
    Both men said that while they could not say whether Khodorkovsky was guilty of the charges leveled at him by prosecutors, his work in the political realm had made him a clear and present danger to the functioning of the Russian state.
    Khodorkovsky had given major donations to two smaller parties that stand in opposition to Putin's United Russia party. But it was Khodorkovsky's support for the Communist Party, which has run a close second to Putin's party in recent opinion polls, that made Lazar and Satanovsky nervous.
    "The danger of a Communist putsch in our country was a reality," Satanovsky said. "Khodorkovsky had thought he could control the Communists; he is not the first to make this mistake."
    The Communist Party in Russia, Satanovsky and Lazar noted, has a number of high-ranking officials who are notoriously antisemitic.
    Khodorkovsky's father is Jewish, and while he has not been publicly involved with the Jewish community, some have suggested that he is being persecuted because of his ancestry.
    Lazar dismissed this notion out of hand: "Khodorkovsky himself said that antisemitism was not the issue in his persecution. We should not cry wolf."
    Foreign observers have been less quick to dismiss the possibility that antisemitism lurks behind Khodorkovsky's arrest, noting that he is just the latest of several Jewish moguls — or oligarchs, as they are called — who have been the targets of Russian prosecutors.
    Speaking about the crackdown on the oligarchs, a leading rabbi in Ukraine, who asked to remain anonymous, updated Elie Wiesel's old adage, saying that "Not all Jews are victims, but all the victims are Jews."
    "In every case the prosecution has been focused on the Jewish oligarchs," said Micah Naftalin, national director of the Union of Councils for Soviet Jews, an American-based activist group that works on human rights issues in the former Soviet Union. "There are plenty of billionaire oligarchs that seem to have done all right."
    Lazar and Satanovsky's unwillingness to entertain the notion that antisemitism is behind the prosecution of Khodorkovsky may have something to do with memories of the much harsher and more overt state-sponsored antisemitism in the Soviet Union, Naftalin said.
    Their less skeptical attitude toward the Kremlin's motives can also be read as part of the larger split between the opinion of Russians and many foreigners on Khodorkovsky's case. In a recent poll, only 13% of Russians disapproved of the arrest, a statistic that many observers attributed to the general antipathy in Russia toward the wealthy.
    But many observers said that Lazar and Satanovsky's support for Putin stems from more than just a skepticism of Khodorkovsky's wealth.
    "This is the only way for either of them to survive," the editor of a Russian-Jewish newspaper said on condition of anonymity, "to show they are necessary in the corridors of power."
    The balance of power in these corridors is especially tenuous now. Voloshin, the erstwhile chief of staff, was widely viewed as the most important Kremlin backer of the alliance with Lazar's federation. Now that he is gone, there seems to be an opportunity for a shift in the dynamics of Jewish power in Russia.
    Lazar, however, insists he is unconcerned.
    "It's no secret that I have a very good relationship with the president," Lazar said. "The relationship has nothing to do with Voloshin, and his resignation does not concern me."

  • Arrested oil tycoon passed shares to banker
    http://washingtontimes.com/world/20031102-111400-3720r.htm
    November 03, 2003
    LONDON (Agence France-Presse) — Control of Mikhail Khodorkovsky's shares in the Russian oil giant Yukos have passed to renowned banker Jacob Rothschild, under a deal they concluded prior to Mr. Khodorkovsky's arrest, the Sunday Times reported.
    Voting rights to the shares passed to Mr. Rothschild, 67, under a "previously unknown arrangement" designed to take effect in the event that Mr. Khodorkovsky could no longer "act as a beneficiary" of the shares, it said.
    Mr. Khodorkovsky, 40, whom Russian authorities arrested at gunpoint and jailed pending further investigation last week, was said by the Sunday Times to have made the arrangement with Mr. Rothschild when he realized he was facing arrest.
    Mr. Rothschild now controls the voting rights on a stake in Yukos worth almost $13.5 billion, the newspaper said in a dispatch from Moscow.
    Mr. Khodorkovsky owns 4 percent of Yukos directly and 22 percent through a trust of which he is the sole beneficiary, according to Russian analysts.
    From the figures reported in the Sunday Times, it appeared Mr. Rothschild had received control of all Mr. Khodorkovsky's shares.
    The two have known each other for years "through their mutual love of the arts" and their positions as directors of the Open Russia Foundation, Yukos' philanthropic branch, it said.
    Russian authorities Thursday froze billions of dollars of shares held by Mr. Khodorkovsky and his top lieutenants in Yukos — throwing control of the country's largest oil company into limbo and causing frenzied selling on financial markets.
    Russian prosecutors said owners of the shares are still entitled to dividends and retain voting rights, but can no longer sell their stakes.
    They said the freeze was necessary as collateral for the $1 billion that Mr. Khodorkovsky and his associates are accused of misappropriating during the 1990s.
    Mr. Rothschild is the British head of Europe's wealthy and influential Rothschild family, and runs his own investment empire.

  • Putin the New Saddam?
    Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2003. Page 10
    moscowtimes.com
    By Eric Kraus Emboldened by their historic propaganda success -- the creation ex nihilo of a justification for the U.S. invasion of Iraq completely unsanctioned by international law -- members of the dangerous Washington faction with deep links to the security services and the military-industrial complex, the dread Bushoviki, have identified a new "terrorist threat": President Vladimir Putin.
    This means they are now deploying are strikingly similar: planted "intelligence," manipulation of public opinion by tame journalists and "nonprofit foundations," as well as the insidious repetition of evident lies on the assumption that at least something will stick.
    In a recent op-ed piece in the increasingly reactionary Washington Post, Bruce Jackson, president of the innocuous sounding Project on Transitional Democracies, accuses Putin not just of re-establishing a tsarist state, but of the supreme crime of opposing U.S. political and economic interests in Russia's historic sphere of influence: the CIS. After long service in the weapons trade (Lockheed, Martin), Jackson is now a hatchet-man for the Bush administration. A member of the far-right Project of the New American Century, he serves with the likes of Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle and Donald Rumsfeld. Jackson was instrumental in rounding up support for the Iraq war with a stealth attack, corralling East European presidents into signing the notorious letter of the "Vilnius 10."
    All is fair in love and (propaganda) war. In a crass insult to the world's Jews, Jackson deploys one of the most cynical foreign policy ploys of the Bushoviki: the callous exploitation of anti-Semitism, demeaning the sufferings of the Jewish people by reducing the term "anti-Semitism" to an epithet for any regime inimical to U.S. interests.
    Jackson notes that three of the business magnates who came to a sticky end are Jewish, but neglects to mention that so were six of the original seven oligarchs, as well as 90 percent of those who currently qualify for the oligarch title. Given the ratios, the real surprise would have been if the fallen angels had been, say, Orthodox Hindus.
    Nowhere, of course, does Jackson mention the dozens of Russian Jewish businessmen currently building their businesses, attracting foreign partners, and enjoying all the good things that Russia's resurrection has brought. It is ironic that of the spinmeisters warning of the anti-Semitic threat coming from Russia not one, to my knowledge, is a Jew.
    Mikhail Khodorkovsky has managed to shake off a profoundly unenviable reputation in a very short time. In fairness, Yukos, acquired for some $300 million in the notorious loans-for-shares auctions and still largely controlled through a cascade of offshore vehicles, has proved to be an absolute star in recent years. But it is Khodorkovsky's generous funding of various U.S. neo-conservative causes, in part through his Open Russia foundation (one of the board members of which is Henry Kissinger, responsible inter alia for the Pinochet coup and the illegal, secret war that devastated Cambodia), that has given him with access to the most reactionary elements of the Bush administration -- Perle, Dick Cheney et al. -- all of whom are now lobbying furiously for the oligarch's interests.
    What is less clear is why Khodorkovsky was naive enough to share their characteristic misconception that U.S. writ runs across the entire planet, and that support from Washington would solve his increasingly grave problems at home. Certainly, if his U.S. backers convinced him of this, they have done him a major disservice.
    Yukos was the first Russian company to understand the profound changes brought about by the Putin government: with safety of ownership regardless of past misdeeds and a stable political and economic backdrop, far greater wealth could be built by increasing company valuations than by stripping assets. Emulation of their examples has fueled a historic boom in equity prices.
    Most of Khodorkovsky's peers thought the concessions demanded in return (payment of taxes and an end to the meddling in politics) were a small price to pay. It is deeply unfortunate that Yukos increasingly sought to build its influence, not just in the oil fields and capital markets, but by buying control of the State Duma.
    On Thursday, Putin met with the heads of the major investment banks, reassuring them about the future direction of reform. With arch-reformer German Gref smiling at his side, he was uncompromising in his message that he would attack corruption wherever it was found -- be it in the bureaucracy, private sector or Duma -- but that minority Yukos shareholders' interests would be zealously protected. He was forceful, lucid and remarkably well-briefed on market issues. Vitally, Putin reiterated that there was no question of a generalized attack upon the other oligarchs nor a revision of the results of privatization -- historically, those who have ignored his words have done so at their own cost.
    The president also announced the dismantling of the Gazprom ring-fence "in a matter of months." The impact of this move may well outweigh the unarguably negative effects of the Yukos saga. Opening Gazprom to foreign investment would overnight almost double Russia's weighting in the main benchmark, the MSCI Index, mechanically driving a huge wave of buying by foreign funds.
    Looking beyond the current turbulence, the vital issue affecting Russia's progress over the next four years is not the fate of one oligarch, but the upcoming Duma elections. Polls show a sharp rise in the popularity of Putin's party, which is set to win a sizeable majority in the next parliament. A clear victory would renew the bold reform drive which characterized the start of his presidency, before the Duma succumbed to oligarchic lobbying.
    Russia has historically done best when it relied on its own internal strengths -- Jackson's coalition-of-the-available may huff and puff, but Putin's house is made of stone.
    Eric Kraus is chief strategist for Sovlink Securities. His full views can be found at www.sovlink.ru
     
  • Kremlin May Target Abramovich Oil Deal
    The Telegraph - UK
    11-6-3
    There were growing signals in Moscow last night that Roman Abramovich, the owner of Chelsea Football Club, is to be the next target in a Kremlin crackdown against Russia's billionaires.
    State prosecutors confirmed that they had received an official request to investigate Mr Abramovich's purchase of the oil company Sibneft. The call came from Vladimir Yudin, the Kremlin-linked MP whose demands led to the investigation and subsequent arrest of Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Russia's richest man by machinegun-carrying special agents.
    Mr Khodorkovsky, then the head of Yukos, the world's fourth largest oil company, has been held in an overcrowded jail in eastern Moscow for 12 days on charges that he cheated the state of £600 million in taxes.
    President Vladimir Putin, who is due to attend a European Union summit in Rome today, has assured investors that he will not try to reverse the privatisations of the Boris Yeltsin era.
    But it is widely believed that he is using the legal system to pursue the billionaires and crush their political ambitions. Newspapers are filled with suggestions that the Kremlin is poised to step up its campaign against the super-rich industrialists, who won their huge wealth in controversial deals overseen by Mr Yeltsin when he was president.
    Mr Yudin, the MP behind the Sibneft investigation, is widely considered to be a stalking horse for a coterie of hardliners, known as the siloviki or "men of power". Most are former KGB men now working in the Kremlin and are believed to have the ear of the president, also a former KGB agent.
    Mr Abramovich snapped up Sibneft, which now generates hundreds of millions of pounds a year, for around £80 million.
    Under Russian law, the prosecutor's office has three months to decide whether to launch an investigation. If Mr Abramovich is formally charged, he may request political asylum in Britain, following the example of his former mentor Boris Berezovsky, another Russian oligarch.
    Mr Berezovsky, who is wanted by Russian prosecutors on charges of fraud and embezzlement, writes in The Telegraph today that political parties in Russia should boycott next month's parliamentary elections in protest at what he calls Mr Putin's "creeping anti-constitutional coup".
    Mr Berezovsky had his Russian television interests effectively nationalised and has been granted political asylum in Britain, which has shielded him from Moscow's attempts to extradite him.
    © Copyright of Telegraph Group Limited 2003.
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/11/06/wabr
    am06.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/11/06/ixnewstop.html

  • Russia, EU can direct formation of new world order - Putin
    ITAR-TASS
    ROME, November 6 (Itar-Tass) -- Russia and the European Union can move forward in their cooperation by building up potential of mutual trust, President Vladimir Putin said at the European Union-Russia summit.
    A "substantive, flexible, effective dialogue at all levels aimed at the achievement of practical results and real unblocking of problems hindering cooperation" is needed, he said.
    Putin stressed that an "efficient and simple vertical of coordination, a clear mechanism of making decisions and, a main thing, their implementation are necessary" as instruments of cooperation.
    The European continent and the whole world are in a period of major transformations, and "at present one must not be guided by outdated models of working interaction", the president said.
    "How weightily the voice of Europe will sound in world politics, economy and trade, in security matters depends of coordination of action," Putin said.
    Only by acting together can Russia and the enlarging European Union direct the process of the formation of a new world order, common values and interests, he said.
    Putin thanked Italian colleagues for good preparation of the summit.
    He recalled the previous summit in St. Petersburg, at which a strategic decision has been made to form common spaces in the economy, internal and external security, science, education and culture.
    Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, whose country holds the rotating EU presidency, said that additional momentum should be given to the Russia-EU relations and positive tendencies that have emerged after the successful St. Petersburg summit consolidated.

  • EXCERPT FROM NOTORIOUS CONSPIRACY THEORIST JOE VIALLS' WEBSITE:
    http://www.joevialls.co.uk/myahudi/sunburn.html
    "
                In terms of protecting Eastern Hemisphere oil reserves from the Zionist crusaders, Russia still had one more hurdle to clear, in the form of Moscow-based Zionist Jew Mikhail Khodorkovsky. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, Khodorkovsky acted as the principal Zionist front man, grabbing cheap oil assets in rigged auctions. In 1995 he pulled the same trick again, rigging an auction at which he paid a mere $200 million for Yukos, a Russian oil major worth at least $14 billon.
                Control of Yukos made Khodorkovsky very dangerous to Russian national security, because the company controls nearly two thirds of Russia’s strategic oil pipelines, including most of those feeding Eastern Europe. Russia is now the second-largest oil producer in the world, and Khodorkovsky’s actions prove he intended to exploit this, by selling 51% of Yukos to ExxonMobil, America’s largest oil multinational. In turn, this would have placed Russian crude oil reserves under direct Zionist control, a situation the Kremlin was not prepared to tolerate.
                Mikhail Khodorkovsky was arrested while en-route to the Russian Far East, though rumor suggests he knew about the plan to arrest him, and actually intended to flee the country via Vladivostok. A spokesman for Yukos said that government security agents rushed Khodorkovsky's private jet at 5am on Saturday during a refuelling stop in Siberia, shouting, "Weapons on the floor or we'll shoot." Khodorkovsky initially faces seven charges including fraud and tax evasion, with possible [consecutive] jail sentences of up to forty years. It could get far worse if prosecutors add the charge of treason, for undermining Russian national security.
                Within hours of Khodorkovsky’s arrest, the Zionist media went berserk, stating that the arrest would “damage investor confidence” in Russia, and further claiming that, “without new investors, Russia will be in big economic trouble”. This is garbage, because Russia is now the second largest producer of oil in the world, and has eager buyers for all of its oil products. About the last thing Russia needs or wants today, is a pack of Zionist “investors” trying to skim their traditional 10% off Russia’s oil profits.
                In slightly more than a single decade, Russia ’s fortunes have come full circle. Back in 1989, General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev sold Russia and its peoples to the Zionists in return for two gold American Express cards and unlimited free shopping for his wife on Fifth Avenue. During the years that followed, Russians underwent almost unbelievable hardships, with old age pensions vanishing into thin air [or into a New York Zionist bank], and starvation became quite common in the provinces. Russians fared no better under “democratic” Boris Yeltsin, but Vladimir Putin is an entirely different matter. In just a few short years as President of Russia, Putin has turned everything upside down, and probably set in train the final destruction of Zionist influence worldwide.
                 Put simply, America is now completely broke. The U.S. dollar is falling like a stone and unemployment is climbing through the roof. Most of America’s manufacturing capacity was shifted years ago to “cheap labor” countries overseas, and there is no practical way of getting it back. For nearly twelve months the Dow Jones Index has been rigged by computers, desperately trying to create an illusion of relative wealth. At the beginning of this year the only chance America and Israel had of staying afloat, was to steal and sell oil from the Caspian, Iraq and Russia, but this entire strategy has now either collapsed or been blocked by Russia and China.
                Where America and Americans go after this is a very good question, but, as you might expect, the Zionists have a fall back plan, at least for them. When things eventually get completely untenable, the Zionists will fall back on “Fortress Americas”, a top-secret initiative designed to change the face of the earth as we now know it. So sensitive is this information, that when a small group of British Marconi defence scientists stumbled on some of the data during the eighties, they very swiftly died in murders dressed up as suicides.
                Hopefully I will be writing a detailed report about “Fortress Americas” sometime during the next month, though this particular report may have to be restricted to a prepaid “snail mail” edition, in an attempt to raise limited funds for my work. Currently, research costs are exceeding my disposable income, derived almost entirely from a very small disability pension, which steadily decreases in buying power as each week goes by. If my financial affairs should inexplicably improve during the next few weeks, rest assured that I will post the “Fortress Americas” report openly on this site for free access. "

  • Death riddle of Jewish student in global cult
    08/11/2003 TIME: 20:12:31 GMT
    Andrew Brightwell
    [email protected]
    The Hampstead and Highgate Express
    http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/archived/2003/1107/news/asp/p1news1.asp
     PICTURED: Erica Duggan with her son Jeremiah’s wallet showing a photo of him and his girlfriend.THE mother of a Jewish student who died after becoming involved in a shady political group has vowed to unearth the truth behind her son’s death.
    Jeremiah Duggan, 22, of Dunstan Road, Golders Green, died after attending a conference in Wiesbaden, Germany, run by a group believed to have anti-Semitic leanings.
    An inquest at Hornsey Coroner’s Court has heard how the talented language student was run over by three cars on a German autobahn in March this year – just 45 minutes after he told his mother he was in “big trouble”.
    According to witnesses, Mr Duggan died after he was struck by a BMW, a Peugeot and a Volkswagen as he ran along the motorway.
    Jeremiah’s mother, 57-year-old Erica Duggan, told the inquest that she had woken at 2.30am on March 27 with a premonition that her son was in danger.
    She said: “I went downstairs and sat at the kitchen table and when Jeremiah rang I was wide awake.
    “He told me: ‘Mum, I’m in big trouble’. He spoke in a very soft voice, a quiet voice like he was trying not to be overheard.”
    Coroner Dr William Dolman has now ruled out any suggestion that Jeremiah took his own life, as claimed by the German authorities.
    Mrs Duggan told the inquest her son had become involved in the LaRouche Youth Movement, run by extremist politician, and US Presidential Candidate Lyndon LaRouche, because he wanted to protest against the war in Iraq.
    Jeremiah, who was studying at the Sorbonne in Paris, was invited to the group’s conference at the Schiller Institute in Wiesbaden, which is run by Helga Zepp LaRouche, Mr LaRouche’s German wife.
    Mrs Duggan, a retired teacher, said she discovered that her son had revealed his Jewish origins while at the Schiller Institute despite their alleged anti-Semitic views.
    Speaking at her home on Wednesday, Mrs Duggan told the Ham&High: “Until I know the truth about what happened to my son none of us will have any peace.
    “I want to know why it was that a healthy, normal boy, who had everything to live for and had just sent his father a birthday card saying that he would see him soon, is found dead a week later and believed to have committed suicide.
    “I want to know what happened.”
    Mr Duggan’s French girlfriend, Maya, 23, added: “I am devastated that Jerry, whom I loved and with whom I planned a future, went away with the idea of helping the world and ended up being killed.”
    The inquest is continuing.
     


    Creepy Disclosures Archives
    Archive#1
    Archive#2
    Archive#3
    Archive#4
    Archive#5
    Archive#6
    Archive#7
    Archive#8
    Archive#9
    Archive#10
    Archive#11
    Archive#12
    Archive#13
    Archive#14
    Archive#15
    Archive#16
    Archive#17
    Archive#18
    Archive#19
    Archive#20
    Archive#21
    Archive#22
    Archive#23
    Archive#24
    Archive#25
    Archive#26
    Archive#27
    Archive#28
    Archive#29
    Archive#30
    Archive#31
    Archive#32
    Archive#33
    Archive#34
    Archive#35
    Archive#36
    Archive#37
    Archive#38
    Archive#36
    Archive#37
    Archive#38
    Archive#39
    Archive#40
    Archive#41
    Archive#42
    Archive#43
    Archive#44