Weird
Skeletons in Mankind's Closet
(from About.com)
Giant skeletons... skulls with horns, way too many teeth and pointy heads... What are we to make of these amazingly unusual specimens?
Whether you
believe humans are the descendents of Adam and Eve, the result of millions of
years of evolution or the genetic creations of the Annunaki, there are many
puzzling specimens of skeletons, skulls and other human (or human-like) remains
that have been unearthed over the years... and that can truly make one wonder
about mankind's past.
Here's a bare-bones look at some of the more intriguing cases:
Horny
Devils Within an ancient burial mound near the town of Sayre in
Bradford County, Pennsylvania, skeletons measuring approximately 7 feet in
length were discovered in the 1800s. But the most remarkable feature of these
tall skeletons was not their height, but the strange horn-like protrusions above
the brow region on their skulls. It was estimated that they were buried around
1200 AD. According to some sources, the skeletons were sent to the "American
Investigating Museum" in Philadelphia, and vanished.
All the
Better to Eat You With, My Dear In 1888, seven skeletons, which
had been placed in a sitting position, were uncovered from a burial mound near
Clearwater, Minnesota. The highly unusual skulls of these beings had double rows
of teeth in both the upper and lower jaws. It was also noted that the foreheads
were low and sloping, compared to "normal" human skulls, and had distinctly
prominent brows.
color=#cc0000>Coneheads Researcher Robert Connolly photographed
this strange elongated skull in 1995. It was found in South America and is
estimated to be tens of thousands of years old. Apart from its obvious
abnormalities, it also exhibits characteristics of both Neanderthal and human
skulls - impossible in itself, according to anthropology texts, since
Neanderthals did not exist in South America. Some believe that the unusual shape
of the skulls might be the result of a primitive practice known as "skull
binding" in which a person's head is tightly bound with cloth or leather straps
throughout his lifetime, causing the skull to grow in this dramatic way. The
skull-binding theory is contested, however, for this and other cone-shaped
skulls, and you can read about them in more detail at
href="http://www.enigmas.org/aef/lib/archeo/askulls.shtml">Anomalous
Skulls.
Small
Wonders Near Coshocton, Ohio in 1837, several fully developed
adult skeletons were found buried in tiny wooden coffins. Why tiny coffins?
Because these adult skeletons were only 3 to 4-1/2 feet tall. No artifacts were
found with the remains that might give clues as to who these small people
were.
Red
Giants In 1911, miners were digging out layers of guano from a
cave located about 22 miles southwest of Lovelock, Nevada when they happened
upon the mummified remains of an individual who must have stood 6-1/2 feet tall
when alive. A tall Native American, perhaps? Probably not, since the mummy was
still crowned with "distinctly red" hair. Amazingly, the ancient legends of the
local Paiute Indians described a race of red-haired giants - called Si-te-cahs -
who were the enemies of many Indian tribes of the region.
bgColor=#cccccc border=1>

face="verdana, geneva, helvetica" size=1>Image courtesy MGS
This drawing projects
what the owner of the Starchild Skull would look
like. |
The
Starchild Skull Lloyd Pye, author of Everything You Know Is Wrong,
has taken it upon himself to discover the identity of an unusual skull he has
dubbed
href="http://www.starchildproject.com/">"The
Starchild Skull." The skull, which was
href="http://www.outsidemag.com/magazine/200005/200005starchild1.html">found
in a mine shaft near Chihuahua, Mexico around 1930, is unusually wide at the
back and exhibits larger than normal eye sockets. Although he says the origin of
the skull is uncertain, Pye speculates on whether or not it could be of alien
origin - or at least belonging to a human-alien hybrid. While some contend that
the skull was merely that of a deformed human child, Pye wanted definitive proof
and so, in late 1999, subjected the skull to DNA testing. The results of the
test indicated that the skull was from a human being, but Pye points out that
the lab could not extract sufficient strands of DNA to make a definitive
conclusion, and therefore the question still remains open.
color=#cc0000>Fatheads Robert Connolly has photographed a similar,
more complete skull. In most respects it appears to be that of a human, except
that it has an extraordinarily large cranium and eye sockets. The eye sockets
are about 15 percent larger than a modern human's. The age and date of the skull
are unknown. Similar skulls appear in photos by Karen Scheidt of remains found
in a Mexican cave. Could they all be genetic mutations, some unknown species of
creature or something not of this world?
Professor's time travel idea fires up the imagination
(Boston Globe)
4/5/2002
Ronald Mallett, a physicist at the University of Connecticut, believes he knows how to build a time machine - an actual device that could send something or someone from the future to the past, or vice versa.
He's not joking.
Unlike other physicists who have pondered the science of time travel, the 57-year-old professor has devised a machine he believes could transport anything from an atom to a person from one time to another.
''I'm not a nut. ... I hope to have a working mockup and start experiments this fall,'' says Mallett, who will detail his ideas about time travel tonight at Boston's Museum of Science. ''I would think I was a crackpot, too, if there weren't other colleagues I knew who were working on it. This isn't Ron Mallett's theory of matter; it's Einstein's theory of relativity. I'm not pulling things out of the known laws of physics.''
But Alan Guth, a physics professor at MIT who has studied the theory of time machines, says he isn't sure it's even theoretically possible to travel through time. As far as whether time travel is a possibility, he says: ''Definitely not within our lifetimes.''
Another physicist, Stanley Deser, a professor at Brandeis University who recently co-authored a paper titled ''Time Travel?,'' says the problem is not the physics, it's the feasibility of making time travel work. ''This is about trying to amass all the matter of the universe in a very small region,'' he says. ''Good luck.''
After 27 years at UConn, Mallett has the confidence of his boss, William Stwalley, chairman of the university's physics department. ''His ideas certainly have merit,'' Stwalley says. ''I think some of his ideas are very interesting and they would make nice tests of general relativity.''
Mallett's plan doesn't require some sort of sleigh, the means of transport in H.G. Wells's ''The Time Machine,'' or reaching 88 miles per hour in a flying DeLorean as in the movie ''Back to the Future.'' His time machine merely uses a ring of light.
According to Einstein's theory of gravity, anything that has mass or energy distorts the space and the passage of time around it, like a bowling ball dropped on a trampoline. Circulating laser beams in the right way, by slowing them down and shooting them through anything from fiber-optic cable to special crystals, might create a similar distortion that could theoretically transport someone through different times, Mallett believes.
The professor and his UConn colleagues plan to build a device to test whether it's possible to transport a subatomic particle, probably a neutron, through time. The energy from a rotating laser beam, Mallett hopes, would warp the space inside the ring of the light so that gravity forces the neutron to rotate sideways. With even more energy, it's possible, he believes, a second neutron would appear. The second particle would be the first one visiting itself from the future.
While Mallett acknowledges that sending a person through time may require more energy than physicists today know how to harness, he sees it merely as ''an engineering problem.'' If it's possible to use light to send a neutron through time, a feat that doesn't require as much energy as sending a human, he believes it wouldn't be long before engineers figure out a way to send a person.
''What we're talking about is at the edge of current technology, not beyond current technology,'' he says.
Since his father, a heavy smoker, died at the age of 33 when Mallett was 10 years old, Mallett has longed for a way to travel back in time to warn him about the dangers of cigarettes.
For most of his career, however, Mallett kept secret that his desire for time travel had drawn him to become a physicist. It wasn't until a few years ago, when he began researching a book on the topic, that he arrived at his idea of how to build a time machine.
If his idea pans out, won't there be a host of potential paradoxes, such as time travelers killing their parents and making it impossible for them to exist? No, he says, explaining that those travelers would continue to exist in a ''parallel universe.''
And what about the ethics of changing history?
There would be government laws to control time travel, he believes.
''Any technology has a potential nefarious side to it,'' he says. ''But I don't think there's a way to stop it. We as a species have always reached out. We've been doing that since the caves. I say let's make it so that we better reality. I think we can bravely do that.''
It's funny the blurb for that new "Time Machine" movie, with Mike from Neighbors, was "Where would you go?" was asking for it. Obviously not to see the movie thought most people.
Archive#1
Archive#2
Archive#3
Archive#4
Archive#5
Archive#6
Archive#7
Archive#8
Archive#9
Archive#10
Archive#11
Archive#12
Archive#13
Archive#14
Archive#15
Archive#16
Archive#17
Archive#18
Archive#19
Archive#20
Archive#21
Archive#22
Archive#23
|